/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 38 In 2015, the National Highway Tr... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In 2015, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reported the number of pedestrian fatalities in San Francisco County was 24 and that the number in Los Angeles County was 209. Can we conclude that pedestrians are safer in San Francisco than in Los Angeles? Why or why not? If you answered no, what additional data would allow us to make a conclusion about which county is safer for pedestrians? (Source: https://cdan.nhtsa.gov)

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, we cannot conclude that pedestrians are safer in San Francisco than in Los Angeles based simply on the number of pedestrian fatalities. To compare safety, we need relative rates, such as number of pedestrian fatalities per 10,000 persons, which requires knowing the population of each county.

Step by step solution

01

Analyze the presented data

The raw data presented shows that in 2015, there were 24 pedestrian fatalities in San Francisco County, and 209 in Los Angeles County.
02

Understand the question

Now, the key question is whether pedestrians are safer in San Francisco than in Los Angeles based on these raw numbers.
03

Consider missing information

To answer this question appropriately, additional information is necessary. The total population of each County need to be known to effectively determine the fatality rate. A smaller number of fatalities doesn't necessarily equate to a lower fatality rate if the population size is significantly smaller.
04

Identify the required data

If the populations can be obtained, then a fair comparison would involve calculating the number of pedestrian fatalities per person (or per 1000 or 10000 persons for easier reading) in each County.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Data Analysis
When we talk about data analysis, we're discussing the techniques used to make sense of gathered data. In this case, we're looking at pedestrian fatality numbers from two counties. When analyzing such data, it's important to consider:
  • The context in which the data was collected, such as the year and location.
  • The raw numbers, while informative, do not always tell the whole story.
  • Additional variables that could influence the interpretation, like population size or environmental factors.
Given the case of San Francisco and Los Angeles, data analysis requires looking beyond just the number of fatalities. It involves understanding the broader implications and influences on those numbers. Only then can meaningful conclusions be drawn and comparisons be made.
Fatality Rates
Fatality rates provide a more accurate comparison than raw fatality numbers. They show the number of fatalities relative to the population size. The formula used to calculate the fatality rate is:\[\text{Fatality Rate} = \frac{\text{Number of Fatalities}}{\text{Population Size}} \times 100,000\]This calculation gives you the number of fatalities per 100,000 people. By converting the raw fatality numbers to rates, you gain a clearer view of the actual safety conditions in each area. Comparing fatality rates, rather than raw numbers, helps avoid misleading conclusions that might arise from differences in population size. For instance, a higher number of fatalities in a county with a larger population may actually signify a lower fatality rate compared to a smaller county with fewer fatalities.
Population Data
Population data is crucial for calculating fatality rates. It refers to the total number of people living in a specific area. Without this information, you cannot accurately compare the safety of San Francisco to Los Angeles, regardless of pedestrian fatalities.
  • Population data should be as current and accurate as possible.
  • It's important to obtain reliable sources, such as census or government reports.
  • Population size is a dynamic factor; always ensure you have data corresponding to the time when fatalities were recorded.
Gathering the population data and aligning it with fatality numbers opens the door to effective data analysis, leading to more realistic and practical conclusions.
NHTSA Report
The NHTSA, or National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, is a key source of traffic safety information, including pedestrian fatality reports. Their data helps provide insight into national and local safety trends. Understanding these reports involves:
  • Recognizing their role in tracking and improving traffic and pedestrian safety.
  • Utilizing their data to identify high-risk areas and patterns.
  • Examining these reports to guide policy makers and the public in implementing safety measures.
NHTSA reports serve as a basis for making data-driven decisions. They can inform safety campaigns and legislative changes to improve pedestrian safety and reduce fatalities.
Pedestrian Safety
Pedestrian safety refers to efforts made to protect people walking in traffic environments. It involves assessing risk factors and implementing measures to minimize accidents. Considerations for pedestrian safety include:
  • Infrastructure improvements, like crosswalks and traffic lights.
  • Education campaigns to enhance awareness among drivers and pedestrians.
  • Legislation aimed at enforcing safe driving practices.
By understanding pedestrian fatality data and analyzing it properly, measures can be taken to increase safety. The goal is to create environments where pedestrians can walk without fear of accidents, contributing to overall traffic safety and urban livability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The blog NHS Choices (February 10 , 2014) noted that "there has been increasing anecdotal evidence that vitamin C may still be useful as an anticancer medicine if used in high concentrations and given directly into the vein (intravenously)." Explain what it means that there is "increasing anecdotal evidence" that Vitamin C may be a useful anticancer medicine. How does anecdotal evidence contrast with scientific evidence? What kind of conclusions, if any, can be made from anecdotal evidence?

A student shared data from the StatCrunch Friend Data Application. Data on gender and number of wall posts for a sample of friends are shown below. (Source: StatCrunch, Facebook Friend Data, posted \(2 / 13 / 14\) ) \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline Male & Wall Posts \\ \hline 1 & 1916 \\ \hline 1 & 183 \\ \hline 1 & 836 \\ \hline 0 & 9802 \\ \hline 1 & 95 \\ \hline 1 & 512 \\ \hline 0 & 153 \\ \hline 0 & 1221 \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. Is the format of this data set stacked or unstacked? b. Explain the coding. What do 1 and 0 represent? c. If you answered "stacked" in part a, then unstack the data into two columns labeled Male and Female. If you answered "unstacked," then stack the data into one column and choose a appropriate name for the stacked variable.

A local public school encourages, but does not require, students to wear uniforms. The principal of the school compares the grade point averages (GPAs) of students at this school who wear uniforms with the GPAs of those who do not wear uniforms to determine whether those wearing uniforms tend to have higher GPAs.

An article in the journal \(B M C\) Medicine reported on a study designed to study the effect of diet on depression. Subjects suffering from moderate to severe depression were randomly assigned to one of two groups: a diet intervention group and a social support control group. The 33 subjects in the diet intervention group received counseling and support to adhere to a "ModiMedDiet," based primarily on a Mediterranean diet. The 34 subjects in the social support group participated in a "befriending" protocol, where trained personnel engaged in conversation and activities with participants. At the end of a 12 -week period, 11 of the diet intervention group achieved remission from depression compared to 3 of the control group. \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|} \hline & Diet (Intervention) & Support (Control) \\ \hline Remission & 11 & 3 \\ \hline No Remission & 22 & 31 \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. Find and compare the sample percentage of remission for each group. b. Was this a controlled experiment or an observational study? Explain. c. Can we conclude that the diet caused a remission in depression? Why of why not?

A study carried out by Baturin and colleagues looked at the effects of light on female mice. Fifty mice were randomly assigned to a regimen of 12 hours of light and 12 hours of dark (LD), while another 50 mice were assigned to 24 hours of light (LL). Researchers observed the mice for two years, beginning when the mice were 2 months old. Four of the LD mice and 14 of the \(\mathrm{LL}\) mice developed tumors. The accompanying table summarizes the data. (Source: Baturin et al., "The effect of light regimen and melatonin on the development of spontaneous mammary tumors in mice," Neuroendocrinology Letters, vol. 22 [December \(2001]: 441-447)\) \begin{tabular}{|l|r|c|} \hline & LD & LL \\ \hline Tumors & 4 & 14 \\ \hline No tumors & 46 & 36 \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. Determine the percentage of mice that developed tumors from each group (LL and LD). Compare them and comment. b. Was this a controlled experiment or an observational study? How do you know? c. Can we conclude that light for 24 hours a day causes an increase in tumors in mice? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.