/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 46 Refer to Exercise \(10.32\). It ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Refer to Exercise \(10.32\). It was mentioned that the average credit limit on 200 credit cards issued during 2008 was \(\$ 4710\) with a standard deviation of \(\$ 485\), and the mean and standard deviation for 200 credit cards issued during the first 4 months of 2009 were \(\$ 4602\) and \(\$ 447\), respectively. Suppose that the standard deviations for the two populations are not equal. a. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the mean credit limits for all new credit cards issued in 2008 and during the first 4 months of 2009 . b. Using the \(2.5 \%\) significance level, can you conclude that the average credit limit for all new credit cards issued in 2008 is higher than the corresponding average for the first 4 months of \(2009 ?\) c. Suppose that the standard deviations for the two samples were \(\$ 590\) and \(\$ 257\), respectively. Redo parts a and b. Discuss any changes in the results.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The stepwise calculation will provide the 95% confidence interval for the difference in credit card limits between 2008 and 2009, and the hypothesis test at the 2.5% level will indicate whether the average limit in 2008 is significantly higher than in 2009. The process will be repeated with updated standard deviations to observe any changes in the results. This shows how changes in sample standard deviations can affect conclusions drawn from data.

Step by step solution

01

Identify given data

Identify and list down the given data. For 2008, the mean is \$4710 and the standard deviation is \$485. For 2009, the mean is \$4602 and the standard deviation is \$447. Both have a sample size of 200.
02

Calculate the standard error for the difference in means

The formula to calculate this is \(\sqrt{(\frac{s1^2}{n1}) + (\frac{s2^2}{n2})}\) where s1 and n1 are the standard deviation and sample size, respectively, for 2008 and s2 and n2 are for 2009.
03

Calculate the 95% confidence interval for the difference in means

The formula for this is \((\overline{x1} - \overline{x2}) \pm Z*SE\) where Z is the z-score for a 95% confidence level, which is 1.96, and SE is the standard error calculated in Step 2. \(\overline{x1}\) and \(\overline{x2}\) are the means for 2008 and 2009, respectively.
04

Interpret the confidence interval

This interval tells us that we can be 95% confident that the true difference in means lies within this interval.
05

Conduct a hypothesis test at the 2.5% significance level

The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in means, and the alternative hypothesis is that the average credit limit in 2008 is higher than in 2009. Calculate the test statistic using the formula \((\overline{x1} - \overline{x2}) / SE\), and compare it to the critical value from the t-distribution table at the 2.5% level.
06

Interpret the hypothesis test

If the test statistic is greater than the critical value, reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the mean credit limit in 2008 is significantly greater than in 2009.
07

Repeat steps 2-6 with updated standard deviations

Repeat the above steps with standard deviations of \$590 for 2008 and \$257 for 2009 and compare the results.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Confidence Interval
A confidence interval is a range of values, derived from the sample data, that is likely to contain the population parameter with a certain level of confidence. In our exercise, we want to determine a 95% confidence interval for the difference in mean credit limits between two different years.

To calculate this, we first need the means and standard deviations for both years. From the sample sizes and these values, we determine the standard error, which measures how much sampling variability there is in the estimate of the difference of means.
  • 2008: Mean = \\(4710, Standard deviation = \\)485
  • 2009: Mean = \\(4602, Standard deviation = \\)447
  • Both years have a sample size of 200.
With these, we use the formula:\[ (\overline{x_1} - \overline{x_2}) \pm Z \cdot SE \]where \(\overline{x_1} - \overline{x_2}\) is the difference in sample means, \(Z\) is the z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level (1.96 for 95%), and \(SE\) is the standard error. The confidence interval gives us a range we can be 95% sure contains the true difference between the means of the two years.
Difference of Means
The difference between two sample means can provide insights into how two populations compare. In this problem, we compare the mean credit limits from credit cards issued in 2008 versus the first part of 2009.

Calculating the difference of means involves simply subtracting the mean for 2009 from the mean for 2008:
\[\Delta \overline{x} = \overline{x_1} - \overline{x_2}\]In our scenario:
  • 2008 Mean = \\(4710
  • 2009 Mean = \\)4602
  • Difference = \\(4710 - \\)4602 = \$108
This tells us that, on average, the credit limit was slightly higher in 2008. However, to determine if this difference is statistically significant, we also need to conduct a hypothesis test using the standard error and significance levels.
Standard Error
The standard error plays a crucial role in hypothesis testing and confidence intervals. It measures the dispersion or "spread" of sample means around the population mean. In other words, it indicates how much we expect a sample mean to vary from the true population mean.

