/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 121 Professor Hansen believes that s... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Professor Hansen believes that some people have the ability to predict in advance the outcome of a spin of a roulette wheel. He takes 100 student volunteers to a casino. The roulette wheel has 38 numbers, each of which is equally likely to occur. Of these 38 numbers, 18 are red, 18 are black, and 2 are green. Each student is to place a serics of five bets, choosing either a red or a black number before each spin of the wheel. Thus, a student who bets on red has an \(18 / 38\) chance of winning that bet. The same is true of betting on black. a. Assuming random guessing, what is the probability that a particular student will win all five of his or her bets? b. Suppose for each student we formulate the hypothesis test \(H_{0}:\) The student is guessing \(H_{1}:\) The student has some predictive ability Suppose we reject \(H_{0}\) only if the student wins all five bets. What is the significance level? c. Suppose that 2 of the 100 students win all five of their bets. Professor Hansen says, "For these two students we can reject \(H_{0}\) and conclude that we have found two students with some ability to predict." What do you make of Professor Hansen's conclusion?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The probability that a particular student will win all five of his or her bets is \((18/38)^5\). \n b. The significance level of the test, where we reject the null hypothesis if a student wins all five bets, is also \((18/38)^5\). \n c. Professor Hansen's conclusion may lack sufficient statistical evidence. Even if 2 out of 100 students win all their five bets, it could be due to chance. Additionally, by conducting 100 tests, he increases the possibility of an unusual result simply due to chance rather than to a real effect.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the probability of a student winning all five bets

By calculating the probability of a single event winning, which is \(18/38\), and given that each event is independent of each other, then the probability of a student winning all five bets is \((18/38)^5\). This is because for independent events, the probability of all events occurring is the product of the probabilities of each event.
02

Determine the significance level

The significance level of a test is the probability of erroneously rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true. This is often denoted as \(\alpha\). From the information given, we reject the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\) if a student wins all five bets. So the significance level is the probability that a student wins all five bets, which is the same as the probability calculated in Step 1, \((18/38)^5\).
03

Evaluate Professor Hansen's conclusion

If 2 out of 100 students win all five of their bets, it could potentially be due to random chance. This is because two students winning five times in a row does not provide strong enough evidence to conclusively reject the null hypothesis that they were guessing. It's also important to consider that by conducting 100 tests, we are increasing the chance of seeing an unusual result simply due to chance. Thus, Professor Hansen's conclusion may lack sufficient statistical evidence.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental concept in probability theory and statistics. It helps us make decisions based on data. When we're unsure about a particular situation or outcome, we can form hypotheses. A hypothesis is a proposed explanation or assumption that we want to test. In our scenario with the roulette wheel, we create two hypotheses:
  • Null Hypothesis ( H_{0} ): The students are guessing. This is our default or initial assumption, meaning there's no special ability involved.
  • Alternative Hypothesis ( H_{1} ): The students have some predictive ability. This suggests the students have an above-average ability to predict outcomes.
By setting up these hypotheses, we can test if students' results align more with guessing or predictive abilities. If the outcome is very unlikely under our null hypothesis, we might consider rejecting it. But we need sufficient evidence to do so, which often involves probability calculations.
Significance Level Explained
The significance level, often represented as α (alpha), is the probability threshold for deciding when to reject the null hypothesis. It's crucial because it helps us determine the threshold for what we consider being a rare or unlikely event. In our example, we decide only to reject the null hypothesis if a student wins all five bets.

This means the significance level is equal to the probability of this happening under the assumption of random guessing. Thus, if α is very low, it means we require strong evidence against the null hypothesis. However, setting a very low α also means there's a low chance of rejecting the null hypothesis when it might, in fact, be false. In our case, Professor Hansen uses the probability of a student winning all five bets as the significance level, reflecting the choosing a risky approach with a potentially higher error due to limited trials.
Role of Independent Events
In probability, independent events are those whose outcomes do not affect each other. This concept is critical when calculating the probability of multiple events happening in sequence.

