/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 102 Maria opposes capital punishment... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Maria opposes capital punishment and wants to find out if a majority of voters in her state support it. She goes to a church picnic and asks everyone there for their opinion. Because most of them oppose capital punishment, she concludes that a vote in her state would go against it. Explain what is wrong with Maria's approach.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Maria's approach was flawed due to sample bias, meaning her sample was not representative of the overall population. She drew conclusions from a small, potentially biased group at a church picnic which may not accurately reflect the views of the broader population of voters in her state.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Maria's Goal

The goal Maria has in mind is to figure out if the majority of voters in her state support capital punishment or not.
02

Analysis of Maria's Method

Maria has taken a sample of voters to ask their opinion about capital punishment. However, the sample is not a representation of the wider population of voters in her state. It is just individuals at a church picnic, a situation likely to attract certain types of individuals with shared beliefs and values, which might be different from the overall population of voters.
03

Pinpoint the Error

The error in Maria's approach is her sample's bias. She assumed that the people at a church picnic, a setting that may naturally appeal more to people opposed to capital punishment, appropriately represent the entire voting population of her state. This is known as sample bias, where the sample chosen is not representative of the population one wishes to draw conclusions about.
04

Suggestion for Correct Approach

For a more accurate outcome, Maria should have attempted to gather data from a more diverse and representative sample of the voting population. This could involve multiple locations and across different settings.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Bias in Sampling
Sampling bias is a common error that can occur when selecting participants for a survey or study. It happens when certain groups are overrepresented or underrepresented in the sample, leading to skewed results. In Maria's case, by choosing to survey individuals at a church picnic, she inadvertently selected a group that shares certain beliefs potentially altering her results. This is an example of sampling bias, as the picnic attendees may largely oppose capital punishment, reflecting their specific shared values rather than the general voter sentiment in the state.

To avoid bias in sampling, one should ensure:
  • that the sample is randomly selected, giving all individuals in the population an equal chance to be included
  • the sample size is sufficient to capture the diversity of the population being studied
  • validation against known distributions of demographic variables within the population, such as age, gender, or socioeconomic status

  • Being mindful of these factors can help ensure that a sample is more balanced and less likely to lead to an inaccurate conclusion.
    Representative Sample
    A representative sample accurately reflects the demographic and opinion diversity of the larger population. It's crucial when conducting surveys to ensure that any conclusions or decisions made from the data reflect real sentiments or facts.

    Maria's sample wasn't representative because she only asked a specific group of people at a church picnic. Attendees might share similar outlooks and be more homogeneous in their beliefs. This lack of representation means the results could not be reliably generalized to the broader population of state voters.
    Ensure a representative sample by:
  • Using stratified sampling techniques, where the population is divided into subgroups, and random samples are drawn from each
  • Ensuring coverage of all major demographic segments within the population
  • Utilizing multistage sampling to get a broader range of participants from various layers of the population

  • By doing so, researchers and surveyors can have confidence that their findings accurately portray the intended population.
    Population Sampling
    Population sampling is a technique used to gather opinions or data from a smaller group to make inferences about the entire population. It serves as a practical approach since reaching every individual in a population is often impractical or impossible.

    Maria needed to conduct her population sampling differently. Instead of selecting individuals at an event like a church picnic, she should aim to engage a more varied set of participants from multiple backgrounds and locations within the state. This broader scope would provide a clearer picture of the voting population's stance on capital punishment.
    To conduct effective population sampling:
  • Define the target population clearly and understand its variety
  • Choose a sampling method that matches the study's needs and objectives, such as random sampling or systematic sampling
  • Regularly check for sampling adequacy to ensure that the collected sample reflects the population's variability

  • This approach enhances the reliability of conclusions drawn about the broader populace.
    Statistical Error
    Statistical error is a deviation of the sample result from the actual population characteristic. It can occur due to bias or other defects in the sampling method. In Maria's situation, statistical error crept in because her sample was not representative, skewing her results away from the actual sentiment of the state voters.

    Addressing statistical errors involves recognizing potential biases and designing sampling strategies to minimize them. It's also important to differentiate between different types of errors:
    • Random errors occur by chance and usually aren't completely avoidable
    • Systematic errors are consistent biases in the sampling method and can skew research results

    To mitigate statistical errors:
  • Enhance data accuracy through cross-validation and repeated sampling
  • Use larger samples to lower the margin of error and get results closer to the actual population parameter
  • Apply weighting adjustments to balance differences between the sample and the overall population

  • By understanding and reducing statistical errors, researchers can achieve more reliable and valid findings.

    One App. One Place for Learning.

    All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

    Get started for free

    Most popular questions from this chapter

    Suppose that, when taking a random sample of three students' GPAs, you get a sample mean of \(3.90 .\) This sample mean is far higher than the collegewide (population) mean. Does that prove that your sample is biased? Explain. What else could have caused this high mean?

    In the primaries leading up to the 2016 presidential election, the Business Insider reported that Bernie Sanders and Hilary Clinton were in a "statistical tie" in the polls leading up to the Vermont primary. Clinton led Sanders \(43 \%\) to \(35 \%\) in the polls, with a margin of error of \(5.2 \%\). Explain what this means to someone who may be unfamiliar with margin of error and confidence intervals.

    In 2003 and 2017 Gallup asked Democratic voters about their views on the FBI. In \(2003,44 \%\) thought the FBI did a good or excellent job. In \(2017,69 \%\) of Democratic voters felt this way. Assume these percentages are based on samples of 1200 Democratic voters. a. Can we conclude, on the basis of these two percentages alone, that the proportion of Democratic voters who think the FBI is doing a good or excellent job has increase from 2003 to \(2017 ?\) Why or why not? b. Check that the conditions for using a two-proportion confidence interval hold. You can assume that the sample is a random sample. c. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the proportions of Democratic voters who believe the FBI is doing a good or excellent job, \(p_{1}-p_{2}\). Let \(p_{1}\) be the proportion of Democratic voters who felt this way in 2003 and \(p_{2}\) be the proportion of Democratic voters who felt this way in 2017 . d. Interpret the interval you constructed in part c. Has the proportion of Democratic voters who feel this way increased? Explain.

    In the 1960 presidential election, \(34,226,731\) people voted for Kennedy, \(34,108,157\) for Nixon, and 197,029 for third-party candidates (Source: www.uselectionatlas.org). a. What percentage of voters chose Kennedy? b. Would it be appropriate to find a confidence interval for the proportion of voters choosing Kennedy? Why or why not?

    a. If a rifleman's gunsight is adjusted incorrectly, he might shoot bullets consistently close to 2 feet left of the bull's-eye target. Draw a sketch of the target with the bullet holes. Does this show lack of precision or bias? b. Draw a second sketch of the target if the shots are both unbiased and precise (have little variation). The rifleman's aim is not perfect, so your sketches should show more than one bullet hole.

    See all solutions

    Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

    View all explanations

    What do you think about this solution?

    We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

    Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.