/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 66 An article in the Chicago Tribun... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

An article in the Chicago Tribune (August \(29 .\) 1999) reported that in a poll of residents of the Chicago suburbs, \(43 \%\) felt that their financial situation had improved during the past year. The following statement is from the article: "The findings of this Tribune poll are based on interviews with 930 randomly selected suburban residents. The sample included suburban Cook County plus DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, and Will Counties. In a sample of this size, one can say with \(95 \%\) certainty that results will differ by no more than \(3 \% \mathrm{t}\) from results obtained if all residents had been included in the poll." Comment on this statement. Give a statistical argument to justify the claim that the estimate of \(43 \%\) is within \(3 \%\) of the true proportion of residents who feel that their financial situation has improved.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The claim is justified because the calculated margin of error is 3% assuming a 95% confidence level, which aligns with the statement in the poll. Therefore, statistically, it is acceptable to claim that the estimate of 43% is within 3% of the true proportion.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Scenario

The first step is to understand the scenario. An article has been published stating that based on a population sample of 930 people, 43% feel that their financial situation has improved over the past year. This percentage is portrayed as an estimate of the true proportion of the whole population. It is stated with 95% certainty that the true proportion will not differ by more than 3% from the estimate.
02

The Margin of Error

Next, recognize that the 3% difference is referred to as the margin of error. In statistics, the margin of error is calculated considering the sample size and the level of confidence which in this case is 95%. In population proportion, the margin of error (E) can be calculated using the formula: E = Z * sqrt((p*(1-p))/n), where Z is the z-score for the given level of confidence, p is the estimated population proportion and n is the sample size.
03

Finding the Z-Score

Given a confidence level of 95%, the Z-score corresponding to this is approximately 1.96. This can either be given or looked up in a standard normal distribution table.
04

Substituting the Values

Substituting the values into the equation, where n = 930 (sample size), p = 0.43 (population proportion) and Z = 1.96, we have E = 1.96 * sqrt((0.43*(1-0.43))/930).
05

Calculating the Margin of Error

Solve the equation to find the margin of error. When rounded to two decimal places, the margin of error E calculated is approximately 0.03 or 3%.
06

Verification

Now, this calculated margin of error aligns with the statement in the poll indicating that the results will differ by no more than 3%. This supports the validity of the poll and hence, statistically, the claim that the estimate of 43% is within 3% of the true proportion is justified.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Population Sample
When conducting a survey or research study, it's often impractical or impossible to collect data from every single member of a population. Instead, we use a population sample, which is a subset of individuals from the larger population. In our scenario from the Chicago Tribune article, the population sample consists of 930 randomly selected suburban residents; this sample should be representative of the larger group of all residents in the specified counties.

The key to a good population sample is randomness. By randomly selecting participants, we can ensure that each member of the population had an equal chance of being included, thereby reducing bias and making the sample more likely to reflect the population accurately. It is important to note that the size of the sample can greatly affect the accuracy of the estimated population proportion; larger samples tend to yield more precise estimates.
Confidence Level
The confidence level is a measure of how sure we can be in making statements about a population based on a sample. Specifically, it indicates the probability that the true population parameter (like a population proportion) falls within a certain range around the sample statistic. In the Tribune poll, the confidence level is 95%, which means researchers are 95% certain that the actual proportion of residents whose financial situation has improved is within 3% of their estimate, 43%. This does not imply that the estimate is exact, rather it acknowledges a range of uncertainty.

Achieving a high confidence level typically requires a larger sample size and increases the reliability of the poll's results. Politicians, marketers, and policymakers often use polls conducted with high confidence levels to make informed decisions, although it's necessary to remember that an increase in confidence level leads to a wider margin of error, assuming the sample size remains fixed.
Z-Score
In the realm of statistics, a z-score is a numerical measurement that describes a value's relationship to the mean of a group of values, expressed in terms of standard deviations. When estimating population parameters using samples, the z-score is a crucial part of calculating the margin of error. It is referenced from the standard normal distribution, or Z-distribution, and adjusts for the desired level of confidence.

For a 95% confidence level, the z-score is approximately 1.96. This value tells us how many standard deviations an element is from the mean; it is used here to determine the margin of error, which is the range that the true population proportion is expected to fall within. The calculation of the margin of error, incorporating the z-score, is what allows pollsters to say with certain assurance the degree to which their sample results reflect the broader population.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Associated Press (December 16,1991 ) reported that in a random sample of 507 people, only 142 correctly described the Bill of Rights as the first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Calculate a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of the entire population that could give a correct description.

The report "2005 Electronic Monitoring \& Surveillance Survey: Many Companies Monitoring, \(\begin{array}{lll}\text { Recording, } & \text { Videotaping-and } & \text { Firing-Employees" }\end{array}\) (American Management Association, 2005) summarized the results of a survey of 526 U.S. businesses. The report stated that 137 of the 526 businesses had fired workers for misuse of the Internet and 131 had fired workers for e-mail misuse. For purposes of this exercise, assume that it is reasonable to regard this sample as representative of businesses in the United States. a. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of U.S. businesses that have fired workers for misuse of the Internet. b. What are two reasons why a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of U.S. businesses that have fired workers for misuse of e-mail would be narrower than the \(95 \%\) confidence interval computed in Part (a)?

According to an AP-Ipsos poll (June 15, 2005), \(42 \%\) of 1001 randomly selected adult Americans made plans in May 2005 based on a weather report that turned out to be wrong. a. Construct and interpret a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of Americans who made plans in May 2005 based on an incorrect weather report. b. Do you think it is reasonable to generalize this estimate to other months of the year? Explain.

A random sample of \(n=12\) four-year-old red pine trees was selected, and the diameter (in inches) of each tree's main stem was measured. The resulting observations are as follows: \(\begin{array}{llllllll}11.3 & 10.7 & 12.4 & 15.2 & 10.1 & 12.1 & 16.2 & 10.5\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{llll}11.4 & 11.0 & 10.7 & 12.0\end{array}\) a. Compute a point estimate of \(\sigma\), the population standard deviation of main stem diameter. What statistic did you use to obtain your estimate? b. Making no assumptions about the shape of the population distribution of diameters, give a point estimate for the population median diameter. What statistic did you use to obtain the estimate? c. Suppose that the population distribution of diameter is symmetric but with heavier tails than the normal distribution. Give a point estimate of the population mean diameter based on a statistic that gives some protection against the presence of outliers in the sample. What statistic did you use? d. Suppose that the diameter distribution is normal. Then the 90 th percentile of the diameter distribution is \(\mu+1.28 \sigma\) (so \(90 \%\) of all trees have diameters less than this value). Compute a point estimate

An Associated Press article on potential violent behavior reported the results of a survey of 750 workers who were employed full time (San Luis Obispo Tribune, September 7. 1999). Of those surveyed, 125 indicated that they were so angered by a coworker during the past year that they felt like hitting the coworker (but didn't). Assuming that it is reasonable to regard this sample of 750 as a random sample from the population of full-time workers, use this information to construct and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval estimate of \(p\), the true proportion of full-time workers so angered in the last year that they wanted to hit a colleague.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.