With our roulette example, each spin of the wheel is independent of the others. This means the outcome of one spin does not change the probability of any subsequent spin. When betting, a student's chances on any bet remain constant at 18/38 regardless of previous results. Therefore, to find the probability of winning multiple times in a row, we multiply the probabilities of each independent event. This calculation underscores each event's independence, maintaining an unchanging probability across all predictions.
Clarifying the Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis ( H_{0} ) is an essential part of hypothesis testing. It serves as the baseline or standard assumption in an experiment or test. Often, the null hypothesis proposes no effect or no difference, suggesting any observations are due to chance.

In the case of Professor Hansen’s experiment, the null hypothesis states that students are merely guessing. This means that any observed success is not due to predictive ability, but random chance.
  • A careful evaluation of how often we reject H_{0} tells us about potential errors. By understanding the idea of the null hypothesis, we see the importance of sufficient evidence before reaching a conclusion, ensuring that decisions are based on objective data rather than subjective belief.
Grasping Roulette Probability
Roulette is a game of chance played with a wheel, where users bet on the outcome of where a small ball will land on a spinning wheel. Each number on the wheel is equally likely to occur. Understanding roulette probability is vital in assessing wins and losses in the game.

On a standard American roulette wheel, there are 38 numbered slots. With segments for red, black, and green, the probabilities translate to:
  • Red: \(\frac{18}{38}\)
  • Black: \(\frac{18}{38}\)
  • Green (0 and 00): \(\frac{2}{38}\)
When a student bets on red or black, their probability of winning is 18/38 each spin. These odds frame hypothesis tests, helping quantify the randomness as students potentially exhibit luck or skill. Roulette probability assists in providing perspective for comparing observed results to expected outcomes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Thirty percent of all people who are inoculated with the current vaccine used to prevent a disease contract the disease within a year. The developer of a new vaccine that is intended to prevent this disease wishes to test for significant evidence that the new vaccine is more effective. a. Determine the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses. b. The developer decides to study 100 randomly selected people by inoculating them with the new vaccine. If 84 or more of them do not contract the disease within a year, the developer will conclude that the new vaccine is superior to the old one. What significance level is the developer using for the test? c. Suppose 20 people inoculated with the new vaccine are studied and the new vaccine is concluded to be better than the old one if fewer than 3 people contract the disease within a year. What is the significance level of the test?

A study claims that \(65 \%\) of students at all colleges and universities hold off-campus (part-time or full-time) jobs. You want to check if the percentage of students at your school who hold off-campus jobs is different from \(65 \%\). Briefly explain how you would conduct such a test. Collect data from 40 students at your school on whether or not they hold off-campus jobs. Then, calculate the proportion of students in this sample who hold off-campus jobs. Using this information, test the hypothesis. Select your own significance level.

As reported on carefair.com (November 15,2006\(), 40 \%\) of women aged 30 years and older would rather get Botox injections than spend a week in Paris. In a recent survey of 400 women aged 65 years and older, 108 women would rather get Botox injections than spend a week in Paris. Using a \(10 \%\) significance level, perform a test of hypothesis to determine whether the current percentage of women aged 65 years or older who would rather get Botox injections than spend a week in Paris is less than \(40 \%\). Use both the \(p\) -value and the critical-value approaches.

A business school claims that students who complete a 3 -month typing course can type, on average, at least 1200 words an hour. A random sample of 25 students who completed this course typed, on average, 1125 words an hour with a standard deviation of 85 words. Assume that the typing speeds for all students who complete this course have an approximately normal distribution. a. Suppose the probability of making a Type I error is selected to be zero. Can you conclude that the claim of the business school is true? Answer without performing the five steps of a test of hypothesis. b. Using the \(5 \%\) significance level, can you conclude that the claim of the business school is true? Use both approaches.

Make the following tests of hypotheses. a. \(H_{0}: \mu=80, \quad H_{1}: \mu \neq 80, \quad n=33, \quad \bar{x}=76.5, \quad \sigma=15, \quad \alpha=.10\) b. \(H_{0}: \mu=32, \quad H_{1}: \mu<32, \quad n=75, \quad \bar{x}=26.5, \quad \sigma=7.4, \quad \alpha=.01\) c. \(H_{0}: \mu=55, \quad H_{1}: \mu>55, \quad n=40, \quad \bar{x}=60.5, \quad \sigma=4, \quad \alpha=.05\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.