/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 29 Prove Theorem 10.12: Let \(Z(v, ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Prove Theorem 10.12: Let \(Z(v, T)\) be a \(T\) -cyclic subspace, \(T_{v}\) the restriction of \(T\) to \(Z(v, T),\) and \(m_{v}(t)=t^{k}+a_{k-1} t^{k-1}+\cdots+a_{0}\) the \(T\) -annihilator of \(v .\) Then (i) The set \(\left\\{v, T(v), \ldots, T^{k-1}(v)\right\\}\) is a basis of \(Z(v, T) ;\) hence, \(\operatorname{dim} Z(v, T)=k\) (ii) The minimal polynomial of \(T_{v}\) is \(m_{v}(t)\) (iii) The matrix of \(T_{v}\) in the above basis is the companion matrix \(C=C\left(m_{v}\right)\) of \(m_{v}(t)\) [which has 1 's below the diagonal, the negative of the coefficients \(a_{0}, a_{1}, \ldots, a_{k-1}\) of \(m_{v}(t)\) in the last column, and \(0 \text { 's elsewhere }]\). (i) \(\quad\) By definition of \(m_{v}(t), T^{k}(v)\) is the first vector in the sequence \(v, T(v), T^{2}(v), \ldots\) that, is a linear combination of those vectors that precede it in the sequence; hence, the set \(B=\left\\{v, T(v), \ldots, T^{k-1}(v)\right\\}\) is linearly independent. We now only have to show that \(Z(v, T)=L(B)\), the linear span of \(B\). By the above, \(T^{k}(v) \in L(B) .\) We prove by induction that \(T^{n}(v) \in L(B)\) for every \(n .\) Suppose \(n>k\) and \(T^{n-1}(v) \in L(B)-\) that \(\quad\) is, \(\quad T^{n-1}(v) \quad\) is \(\quad\) a \(\quad\) linear \(\quad\) combination \(\quad\) of \(\quad v, \ldots, T^{k-1}(v) . \quad\) Then \(T^{n}(v)=T\left(T^{n-1}(v)\right)\) is a linear combination of \(T(v), \ldots, T^{k}(v) .\) But \(T^{k}(v) \in L(B) ;\) hence, \(T^{n}(v) \in L(B)\) for every \(n .\) Consequently, \(f(T)(v) \in L(B)\) for any polynomial \(f(t) .\) Thus, \(Z(v, T)=L(B),\) and \(\operatorname{so~} B\) is a basis, as claimed. (ii) Suppose \(m(t)=t^{s}+b_{s-1} t^{s-1}+\cdots+b_{0}\) is the minimal polynomial of \(T_{v} .\) Then, because \(v \in Z(v, T)\) \\[ 0=m\left(T_{v}\right)(v)=m(T)(v)=T^{s}(v)+b_{s-1} T^{s-1}(v)+\cdots+b_{0} v \\] Thus, \(T^{s}(v)\) is a linear combination of \(v, T(v), \ldots, T^{s-1}(v),\) and therefore \(k \leq s\). However, \(m_{v}(T)=\mathbf{0}\) and so \(m_{v}\left(T_{v}\right)=\mathbf{0} .\) Then \(m(t)\) divides \(m_{v}(t),\) and so \(s \leq k .\) Accordingly, \(k=s\) and hence \(m_{v}(t)=m(t)\) (iii) \\[ \begin{array}{ll} T_{v}(v) & =\quad T(v) \\ T_{v}(T(v)) & = \\ & = \\ T_{v}\left(T^{k-2}(v)\right) & = \\ T_{v}\left(T^{k-1}(v)\right) & =T^{k}(v)=-a_{0} v-a_{1} T(v)-a_{2} T^{2}(v)-\cdots-a_{k-1} T^{k-1}(v) \end{array} \\] By definition, the matrix of \(T_{v}\) in this basis is the tranpose of the matrix of coefficients of the above system of equations; hence, it is \(C,\) as required.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(i) By the definition of \(m_v(t)\), the set \(B=\{v, T(v), \ldots, T^{k-1}(v)\}\) is linearly independent. It can be proven by induction that for any \(n\), \(T^n(v) \in L(B)\). Thus, \(Z(v, T) = L(B)\) with \(B\) as a basis and \(\text{dim} Z(v, T) = k\). (ii) Let \(m(t)\) be the minimal polynomial of \(T_v\). From the analysis, we have \(k \le s\) and \(s \le k\), which implies \(k=s\) and \(m_v(t)=m(t)\). (iii) The matrix of \(T_v\) in the basis \(B\) is the transpose of the matrix of coefficients from the transformation of basis vectors, which is the companion matrix \(C\) of \(m_v(t)\).

