/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 24 In an AP-AOL sports poll (Assoda... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In an AP-AOL sports poll (Assodated Press. December 18,2005\(), 394\) of 1000 randomly selected U.S. adults indicated that they considered themselves to be baseball fans. Of the 394 baseball fans, 272 stated that they thought the designated hitter rule should either be expanded to both baseball leagues or eliminated. a. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of U.S. adults who consider themselves to be baseball fans. b. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of those who consider themselves to be baseball fans who think the designated hitter rule should be expanded to both leagues or eliminated. c. Explain why the confidence intervals of Parts (a) and (b) are not the same width even though they both have a confidence level of \(95 \%\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) A 95% confidence interval for the percentage of U.S. Adults who are baseball fans is (0.365, 0.423). b) A 95% confidence interval for the percentage of baseball fans who want the designated hitter rule changed is (0.650, 0.731). c) The confidence intervals are not the same width because the proportion estimates are based on different sample sizes, which affects the standard error used in calculating the width of the confidence interval.

Step by step solution

01

Identify sample proportions and size

First, identify the sample proportions and size. Here, the sample size of U.S. adults is \(N = 1000\), with \(x = 394\) of them considering themselves baseball fans. Then, for the fans who want the designated hitter rule expanded or eliminated, that's \(y = 272\) out of the \(x = 394\) baseball fans.
02

Calculating the sample proportions

Next, calculate the sample proportions. For U.S. adults who are baseball fans, it's \(p1 = x / N = 394/1000 = 0.394\). For baseball fans who think the designated hitter rule should be expanded or eliminated, it's \(p2 = y / x = 272 / 394 ≈ 0.690\).
03

Calculate a 95% Confidence Interval for the Proportions

Now calculate a 95% Confidence Interval for the proportions. The formula for the confidence interval for a proportion is \(CI = p ± Z ∗ \sqrt{ (P(1 - P)) / N }\) where \(Z\) is the Z-value from the standard normal distribution corresponding to the desired confidence level. For a 95% confidence interval, \(Z\) is approximately 1.96. So, for U.S. adults who are baseball fans, it's \(CI1 = p1 ± 1.96 * \sqrt{ (p1 * (1 - p1)) / 1000 }\). For fans who want the designated hitter rule changed, it's \(CI2 = p2 ± 1.96 * \sqrt{ (p2 * (1 - p2)) / 394 }\).
04

Explain the difference in interval widths

Now, answer why the confidence intervals for part (a) and (b) are not the same width. The widths of confidence intervals depend on the variability of the data and the sample size. Even though the confidence level is the same, the sample sizes and proportions are different, which results in different widths of confidence intervals.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sample Size
The concept of sample size plays a crucial role in statistics. It refers to the number of observations or respondents used when conducting a survey or experiment. In the context of our exercise, the sample size is the number of U.S. adults surveyed, which is 1,000.

A larger sample size generally leads to more accurate and reliable results. This happens because larger samples tend to better approximate the true population characteristics, reducing sampling error. In essence, the larger the sample, the more it resembles the entire population.

With a sufficient sample size, confidence intervals become narrower, meaning our estimates are more precise. Conversely, smaller samples have wider confidence intervals, indicating less certainty about the estimated population parameter. Therefore, choosing an appropriate sample size is vital for achieving reliable results in statistical analysis.
Sample Proportions
Sample proportions represent the fraction of the sample that possesses a particular characteristic of interest. In this exercise, there are two key proportions: the proportion of U.S. adults who consider themselves baseball fans, and the proportion of those fans who have specific opinions about the designated hitter rule.

To calculate sample proportions, divide the number of favorable responses by the total sample size.
  • For adults considering themselves as baseball fans: \( p_1 = \frac{394}{1000} = 0.394 \).
  • For baseball fans with views on the designated hitter rule: \( p_2 = \frac{272}{394} \approx 0.690 \).

These proportions provide insights into the characteristics of the sample and help in making inferences about the broader population. Such proportions are critical when constructing confidence intervals, as they form the basis of estimating the population parameter.

Understanding how to compute and interpret sample proportions is fundamental for analyzing survey data and making informed decisions.
Statistical Variability
Statistical variability refers to the degree of variation or dispersion present within a set of data points. In any sampling process, variability affects the precision and reliability of the estimates. The widths of confidence intervals are directly influenced by statistical variability.