In our exercise, we calculate the standard error for the difference in means using the formula:\[SE = \sqrt{\left(\frac{s_1^2}{n_1}\right) + \left(\frac{s_2^2}{n_2}\right)}\]with \(s_1\) and \(s_2\) as the sample standard deviations and \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) as the sample sizes for 2008 and 2009, respectively.
  • 2008: Standard Deviation = \\(485
  • 2009: Standard Deviation = \\)447
  • Both Sample Sizes = 200
Calculating this gives us the standard error for the difference between these two yearly means. This helps assess the reliability of the conclusions we draw from our analyses, such as estimating confidence intervals or testing hypotheses.
Significance Level
The significance level is a critical concept in hypothesis testing, used to decide whether our results are statistically significant. In this exercise, we use a significance level of 2.5% (or \(\alpha = 0.025\)).

The significance level determines the threshold for rejecting the null hypothesis, often expressed as a percentage. A lower significance level means stricter criteria for confirming a statistically significant difference.
To test our hypothesis:
  • Null Hypothesis \(H_0\): The mean credit limit for 2008 is not higher than that of 2009.
  • Alternative Hypothesis \(H_1\): The mean credit limit for 2008 is higher than that of 2009.
We calculate the test statistic based on the difference in sample means and the corresponding standard error. Comparing it against the critical value from the Z or t-distribution (depending on sample size and standard deviation equality), we determine whether to reject \(H_0\).
Remember, if the calculated value exceeds the critical value, it suggests there's enough evidence to conclude a significant difference, thus supporting the alternative hypothesis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The manufacturer of a gasoline additive claims that the use of this additive increases gasoline mileage. A random sample of six cars was selected, and these cars were driven for 1 week without the gasoline additive and then for 1 week with the gasoline additive. The following table gives the miles per gallon for these cars without and with the gasoline additive. $$ \begin{array}{l|cccccc} \hline \text { Without } & 24.6 & 28.3 & 18.9 & 23.7 & 15.4 & 29.5 \\ \hline \text { With } & 26.3 & 31.7 & 18.2 & 25.3 & 18.3 & 30.9 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Construct a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the mean \(\mu_{d}\) of the population paired differences, where a paired difference is equal to the miles per gallon without the gasoline additive minus the miles per gallon with the gasoline additive. b. Using the \(2.5 \%\) significance level, can you conclude that the use of the gasoline additive increases the gasoline mileage?

According to the credit rating firm Equifax, credit limits on newly issued credit cards decreased between 2008 and the period of January to April 2009 (USA TODAY, July 7, 2009). Suppose that random samples of 200 credit cards issued in 2008 and 200 credit cards issued during the first 4 months of 2009 had average credit limits of \(\$ 4710\) and \(\$ 4602\), respectively, which are comparable to the values given in the article. Although no information about standard deviations was provided, suppose that the sample standard deviations for the 2008 and 2009 samples were \(\$ 485\) and \(\$ 447\), respectively, and that the assumption that the population standard deviations are equal for the two time periods is reasonable. a. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the mean credit limits for all new credit cards issued in 2008 and during the first 4 months of 2009 . b. Using the \(2.5 \%\) significance level, can you conclude that the average credit limit for all new credit cards issued in 2008 was higher than the corresponding average for the first 4 months of 2009 ?

In a random sample of 800 men aged 25 to 35 years, \(24 \%\) said they live with one or both parents. In another sample of 850 women of the same age group, \(18 \%\) said that they live with one or both parents. a. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of all men and all women aged 25 to 35 years who live with one or both parents. b. Test at the \(2 \%\) significance level whether the two population proportions are different. c. Repeat the test of part b using the \(p\) -value approach.

A new type of sleeping pill is tested against an older, standard pill. Two thousand insomniacs are randomly divided into two equal groups. The first group is given the old pill, and the second group receives the new pill. The time required to fall asleep after the pill is administered is recorded for each person. The results of the experiment are given in the following table, where \(\bar{x}\) and \(s\) represent the mean and standard deviation, respectively, for the times required to fall asleep for people in each group after the pill is taken. $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \hline & \begin{array}{c} \text { Group 1 } \\ \text { (Old PilI) } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Group 2 } \\ \text { (New Pill) } \end{array} \\ \hline n & 1000 & 1000 \\ \bar{x} & 15.4 \text { minutes } & 15.0 \text { minutes } \\ s & 3.5 \text { minutes } & 3.0 \text { minutes } \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Consider the test of hypothesis \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=0\) versus \(H_{1}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2}>0\), where \(\mu_{1}\) and \(\mu_{2}\) are the mean times required for all potential users to fall asleep using the old pill and the new pill, respectively. a. Find the \(p\) -value for this test. b. Does your answer to part a indicate that the result is statistically significant? Use \(\alpha=.025\). c. Find the \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\). d. Does your answer to part c imply that this result is of great practical significance?

Assuming that the two populations have unequal and unknown population standard deviations, construct a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) for the following. $$ \begin{array}{lll} n_{1}=48 & \bar{x}_{1}=.863 & s_{1}=.176 \\ n_{2}=46 & \bar{x}_{2}=.796 & s_{2}=.068 \end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.