Step by step solution

01

(i) Proving basis of Z(v, T)

First, we need to show the set \(B=\{v, T(v), \ldots, T^{k-1}(v)\}\) is linearly independent. By definition of \(m_v(t)\), \(T^k(v)\) is the first vector in the sequence \(v, T(v), T^2(v), \ldots\) that is a linear combination of those vectors that precede it in the sequence. Therefore, the set \(B\) must be linearly independent. Next, we need to show that \(Z(v, T) = L(B)\) (the linear span of \(B\)). We know that \(T^k(v) \in L(B)\). We can prove by induction that \(T^n(v) \in L(B)\) for every \(n\). Suppose for some \(n>k\), \(T^{n-1}(v) \in L(B)\). Then, \(T^n(v) = T(T^{n-1}(v))\) is a linear combination of \(T(v), \ldots, T^k(v)\). Since \(T^k(v) \in L(B)\), it follows that \(T^n(v) \in L(B)\) for every \(n\). Therefore, \(f(T)(v) \in L(B)\) for any polynomial \(f(t)\). Thus, \(Z(v, T) = L(B)\), and so \(B\) is a basis with dimension \(k\).
02

(ii) Proving the minimal polynomial of Tv

Let \(m(t)=t^s+b_{s-1}t^{s-1}+\cdots+b_0\) be the minimal polynomial of \(T_v\). Since \(v \in Z(v, T)\), we have \[0 = m(T_v)(v) = m(T)(v) = T^s(v) + b_{s-1} T^{s-1}(v) + \cdots + b_0 v.\] This means \(T^s(v)\) is a linear combination of \(v, T(v), \ldots, T^{s-1}(v)\), thus \(k \le s\). However, \(m_v(T)=\mathbf{0}\), so \(m_v(T_v) = \mathbf{0}\). Therefore, \(m(t)\) divides \(m_v(t)\), and so \(s \le k\). Consequently, \(k=s\), and hence \(m_v(t)=m(t)\).
03

(iii) Proving the matrix of Tv is the companion matrix of mv(t)

Let's compute the action of the restricted transformation \(T_v\) on the basis vectors: \[\begin{array}{ll} T_v(v) & = T(v) \\ T_v(T(v)) & = T^2(v) \\ & = \vdots \\ T_v(T^{k-2}(v)) & = T^{k-1}(v) \\ T_v(T^{k-1}(v)) & = T^k(v) = -a_0v - a_1T(v) - a_2T^2(v) - \cdots - a_{k-1} T^{k-1}(v) \end{array}\] The matrix of \(T_v\) in this basis is the transpose of the matrix of coefficients of the above system of equations, which is the companion matrix \(C\) of \(m_v(t)\). This shows that the matrix of \(T_v\) in the basis \(B\) is the companion matrix of the minimal polynomial \(m_v(t)\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Minimal Polynomial
The concept of a minimal polynomial plays a crucial role in understanding the structure of linear operators in linear algebra. It is the monic polynomial of least degree such that when the linear operator is applied to it, it returns the zero vector. In the context of the problem, the minimal polynomial of the restriction of transformation T to the cyclic subspace generated by v, denoted by m_v(t), is essential in determining the dynamic of the linear operator within the subspace.

