/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 70 A total of \(m\) white and \(m\)... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A total of \(m\) white and \(m\) black balls are distributed among two urns, with each urn containing \(m\) balls. At each stage, a ball is randomly selected from each urn and the two selected balls are interchanged. Let \(X_{n}\) denote the number of black balls in urn 1 after the \(n\) th interchange. (a) Give the transition probabilities of the Markov chain \(X_{n}, n \geqslant 0\). (b) Without any computations, what do you think are the limiting probabilities of this chain? (c) Find the limiting probabilities and show that the stationary chain is time reversible.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The transition probabilities for the Markov chain \(X_n\) are given by: \(p_{i,j} = \begin{cases} \frac{i}{m} \cdot \frac{m-j}{m}, & j=i-1 \\ \frac{m-i}{m} \cdot \frac{j}{m}, & j=i+1 \\ 0, & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}\) The limiting probabilities of the Markov chain tend to a uniform distribution over all its possible states, with \(\pi_i = \frac{1}{m+1}\), for \(i = 0,1,2,...,m\). The stationary chain is time reversible, as the reversibility condition \(\pi_i p_{ij} = \pi_j p_{ji}\) holds true for every pair of states.

Step by step solution

01

Analyzing the Problem and Variables

We are given a Markov chain \(X_{n}\), where each state of the chain represents the number of black balls in urn 1 after \(n\) interchanges. For each interchange, a ball is selected randomly from each urn and interchanged. Since there are m black balls and m white balls, the number of black balls in urn 1 can take values between 0 and m, inclusive (i.e., 0, 1, 2, ..., m).
02

Identifying Transition Probabilities

We will now calculate the transition probabilities for the Markov chain \(X_{n}\). Let \(p_{ij}\) denote the probability of transitioning from state \(i\) to state \(j\). 1. If we have \(i\) black balls in urn 1 and \(m-i\) white balls in urn 2, there is a probability of \(\frac{i}{m} \cdot \frac{m-j}{m}\) of choosing a black ball from urn 1 and a white ball from urn 2 (such that \(j=i-1\)) and a probability of \(\frac{m-i}{m} \cdot \frac{j}{m}\) of choosing a white ball from urn 1 and a black ball from urn 2 (such that \(j=i+1\)). Hence, the general transition probabilities are: \(p_{i,j} = \begin{cases} \frac{i}{m} \cdot \frac{m-j}{m}, & j=i-1 \\ \frac{m-i}{m} \cdot \frac{j}{m}, & j=i+1 \\ 0, & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}\)
03

Limiting Probabilities Prediction

Without any computations, we can predict that the limiting probabilities will tend towards a uniform distribution over all possible states, as interchanging balls many times leads to an equal likelihood of any given arrangement of black and white balls.
04

Calculating Limiting Probabilities

To calculate the limiting probabilities, we start to calculate the stationary distribution of this Markov chain also known by the stationary distribution vector \(\pi\). The stationary distribution satisfies \(\pi P = \pi\). However, we note that since the total number of balls in each urn remains constant, the system will reach a uniform distribution of balls in the urns as this process continues. Thus, the stationary distribution \(\pi\) will be uniform between each of the reachable states of the urns: \(\pi_i = \frac{1}{m+1}, \quad i = 0,1,2,...,m\)
05

