/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 78 An economist was interested in s... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

An economist was interested in studying the impact of the recession on dining out, including drivethru meals at fast food restaurants. A random sample of forty-cight families of four with discretionary incomes between \(\$ 300\) and \(\$ 400\) per week indicated that they reduced their spending on dining out by an average of \(\$ 31.47\) per week, with a sample standard deviation of \(\$ 10.95 .\) Another random sample of 42 families of five with discretionary incomes between \(\$ 300\) and \(\$ 400\) per week reduced their spending on dining out by an average \(\$ 35.28\) per week, with a sample standard deviation of \(\$ 12.37\). (Note that the two groups of families are differentiated by the number of family members.) Assume that the distributions of reductions in weekly dining-out spendings for the two groups have the same population standard deviation. a. Construct a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the mean weekly reduction in diningout spending levels for the populations. b. Using a \(5 \%\) significance level, can you conclude that the average weekly spending reduction for all families of four with discretionary incomes between \(\$ 300\) and \(\$ 400\) per week is less than the average weekly spending reduction for all families of five with discretionary incomes between \(\$ 300\) and \(\$ 400\) per week?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The confidence interval will give the range of values within which the difference in average spending reduction between the two groups of families lies with a 90% confidence. Based on the t-test results, we can state whether the average spending reduction for families of four is less than those for families of five with a certain level of confidence.

Step by step solution

01

Formulate Hypotheses for each Part

For part a, the goal is to construct a 90% confidence interval for the difference between two means, hence a null hypothesis can be formulated as Ho: u1 - u2 = 0 which means there is no difference in mean weekly reduction between families of four and five. The alternative hypothesis would then be Ha: u1 - u2 != 0 suggesting there is a difference. For part b, the goal is to test the assumption that the weekly spending reduction for families of four is less than families of five. So null hypothesis can be Ho: u1 >= u2 and alternative hypothesis Ha: u1 < u2.
02

Define and Apply Confidence Interval Calculation

For part a, the formula for calculating confidence interval for difference of means is: (X1 - X2) ± Z(α/2)*sqrt((SD12/n1) + (SD22/n2)). Where X1 and X2 are sample means, n1 and n2 are the sample sizes, and SD1 and SD2 are the standard deviations. Substituting the given values to compute the confidence interval.
03

Compute t Statistic for Hypothesis Testing

For part b, we need to calculate the t-statistic with the formula: t = (X1 - X2 - D0)/(sqrt((SD12/n1) + (SD22/n2))), where D0 is the hypothesized difference between population means which is zero in this case. The calculated t score will be compared with the critical t score for a 5% significance level and a certain degree of freedom to determine whether to reject the null hypothesis.
04

Make Decision based on t Statistic

If the calculated t-statistic is less than the critical t-score, then null hypothesis is not rejected. Otherwise, the null hypothesis is rejected in favour of the alternative hypothesis suggesting the spending reduction for families of four is less than families of five.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Confidence Interval
A confidence interval is a valuable statistical tool used to estimate a range of values that is likely to contain an unknown population parameter. In the context of this problem, the goal is to construct a 90% confidence interval for the difference between two means: the average weekly reduction in dining-out spending between two groups of families.
To construct this confidence interval, we use the formula: \[(X_1 - X_2) \pm Z_{\frac{\alpha}{2}} \times \sqrt{\left(\frac{SD_1^2}{n_1}\right) + \left(\frac{SD_2^2}{n_2}\right)}\]where:
  • \(X_1\) and \(X_2\) are the sample means for families of four and five, respectively.
  • \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) are the sample sizes.
  • \(SD_1\) and \(SD_2\) are the sample standard deviations.
  • \(Z_{\frac{\alpha}{2}}\) is the Z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level, in this case, 90%.
This formula helps to identify a range in which the true difference in means is likely to lie, with 90% confidence. This does not mean that 90% of all possible observations fall within this range, but rather it means there is a 90% chance that the true difference in means falls within this interval.
T-statistic
A t-statistic is often used in statistical hypothesis testing to determine if there is a significant difference between sample means. In this exercise, a t-statistic is used to compare the mean reduction in dining-out spending between families of four and families of five.
The t-statistic is calculated using the formula:\[t = \frac{(X_1 - X_2 - D_0)}{\sqrt{\frac{SD_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{SD_2^2}{n_2}}}\]where:
  • \(D_0\) is the hypothesized difference in population means, often assumed to be zero when testing for equality of means.
Once the t-statistic is computed, it is compared with a critical value from the t-distribution. This helps to decide whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. The critical value is determined based on the chosen significance level and the degrees of freedom of the test.
Mean Comparison
Mean comparison is a statistical method used to determine whether there is a significant difference between the means of two or more groups. In this case, the means being compared are the average reductions in dining-out spending for two different family sizes.
By comparing these means, it is possible to assess if the economic impact, such as a recession, differently affects families based on size. A significant mean difference suggests that one family group is reducing their spending more than the other, possibly due to different financial pressures or priorities.
To effectively compare means, statistical methods like confidence intervals and hypothesis testing (using t-statistics) are employed, providing insights into whether observed differences are statistically meaningful or could have occurred by random chance.
Significance Level
The significance level, usually denoted as \(\alpha\), is a critical concept in hypothesis testing. It represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true – in other words, making a Type I error. For this exercise, a significance level of 5% (or 0.05) is used.
This means that there is a 5% risk of concluding that there is a difference in spending reductions when there actually isn't one.
Selecting a significance level involves a trade-off between sensitivity (detecting a true effect) and specificity (avoiding a false positive). A smaller \(\alpha\) results in a more stringent test but might also miss detecting a true effect.
In practice, the significance level dictates the critical value against which the test statistic is compared. By setting a 5% significance level, the t-critical value we use forms the threshold in deciding whether the observed data is sufficiently unexpected under the null hypothesis to warrant rejecting it.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A high school counselor wanted to know if tenth-graders at her high school tend to have more free time than the twelfth-graders. She took random samples of 25 tenth-graders and 23 twelfth-graders. Each student was asked to record the amount of free time he or she had in a typical week. The mean for the tenthgraders was found to be 29 hours of free time per week with a standard deviation of \(7.0\) hours. For the twelfthgraders, the mean was 22 hours of free time per week with a standard deviation of \(6.2\) hours. Assume that the two populations are normally distributed with equal but unknown population standard deviations. a. Make a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the difference between the corresponding population means. b. Test at a \(5 \%\) significance level whether the two population means are different.

