/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 18 A regression of \(y=\) calcium c... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A regression of \(y=\) calcium content \((\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{L})\) on \(x=\) dissolved material \(\left(\mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{cm}^{2}\right)\) was reported in the article "Use of Fly Ash or Silica Fume to Increase the Resistance of Concrete to Feed Acids" (Mag. Concrete Res., 1997: 337-344). The equation of the estimated regression line was \(y=3.678+.144 x\), with \(r^{2}=.860\), based on \(n=23\). a. Interpret the estimated slope \(.144\) and the coefficient of determination .860. b. Calculate a point estimate of the true average calcium content when the amount of dissolved material is \(50 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{cm}^{2}\). c. The value of total sum of squares was SST \(=320.398\). Calculate an estimate of the error standard deviation \(\sigma\) in the simple linear regression model.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The slope signifies a 0.144 g/L increase in calcium per mg/cm² of material. \( r^2 \) shows 86% variability is explained. The point estimate at 50 mg/cm² is 10.878 g/L; \( \sigma \) is approximately 1.460.

Step by step solution

01

Interpret the Estimated Slope

The estimated slope of the regression line is 0.144. This means that for every one-unit increase in the amount of dissolved material, the calcium content is expected to increase by 0.144 grams per liter. Thus, for every additional mg/cm² of dissolved material, the calcium content increases by an average of 0.144 g/L.
02

Interpret the Coefficient of Determination

The coefficient of determination, denoted by \( r^2 \), is 0.860. This indicates that 86% of the variability in calcium content (\( y \)) can be explained by the variability in the amount of dissolved material (\( x \)). This signifies a strong linear relationship between the variables.
03

Calculate the Point Estimate of Calcium Content

To find the point estimate of the calcium content when the dissolved material is 50 mg/cm², substitute \( x = 50 \) into the regression equation: \( y = 3.678 + 0.144 \times 50 \). First, calculate \( 0.144 \times 50 = 7.2 \). Then, add this to 3.678: \( 3.678 + 7.2 = 10.878 \). Thus, the point estimate is 10.878 g/L.
04

Calculate the Estimate of the Error Standard Deviation

First, find the regression sum of squares \( SSR \) using \( SSR = r^2 \times SST \): \( SSR = 0.860 \times 320.398 = 275.5428 \). Now calculate the error sum of squares \( SSE \) using \( SSE = SST - SSR \): \( SSE = 320.398 - 275.5428 = 44.8552 \). The estimate of the error standard deviation \( \sigma \) is found using the formula: \( \sigma = \sqrt{\frac{SSE}{n-2}} = \sqrt{\frac{44.8552}{23-2}} \).Calculate this value: \( \sqrt{\frac{44.8552}{21}} = 1.460 \). Thus, the estimate of the error standard deviation is approximately 1.460.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Regression Analysis
Regression analysis is a powerful statistical method used to examine the relationship between two or more variables. In simple linear regression, we focus on the relationship between just two variables - a dependent variable and an independent variable. The primary goal is to model this relationship using a linear equation.

For example, in the given exercise, the regression equation is\[ y = 3.678 + 0.144x \]
where \( y \) is the calcium content in grams per liter and \( x \) is the amount of dissolved material in mg/cm². The regression equation helps us predict the value of \( y \) for a given value of \( x \), providing a way to understand how changes in \( x \) affect \( y \).

Key aspects of regression analysis include:
  • Identifying the strength and nature of relationships between variables.
  • Making predictions based on these relationships.
  • Quantifying the precision of these predictions through various statistics, such as the coefficient of determination and error standard deviation.
Understanding regression analysis is essential for interpreting data and making informed decisions based on statistical findings.
Coefficient of Determination
The coefficient of determination, represented as \( r^2 \), is a crucial metric in regression analysis. It tells us how well the data points fit a statistical model. This value ranges from 0 to 1, where a higher \( r^2 \) value indicates a better fit.

In the exercise at hand, the \( r^2 \) value of 0.860 means that 86% of the variability in the calcium content (\( y \)) can be explained by variability in the amount of dissolved material (\( x \)). This high value signifies a strong relationship between the two variables. Consequently, our linear model is effective at predicting the calcium content based on levels of dissolved material.

In practice, the coefficient of determination helps:
  • Assessing the effectiveness of a model in capturing the data's variation.
  • Determining the reliability of predictions made based on the model.
  • Comparing different models to select the one that best explains the data.
A high \( r^2 \) promotes confidence in the model's predictive capabilities, although it is just one of many factors to consider.
Error Standard Deviation
The error standard deviation, or residual standard error, measures how much observed data points deviate from the predicted values provided by a regression model. It helps in understanding the precision of predictions made by the model.

In the exercise, the error standard deviation, denoted as \( \sigma \), is calculated to be approximately 1.460. This value tells us the extent to which actual calcium content values vary from what the regression model forecasts. A smaller \( \sigma \) indicates more precise estimates with less scatter around the regression line.

Importantly, when interpreting the error standard deviation, consider:
  • It reflects the average distance of the data points from the regression line.
  • Lower values imply a tighter fit of the data around the model.
  • It's a vital component for constructing confidence intervals and making more accurate predictions.
A thorough analysis that incorporates \( \sigma \) empowers a deeper understanding of a model's accuracy.
Point Estimation
Point estimation involves finding a single predicted value for an unknown parameter in the population based on sample data. In the context of regression analysis, it deals with estimating outcomes using the derived regression equation.

