/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 74 Can the right diet help us cope ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Can the right diet help us cope with diseases associated with aging such as Alzheimer's disease? A study ("Reversals of Age-Related Declines in Neuronal Signal Transduction, Cognitive, and Motor Behavioral Deficits with Blueberry, Spinach, or Strawberry Dietary Supplement," \(J\). Neurosci., 1999; 8114-8121) investigated the effects of fruit and vegetable supplements in the diet of rats. The rats were 19 months old, which is aged by rat standards. The 40 rats were randomly assigned to four diets, of which we will consider just the blueberry diet and the control diet here. After 8 weeks on their diets, the rats were given a number of tests. We give the data for just one of the tests, which measured how many seconds they could walk on a rod. Here are the times for the ten control rats (C) and ten blueberry rats (B): The objective is to obtain a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference of population means. a. Determine a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference of population means using the method based on the Theorem of Section 10.2. b. Obtain a bootstrap sample of 999 differences of means. Check the bootstrap distribution for normality using a normal probability plot. c. Use the standard deviation of the bootstrap distribution along with the mean and \(t\) critical value from (a) to get a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference of means. d. Use the bootstrap sample and the percentile method to obtain a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference of means. e. Compare your three confidence intervals. If they are very similar, why do you think this is the case? If you had used a critical value from the normal table rather than the \(t\) table, would the result of (c) agree better with the result of (d)? Why? f. Interpret your results. Do the blueberries make a substantial difference?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Differences in means suggest blueberries may improve cognitive ability, but interpretation depends on CI overlap with zero.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Difference in Sample Means

First, calculate the sample means for both the blueberry and control groups. Let \( \bar{x}_B \) be the mean of the blueberry diet group and \( \bar{x}_C \) be the mean of the control group. Then compute the difference: \( \bar{x}_B - \bar{x}_C \). This difference forms the basis for our confidence interval estimation.
02

Determine 95% Confidence Interval using t-distribution

Use the given samples from both groups to calculate the standard deviation and the standard error of the difference between the two means. With the sample sizes being equal, use the formula for the confidence interval of the difference of two means based on the t-distribution:\[\text{CI} = (\bar{x}_B - \bar{x}_C) \pm t^* \times \sqrt{\frac{s_B^2}{n} + \frac{s_C^2}{n}}\]where \( t^* \) is the critical t value for \( \alpha = 0.05 \) and \( df = n - 1 \).
03

Create Bootstrap Sample and Distribution

Randomly sample the differences between individual values of the two groups, with replacement, to create a bootstrap distribution of 999 differences in means. This distribution will allow for an assessment of normality.
04

Check for Normality with Normal Probability Plot

Plot the bootstrap distribution on a normal probability plot to verify if it approximates a normal distribution. A linear appearance of data points suggests a normal distribution.
05

Calculate CI using Bootstrap Standard Deviation and t-distribution

Using the standard deviation \( s_{bootstrap} \) from the bootstrap distribution, calculate a 95% confidence interval using the formula:\[\text{CI} = (\bar{x}_{bootstrap}) \pm t^* \times s_{bootstrap}\]where \( \bar{x}_{bootstrap} \) is the mean from the bootstrap distribution.
06

Use Bootstrap Percentile Method

Order the bootstrap sample differences and identify the 25th and 975th values from the ordered list. These values form the bounds for the 95% confidence interval using the percentile method.
07

Compare Confidence Intervals

Compare the three confidence intervals calculated. Any similarities among them suggest that the data, the assumptions of normality, and methods are robust. Consider if using a normal instead of a t-distribution would impact method (c).
08

Interpret the Results

Evaluate whether the confidence intervals overlap zero; this would indicate that any observed difference could be due to chance. Consider if there is enough evidence to suggest that blueberry consumption affects the rat's performance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Bootstrap Method
The Bootstrap Method is a powerful statistical tool used to estimate the distribution of a statistic by resampling with replacement from the original data. This technique is especially useful when the sample size is small, or the underlying distribution is unknown. In the context of our exercise, the bootstrap method helps create a distribution of the difference in means between two groups - the blueberry diet group and the control group.

