/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 46 Determine if the following state... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Determine if the following statements are true or false, and explain your reasoning for statements you identify as false. If the null hypothesis that the means of four groups are all the same is rejected using ANOVA at a \(5 \%\) significance level, then ... (a) we can then conclude that all the means are different from one another. (b) the standardized variability between groups is higher than the standardized variability within groups. (c) the pairwise analysis will identify at least one pair of means that are significantly different. (d) the appropriate \(\alpha\) to be used in pairwise comparisons is \(0.05 / 4=0.0125\) since there are four groups.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) False, (b) True, (c) True, (d) False

Step by step solution

01

Analyze statement (a)

Statement (a) claims that if the null hypothesis that all group means are the same is rejected, then all the means are different from each other. This is false. Rejection of the null hypothesis only indicates that not all means are equal, but does not necessarily mean that each group mean is different from every other group mean.
02

Analyze statement (b)

Statement (b) states that the standardized variability between groups is higher than the standardized variability within groups. This is true. In ANOVA, rejection of the null hypothesis implies that the between-group variance is significantly greater than the within-group variance.
03

Analyze statement (c)

Statement (c) suggests that a pairwise analysis will identify at least one pair of means that are significantly different. This is true if the null hypothesis is rejected. ANOVA indicates at least one difference exists, and while not all means may be different, at least one pair will be.
04

Analyze statement (d)

Statement (d) claims that the appropriate α for pairwise comparisons should be adjusted to 0.0125 (0.05/4) because there are four groups. This is false because this adjustment does not consider the increased risk of Type I error with multiple comparisons. The Bonferroni correction is one method to adjust α, where you divide 0.05 by the number of comparisons, not the number of groups.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
In the world of statistics, the null hypothesis often serves as the starting point of any hypothesis test, including ANOVA. The null hypothesis is a statement that assumes no effect or no difference among the groups. For example, in ANOVA, the null hypothesis typically assumes that the means of all groups being compared are equal. Rejection of the null hypothesis implies that there is enough evidence to suggest that at least one group mean is different from the others. However, it does not specify which groups are different or if all groups are different from each other.
Using ANOVA doesn't tell us everything about the groups, just that there's evidence to suggest that not all group means are the same.
  • **Key point:** The null hypothesis claims no difference.
  • **Outcome:** Rejection simply means not all groups are the same.
  • **Limitation:** Rejection doesn't specify which particular means differ.
Understanding the null hypothesis is essential for interpreting ANOVA results correctly.
Pairwise Comparison
Once ANOVA reveals that there is a significant difference, the next step is often to conduct pairwise comparisons. This form of analysis dives deeper to pinpoint exactly which group means differ from each other. The pairwise comparison technique involves comparing each pair of group means separately to check for statistical significance.
  • **Process:** Start by comparing the first group with the second, then the first with the third, and so forth.
  • **Objective:** Identify which specific group means are different.
  • **Outcome:** You can find at least one pair that shows a significant difference if ANOVA indicates so.
Pairwise comparisons can be extremely useful, but care should be taken regarding the significance level, as making multiple comparisons increases the risk of a Type I error.
Bonferroni Correction
When conducting multiple pairwise comparisons, there is an increased chance of making a Type I error \(\) - incorrectly concluding a significant difference when there isn't one. To counteract this risk, the Bonferroni correction is often applied.
This adjustment works by lowering the alpha level for each individual test. You divide the overall desired significance level (e.g., 0.05) by the number of comparisons made.
  • **Purpose:** It's used to control the probability of committing a Type I error.
  • **Implementation:** Alpha is divided by the total number of comparisons, not merely the number of groups.
  • **Result:** Increases the reliability of the findings in multiple comparisons.
The Bonferroni correction is a simple and effective safeguard against false positives in multiple testing scenarios.
Significance Level
The significance level, often denoted by alpha (\(\alpha\)), is a threshold for determining when to reject the null hypothesis. It's the probability of making a Type I error, or rejecting a true null hypothesis. Common significance levels are 0.05, 0.01, or 0.10.
In the context of ANOVA, a 5% significance level means there's a 5% risk of concluding a difference exists when there is none.
  • **Common choice:** 0.05 is a frequently used significance level for tests.
  • **Impact:** If calculated p-value is less than alpha, the null hypothesis is rejected.
  • **Balancing act:** Lower significance levels reduce the chance of Type I errors but can increase Type II errors (failing to reject a false null hypothesis).
The chosen significance level should align with the researcher's tolerance for error and the context of the research.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Researchers interested in lead exposure due to car exhaust sampled the blood of 52 police officers subjected to constant inhalation of automobile exhaust fumes while working traffic enforcement in a primarily urban environment. The blood samples of these officers had an average lead concentration of \(124.32 \mu \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{l}\) and a SD of \(37.74 \mu \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{l} ;\) a previous study of individuals from a nearby suburb, with no history of exposure, found an average blood level concentration of \(35 \mu \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{l} .\) (a) Write down the hypotheses that would be appropriate for testing if the police officers appear to have been exposed to a different concentration of lead. (b) Explicitly state and check all conditions necessary for inference on these data. (c) Regardless of your answers in part (b), test the hypothesis that the downtown police officers have a higher lead exposure than the group in the previous study. Interpret your results in context.

