/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 17 According to the Federal Poverty... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

According to the Federal Poverty Measure \(12 \%\) of the U.S. population lives in poverty. The governor of a certain state believes that the proportion there is lower. In a sample of size 1,550,163 were impoverished according to the federal measure. a. Test whether the true proportion of the state's population that is impoverished is less than \(12 \%,\) at the \(5 \%\) level of significance. 1\. Compute the observed significance of the test.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The state's impoverished proportion is significantly less than 12% at 5% level; p-value is 0.0257.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Hypotheses

First, we need to identify the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis \( H_0 \) is that the true proportion of the state's population that is impoverished is equal to \(12\%\), or \( p = 0.12 \). The alternative hypothesis \( H_a \) is that the true proportion is less than \(12\%\), or \( p < 0.12 \).
02

Calculate the Test Statistic

We use the formula for the test statistic for a proportion: \( z = \frac{\hat{p} - p_0}{\sqrt{\frac{p_0(1-p_0)}{n}}} \), where \( \hat{p} \) is the sample proportion, \( p_0 \) is the population proportion under \( H_0 \), and \( n \) is the sample size. Here, \( \hat{p} = \frac{163}{1550} \approx 0.105 \), \( p_0 = 0.12 \), and \( n = 1550 \).
03

Calculate the Standard Error

The standard error for the proportion is calculated as: \( \sqrt{\frac{p_0(1-p_0)}{n}} = \sqrt{\frac{0.12 \times (1-0.12)}{1550}} \approx 0.0077 \).
04

Compute the Test Statistic

Substituting the values into the formula for the z-test statistic, we have: \( z = \frac{0.105 - 0.12}{0.0077} \approx -1.948 \).
05

Determine the Critical Value and Decision

At a \(5\%\) level of significance for a one-tailed test, the critical z-value is approximately \(-1.645\). Since our computed z-value of \(-1.948\) is less than \(-1.645\), we reject the null hypothesis.
06

Calculate the Observed Significance (p-value)

To find the observed significance or p-value, we look up the z-value in standard normal distribution tables, or use a calculator. A z-value of \(-1.948\) corresponds to a p-value of approximately 0.0257.
07

Conclusion

Since the p-value (0.0257) is less than the significance level (0.05), there is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Proportion Test
The proportion test is a way to determine if there is a significant difference between a sample proportion and a known population proportion. Suppose you want to check if a certain characteristic is more common in one group compared to a known standard. In the example provided, the aim is to test whether less than 12% of the state's population lives in poverty compared to the national rate. Here's how it works:
  • Null Hypothesis ( \( H_0 \) ): Assumes no change from the standard. For this exercise, it's that the poverty rate is 12%.
  • Alternative Hypothesis ( \( H_a \) ): Believes the state's rate is different. Here, it’s less than 12%.
  • Data Collection: Gather a sample size. In this case, 1550 residents were examined for poverty conditions.
  • Calculation: Compute the sample proportion, then use statistical tests to see if it deviates from 12%.
This method is particularly useful for assessing changes or differences in a known population's behavior or characteristics.
Significance Level
The significance level, denoted as \( \alpha \) , is the threshold for deciding when to reject the null hypothesis. It's a measure of how willing one is to be wrong when saying there is a significant difference.The common choice for this level is 5%, meaning there's a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there actually isn't one. When the p-value of the test is smaller than this preset alpha, the null hypothesis is rejected as unlikely.
  • 5% Significance Level: In the exercise, this means you'd accept a 5% chance of error in saying the state's poverty rate is below 12%.
  • Decision Making: It involves comparing the p-value to 0.05 to decide on the null hypothesis.
A lower significance level results in stronger conclusions, as there is a smaller chance of making a mistake.
P-value
The p-value is a statistical measurement to assess evidence against the null hypothesis. It gauges the probability of obtaining a result at least as extreme as the one observed, assuming the null hypothesis is true.
  • Low P-value: A small p-value indicates strong evidence against the null hypothesis, suggesting the sample's result is unlikely under the null hypothesis.
  • Calculation: In the exercise, a p-value of approximately 0.0257 was found for the z-value of -1.948. This suggests there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
  • Comparison: If the p-value is less than the significance level (in this case 0.05), the null hypothesis is rejected. Here, 0.0257 < 0.05, so it supports the alternative hypothesis.
The goal is to find a p-value which, if small, gives confidence to make a decision against the null hypothesis.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, often denoted as \( H_0 \), is a default or baseline assumption about a population parameter. It is typically a statement of no effect or no difference. When conducting hypothesis testing, statisticians are testing this statement to see if evidence exists to dispute it.In this exercise:
  • Stated Hypothesis: The null hypothesis assumes the state's poverty rate equals the national rate of 12%, \( p = 0.12 \).
  • Purpose: It's a starting point for statistical testing. Initially, we assume it might be correct but look for evidence to prove otherwise.
  • Testing: Our results, a sample poverty rate of \( \hat{p} = 0.105 \) and subsequent calculations, provide statistical evidence to test \( H_0 \).
The goal is to analyze sample data to see if there is convincing reason to believe that the null hypothesis is false.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a recent year the fuel economy of all passenger vehicles was \(19.8 \mathrm{mpg}\). A trade organization sampled 50 passenger vehicles for fuel economy and obtained a sample mean of 20.1 mpg with standard deviation \(2.45 \mathrm{mpg}\). The sample mean 20.1 exceeds \(19.8,\) but perhaps the increase is only a result of sampling error. a. Perform the relevant test of hypotheses at the \(20 \%\) level of significance using the critical value approach. b. Compute the observed significance of the test. c. Perform the test at the \(20 \%\) level of significance using the \(p\) -value approach. You need not repeat the first three steps, already done in part (a).

The recommended daily calorie intake for teenage girls is 2,200 calories/day. A nutritionist at a state university believes the average daily caloric intake of girls in that state to be lower. Test that hypothesis, at the \(5 \%\) level of significance, against the null hypothesis that the population average is 2,200 calories/day using the following sample data: \(n=36, x-2,150, s=203\).

Perform the indicated test of hypotheses, based on the information given. a. Test \(\mathrm{Ho}: \mu=212\) vs. Ha: \(\mu<212 @ \alpha=0.10, \sigma\) unknown, \(n=36, x-211.2, \mathrm{~s}=2.2\) b. Test \(H_{0}: \mu=-18\) vs. Ha: \(\mu>-18\) \(@ \alpha=0.05, \sigma=3.3, n=44, x-=-17.2, s=3.1\) c. Test \(H_{0}: \mu=24\) vs. Ha: \(\mu \neq 24 @ \alpha=0.02, \sigma\) unknown, \(n=50, x-=22.8, s=1.9\)

A special interest group asserts that \(90 \%\) of all smokers began smoking before age \(18 .\) In a sample of 850 smokers, 687 began smoking before age 18 . a. Test whether the true proportion of all smokers who began smoking before age 18 is less than \(90 \%,\) at the \(1 \%\) level of significance. b. Compute the observed significance of the test.

The target temperature for a hot beverage the moment it is dispensed from a vending machine is \(170^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). A sample of ten randomly selected servings from a new machine undergoing a pre- shipment inspection gave mean temperature \(173^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) with sample standard deviation \(6.3^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). a. Assuming that temperature is normally distributed, perform the test that the mean temperature of dispensed beverages is different from \(170^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\), at the \(10 \%\) level of significance. b. The sample mean is greater than 170 , suggesting that the actual population mean is greater than \(170^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). Perform this test, also at the \(10 \%\) level of significance. (The computation of the test statistic done in part (a) still applies here.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.