/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 66 In single-factor ANOVA, suppose ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In single-factor ANOVA, suppose the \(x_{i j}\) 's are "coded" by \(y_{i j}=c x_{i j}+d\). How does the value of the \(F\) statistic computed from the \(y_{i j}\) 's compare to the value computed from the \(x_{i j}\) 's? Justify your assertion.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The \(F\) statistic remains unchanged after coding since both variances scale equally.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Coding Transformation

In this problem, we're using a coding transformation on the data given by \(y_{ij} = c x_{ij} + d\). This linear transformation changes each data point by multiplying by a constant \(c\) and adding a constant \(d\).
02

Analyze the Effect on the Mean

Calculate the mean for each group in the dataset before and after transformation. The mean of \(y_{ij}\) is given by: \[ \bar{y}_{i \cdot} = c \bar{x}_{i \cdot} + d \]. The addition of \(d\) affects only the mean, while the multiplication by \(c\) uniformly scales the mean values.
03

Analyze the Effect on Variance

The variance of a dataset when transformed by \(y_{ij} = c x_{ij} + d\) is scaled by \(c^2\). The additive constant \(d\) does not affect the variance. This means \(Var(y_{ij}) = c^2 Var(x_{ij})\).
04

Consider the Effect on F statistic

The \(F\) statistic in ANOVA is the ratio of between-group variance to within-group variance. Both these variances are scaled by \(c^2\), so their ratio (the \(F\) statistic) remains unchanged. Thus, the value of the \(F\) statistic is identical for \(y_{ij}\) and \(x_{ij}\).
05

Conclude the Effect on F statistic

Since the \(F\) statistic is a ratio and both numerator and denominator are affected equally by the transformation factor \(c^2\), the \(F\) statistic computed from \(y_{ij}\) is the same as that computed from \(x_{ij}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Coding Transformation in ANOVA
In the context of ANOVA, coding transformation involves adjusting the dataset by using a specific formula:
  • Every data point, denoted as \(x_{ij}\), is transformed into a new value \(y_{ij}\) using the equation \(y_{ij} = c x_{ij} + d\).
  • This transformation is linear, meaning that it alters each data point by multiplying by a constant \(c\) and then adding a constant \(d\).
It's important to note that this transformation changes the scale and location of the data:
  • The multiplication factor \(c\) controls how the data "stretches" or "shrinks."
  • The addition of \(d\) moves (or shifts) the entire dataset up or down the scale.
Even after this transformation, the underlying relationships in the data remain intact, which is crucial for upcoming computations like variance and the \(F\) statistic.
The purpose of coding transformation often revolves around making the data easier to handle or interpret without altering the statistical conclusions it leads to.
Deciphering the F Statistic in ANOVA
The \(F\) statistic is a fundamental component of ANOVA, which stands for Analysis of Variance. This statistic helps us compare different group means to ascertain if at least one of them significantly differs from the others. It is calculated as the ratio of:
  • The variance between group means (which measures the variation due to the interaction between groups)
  • To the variance within the groups (which measures the variation due to differences within individual groups).
Mathematically, this can be expressed as:\[F = \frac{MS_{\text{between}}}{MS_{\text{within}}}\]where \(MS\) stands for "mean square." An interesting property of \(F\) statistic, highlighted in coding transformation, is its invariance to a linear transformation like \(y_{ij} = c x_{ij} + d\). This is because both the numerator (between-group variance) and the denominator (within-group variance) are scaled by \(c^2\), leaving their ratio, the \(F\) statistic, unchanged. This invariance implies that statistical tests using the \(F\) statistic remain valid, regardless of such transformations.
Exploring Variance in Transformed Data
Variance is a measure of how much the data points in a dataset differ from the mean. It is sensitive to changes in data values and is fundamentally altered by linear transformations. Here’s how variance is affected by the transformation \(y_{ij} = c x_{ij} + d\):
  • When you multiply each data point by \(c\), the variance is scaled by \(c^2\).
  • The additive constant \(d\) does not impact the variance. This is because variance measures relative spread, and shifting all data by \(d\) does not affect overall spread.
Thus, after the transformation, the variance of each group or the dataset, denoted as \(Var(y_{ij})\), becomes:\[ Var(y_{ij}) = c^2 \, Var(x_{ij}) \] This effect on variance due to transformation underlines the transformation's role in modifying the dataset without biasing the conclusions about statistical significance through transformations such as the \(F\) statistic.
Unpacking Mean Transformation in Data
Mean transformation directly affects how we perceive the locations of data groups. With the transformation formula \(y_{ij} = c x_{ij} + d\), the mean of transformed data shifts as follows:
  • The new mean for each group, \(\bar{y}_{i\cdot}\), is computed using the formula:\[ \bar{y}_{i\cdot} = c \bar{x}_{i\cdot} + d \]
  • This equation shows that each group mean is stretched by \(c\) and shifted by \(d\).