A professor who teaches a large introductory statistics class (197 students) with eight discussion sections would like to test if student performance differs by discussion section, where each discussion section has a different teaching assistant. The summary table below shows the average final exam score for each discussion section as well as the standard deviation of scores and the number of students in each section. $$ \begin{array}{rrrrrrrrrr} \hline & \text { Sec 1 } & \text { Sec 2 } & \text { Sec 3 } & \text { Sec 4 } & \text { Sec 5 } & \text { Sec 6 } & \text { Sec 7 } & \text { Sec 8 } \\ \hline n_{i} & 33 & 19 & 10 & 29 & 33 & 10 & 32 & 31 \\ \bar{x}_{i} & 92.94 & 91.11 & 91.80 & 92.45 & 89.30 & 88.30 & 90.12 & 93.35 \\\ s_{i} & 4.21 & 5.58 & 3.43 & 5.92 & 9.32 & 7.27 & 6.93 & 4.57 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ The ANOVA output below can be used to test for differences between the average scores from the different discussion sections. $$ \begin{array}{lrrrrr} \hline & \text { Df } & \text { Sum Sq } & \text { Mean Sq } & \text { F value } & \operatorname{Pr}(>\mathrm{F}) \\ \hline \text { section } & 7 & 525.01 & 75.00 & 1.87 & 0.0767 \\ \text { Residuals } & 189 & 7584.11 & 40.13 & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Conduct a hypothesis test to determine if these data provide convincing evidence that the average score varies across some (or all) groups. Check conditions and describe any assumptions you must make to proceed with the test.

Determine if the following statements are true or false, and explain your reasoning for statements you identify as false. (a) When comparing means of two samples where \(n_{1}=20\) and \(n_{2}=40,\) we can use the normal model for the difference in means since \(n_{2} \geq 30\). (b) As the degrees of freedom increases, the \(t\) -distribution approaches normality. (c) We use a pooled standard error for calculating the standard error of the difference between means when sample sizes of groups are equal to each other.

Georgianna claims that in a small city renowned for its music school, the average child takes less than 5 years of piano lessons. We have a random sample of 20 children from the city, with a mean of 4.6 years of piano lessons and a standard deviation of 2.2 years. (a) Evaluate Georgianna's claim (or that the opposite might be true) using a hypothesis test. (b) Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the number of years students in this city take piano lessons, and interpret it in context of the data. (c) Do your results from the hypothesis test and the confidence interval agree? Explain your reasoning.

Caffeine is the world's most widely used stimulant, with approximately \(80 \%\) consumed in the form of coffee. Participants in a study investigating the relationship between coffee consumption and exercise were asked to report the number of hours they spent per week on moderate (e.g., brisk walking) and vigorous (e.g., strenuous sports and jogging) exercise. Based on these data the researchers estimated the total hours of metabolic equivalent tasks (MET) per week, a value always greater than \(0 .\) The table below gives summary statistics of MET for women in this study based on the amount of coffee consumed. \(^{36}\) (a) Write the hypotheses for evaluating if the average physical activity level varies among the different levels of coffee consumption. (b) Check conditions and describe any assumptions you must make to proceed with the test. (c) Below is part of the output associated with this test. Fill in the empty cells. (d) What is the conclusion of the test?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.