/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 48 Suppose \(A\) is a supertriangul... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose \(A\) is a supertriangular matrix (i.e., all entries on and below the main diagonal are 0 ). Show that \(A\) is nilpotent.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In summary, given A as a supertriangular matrix, we showed that all entries below or at the k-th diagonal of A^k are 0. Consequently, in A^n, where k = n, all elements in or below the n-th diagonal are 0, implying that A^n is a zero matrix. Therefore, A is nilpotent with k = n.

Step by step solution

01

Define the given matrix

A supertriangular matrix A has all entries on and below the main diagonal equal to 0. We consider A as an n x n matrix.
02

Understand what a nilpotent matrix is

A matrix A is said to be nilpotent if there exists a positive integer k such that A^k = 0 (the 0 here is an n x n zero matrix).
03

Calculate A^2

To investigate the powers of A, let's first compute A^2 by multiplying A with itself: A^2 = A * A In general, whenever there exists a non-zero element a_{i, j} in A, with i < j, the value a_{i+1, j+1} (when it exists) may be non-zero, otherwise no other element of A^2 with a row index lower or equal than i and a column index higher or equal than j can be non-zero. Now, for the first row, the first matrix multiplication term would be a_{1,1} * a_{1,2}, which is guaranteed to be nil, since the row of i=1 term is 0. The fact that all other terms will be 0 will extend to any row i=n, with the non-zero terms being excluded from multiplying with the elements their row index is lower than, leaving all other terms as 0. Consequently, all elements at or below the second diagonal in A^2 are 0.
04

Calculate A^k iteratively

By analyzing A^2, we see that all elements below or at the second diagonal are 0. Let's consider the pattern and generalize it. We can compute A^k by repeatedly multiplying A with itself. At each step, all elements in or below the k-th diagonal (the k-th term being k-1 elements above the main diagonal) of A^k will be 0.
05

Show that A^n is a zero matrix

By continuing the pattern, when k = n, all elements in or below the n-th diagonal of A^n are 0. Since an n x n matrix has only n diagonals, this implies that all elements in A^n are 0. Thus, since A^n = 0, A is a nilpotent matrix with k = n.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that \(V=W_{1} \oplus \cdots \oplus W_{r}\) if and only if (i) \(V=\operatorname{span}\left(W_{i}\right)\) and (ii) for \(k=1,2, \ldots, r\) \(W_{k} \cap \operatorname{span}\left(W_{1}, \ldots, W_{k-1}, W_{k+1}, \ldots, W_{r}\right)=\\{0\\}\).

Prove Theorem 10.9: A linear operator \(T: V \rightarrow V\) has a diagonal matrix representation if and only if its minimal polynomal \(m(t)\) is a product of distinct linear polynomials. Suppose \(m(t)\) is a product of distinct linear polynomials, say, \\[ m(t)=\left(t-\lambda_{1}\right)\left(t-\lambda_{2}\right) \cdots\left(t-\lambda_{r}\right) \\] where the \(\lambda_{i}\) are distinct scalars. By the Primary Decomposition Theorem, \(V\) is the direct sum of subspaces \(W_{1}, \ldots, W_{r},\) where \(W_{i}=\operatorname{Ker}\left(T-\lambda_{i} I\right) .\) Thus, if \(v \in W_{i},\) then \(\left(T-\lambda_{i} I\right)(v)=0\) or \(T(v)=\lambda_{i} v .\) In other words, every vector in \(W_{i}\) is an eigenvector belonging to the eigenvalue \(\lambda_{i}\). By Theorem 10.4 , the union of bases for \(W_{1}, \ldots, W_{r}\) is a basis of \(V\). This basis consists of eigenvectors, and so \(T\) is diagonalizable. Conversely, suppose \(T\) is diagonalizable (i.e., \(V\) has a basis consisting of eigenvectors of \(T\) ). Let \(\lambda_{1}, \ldots, \lambda_{s}\) be the distinct eigenvalues of \(T .\) Then the operator \\[ f(T)=\left(T-\lambda_{1} I\right)\left(T-\lambda_{2} I\right) \cdots\left(T-\lambda_{s} I\right) \\] maps each basis vector into \(0 .\) Thus, \(f(T)=0,\) and hence, the minimal polynomial \(m(t)\) of \(T\) divides the polynomial \\[ f(t)=\left(t-\lambda_{1}\right)\left(t-\lambda_{2}\right) \cdots\left(t-\lambda_{s} I\right) \\] Accordingly, \(m(t)\) is a product of distinct linear polynomials.

Let \(W\) be a subspace of \(V\). Suppose the set of cosets \(\left\\{v_{1}+W, \quad v_{2}+W, \ldots, v_{n}+W\right\\}\) in \(V / W\) is linearly independent. Show that the set of vectors \(\left\\{v_{1}, v_{2}, \ldots, v_{n}\right\\}\) in \(V\) is also linearly independent.