In our context, even though both confidence intervals have the same confidence level, their widths differ due to the variability attributed to different sample proportions and sizes. For example, the variability in the entire group of surveyed U.S. adults (1,000) is different from that of the specific group of baseball fans (394).

There are a few factors that influence statistical variability:
  • Sample size: Larger samples tend to have less variability.
  • Proportions: Extreme proportions (close to 0 or 1) usually have lower variability compared to proportions near 0.5.

Lower variability leads to narrower confidence intervals, suggesting high precision in our estimates. Recognizing the role of variability helps in understanding why different data sets produce intervals of varying widths, even under the same confidence conditions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An Associated Press article on potential violent behavior reported the results of a survey of 750 workers who were employed full time (San Luis Obispo Tribune, September 7. 1999). Of those surveyed, 125 indicated that they were so angered by a coworker during the past year that they felt like hitting the coworker (but didn't). Assuming that it is reasonable to regard this sample of 750 as a random sample from the population of full-time workers, use this information to construct and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval estimate of \(p\), the true proportion of full-time workers so angered in the last year that they wanted to hit a colleague.

The authors of the paper "Deception and Design: The Impact of Communication Technology on Lying Behavior" (Proceedings of Computer Human Interaction [2004]) asked 30 students in an upper division communications course at a large university to keep a journal for 7 days, recording each social interaction and whether or not they told any lies during that interaction. A lie was defined as "any time you intentionally try to mislead someone." The paper reported that the mean number of lies per day for the 30 students was \(1.58\) and the standard deviation of number of lies per day was \(1.02 .\) a. What assumption must be made in order for the \(t\) confidence interval of this section to be an appropriate method for estimating \(\mu\), the mean number of lies per day for all students at this university? b. Would you recommend using the \(t\) confidence interval to construct an estimate of \(\mu\) as defined in Part (a)? Explain why or why not.

The article "Most Canadians Plan to Buy Treats. Many Will Buy Pumpkins, Decorations and/or Costumes" (Ipsos-Reid, October 24, 2005) summarized results from a survey of 1000 randomly selected Canadian residents. Each individual in the sample was asked how much he or she anticipated spending on Halloween during \(2005 .\) The resulting sample mean and standard deviation were \(\$ 46.65\) and \(\$ 83.70\), respectively. a. Explain how it could be possible for the standard deviation of the anticipated Halloween expense to be larger than the mean anticipated expense. b. Is it reasonable to think that the distribution of the variable anticipated Halloween expense is approximately normal? Explain why or why not. c. Is it appropriate to use the \(t\) confidence interval to estimate the mean anticipated Halloween expense for Canadian residents? Explain why or why not. d. If appropriate, construct and interpret a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the mean anticipated Halloween expense for Canadian residents.

"Tongue Piercing May Speed Tooth Loss. Researchers Say" is the headline of an article that appeared in the San Luis Obispo Tribune (June 5,2002 ). The article describes a study of 52 young adults with pierced tongues. The researchers found receding gums, which can lead to tooth loss, in 18 of the participants. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of young adults with pierced tongues who have receding gums. What assumptions must be made for use of the \(z\) confidence interval to be appropriate?

The authors of the paper "Driven to Distraction" (Psychological Science [2001]: \(462-466\) ) describe an experiment to evaluate the effect of using a cell phone on reaction time. Subjects were asked to perform a simulated driving task while talking on a cell phone. While performing this task, occasional red and green lights flashed on the computer screen. If a green light flashed, subjects were to continue driving, but if a red light flashed, subjects were to brake as quickly as possible and the reaction time (in msec) was recorded. The following summary statistics are based on a graph that appeared in the paper: $$n=48 \quad \bar{x}=530 \quad s=70$$ a. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu\), the mean time to react to a red light while talking on a cell phone. What assumption must be made in order to generalize this confidence interval to the population of all drivers? b. Suppose that the researchers wanted to estimate the mean reaction time to within \(5 \mathrm{msec}\) with \(95 \%\) confidence. Using the sample standard deviation from the study described as a preliminary estimate of the standard deviation of reaction times, compute the required sample size.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.