/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 152 An article in the Journal of the... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

An article in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics reported on a study of diet in subjects with moderate to severe acne. Read the excerpts from the abstract and answer the questions that follow. (Source: Burris et al. "Differences in dietary glycemic load and hormones in New York City adults with no or moderate/severe acne," Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, vol. 117 \([\) September 2017\(]: 1375-1383\) ) Methods: Sixty-four participants (no acne, \(\mathrm{n}=32\); moderate/severe acne, \(n=32\) ) were included in this study. Participants completed a 5-day food record, had blood drawn and completed a questionnaire to evaluate food- aggravated acne beliefs and acne-specific quality of life. Results: Participants with moderate/severe acne consumed greater total carbohydrate compared to participants without acne. Participants with moderate/severe acne had greater insulin compared to participants without acne. Although there were no differences between groups, \(61 \%\) of participants reported food-influenced acne. a. Was this a controlled experiment or an observational study? Explain how you know. b. Assuming the study was properly conducted, can we conclude that higher consumption of carbohydrates causes more severe acne? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The study was an observational study as there were no manipulations or interventions applied to the subjects. b. Based on the results of this observational study, we can only suggest an association between carbohydrate intake and incidence of acne, but we cannot definitively conclude a cause-effect relationship.

Step by step solution

01

Identifying the Type of Study

From the description given, this study seems to be an observational study as it reports observed characteristics of a specific group of individuals. There's no evidence of any manipulation or intervention applied to a treatment group as would be the case in a controlled experiment. The researchers simply observed the diets of subjects with no acne and those of individuals with moderate/severe acne and documented the findings.
02

Analysing the Cause-Effect Relationship

The study suggests an association or correlation between acute intake of carbohydrates and incidence of acne. However, caution must be exerted while interpreting such results. In an observational study, while it can be concluded that a relationship exists between two variables, it does not indicate a cause-and-effect relationship. There could be other factors (like hormones, genetics etc.) that could be influencing this finding. So, although there's an increase in carbohydrate intake amongst subjects with moderate to severe acne, it cannot be definitively concluded that higher consumption of carbohydrates causes more severe acne.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Dietary Analysis
In observational studies, dietary analysis plays a crucial role in understanding how different food components affect health conditions. In this specific study, researchers gathered data using 5-day food records from participants to analyze their diet, focusing on carbohydrate intake. This method helps in collecting detailed information about the participants' eating habits over a short period.

The dietary analysis provides insights into the type and quantity of food consumed by individuals who have varying degrees of acne. This information is vital because it could help identify potential dietary triggers that may contribute to skin conditions like acne. By understanding these patterns, nutritionists can develop dietary recommendations aimed at improving skin health.

It's important to note that dietary analysis in observational studies is limited by factors such as self-reporting, which can lead to inaccuracies. Therefore, while dietary analysis is a powerful tool, it's always interpreted cautiously alongside other data from the study.
Causal Inference
Causal inference is the process of drawing a conclusion about a cause-and-effect relationship between two variables. In the context of the acne study, researchers observed a possible link between carbohydrate intake and acne severity. However, making a causal inference requires more than just noticing a pattern; it involves proving that one factor directly causes an effect on another.

Observational studies can highlight associations but are not designed to establish causation. This is because they do not control external variables that could influence the results. For instance, while the study found a correlation between higher carbohydrate consumption and more severe acne, without experimental manipulation, one cannot definitively claim that carbohydrates cause severe acne. Other factors, such as genetic predispositions or hormonal imbalances, might be the actual causes.
Statistical Correlation
Statistical correlation refers to a measure that describes the size and direction of a relationship between two or more variables. In the acne study, researchers identified a correlation between carbohydrate intake and acne severity. However, correlation should not be confused with causation.

When you observe a statistical correlation, it means there is a relationship where changes in one variable are associated with changes in another. In the study, as carbohydrate intake increased, so did the instances of moderate to severe acne. Nevertheless, a statistical correlation on its own does not imply that one caused the other. It simply indicates a connection worth investigating further.