The standard recommendation for automobile oil changes is once every 3000 miles. A local mechanic is interested in determining whether people who drive more expensive cars are more likely to follow the recommendation. Independent random samples of 45 customers who drive luxury cars and 40 customers who drive compact lower-price cars were selected. The average distance driven between oil changes was 3187 miles for the luxury car owners and 3214 miles for the compact lower-price cars. The sample standard deviations were \(42.40\) and \(50.70\) miles for the luxury and compact groups, respectively. Assume that the population distributions of the distances between oil changes have the same standard deviation for the two populations. a. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the mean distances between oil changes for all luxury cars and all compact lower-price cars. b. Using a \(1 \%\) significance level, can you conclude that the mean distance between oil changes is less for all luxury cars than that for all compact lower-price cars?

According to Exercise \(10.27\), an insurance company wants to know if the average speed at which men drive cars is higher than that of women drivers. The company took a random sample of 27 cars driven by men on a highway and found the mean speed to be 72 miles per hour with a standard deviation of \(2.2\) miles per hour. Another sample of 18 cars driven by women on the same highway gave a mean speed of 68 miles per hour with a standard deviation of \(2.5\) miles per hour. Assume that the speeds at which all men and all women drive cars on this highway are both normally distributed with unequal population standard deviations. a. Construct a \(98 \%\) confidence interval for the difference between the mean speeds of cars driven by all men and all women on this highway. b. Test at a \(1 \%\) significance level whether the mean speed of cars driven by all men drivers on this highway is higher than that of cars driven by all women drivers. c. Suppose that the sample standard deviations were \(1.9\) and \(3.4\) miles per hour, respectively. Redo parts a and b. Discuss any changes in the results.

A sample of 1000 observations taken from the first population gave \(x_{1}=290 .\) Another sample of 1200 observations taken from the second population gave \(x_{2}=396\). a. Find the point estimate of \(p_{1}-p_{2}\) b. Make a \(98 \%\) confidence interval for \(p_{1}-p_{2}\) c. Show the rejection and nonrejection regions on the sampling distribution of \(\hat{p}_{1}-\hat{p}_{2}\) for \(H_{0}=p_{1}=p_{2}\) versus \(H_{1}: p_{1}

The U.S. Department of Labor collects data on unemployment insurance payments made to unemployed people in different states. Suppose that during 2011 a random sample of 1000 unemployed people in Florida received an average weekly unemployment benefit of \(\$ 219.65\), while a random sample of 900 unemployed people in Mississippi received an average weekly unemployment benefit of \(\$ 191.47\). Assume that the population standard deviations of 2011 weekly unemployment benefits paid to all unemployed workers in Florida and Mississippi were \(\$ 35.15\) and \(\$ 28.22\), respectively. (Note: A 2011 study by DailyFinance.com (http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/05/12/unemployment- benefits-best-worst-states/) rated Mississippi and Florida as the two worst states for unemployment benefits.) a. Let \(\mu_{1}\) and \(\mu_{2}\) be the means of weekly unemployment benefits paid to all unemployed workers during 2011 in Florida and Mississippi, respectively. What is the point estimate of \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2} ?\) b. Construct a \(96 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\). c. Using a \(2 \%\) significance level, can you conclude that the means of all weekly unemployment benefits paid to all unemployed workers during 2011 in Florida and Mississippi are different? IIse both the \(p\) -value and the critical-value annroaches to make this.te-

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.