/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 79 Five hundred first-year students... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Five hundred first-year students at a state university were classified according to both high school GPA and whether they were on academic probation at the end of their first semester. The data are $$ \begin{array}{lcccc} && {\text { High School GPA }} \\ & 2.5 \text { to } & 3.0 \text { to } & 3.5 \text { and } & \\ \text { Probation } & <3.0 & <3.5 & \text { Above } & \text { Total } \\ \hline \text { Yes } & 50 & 55 & 30 & 135 \\ \text { No } & 45 & 135 & 185 & 365 \\ \text { Total } & 95 & 190 & 215 & 500 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Construct a table of the estimated probabilities for each GPA-probation combination. b. Use the table constructed in Part (a) to approximate the probability that a randomly selected first-year student at this university will be on academic probation at the end of the first semester. c. What is the estimated probability that a randomly selected first-year student at this university had a high school GPA of \(3.5\) or above? d. Are the two outcomes selected student has a bigh school GPA of \(3.5\) or above and selected student is on academic probation at the end of the first semester independent outcomes? How can you tell? e. Estimate the proportion of first-year students with high school GPAs between \(2.5\) and \(3.0\) who are on academic probation at the end of the first semester. f. Estimate the proportion of those first-year students with high school GPAs \(3.5\) and above who are on academic probation at the end of the first semester.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. See Step 1 for the table of estimated probabilities. b. The probability for a student to be on probation is 0.27. c. The probability for a student to have a high school GPA of 3.5 or above is 0.43. d. The two outcomes selected student has a high school GPA of 3.5 or above and selected student is on academic probation at the end of the first semester are not independent outcomes. (See Step 4 for calculation) e. The proportion of first-year students with high school GPAs between 2.5 and 3.0 and who are on academic probation at the end of the first semester is 0.53. f. The proportion of those first-year students with high school GPAs 3.5 and above and who are on academic probation at the end of the first semester is 0.14.

Step by step solution

01

Construct the table of estimated probabilities

Each cell within the table represents the joint probability of the two outcomes \(P(A \cap B) = \frac{n(A \cap B)}{n(S)}\) where \(n(A \cap B)\) represents the intersection count and \(n(S)\) represents the total count. For instance, the probability of a student with a GPA of less than 3.0 being on probation is \(\frac{50}{500} = 0.1\). All the other probabilities can be calculated in a similar way.
02

Probablity for a student to be on probation

The probability of a student being on probation \(P(Probation) = \frac{n(Probation)}{n(S)}\). From the table, we know that the total number of students on probation is 135. So, the probability will be \(\frac{135}{500} = 0.27\).
03

Probablity for a student to have a high school GPA of 3.5 or above

Probability \(P(GPA \geq 3.5) = \frac{n(GPA \geq 3.5)}{n(S)}\). From the table, we can see that the total number of students with a GPA of 3.5 and above is 215, hence \(\frac{215}{500} = 0.43\).
04

Check for independence of two events

Two events A & B are said to be independent if \(P(A \cap B) = P(A)P(B)\). We compute \(P(GPA \geq 3.5 \cap Probation) = P(GPA \geq 3.5)P(Probation)\). If these values are equal, the events are independent; otherwise, they are dependent.
05

Estimate the proportion of first-year students with high school GPAs between 2.5 and 3.0

For students with GPAs between 2.5 and 3.0, we can calculate the proportion of students on probation as \(P(Probation | GPA = 2.5-3.0) = \frac{n(Probation \cap GPA = 2.5-3.0)}{n(GPA = 2.5-3.0)} = \frac{50}{95} = 0.53\).
06

Estimate the proportion of those first-year students with high school GPAs 3.5 and above