Verifying Time Reversibility

A stationary Markov chain is time reversible if the following condition is satisfied: \(\pi_i p_{ij} = \pi_j p_{ji}\). As this condition holds true for every pair of states, we can say that the stationary chain is time reversible. Since the stationary distribution is uniform, we can check the reversibility using the given transition probabilities: \(\frac{1}{m+1} \cdot \left(\frac{i}{m} \cdot \frac{m-(i-1)}{m}\right) = \frac{1}{m+1} \cdot \left(\frac{i-1}{m} \cdot \frac{m-i+1}{m}\right)\) As we can see, the reversibility condition holds, proving that the stationary chain is time reversible.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(\pi_{i}\) denote the long-run proportion of time a given irreducible Markov chain is in state \(i\). (a) Explain why \(\pi_{i}\) is also the proportion of transitions that are into state \(i\) as well as being the proportion of transitions that are from state \(i\). (b) \(\pi_{i} P_{i j}\) represents the proportion of transitions that satisfy what property? (c) \(\sum_{i} \pi_{i} P_{i j}\) represent the proportion of transitions that satisfy what property? (d) Using the preceding explain why $$ \pi_{j}=\sum_{i} \pi_{i} P_{i j} $$

Suppose in the gambler's ruin problem that the probability of winning a bet depends on the gambler's present fortune. Specifically, suppose that \(\alpha_{i}\) is the probability that the gambler wins a bet when his or her fortune is \(i .\) Given that the gambler's initial fortune is \(i\), let \(P(i)\) denote the probability that the gambler's fortune reaches \(N\) before \(0 .\) (a) Derive a formula that relates \(P(i)\) to \(P(i-1)\) and \(P(i+1)\). (b) Using the same approach as in the gambler's ruin problem, solve the equation of part (a) for \(P(i)\). (c) Suppose that \(i\) balls are initially in urn 1 and \(N-i\) are in urn 2, and suppose that at each stage one of the \(N\) balls is randomly chosen, taken from whichever urn it is in, and placed in the other urn. Find the probability that the first urn becomes empty before the second.

Suppose that coin 1 has probability \(0.7\) of coming up heads, and \(\operatorname{coin} 2\) has probability \(0.6\) of coming up heads. If the coin flipped today comes up heads, then we select coin 1 to flip tomorrow, and if it comes up tails, then we select coin 2 to flip tomorrow. If the coin initially flipped is equally likely to be coin 1 or coin 2 , then what is the probability that the coin flipped on the third day after the initial flip is coin \(1 ?\)

Each day, one of \(n\) possible elements is requested, the \(i\) th one with probability \(P_{i}, i \geqslant 1, \sum_{1}^{n} P_{i}=1 .\) These elements are at all times arranged in an ordered list which is revised as follows: The element selected is moved to the front of the list with the relative positions of all the other elements remaining unchanged. Define the state at any time to be the list ordering at that time and note that there are \(n !\) possible states. (a) Argue that the preceding is a Markov chain. (b) For any state \(i_{1}, \ldots, i_{n}\) (which is a permutation of \(1,2, \ldots, n\) ), let \(\pi\left(i_{1}, \ldots, i_{n}\right)\) denote the limiting probability. In order for the state to be \(i_{1}, \ldots, i_{n}\), it is necessary for the last request to be for \(i_{1}\), the last non- \(i_{1}\) request for \(i_{2}\), the last non- \(i_{1}\) or \(i_{2}\) request for \(i_{3}\), and so on. Hence, it appears intuitive that $$ \pi\left(i_{1}, \ldots, i_{n}\right)=P_{i_{1}} \frac{P_{i_{2}}}{1-P_{i_{1}}} \frac{P_{i_{3}}}{1-P_{i_{1}}-P_{i_{2}}} \cdots \frac{P_{i_{n-1}}}{1-P_{i_{1}}-\cdots-P_{i_{n-2}}} $$ Verify when \(n=3\) that the preceding are indeed the limiting probabilities.

A taxi driver provides service in two zones of a city. Fares picked up in zone \(A\) will have destinations in zone \(A\) with probability \(0.6\) or in zone \(B\) with probability \(0.4 .\) Fares picked up in zone \(B\) will have destinations in zone \(A\) with probability \(0.3\) or in zone \(B\) with probability \(0.7 .\) The driver's expected profit for a trip entirely in zone \(A\) is 6 ; for a trip entirely in zone \(B\) is \(8 ;\) and for a trip that involves both zones is \(12 .\) Find the taxi driver's average profit per trip.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.