The process involves taking many (in this case, 999) random samples from the original dataset and recalculating the difference in means for each sample. This creates a bootstrap distribution, which provides insight into the sampling variability and can be used for constructing confidence intervals.

One of the main advantages of the bootstrap method is its flexibility. It doesn't make strict assumptions about the distribution of the data, unlike parametric methods. This makes it particularly useful in real-world data scenarios where such assumptions may not be valid.
T-Distribution
The T-Distribution is a fundamental concept used in the estimation of confidence intervals when the sample size is small and population standard deviation is unknown. In statistics, especially when dealing with small sample sizes like in our rat diet study, the assumption of a normal distribution of sample means may not hold. This is where the t-distribution comes into play.

The t-distribution is similar to the normal distribution but with heavier tails. This feature allows it to accommodate the increased uncertainty associated with estimating the population mean from a small sample. When we compute a 95% confidence interval using the t-distribution, the formula differs slightly from the one that uses the normal distribution as seen in our solution:

- The t-value is dynamically determined based on the degrees of freedom, usually calculated as the sample size minus one. - It reflects the lower precision in estimates when the sample size is small.

Using the t-distribution for confidence intervals results in slightly wider intervals than those obtained with the normal distribution, which helps account for the additional uncertainty.
Normal Probability Plot
A Normal Probability Plot is a graphical technique used to visually assess whether a dataset follows a normal distribution. This plot helps us identify if the assumptions of normality required for certain statistical methods, like the t-test, are valid for our specific data.

In this exercise, after generating the bootstrap distribution of the difference in means, we use a normal probability plot to check for normality. If the points in the plot tend to fall along a straight line, it suggests that the data is approximately normally distributed.

This step is crucial because many statistical techniques, including those used to calculate confidence intervals, assume a normal distribution of the data. If the plot indicates deviations from normality, it might necessitate the use of non-parametric methods or transformations to achieve accurate statistical inference.
Population Means Difference
The Population Means Difference is a statistical concept used to compare the central tendency between two groups. In experiments or studies such as the one focused on rat diets, understanding the difference in means sheds light on the effect of different conditions, in this case, the dietary impact on rats.

This concept usually involves calculating the difference between the means of two samples (\( ar{x}_B ext{ (blueberry)} - ar{x}_C ext{ (control)} \)). This measure provides useful information about any potential effect the treatment (blueberry diet) may have when compared to the control.
  • If the calculated confidence interval for this difference does not include zero, it suggests a significant difference between the two population means.
  • If the interval includes zero, it indicates that the observed difference might be attributed to sampling variability or chance.


By understanding and calculating the population means difference, researchers can make informed decisions about the effectiveness of treatments or interventions applied in their studies.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

According to the article "Fatigue Testing of Condoms" (Polym. Test., 2009: 567-571), "tests currently used for condoms are surrogates for the challenges they face in use," including a test for holes, an inflation test, a package seal test, and tests of dimensions and lubricant quality (all fertile territory for the use of statistical methodology!). The investigators developed a new test that adds cyclic strain to a level well below breakage and determines the number of cycles to break. The cited article reported that for a sample of 20 natural latex condoms of a certain type, the sample mean and sample standard deviation of the number of cycles to break were 4358 and 2218 , respectively, whereas a sample of 20 polyisoprene condoms gave a sample mean and sample standard deviation of 5805 and 3990 , respectively. Is there strong evidence for concluding that the true average number of cycles to break for the polyisoprene condom exceeds that for the natural latex condom by more than 1000 cycles? [Note: The article presented the results of hypothesis tests based on the \(t\) distribution; the validity of these depends on assuming normal population distributions.]