Let \(T: V \rightarrow V\) be linear. Let \(W\) be a \(T\) -invariant subspace of \(V\) and \(\bar{T}\) the induced operator on \(V / W\). Prove (a) The T-annihilator of \(v \in V\) divides the minimal polynomial of \(T\) (b) The \(\bar{T}\) -annihilator of \(\bar{v} \in V / W\) divides the minimal polynomial of \(T\) (a) The \(T\) -annihilator of \(v \in V\) is the minimal polynomial of the restriction of \(T\) to \(Z(v, T) ;\) therefore, by Problem \(10.6,\) it divides the minimal polynomial of \(T\) (b) The \(\bar{T}\) -annihilator of \(\bar{v} \in V / W\) divides the minimal polynomial of \(\bar{T},\) which divides the minimal polynomial of \(T\) by Theorem 10.16 Remark: In the case where the minimum polynomial of \(T\) is \(f(t)^{n},\) where \(f(t)\) is a monic irreducible polynomial, then the \(T\) -annihilator of \(v \in V\) and the \(\bar{T}\) -annihilator of \(\bar{v} \in V / W\) are of the form \(f(t)^{m},\) where \(m \leq n\).

Prove Theorem 10.12: Let \(Z(v, T)\) be a \(T\) -cyclic subspace, \(T_{v}\) the restriction of \(T\) to \(Z(v, T),\) and \(m_{v}(t)=t^{k}+a_{k-1} t^{k-1}+\cdots+a_{0}\) the \(T\) -annihilator of \(v .\) Then (i) The set \(\left\\{v, T(v), \ldots, T^{k-1}(v)\right\\}\) is a basis of \(Z(v, T) ;\) hence, \(\operatorname{dim} Z(v, T)=k\) (ii) The minimal polynomial of \(T_{v}\) is \(m_{v}(t)\) (iii) The matrix of \(T_{v}\) in the above basis is the companion matrix \(C=C\left(m_{v}\right)\) of \(m_{v}(t)\) [which has 1 's below the diagonal, the negative of the coefficients \(a_{0}, a_{1}, \ldots, a_{k-1}\) of \(m_{v}(t)\) in the last column, and \(0 \text { 's elsewhere }]\). (i) \(\quad\) By definition of \(m_{v}(t), T^{k}(v)\) is the first vector in the sequence \(v, T(v), T^{2}(v), \ldots\) that, is a linear combination of those vectors that precede it in the sequence; hence, the set \(B=\left\\{v, T(v), \ldots, T^{k-1}(v)\right\\}\) is linearly independent. We now only have to show that \(Z(v, T)=L(B)\), the linear span of \(B\). By the above, \(T^{k}(v) \in L(B) .\) We prove by induction that \(T^{n}(v) \in L(B)\) for every \(n .\) Suppose \(n>k\) and \(T^{n-1}(v) \in L(B)-\) that \(\quad\) is, \(\quad T^{n-1}(v) \quad\) is \(\quad\) a \(\quad\) linear \(\quad\) combination \(\quad\) of \(\quad v, \ldots, T^{k-1}(v) . \quad\) Then \(T^{n}(v)=T\left(T^{n-1}(v)\right)\) is a linear combination of \(T(v), \ldots, T^{k}(v) .\) But \(T^{k}(v) \in L(B) ;\) hence, \(T^{n}(v) \in L(B)\) for every \(n .\) Consequently, \(f(T)(v) \in L(B)\) for any polynomial \(f(t) .\) Thus, \(Z(v, T)=L(B),\) and \(\operatorname{so~} B\) is a basis, as claimed. (ii) Suppose \(m(t)=t^{s}+b_{s-1} t^{s-1}+\cdots+b_{0}\) is the minimal polynomial of \(T_{v} .\) Then, because \(v \in Z(v, T)\) \\[ 0=m\left(T_{v}\right)(v)=m(T)(v)=T^{s}(v)+b_{s-1} T^{s-1}(v)+\cdots+b_{0} v \\] Thus, \(T^{s}(v)\) is a linear combination of \(v, T(v), \ldots, T^{s-1}(v),\) and therefore \(k \leq s\). However, \(m_{v}(T)=\mathbf{0}\) and so \(m_{v}\left(T_{v}\right)=\mathbf{0} .\) Then \(m(t)\) divides \(m_{v}(t),\) and so \(s \leq k .\) Accordingly, \(k=s\) and hence \(m_{v}(t)=m(t)\) (iii) \\[ \begin{array}{ll} T_{v}(v) & =\quad T(v) \\ T_{v}(T(v)) & = \\ & = \\ T_{v}\left(T^{k-2}(v)\right) & = \\ T_{v}\left(T^{k-1}(v)\right) & =T^{k}(v)=-a_{0} v-a_{1} T(v)-a_{2} T^{2}(v)-\cdots-a_{k-1} T^{k-1}(v) \end{array} \\] By definition, the matrix of \(T_{v}\) in this basis is the tranpose of the matrix of coefficients of the above system of equations; hence, it is \(C,\) as required.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.