/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 32 According to the credit rating a... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

According to the credit rating agency Equifax, credit limits on newly issued credit cards increased between January 2011 and May 2011 (money.cnn.com/2011/08/19/pf/credit_card_issuance/index.htm). Suppose that random samples of 400 credit cards issued in January 2011 and 500 credit cards issued in May 2011 had average credit limits of \(\$ 2635\) and \(\$ 2887\), respectively. Suppose that the sample standard deviations for these two samples were \(\$ 365\) and \(\$ 412\), respectively, and the assumption that the population standard deviations are equal for the two populations is reasonable. a. Let \(\mu_{1}\) and \(\mu_{2}\) be the average credit limits on all credit cards issued in January 2011 and in May 2011 , respectively. What is the point estimate of \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) ? b. Construct a \(98 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) c. Using a \(1 \%\) significance level, can you conclude that the average credit limit for all new credit cards issued in January 2011 was lower than the corresponding average for all credit cards issued in May 2011 ? Use both the \(p\) -value and the critical-value approaches to make this test.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The point estimate of \(\mu_{1} - \mu_{2}\) is -$252. b. The 98% confidence interval needs to be computed using the formula and values provided. c. Hypothesis testing needs to be conducted using 1% significance level. The built confidence interval and z-test will provide evidence to reject or not reject the null hypothesis.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Point Estimate for \(\mu_{1} - \mu_{2}\)

The point estimate of \(\mu_{1} - \mu_{2}\) is the difference between the sample means of the two samples, \(\bar{x}_{1} - \bar{x}_{2}\) which equals $2635 - $2887 = -$252.
02

Construct a 98% Confidence Interval for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\)

To construct the confidence interval, we need the standard error, which is calculated as: \(SE = \sqrt{\frac{s_{1}^{2}}{n_{1}} + \frac{s_{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}}\), where \(s_{1}\) and \(s_{2}\) are the sample standard deviations and \(n_{1}\) and \(n_{2}\) are the sample sizes of the two groups. Substituting the provided values: \(SE = \sqrt{\frac{(365)^{2}}{400} + \frac{(412)^{2}}{500}}\). The z-value for a 98% confidence interval is 2.33. Hence, the confidence interval is given by: \(CI = (\bar{x}_{1} - \bar{x}_{2}) \pm z_{\alpha/2} * SE\)
03

Perform Hypothesis Testing

Firstly, formulate the null and alternative hypothesis. \(H_{0}: \mu_{1} - \mu_{2} = 0\), the average credit limits are equal. \(H_{1}: \mu_{1} - \mu_{2} < 0\), the average credit limit of January 2011 is lower. We need to conduct a two-tailed test with 1% significance level. The testing statistic, z, is calculated as: \(z = \frac{(\bar{x}_{1} - \bar{x}_{2}) - D}{SE}\), where D is the difference in population means under the null hypothesis (0). Compute the p-value and the critical value and compare.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a method used to make decisions about population parameters based on sample data. Here, we want to see if the average credit limit for credit cards in January 2011 is lower than in May 2011.

We start by defining our hypotheses:
  • Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)): There is no difference in the average credit limits, or \( \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 0 \).
  • Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_1\)): The average credit limit in January is lower, or \( \mu_1 - \mu_2 < 0\).
Next, we calculate the test statistic using the formula:
\( \text{z} = \frac{(\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) - D}{SE}\)\, where \(D\) is 0 under the null hypothesis. The calculated z-value will help us find the p-value, which tells us the probability of observing our data if the null hypothesis is true.

If the p-value is less than 0.01 (our significance level), or if our z-value is less than the critical z-value at 1%, we reject the null hypothesis and accept that there is a difference.
Confidence Interval
A confidence interval provides a range of values for a population parameter based on sample data. Here, we're looking for a 98% confidence interval for the difference in credit limits from January to May.The confidence interval is calculated with:
\( \text{CI} = (\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) \pm z_{\alpha/2} \times SE\)\,
where \(z_{\alpha/2}\) for a 98% confidence level is 2.33. The standard error (SE) is crucial here, informing us of the variability in our samples.