When we say that m_v(t) is the T-annihilator of v, we mean it is the smallest polynomial such that m_v(T)(v) = 0. Finding the minimal polynomial is instrumental in establishing several key properties of T_v, including its matrix representation which turns out to be the companion matrix of m_v(t). Notably, the minimal polynomial also gives us insights into the characteristic polynomial and the eigenspaces associated with T.
Linear Algebra
Linear algebra is the branch of mathematics concerning linear equations, linear functions, and their representations through matrices and vector spaces. It is foundational for understanding systems of linear equations, which are prevalent in various fields such as engineering, physics, computer science, and more.

In terms of cyclic subspaces and minimal polynomials, linear algebra provides us with the tools to examine the behavior of linear transformations and the structure of the spaces they act upon. The notions of independence, span, and basis, which are fundamental to linear algebra, enable us to characterize the cyclic subspace Z(v, T) and to demonstrate that the set {v, T(v), ..., Tk-1(v)} is indeed a basis for that subspace.
Companion Matrix
The companion matrix of a polynomial is a special type of square matrix that encapsulates the coefficients of the polynomial. The construction of a companion matrix is standard: ones on the subdiagonal, coefficients of the polynomial (with flipped signs) in the last column, and zeros elsewhere.

For instance, the companion matrix of the minimal polynomial m_v(t) = tk + ak-1tk-1 + ... + a0 is critical in defining the matrix representation of the linear transformation T_v restricted to the cyclic subspace. This matrix becomes a powerful computational tool to understand the effect of T_v and to solve for eigenvectors and eigenvalues that may arise from applications in differential equations, control theory, and more.
Basis of Subspace
In linear algebra, a basis of a subspace is a set of vectors that are linearly independent and span the entire subspace. Every element of the subspace can be written uniquely as a linear combination of basis vectors.

In the provided exercise, the basis of the cyclic subspace Z(v, T) consists of the vectors {v, T(v), ..., Tk-1(v)}, where k is the dimension of the subspace. The importance of identifying a basis lies in its ability to simplify problems by providing a framework for which every vector in the space can be expressed and operations such as linear transformations can be efficiently performed. Recognizing and proving that a set of vectors forms a basis is fundamental in transitioning between different vector spaces and in understanding the underlying structure of a given subspace.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Find the rational canonical form for the four-square Jordan block with \(\lambda^{\prime}\) s on the diagonal.

Prove that two \(3 \times 3\) matrices with the same minimal and characteristic polynomials are similar.

Prove Theorem 10.9: A linear operator \(T: V \rightarrow V\) has a diagonal matrix representation if and only if its minimal polynomal \(m(t)\) is a product of distinct linear polynomials. Suppose \(m(t)\) is a product of distinct linear polynomials, say, \\[ m(t)=\left(t-\lambda_{1}\right)\left(t-\lambda_{2}\right) \cdots\left(t-\lambda_{r}\right) \\] where the \(\lambda_{i}\) are distinct scalars. By the Primary Decomposition Theorem, \(V\) is the direct sum of subspaces \(W_{1}, \ldots, W_{r},\) where \(W_{i}=\operatorname{Ker}\left(T-\lambda_{i} I\right) .\) Thus, if \(v \in W_{i},\) then \(\left(T-\lambda_{i} I\right)(v)=0\) or \(T(v)=\lambda_{i} v .\) In other words, every vector in \(W_{i}\) is an eigenvector belonging to the eigenvalue \(\lambda_{i}\). By Theorem 10.4 , the union of bases for \(W_{1}, \ldots, W_{r}\) is a basis of \(V\). This basis consists of eigenvectors, and so \(T\) is diagonalizable. Conversely, suppose \(T\) is diagonalizable (i.e., \(V\) has a basis consisting of eigenvectors of \(T\) ). Let \(\lambda_{1}, \ldots, \lambda_{s}\) be the distinct eigenvalues of \(T .\) Then the operator \\[ f(T)=\left(T-\lambda_{1} I\right)\left(T-\lambda_{2} I\right) \cdots\left(T-\lambda_{s} I\right) \\] maps each basis vector into \(0 .\) Thus, \(f(T)=0,\) and hence, the minimal polynomial \(m(t)\) of \(T\) divides the polynomial \\[ f(t)=\left(t-\lambda_{1}\right)\left(t-\lambda_{2}\right) \cdots\left(t-\lambda_{s} I\right) \\] Accordingly, \(m(t)\) is a product of distinct linear polynomials.