For instance, in the exercise, a point estimate was calculated for the calcium content when the amount of dissolved material is 50 mg/cm². Plugging 50 into the regression equation gives:\[ y = 3.678 + 0.144 \times 50 = 10.878 \text{ g/L}\]
The point estimate of 10.878 g/L represents our best guess of the calcium content at this specific level of dissolved material.

Advantages of point estimation include:
  • Providing specific predictions for given values of the independent variable.
  • Offering concise numerical forecasts that simplify interpretations.
  • Essentially supporting decision-making by providing expected outcomes based on observed data.
Point estimation is fundamental in making precise predictions, though it is often supplemented with interval estimates and other tools for a comprehensive analysis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A sample of \(n=500(x, y)\) pairs was collected and a test of \(H_{0}: \rho=0\) versus \(H_{\mathrm{a}}: \rho \neq 0\) was carried out. The resulting \(P\)-value was computed to be \(.00032\). a. What conclusion would be appropriate at level of significance .001? b. Does this small \(P\)-value indicate that there is a very strong relationship between \(x\) and \(y\) (a value of \(\rho\) that differs considerably from 0\()\) ? Explain. c. Now suppose a sample of \(n=10,000(x, y)\) pairs resulted in \(r=.022\). Test \(H_{0}: \rho=0\) versus \(H_{\mathrm{a}}: \rho \neq 0\) at level .05. Is the result statistically significant? Comment on the practical significance of your analysis.

A regression analysis carried out to relate \(y=\) repair time for a water filtration system ( \(\mathrm{hr}\) ) to \(x_{1}=\) elapsed time since the previous service (months) and \(x_{2}=\) type of repair ( 1 if electrical and 0 if mechanical) yielded the following model based on \(n=12\) observations: \(y\) \(=.950+.400 x_{1}+1.250 x_{2}\). In addition, SST \(=12.72, \mathrm{SSE}=2.09\), and \(s_{\hat{\beta}_{2}}=.312\). a. Does there appear to be a useful linear relationship between repair time and the two model predictors? Carry out a test of the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\). b. Given that elapsed time since the last service remains in the model, does type of repair provide useful information about repair time? State and test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of \(.01\). c. Calculate and interpret a 95\% CI for \(\beta_{2}\). d. The estimated standard deviation of a prediction for repair time when elapsed time is 6 months and the repair is electrical is .192. Predict repair time under these circumstances by calculating a \(99 \%\) prediction interval. Does the interval suggest that the estimated model will give an accurate prediction? Why or why not?

The article "Objective Measurement of the Stretchability of Mozzarella Cheese" \((J\). Texture Stud., 1992: 185-194) reported on an experiment to investigate how the behavior of mozzarella cheese varied with temperature. Consider the accompanying data on \(x=\) temperature and \(y=\) elongation (\%) at failure of the cheese. [Note: The researchers were Italian and used real mozzarella cheese, not the poor cousin widely available in the United States.] $$ \begin{array}{r|rrrrrrr} x & 59 & 63 & 68 & 72 & 74 & 78 & 83 \\ \hline y & 118 & 182 & 247 & 208 & 197 & 135 & 132 \end{array} $$ a. Construct a scatter plot in which the axes intersect at \((0,0)\). Mark \(0,20,40,60,80\), and 100 on the horizontal axis and \(0,50,100,150,200\), and 250 on the vertical axis. b. Construct a scatter plot in which the axes intersect at \((55,100)\), as was done in the cited article. Does this plot seem preferable to the one in part (a)? Explain your reasoning. c. What do the plots of parts (a) and (b) suggest about the nature of the relationship between the two variables?

The article "Exhaust Emissions from Four-Stroke Lawn Mower Engines" \((J\). Air Water Manage. Assoc., 1997: 945-952) reported data from a study in which both a baseline gasoline mixture and a reformulated gasoline were used. Consider the following observations on age (year) and \(\mathrm{NO}_{\mathbf{x}}\) emissions (g/kWh): $$ \begin{array}{lccccc} \text { Engine } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 \\ \text { Age } & 0 & 0 & 2 & 11 & 7 \\ \text { Baseline } & 1.72 & 4.38 & 4.06 & 1.26 & 5.31 \\ \text { Reformulated } & 1.88 & 5.93 & 5.54 & 2.67 & 6.53 \\ \text { Engine } & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 \\ \text { Age } & 16 & 9 & 0 & 12 & 4 \\ \text { Baseline } & .57 & 3.37 & 3.44 & .74 & 1.24 \\ \text { Reformulated } & .74 & 4.94 & 4.89 & .69 & 1.42 \end{array} $$ Construct scatter plots of \(\mathrm{NO}_{x}\) emissions versus age. What appears to be the nature of the relationship between these two variables? [Note: The authors of the cited article commented on the relationship.]

A sample of \(n=20\) companies was selected, and the values of \(y=\) stock price and \(k=15\) predictor variables (such as quarterly dividend, previous year's earnings, and debt ratio) were determined. When the multiple regression model using these 15 predictors was fit to the data, \(R^{2}=.90\) resulted. a. Does the model appear to specify a useful relationship between \(y\) and the predictor variables? Carry out a test using significance level \(.05\). [Hint: The \(F\) critical value for 15 numerator and 4 denominator df is \(5.86\).] b. Based on the result of part (a), does a high \(R^{2}\) value by itself imply that a model is useful? Under what circumstances might you be suspicious of a model with a high \(R^{2}\) value? c. With \(n\) and \(k\) as given previously, how large would \(R^{2}\) have to be for the model to be judged useful at the \(.05\) level of significance?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.