Researchers should be cautious when interpreting correlations, particularly in observational studies, where external factors can influence the variables under study. Proper context and additional research are crucial to make informed conclusions about the data.
Variables in Research
Variables are critical components in any study as they are the elements that researchers manipulate, observe, or analyze. In the context of this observational study on acne, several key variables are at play.

The primary variables include:
  • Carbohydrate Intake: This is a variable monitored through dietary records, crucial for understanding dietary impacts on acne severity.
  • Acne Severity: Categorized as no acne or moderate/severe acne, this serves as an outcome variable.
  • Insulin Levels: Measured via blood tests, it is another variable that might be associated with the dietary habits observed.
Other potential variables include personal factors like hormonal levels and genetics, which can also affect acne.

By carefully identifying and analyzing these variables, researchers can better understand the observed phenomena. Nevertheless, in observational studies, it's challenging to control all variables, which complicates drawing direct causal conclusions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Cartilage is a smooth, rubber-like padding that protects the long bones in the body at the joints. A study by Lu et. al. in Arthritis Care \& Research found that women who drank one glass of milk daily had \(32 \%\) thicker, healthier cartilage than women who did not. Researchers obtained information on milk consumption through questionnaires and measured cartilage through x-rays. In the article, researched conclude, "Our study suggested that frequent milk intake may be associated with reduced OA progression in women." (Source: Lu et al., "Milk consumption and progression of medial tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis: Data from the osteoarthritis initiative," Arthritis Care \& Research, vol. 66 [June \(2014]: 802-809\), https: \(/ /\) doi.org \(/ 10.10002 /\) acr. 22297 Does this study show drinking milk causes increased cartilage production? Why or why not?

The table gives the prison population and total population for a sample of states in \(2014-15 .\) (Source: The 2017 World Almanac and Book of Facts) \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|} \hline State & Prison Population & Total Population \\ \hline California & 136,088 & \(39,144,818\) \\ \hline New York & 52,518 & \(19,795,791\) \\ \hline Illinois & 48,278 & \(12,859,995\) \\ \hline Louisiana & 38,030 & \(4,670,724\) \\ \hline Mississippi & 18,793 & \(2,992,333\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} Find the number of people in prison per thousand residents in each state and rank each state from the highest rate (rank 1) to the lowest rank (rank 6). Compare these rankings of rates with the ranks of total numbers of people in prison. Of the states in this table, which state has the highest prison population? Which state has the highest rate of imprisonment? Explain why these two answers are different.

Patients with Alzheimer's disease are randomly divided into two groups. One group is given a new drug, and the other is given a placebo. After six months they are given a memory test to see whether the new drug fights Alzheimer's better than a placebo.

Effects of Tutoring on Math Grades (Example 8) A group of educators want to determine how effective tutoring is in raising students" grades in a math class, so they arrange free tutoring for those who want it. Then they compare final exam grades for the group that took advantage of the tutoring and the group that did not. Suppose the group participating in the tutoring tended to receive higher grades on the exam. Does that show that the tutoring worked? If not, explain why not and suggest a confounding variable.

Babies 6 to 23 months of age with inner ear infections were given antibiotics. The children were randomly assigned to receive antibiotics for a full 10 days or to receive antibiotics for 5 days and then a placebo for 5 days. There were 229 children assigned the shorter course, and 77 of them had "clinical failure" whereas of the 238 assigned to the longer course of antibiotics, 39 had clinical failure. (Source: Hoberman et al., "Shortened antimicrobial treatment for acute otitis media in young children," New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 375 [December 2016]: \(2446-2456)\) a. Compare the percentage of clinical failure in each group and state which group did better. b. Create a two-way table with 10 days and 5 days across the top and failure and success down the left side. Fill in all four numbers. c. Was this an observational study or a controlled experiment? How do you know? d. Can you conclude that the treatment caused the difference? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.