Suppose \(W\) is a subspace of a vector space \(V .\) Show that the operations in Theorem 10.15 are well defined; namely, show that if \(u+W=u^{\prime}+W\) and \(v+W=v^{\prime}+W,\) then (a) \(\quad(u+v)+W=\left(u^{\prime}+v^{\prime}\right)+W\) and (b) \(\quad k u+W=k u^{\prime}+W \quad\) for any \(k \in K\) (a) Because \(u+W=u^{\prime}+W\) and \(v+W=v^{\prime}+W,\) both \(u-u^{\prime}\) and \(v-v^{\prime}\) belong to \(W .\) But then \((u+v)-\left(u^{\prime}+v^{\prime}\right)=\left(u-u^{\prime}\right)+\left(v-v^{\prime}\right) \in W .\) Hence, \((u+v)+W=\left(u^{\prime}+v^{\prime}\right)+W\) (b) Also, because \(u-u^{\prime} \in W\) implies \(k\left(u-u^{\prime}\right) \in W,\) then \(k u-k u^{\prime}=k\left(u-u^{\prime}\right) \in W ;\) accordingly, \(k u+W=k u^{\prime}+W\).

Prove Theorem 10.3: Suppose \(W\) is \(T\) -invariant. Then \(T\) has a triangular block representation \(\left[\begin{array}{ll}A & B \\ 0 & C\end{array}\right],\) where \(A\) is the matrix representation of the restriction \(\hat{T}\) of \(T\) to \(W\) We choose a basis \(\left\\{w_{1}, \ldots, w_{r}\right\\}\) of \(W\) and extend it to a basis \(\left\\{w_{1}, \ldots, w_{r}, v_{1}, \ldots, v_{s}\right\\}\) of \(V\). We have \\[ \begin{array}{l} \hat{T}\left(w_{1}\right)=T\left(w_{1}\right)=a_{11} w_{1}+\cdots+a_{1 r} w_{r} \\ \hat{T}\left(w_{2}\right)=T\left(w_{2}\right)=a_{21} w_{1}+\cdots+a_{2 r} w_{r} \\ \begin{array}{l} \hat{T}\left(w_{r}\right)=T\left(w_{r}\right)=a_{r 1} w_{1}+\cdots+a_{n} w_{r} \\\ T\left(v_{1}\right)=b_{11} w_{1}+\cdots+b_{1 r} w_{r}+c_{11} v_{1}+\cdots+c_{1 s} v_{s} \\ T\left(v_{2}\right)=b_{21} w_{1}+\cdots+b_{2 r} w_{r}+c_{21} v_{1}+\cdots+c_{2 s} v_{s} \\ T\left(v_{s}\right)=b_{s 1} w_{1}+\cdots+b_{s r} w_{r}+c_{s 1} v_{1}+\cdots+c_{s s} v_{s} \end{array} \end{array} \\] \\[ T\left(v_{s}\right)=b_{s 1} w_{1}+\cdots+b_{s r} w_{r}+c_{s 1} v_{1}+\cdots+c_{s s} v_{s} \\] But the matrix of \(T\) in this basis is the transpose of the matrix of coefficients in the above system of equations (Section 6.2). Therefore, it has the form \(\left[\begin{array}{ll}A & B \\ 0 & C\end{array}\right],\) where \(A\) is the transpose of the matrix of coefficients for the obvious subsystem. By the same argument, \(A\) is the matrix of \(\hat{T}\) relative to the basis \(\left\\{w_{i}\right\\}\) of \(W\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.