Assume that \(X\) is uniformly distributed on \((-1,1)\) and \(Y\) is split evenly between a uniform distribution on \((-101,-100)\) and a uniform distribution on ( 100,101 ). Thus the means are both 0 , but the variances differ strongly. We take random samples of size three from each distribution and apply a permutation test for the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}\) against the alternative \(H_{a}: \mu_{1}<\mu_{2}\). a. Show that the probability is \(\frac{1}{8}\) that all three of the \(Y\) values come from \((100,101)\). b. Show that, if all three \(Y\) values come from \((100,101)\), then the \(P\)-value for the permutation test is .05. c. Explain why (a) and (b) are in conflict. What is the true probability that the permutation test rejects the null hypothesis at the \(.05\) level?

The Weaver-Dunn procedure with a fiber mesh tape augmentation is commonly used to treat \(\mathrm{AC}\) joint (a joint in the shoulder) separations requiring surgery. The article "TightRope Versus Fiber Mesh Tape Augmentation of Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction" (Am. J. Sport Med., 2010: 1204-1208) described the investigation of a new method which was hypothesized to provide superior stability (less movement) compared to the W-D procedure. The authors of the cited article kindly provided the accompanying data on anteposterior (forward-backward) movement \((\mathrm{mm})\) for six matched pairs of shoulders: \(\begin{array}{lrrrrrr}\text { Subject: } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 \\ \text { Fiber mesh: } & 20 & 30 & 20 & 32 & 35 & 33 \\ \text { TightRope: } & 15 & 18 & 16 & 19 & 10 & 12\end{array}\) Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level \(.01\) to see if true average movement for the TightRope treatment is indeed less than that for the Fiber Mesh treatment. Be sure to check any assumptions underlying your analysis.

A student project by Heather Kral studied students on "lifestyle floors" of a dormitory in comparison to students on other floors. On a lifestyle floor the students share a common major, and there are a faculty coordinator and resident assistant from that department. Here are the grade point averages of 30 students on lifestyle floors (L) and 30 students on other floors \((\mathrm{N})\) : L: \(2.00,2.25,2.60,2.90,3.00,3.00,3.00,3.00\), \(3.00,3.20,3.20,3.25,3.30,3.30,3.32,3.50\), \(3.50,3.60,3.60,3.70,3.75,3.75,3.79,3.80\), \(3.80,3.90,4.00,4.00,4.00,4.00\). \(\mathrm{N}: 1.20,2.00,2.29,2.45,2.50,2.50,2.50,2.50\), \(2.65,2.70,2.75,2.75,2.79,2.80,2.80,2.80\), \(2.86,2.90,3.00,3.07,3.10,3.25,3.50,3.54\), \(3.56,3.60,3.70,3.75,3.80,4.00\). Notice that the lifestyle grade point averages have a large number of repeats and the distribution is skewed, so there is some question about normality. a. Obtain a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference of population means using the method based on the theorem of Section 10.2. b. Obtain a bootstrap sample of 999 differences of means. Check the bootstrap distribution for normality using a normal probability plot. c. Use the standard deviation of the bootstrap distribution along with the mean and \(t\) critical value from (a) to get a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference of means. d. Use the bootstrap sample and the percentile method to obtain a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference of means. e. Compare your three confidence intervals. If they are very similar, why do you think this is the case? f. Interpret your results. Is there a substantial difference between lifestyle and other floors? Why do you think the difference is as big as it is?

It has been estimated that between 1945 and 1971 , as many as 2 million children were born to mothers treated with diethylstilbestrol (DES), a nonsteroidal estrogen recommended for pregnancy maintenance. The FDA banned this drug in 1971 because research indicated a link with the incidence of cervical cancer. The article "Effects of Prenatal Exposure to Diethylstilbestrol (DES) on Hemispheric Laterality and Spatial Ability in Human Males" (Hormones Behav., 1992: 62-75) discussed a study in which 10 males exposed to DES and their unexposed brothers underwent various tests. This is the summary data on the results of a spatial ability test: \(\bar{x}=12.6\) (exposed), \(\bar{y}=13.7\), and standard error of mean difference \(=.5\). Test at level \(.05\) to see whether exposure is associated with reduced spatial ability by obtaining the \(P\)-value.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.