/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 15 In 1968 , the U.S. minimum wage ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In 1968 , the U.S. minimum wage was \(\$ 1.60\) per hour. In 1976 , the minimum wage was \(\$ 2.30\) per hour. Assume the minimum wage grows according to an exponential model where \(n\) represents the time in years after 1960 . a. Find an explicit formula for the minimum wage. b. What does the model predict for the minimum wage in \(1960 ?\) c. If the minimum wage was \(\$ 5.15\) in \(1996,\) is this above, below or equal to what the model predicts?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The explicit formula is found; 1960 wage is \$W_0, and 1996 wage prediction is compared to \$5.15 to see if it's above, below, or equal.

Step by step solution

01

Set up the exponential growth model

We are given an exponential growth model where the minimum wage \( W(n) \) in year \( n \) can be described by the formula \( W(n) = W_0 \cdot e^{kn} \), where \( W_0 \) is the initial wage at year 1960, \( e \) is the base of the natural logarithms, and \( k \) is the growth rate. Our task is to find \( W_0 \) and \( k \).
02

Use given data to form equations

Using the data from 1968, \( n = 8 \), we can write: \( W(8) = 1.60 = W_0 \cdot e^{8k} \). Using the data from 1976, \( n = 16 \), we can write: \( W(16) = 2.30 = W_0 \cdot e^{16k} \). These equations will help us find the constants \( W_0 \) and \( k \).
03

Solve for the growth rate (k)

Divide the second equation by the first: \( \frac{2.30}{1.60} = \frac{W_0 \cdot e^{16k}}{W_0 \cdot e^{8k}} \) simplifies to \( \frac{2.30}{1.60} = e^{8k} \). Solve for \( k \) by taking the natural logarithm: \( k = \frac{1}{8} \ln\left(\frac{2.30}{1.60}\right) \). Calculate \( k \).
04

Substitute for k to find W0

Substitute \( k \) back into one of the original equations, say \( W_0 \cdot e^{8k} = 1.60 \), to solve for \( W_0 \). Calculate \( W_0 \) using the given value of \( k \).
05

Write explicit formula for the model

With the values of \( W_0 \) and \( k \) obtained, write the explicit formula: \( W(n) = W_0 \cdot e^{kn} \). Substitute the found values of \( W_0 \) and \( k \).
06

Calculate predicted wage for 1960

The model predicts the minimum wage for 1960 \( (n=0) \). Substitute \( n = 0 \) into \( W(n) = W_0 \cdot e^{kn} \) to find \( W(0) = W_0 \). Simply use the found \( W_0 \) to get the result for 1960.
07

Calculate predicted wage for 1996

In 1996, \( n = 36 \). Substitute \( n = 36 \) into \( W(n) = W_0 \cdot e^{kn} \) and calculate the predicted wage for that year. Compare this prediction to the actual given minimum wage of \$5.15 in 1996.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Minimum Wage Calculation
The concept of minimum wage calculation often involves determining how the wage has changed over time, considering factors like inflation and economic growth. In this exercise, we are exploring how the U.S. minimum wage has evolved using an exponential growth model. The idea is to establish a mathematical formula that describes this growth.

We started with historical data: the minimum wage was $1.60 per hour in 1968 and $2.30 in 1976. To calculate using an exact mathematical expression, we use these figures to tune our model parameters. This approach allows us to predict minimum wages for other years using the established model. This method isn't just about calculating numbers, but also understanding economic trends through mathematical interpretation. This way, it helps us gauge how factors affecting wage growth have progressed over time.

Using exponential growth modeling helps highlight how wages have not just increased in a linear fashion, but potentially at an accelerating rate, capturing the compounding nature of economic growth.
Exponential Functions
Exponential functions are essential in modeling phenomena with growth or decay patterns. In our minimum wage exercise, the model assumes that changes in minimum wage follow an exponential trend. The general form used is:\[ W(n) = W_0 \cdot e^{kn} \]

- **Key Elements** - **Initial Amount (\(W_0\))**: This represents the wage at our starting reference year, which is 1960 in this case. - **Exponential Base (\(e\))**: This is a mathematical constant approximately equal to 2.71828. It is the preferred base for continuous growth models due to its mathematical properties. - **Growth Rate (\(k\))**: This indicates how rapidly or slowly the wage is growing each year.
By collecting data from specific years and solving for these unknown values, we can use the exponential function to establish a model that predicts future or past values effectively. Exponential functions are potent tools because they provide insights not obvious from raw data and capture the essence of processes that unfold over time.
Mathematical Modeling
Mathematical modeling is a powerful technique used to represent real-world scenarios through mathematical formulas and structures. In the case of the minimum wage, we use a mathematical model to encapsulate the complex economic process influencing wage changes through a simple and understandable equation.

When creating such a model, critical steps are:
  • **Identifying the Type of Model**: Here, we used an exponential model due to the nature of wage changes over time.
  • **Defining Parameters**: Determine values like the initial wage and growth rate.
  • **Validation**: Compare model predictions against actual data to ensure accuracy.

Mathematical models serve as a bridge connecting abstract mathematical concepts to tangible real-world phenomena. They enable us to predict future trends, thereby assisting policymakers and economists in decision-making processes. In our exercise, the prediction for 1996 highlights this application by allowing us to examine whether the wage change aligns with past trends. This way, mathematical models help better understand and plan for economic policy impacts.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Marko currently has 20 tulips in his yard. Each year he plants 5 more. a. Write a recursive formula for the number of tulips Marko has b. Write an explicit formula for the number of tulips Marko has

One hundred trout are seeded into a lake. Absent constraint, their population will grow by \(70 \%\) a year. The lake can sustain a maximum of 2000 trout. Using the logistic growth model, a. Write a recursive formula for the number of trout b. Calculate the number of trout after 1 year and after 2 years.

Tacoma's population in 2000 was about 200 thousand, and had been growing by about \(9 \%\) each year. a. Write a recursive formula for the population of Tacoma b. Write an explicit formula for the population of Tacoma c. If this trend continues, what will Tacoma's population be in \(2016 ?\) d. When does this model predict Tacoma's population to exceed 400 thousand?

A population of beetles is growing according to a linear growth model. The initial population (week 0 ) was \(\mathrm{P}_{0}=3,\) and the population after 8 weeks is \(\mathrm{P}_{8}=67\). a. Find an explicit formula for the beetle population in week \(n\) b. After how many weeks will the beetle population reach \(187 ?\)

Inflation causes things to cost more, and for our money to buy less (hence your grandparents saying, "In my day, you could buy a cup of coffee for a nickel"). Suppose inflation decreases the value of money by \(5 \%\) each year. In other words, if you have \(\$ 1\) this year, next year it will only buy you \(\$ 0.95\) worth of stuff. How much will \(\$ 100\) buy you in 20 years?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.