This dual effect makes analyzing the data in its new form essential for interpretation.Though the mean gets affected by both \(c\) and \(d\), the implications for analysis remain consistent as long as the transformations are uniformly applied across all data points. Thus, while mean transformation impacts individual data insights, it preserves the integrity of comparative analysis such as those seen in ANOVA.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Six samples of each of four types of cereal grain grown in a certain region were analyzed to determine thiamin content, resulting in the following data \((\mu \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{g})\) : \(\begin{array}{lllllll}\text { Wheat } & 5.2 & 4.5 & 6.0 & 6.1 & 6.7 & 5.8 \\\ \text { Barley } & 6.5 & 8.0 & 6.1 & 7.5 & 5.9 & 5.6 \\ \text { Maize } & 5.8 & 4.7 & 6.4 & 4.9 & 6.0 & 5.2 \\ \text { Oats } & 8.3 & 6.1 & 7.8 & 7.0 & 5.5 & 7.2\end{array}\) a. Check the ANOVA assumptions with a normal probability plot and a test for equal variances. b. Test to see if at least two of the grains differ with respect to true average thiamin content. Use an \(\alpha=.05\) test based on the \(P\)-value method.

The article "The Effects of a Pneumatic Stool and a One-Legged Stool on Lower Limb Joint Load and Muscular Activity During Sitting and Rising" (Ergonomics, 1993: 519-535) gives the accompanying data on the effort required of a subject to arise from four different types of stools (Borg scale). Perform an analysis of variance using \(a=.05\), and follow this with a multiple comparisons analysis if appropriate. $$ \begin{array}{lr|rrrrrrrrr|r} & & \mathbf{1} & \mathbf{2} & \mathbf{3} & \mathbf{4} & \mathbf{5} & \mathbf{6} & \mathbf{7} & \mathbf{8} & \mathbf{9} & {\overline{\boldsymbol{x}}_{i .}} \\ \hline \text { Type } & \mathbf{1} & 12 & 10 & 7 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 8 & 7 & 9 & 8.56 \\ \text { of } & \mathbf{2} & 15 & 14 & 14 & 11 & 11 & 11 & 12 & 11 & 13 & 12.44 \\\ \text { Stool } & \mathbf{3} & 12 & 13 & 13 & 10 & 8 & 11 & 12 & 8 & 10 & 10.78 \\ & \mathbf{4} & 10 & 12 & 9 & 9 & 7 & 10 & 11 & 7 & 8 & 9.22 \end{array} $$

The number of miles of useful tread wear (in 1000's) was determined for tires of each of five different makes of subcompact car (factor \(A\), with \(I=5\) ) in combination with each of four different brands of radial tires (factor \(B\), with \(J=4\) ), resulting in \(I J=20\) observations. The values \(\mathrm{SSA}=30.6, \mathrm{SSB}=44.1\), and \(\mathrm{SSE}=\) \(59.2\) were then computed. Assume that an additive model is appropriate. a. Test \(H_{0}: \alpha_{1}=\alpha_{2}=\alpha_{3}=\alpha_{4}=\alpha_{5}=0\) (no differences in true average tire lifetime due to makes of cars) versus \(H_{\mathrm{a}}\) : at least one \(\alpha_{i} \neq 0\) using a level \(.05\) test. b. \(H_{0}: \beta_{1}=\beta_{2}=\beta_{3}=\beta_{4}=0\) (no differences in true average tire lifetime due to brands of tires) versus \(H_{\mathrm{a}}\) : at least one \(\beta_{j} \neq 0\) using a level \(.05\) test.

The article "Origin of Precambrian Iron Formations" (Econ. Geol., 1964: 1025-1057) reports the following data on total Fe for four types of iron formation \((1=\) carbonate, \(2=\) silicate, \(3=\) magnetite, \(4=\) hematite). $$ \begin{array}{llllll} 1: & 20.5 & 28.1 & 27.8 & 27.0 & 28.0 \\ & 25.2 & 25.3 & 27.1 & 20.5 & 31.3 \\ 2: & 26.3 & 24.0 & 26.2 & 20.2 & 23.7 \\ & 34.0 & 17.1 & 26.8 & 23.7 & 24.9 \\ 3: & 29.5 & 34.0 & 27.5 & 29.4 & 27.9 \\ & 26.2 & 29.9 & 29.5 & 30.0 & 35.6 \\ 4: & 36.5 & 44.2 & 34.1 & 30.3 & 31.4 \\ & 33.1 & 34.1 & 32.9 & 36.3 & 25.5 \end{array} $$ Carry out an analysis of variance \(F\) test at significance level \(.01\), and summarize the results in an ANOVA table.

In a study to assess the effects of malaria infection on mosquito hosts ("Plasmodium cynomolgi: Effects of Malaria Infection on Laboratory Flight Performance of Anopheles stephensi Mosquitos," Exp. Parasitol., 1977: 397-404), mosquitoes were fed on either infective or noninfective rhesus monkeys. Subsequently the distance they flew during a 24 -h period was measured using a flight mill. The mosquitoes were divided into four groups of eight mosquitoes each: infective rhesus and sporozites present (IRS), infective rhesus and oocysts present (IRD), infective rhesus and no infection developed (IRN), and noninfective (C). The summary data values are \(\bar{x}_{1}=4.39(\mathrm{IRS}), \quad \bar{x}_{2}=4.52(\mathrm{IRD}), \quad \bar{x}_{3}=\) \(5.49(\mathrm{IRN}), \quad \bar{x}_{4}=6.36(\mathrm{C}), \quad \bar{x}_{. .}=5.19, \quad\) and \(\sum \sum x_{i j}^{2}=911.91\). Use the ANOVA \(F\) test at level \(.05\) to decide whether there are any differences between true average flight times for the four treatments.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.