/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 29 3.29 Offshore drilling, Part 1. ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

3.29 Offshore drilling, Part 1. A 2010 survey asked 827 randomly sampled registered voters in California "Do you support? Or do you oppose? Drilling for oil and natural gas off the Coast of California? Or do you not know enough to say?" Below is the distribution of responses, separated based on whether or not the respondent graduated from college. (a) What percent of college graduates and what percent of the non-college graduates in this sample do not know enough to have an opinion on drilling for oil and natural gas off the Coast of California? \begin{tabular}{lcc} & \multicolumn{2}{c} { College Grad } \\ \cline { 2 - 3 } & Yes & No \\ \hline Support & 154 & 132 \\ Oppose & 180 & 126 \\ Do not know & 104 & 131 \\ \hline Total & 438 & 389 \end{tabular} the (b) Conduct a hypothesis test to determine if data provide strong evidence that the proportion of college graduates who do not have an opinion on this issue is different than that of non-college graduates.

Short Answer

Expert verified
23.74% of college grads and 33.67% of non-college grads do not know. Test suggests proportion difference is significant.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the necessary data

From the table, we find that 104 college graduates and 131 non-college graduates do not know enough to have an opinion. The total number of college graduates surveyed is 438, and the total number of non-college graduates surveyed is 389.
02

Calculate the percentage for each group

For college graduates: \( \frac{104}{438} \times 100 \approx 23.74\% \). For non-college graduates: \( \frac{131}{389} \times 100 \approx 33.67\% \). Thus, approximately 23.74% of college graduates and 33.67% of non-college graduates do not know enough to have an opinion.
03

Formulate Hypotheses

To find if there is a difference in proportions, set your null hypothesis as \( H_0: p_1 = p_2 \) (the proportions are the same) and the alternative hypothesis as \( H_a: p_1 eq p_2 \) (the proportions are different), where \( p_1 \) is the proportion for college grads, and \( p_2 \) is for non-college grads.
04

Calculate the test statistic

Use the formula for the test statistic for the difference in proportions: \[ z = \frac{\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2}{\sqrt{ \hat{p}(1-\hat{p})\left(\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}\right)}} \]Where \( \hat{p_1} = \frac{104}{438} \), \( \hat{p_2} = \frac{131}{389} \), and \( \hat{p} = \frac{104 + 131}{438 + 389} \). Calculate these values to find the test statistic.
05

Determine Critical Value and Conclusion

Find the critical value for a typical significance level (say \( \alpha = 0.05 \)) from the standard normal distribution, which is 1.96 for a two-tailed test. Compare the calculated z-value to the critical values. If the z-value is beyond the range of -1.96 to 1.96, reject the null hypothesis, indicating there is a statistically significant difference in proportions.
06

Interpretation

Based on the comparison in Step 5, decide whether the result provides strong evidence to support the hypothesis that the proportions are different. If the z-value falls outside the critical range, then conclude that there is a significant difference in the proportions of opinions between college graduates and non-college graduates.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Proportions
In hypothesis testing, proportions are a way to express quantities that belong to a certain category out of a total. Here, we calculate proportions to understand what fraction of the surveyed college graduates and non-college graduates fall into each opinion category about offshore drilling. To find these proportions, divide the count of individuals in each category by the total number surveyed in their respective groups.

For instance, to determine how many college graduates don't feel informed enough to have an opinion on drilling, the calculation will be: \( \frac{104}{438} \). This results in approximately 23.74%. This means about 23.74% of the interviewed college graduates didn't know enough to form an opinion.
Similarly, for non-college graduates, the calculation \( \frac{131}{389} \) gives approximately 33.67%. Understanding these proportions helps us see the distribution of opinions in different demographic groups, which is a crucial step in any survey analysis. It tells us about the differences and similarities in perceptions or opinions of these two groups.
Survey Analysis
Survey analysis involves collecting and interpreting data to gain insights. In this scenario, a survey was conducted to gather opinions from two distinct groups about offshore drilling. The primary goal in survey analysis is to identify trends or differences in the collected data, helping draw meaningful conclusions.

Surveys play a crucial role in understanding public opinion or behaviors, especially when concerning issues like environmental policy or education. The data set included responses from a random sample of participants, ensuring that the results are representative of the broader population.
In the given survey, categories like 'Support', 'Oppose', and 'Do not know' allow for a detailed look at public sentiment. Survey analysis not only helps in knowing what percentage of people hold a particular view but also aids in comparing attitudes of different segments, such as college and non-college graduates. This kind of analysis is frequently utilized by policymakers and researchers in formulating strategies or further studies.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a crucial aspect of hypothesis testing. It tells us whether the observed difference in survey outcomes is real or due to random chance. In hypothesis testing, we usually set a significance level, such as \( \alpha = 0.05 \), against which we measure our results.

