/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 21 Beweisen Sie die Absorptionsgese... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Beweisen Sie die Absorptionsgesetze: $$ \begin{aligned} &M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right)=M_{1} \\ &M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right)=M_{1} \end{aligned} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Prove the Absorption Laws in set theory: 1. \(M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right)=M_{1}\) 2. \(M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right)=M_{1}\)

Step by step solution

01

Proof of the First Absorption Law (\(M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right)=M_{1}\))

To prove this, we will show that \(M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right) \subseteq M_{1}\) and \(M_{1} \subseteq M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right)\). If both of these are true, we can conclude that both sets are equal. 1. Let \(x \in M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right)\). By definition of intersection, we know that \(x \in M_{1}\) and \(x \in \left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right)\). However, we only need the first condition to claim that \(x \in M_{1}\). Therefore, \(M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right) \subseteq M_{1}\). 2. Now let \(x \in M_{1}\). From this, we know that \(x\) is in both \(M_{1}\) and \(\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right)\). Thus, by definition of the set intersection, we have \(x \in M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right)\), and therefore \(M_{1} \subseteq M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right)\). Since \(M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right) \subseteq M_{1}\) and \(M_{1} \subseteq M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right)\), we conclude that \(M_{1} \cap\left(M_{1} \cup M_{2}\right) = M_{1}\).
02

Proof of the Second Absorption Law (\(M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right)=M_{1}\))

To prove this, we will show that \(M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right) \subseteq M_{1}\) and \(M_{1} \subseteq M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right)\). If both of these are true, we can conclude that both sets are equal. 1. Let \(x \in M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right)\). By definition of the union, we know that \(x \in M_{1}\) or \(x \in \left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right)\). In either case, \(x \in M_{1}\). Therefore, \(M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right) \subseteq M_{1}\). 2. Now let \(x \in M_{1}\). From this, we know that \(x\) is in either \(M_{1}\) or \(\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right)\). Thus, by definition of the set union, we have \(x \in M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right)\), and therefore \(M_{1} \subseteq M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right)\). Since \(M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right) \subseteq M_{1}\) and \(M_{1} \subseteq M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right)\), we conclude that \(M_{1} \cup\left(M_{1} \cap M_{2}\right) = M_{1}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Set Theory
Set theory is a fundamental part of mathematics that deals with the collection of objects, known as elements, grouped into sets. It is the backbone of various mathematical disciplines and provides a standardized framework to describe how sets interact with each other through operations such as union (\(\cup\)), intersection (\(\cap\)), and complement. Understanding set theory is crucial for studying important algebraic properties and for proving various mathematical concepts, including the Absorptionsgesetze (Absorption Laws) in question.

In the context of the given exercise, the Absorption Laws describe how a set can 'absorb' another set under the union and intersection operations without changing the original set. These laws are important for simplifying expressions and understanding the structure of sets within a given universal set.
Proofs
Proofs are logical arguments that demonstrate the truth of a mathematical statement. They are essential in mathematics since they provide indisputable evidence that a concept or formula is universally valid. In set theory, proofs often rely on showing that two sets are subsets of each other to establish equality between them.

When proving the Absorption Laws, we used the definition of subset to show that each side of the equation is contained within the other. This involved taking an arbitrary element from one set and showing that it must also belong to the other set, hence proving they are equal. The step-by-step solution provided for the Absorption Laws is an excellent example of a direct proof, where we explicitly construct the argument to show that the initial assumption leads to the desired conclusion.
Algebraic Properties
Algebraic properties are the rules that govern how mathematical operations can be carried out and rearranged. These properties, such as commutative, associative, distributive laws, and of course, the absorption laws, simplify and enable the manipulation of algebraic expressions.

The Absorption Laws in particular show how combining sets with union and intersection can simplify to one of the sets involved. These properties are incredibly powerful for reducing complex expressions in both algebra and set theory. Understanding these algebraic properties can significantly ease the study of mathematics by providing a set of tools for manipulating expressions and proving relationships between them.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Die Menge \(A_{4}\) hat vier Elemente, die Mengen \(B_{3}\), \(B_{4}\) und \(B_{5}\) haben entsprechend drei, vier und fünf Elemente. Überlegen Sie jeweils, ob es Abbildungen $$ \begin{aligned} &f_{43}: A_{4} \rightarrow B_{3} \\ &f_{44}: A_{4} \rightarrow B_{4} \\ &f_{45}: A_{4} \rightarrow B_{5} \end{aligned} $$ geben kann, die (a) injektiv, aber nicht surjektiv, (b) surjektiv, aber nicht injektiv, (c) bijektiv sind.

Beweisen Sie die Assoziativgesetze: $$ \begin{aligned} &(A \wedge B) \wedge C \Leftrightarrow A \wedge(B \wedge C) \\ &(A \vee B) \vee C \Leftrightarrow A \vee(B \vee C) \end{aligned} $$

Welche der folgenden Schlüsse sind auf formaler Ebene (d. h. noch ohne tatsächliche Betrachtung der Wahrheitswerte der Aussagen) richtig? Welche sind als Implikationen wahre Aussagen, wenn man auch die Wahrheitswerte der jeweils verknüpften Aussagen betrachtet? 1\. Alle Vögel können fliegen. Möwen sind Vögel. \(\Rightarrow\) Möwen können fliegen. 2\. Alle Vögel können fliegen. Pinguine sind Vögel. \(\Rightarrow\) Pinguine können fliegen. 3\. Alle Vögel können fliegen. Möwen können fliegen. \(\Rightarrow\) Möwen sind Vögel. 4\. Alle Vögel können fliegen. Libellen können fliegen. \(\Rightarrow\) Libellen sind Vögel.

Jene reellen Zahlen \(x\), die Lösung einer Polynomgleichung $$ a_{n} x^{n}+a_{n-1} x^{n-1}+\ldots+a_{1} x+a_{0}=0 $$ mit Koeffizienten \(a_{k} \in \mathbb{Z}\) sind, nennt man algebraische Zahlen. Dabei muss mindestens ein \(a_{k} \neq 0\) sein. Alle rationalen Zahlen sind algebraisch, aber auch viele irrationale Zahlen gehören zu dieser Klasse, etwa \(\sqrt{2}\). Reelle Zahlen. die nicht algebraisch sind, heißen transzendent. Zeigen Sie, dass unter der Voraussetzung, dass jedes Polynom nur endlich viele Nullstellen hat (was wir bald ohne Mühe beweisen werden können), die Menge aller algebraischen Zahlen abzählbar ist.

Nach einem Mordfall gibt es drei Verdächtige, \(A\), \(B\) und \(C\), von denen zumindest einer der Täter sein muss. Nachdem sie und die Zeugen getrennt vernommen wurden, kennen die Ermittler folgende Fakten: 1\. Wenn \(A\) Täter ist, dann müssen \(B\) oder \(C\) ebenfalls Täter sein. 2\. Wenn \(B\) Täter ist, dann ist \(A\) unschuldig. 3\. Wenn \(C\) Täter ist, dann ist auch \(B\) Täter. Lässt sich damit herausfinden, wer von den dreien schuldig bzw. unschuldig ist?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.