This interval gives us a range where we expect the true difference in population means to lie, 98% of the time. If the interval doesn't include 0, it suggests a significant difference.
Point Estimate
The point estimate provides a single best guess for a population parameter based on sample data. In this exercise, it's the difference in average credit limits between two periods. The point estimate is determined by the difference in sample means: \( \bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2 = 2635 - 2887 = -252\)\.

This means, on average, credit limits were \( \$252\) lower in January compared to May. This single value is critical as it represents the observed effect in the data.
Sample Standard Deviation
The sample standard deviation is a measure of the variability or spread in a data set. Here, it tells us how much the credit limits vary in each sample month.For January 2011, the standard deviation is \( \\(365\), and for May 2011, it's \( \\)412\). These values are used to compute the standard error:
  • January: \(s_1 = 365\)
  • May: \(s_2 = 412\)
A larger standard deviation indicates more variability in credit limits. By converting these into a standard error, we get an understanding of how reliable our sample means are in estimating the true population means.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Assuming that the two populations have unequal and unknown population standard deviations, construct a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) for the following. $$ \begin{array}{lll} n_{1}=48 & \bar{x}_{1}=.863 & s_{1}=.176 \\ n_{2}=46 & \bar{x}_{2}=.796 & s_{2}=.068 \end{array} $$

Construct a 99 ?o confidence interval for \(p_{1}-p_{2}\) for the following. $$ n_{1}=300, \quad \hat{p}_{1}=.55, \quad n_{2}=200, \quad \hat{p}_{2}=.62 $$

A mail-order company has two warehouses, one on the West Coast and the second on the East Coast. The company's policy is to mail all orders placed with it within 72 hours. The company's quality control department checks quite often whether or not this policy is maintained at the two warehouses. A recently taken sample of 400 orders placed with the warehouse on the West Coast showed that 364 of them were mailed within 72 hours. Another sample of 300 orders placed with the warehouse on the East Coast showed that 279 of them were mailed within 72 hours. a. Construct a \(97 \%\) confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of all orders placed at the two warehouses that are mailed within 72 hours. b. Using a \(2.5 \%\) significance level, can you conclude that the proportion of all orders placed at the warehouse on the West Coast that are mailed within 72 hours is lower than the corresponding proportion for the warehouse on the East Coast?

According to Pew Research Center surveys, \(79 \%\) of U.S. adults were using the Internet in January 2011 and \(83 \%\) were using it in January 2012 (USA TODAY, January 26,2012 ). Suppose that these percentages are based on random samples of 1800 U.S. adults in January 2011 and 1900 in January \(2012 .\) a. Let \(p_{1}\) and \(p_{2}\) be the proportions of all U.S. adults who were using the Internet in January 2011 and January 2012, respectively. Construct a \(98 \%\) confidence interval for \(p_{1}-p_{2}\) b. Using a \(1 \%\) significance level, can you conclude that \(p_{1}\) is lower than \(p_{2}\) ? Use both the criticalvalue and the \(p\) -value approaches.

The owner of a mosquito-infested fishing camp in Alaska wants to test the effectiveness of two rival brands of mosquito repellents, \(\mathrm{X}\) and \(\mathrm{Y}\). During the first month of the season, eight people are chosen at random from those guests who agree to take part in the experiment. For each of these guests, Brand \(\bar{X}\) is randomly applied to one arm and Brand \(\mathrm{Y}\) is applied to the other arm. These guests fish for 4 hours, then the owner counts the number of bites on each arm. The table below shows the number of bites on the arm with Brand \(X\) and those on the arm with Brand \(Y\) for each guest. \begin{tabular}{l|rrrrrrrr} \hline Guest & A & B & C & D & E & F & G & H \\ \hline Brand X & 12 & 23 & 18 & 36 & 8 & 27 & 22 & 32 \\ \hline Brand Y & 9 & 20 & 21 & 27 & 6 & 18 & 15 & 25 \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean \(\mu_{d}\) of population paired differences, where a paired difference is defined as the number of bites on the arm with Brand \(X\) minus the number of bites on the arm with Brand \(Y\). b. Test at a \(5 \%\) significance level whether the mean number of bites on the arm with Brand \(\mathrm{X}\) and the mean number of bites on the arm with Brand \(Y\) are different for all such guests.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.