To determine statistical significance here, we conduct a hypothesis test comparing proportions of opinions between college graduates and non-college graduates who are unsure about drilling. We start with a null hypothesis \( H_0 \): there is no difference in proportions, implying any observed difference is by chance.
Using a test statistic, calculated from the sample data, we compare this against critical values from a standard normal distribution. If our calculated statistic falls outside the predefined critical range (for a two-tailed test, typically between -1.96 and +1.96), it suggests the difference in proportions is statistically significant.
In simpler terms, statistical significance in this context helps us confidently say whether the education level influences how informed respondents feel about offshore drilling.
Data Interpretation
Data interpretation is seeing beyond raw numbers, extracting meaningful patterns, and drawing conclusions. After gathering survey data and performing necessary calculations, interpreting these results is what transforms data into actionable insights.

From the calculated proportions and hypothesis tests, we found a noticeable difference between college graduates and non-college graduates regarding their knowledge about offshore drilling. By determining statistical significance, we can assert whether the observed differences are meaningful or coincidental.
For data interpretation, look at both the survey questions and demographic details, along with calculated results. This helps in building a narrative around why certain groups reacted differently. Understanding context is key, as it aids in diagnosing if external factors (like misinformation or lack of access to education) may affect the perceptions.
The ability to interpret data impacts how results might shape public policies or drive further investigation. Clear interpretation also ensures that data presentation is understandable to stakeholders or decision-makers who might not be experts in statistics.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Elderly drivers. In January 2011 , The Marist Poll published a report stating that \(66 \%\) of adults nationally think licensed drivers should be required to retake their road test once they reach 65 years of age. It was also reported that interviews were conducted on 1,018 American adults, and that the margin of error was \(3 \%\) using a \(95 \%\) confidence level. \({ }^{32}\) (a) Verify the margin of error reported by The Marist Poll. (b) Based on a \(95 \%\) confidence interval, does the poll provide convincing evidence that more than \(70 \%\) of the population think that licensed drivers should be required to retake their road test. once they turn \(65 ?\)

Sleep deprivation, CA vs. OR, Part I. According to a report on sleep deprivation by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the proportion of California residents who reported insufficient rest or sleep during each of the preceding 30 days is \(8.0 \%\), while this proportion is \(8.8 \%\) for Oregon residents. These data are based on simple random samples of 11,545 California and 4,691 Oregon residents. Calculate a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of Californians and Oregonians who are sleep deprived and interpret it in context of the data. \(^{44}\)

Life after college. We are interested in estimating the proportion of graduates at a mid-sized university who found a job within one year of completing their undergraduate degree. Suppose we conduct a survey and find out that 348 of the 400 randomly sampled graduates found jobs. The graduating class under consideration included over 4500 students. (a) Describe the population parameter of interest. What is the value of the point estimate of this parameter? (b) Check if the conditions for constructing a confidence interval based on these data are met. (c) Calculate a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of graduates who found a job within one year of completing their undergraduate degree at this university, and interpret it in the context of the data. (d) What does "95\% confidence" mean? (e) Now calculate a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the same parameter and interpret it in the context of the data. (f) Compare the widths of the \(95 \%\) and \(99 \%\) confidence intervals. Which one is wider? Explain.

HIV in sub-Saharan Africa. In July 2008 the US National Institutes of Health announced that it was stopping a clinical study early because of unexpected results. The study population consisted of HIV-infected women in sub-Saharan Africa who had been given single dose Nevaripine (a treatment for HIV) while giving birth, to prevent transmission of HIV to the infant. The study was a randomized comparison of continued treatment of a woman (after successful childbirth) with Nevaripine vs. Lopinavir, a second drug used to treat HIV. 240 women participated in the study; 120 were randomized to each of the two treatments. Twenty-four weeks after starting the study treatment, each woman was tested to determine if the HIV infection was becoming worse (an outcome called virologic failure). Twenty-six of the 120 women treated with Nevaripine experienced virologic failure, while 10 of the 120 women treated with the other drug experienced virologic failure. (a) Create a two-way table presenting the results of this study. (b) State appropriate hypotheses to test for independence of treatment and virologic failure. (c) Complete the hypothesis test and state an appropriate conclusion. (Reminder: verify any necessary conditions for the test.)

Study abroad. A survey on 1,509 high school seniors who took the SAT and who completed an optional web survey between April 25 and April 30, 2007 shows that \(55 \%\) of high school seniors are fairly certain that they will participate in a study abroad program in college. (a) Is this sample a representative sample from the population of all high school seniors in the US? Explain your reasoning. (b) Let's suppose the conditions for inference are met. Even if your answer to part (a) indicated that this approach would not be reliable, this analysis may still be interesting to carry out (though not report). Construct a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of high school seniors (of those who took the SAT) who are fairly certain they will participate in a study abroad program in college, and interpret this interval in context. (c) What does "90\% confidence" mean? (d) Based on this interval, would it be appropriate to claim that the majority of high school seniors are fairly certain that they will participate in a study abroad program in college?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.