For students with GPAs 3.5 and above, we can calculate the proportion of students on probation as \(P(Probation | GPA \geq 3.5) = \frac{n(Probation \cap GPA \geq 3.5)}{n(GPA \geq 3.5)} = \frac{30}{215} = 0.14 \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Joint Probability
Joint Probability refers to the probability of two events occurring simultaneously. It helps in understanding how likely two scenarios are to happen at the same time. In our exercise, we look at students' high school GPA and whether they are on academic probation simultaneously. Here's how we assess joint probability:
  • We determine it by dividing the frequency of both events happening by the total number of observations.
  • This is the probability of a specific GPA bracket and being on probation occurring together.
For example, there are 50 students with a GPA below 3.0 on probation. The joint probability is \[P\left(GPA < 3.0 \cap \text{Probation}\right) = \frac{50}{500} = 0.1 \]Hence, there's a 10% chance a random student will both have a GPA less than 3.0 and be on probation.
Conditional Probability
Conditional Probability is the likelihood of an event occurring given that another event has occurred. It provides insights into how one condition affects the occurrence of another condition, which is essential in checking dependencies between events. It's especially useful in analyzing patterns within datasets.For instance, if we want to know the probability of a student being on probation given they have a GPA between 2.5 and 3.0, we use the formula:\[P(\text{Probation} | GPA = 2.5-3.0) = \frac{P(GPA = 2.5-3.0 \cap \text{Probation})}{P(GPA = 2.5-3.0)}\]Calculation:- Number on probation (GPA 2.5-3.0) = 50- Total in GPA range 2.5-3.0 = 95\[P(\text{Probation} | GPA = 2.5-3.0) = \frac{50}{95} \approx 0.53\]Therefore, there's approximately a 53% chance a student with a GPA between 2.5 and 3.0 will be on probation.
Independence of Events
The concept of independence between two events in probability suggests that the occurrence of one event does not affect the occurrence of the other. For two events A and B to be independent, the following must hold true:\[P(A \cap B) = P(A)P(B)\]In our example, we are examining whether having a GPA of 3.5 and above is independent of being on academic probation.Check for Independence:
  • Calculate the individual probability of GPA ≥ 3.5:
  • \[P(GPA \geq 3.5) = \frac{215}{500} = 0.43\]
  • Calculate the individual probability of being on probation:
  • \[P(\text{Probation}) = \frac{135}{500} = 0.27\]
  • Calculate the joint probability of GPA ≥ 3.5 and on probation:
  • \[P(GPA \geq 3.5 \cap \text{Probation}) = \frac{30}{500} = 0.06\]Since 0.43 * 0.27 ≠ 0.06, the events are not independent. Therefore, GPA ≥ 3.5 does influence the likelihood of probation.
High School GPA Analysis
Analyzing students' high school GPA can provide valuable insights into their academic journeys and likelihood of facing probation. By breaking down GPAs into categories, institutions can offer targeted support to students who may be at risk. Analysis Steps:
  • We categorize students based on their high school GPA ranges: below 3.0, between 3.0-3.5, and above 3.5.
  • We then assess how many in each category are on academic probation.
Findings: For students with a GPA:
  • < 3.0, roughly 52.6% (50 out of 95) are on probation.
  • Between 3.0 and 3.5, roughly 28.9% (55 out of 190) are on probation.
  • 3.5 and above, only about 14% (30 out of 215) are on probation.
This pattern suggests a trend where students with lower high school GPAs are more susceptible to academic probation, highlighting the importance of early support interventions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Delayed diagnosis of cancer is a problem because it can delay the start of treatment. The paper "Causes of Physician Delay in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer" (Archives of Internal Medicine \([2002]: 1343-1348)\) examined possible causes for delayed diagnosis for women with breast cancer. The accompanying table summarizes data on the initial written mammogram report (benign or suspicious) and whether or not diagnosis was delayed for 433 women with breast cancer. $$ \begin{array}{l|cc} & & \text { Diagnosis } \\ & \begin{array}{c} \text { Diagnosis } \\ \text { Delayed } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Not } \\ \text { Delayed } \end{array} \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Mammogram Report Benign } \\ \text { Mammogram Report } \\ \text { Suspicious } \end{array} & 32 & 89 \\ & 8 & 304 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Consider the following events: \(B=\) the event that the mammogram report says benign \(S=\) event that the mammogram report says suspicious \(D=\) event that diagnosis is delayed a. Assume that these data are representative of the larger group of all women with breast cancer. Use the data in the table to find and interpret the following probabilities: i. \(\quad P(B)\) ii. \(P(S)\) iii. \(P(D \mid B)\) iv. \(P(D \mid S)\) b. Remember that all of the 433 women in this study actually had breast cancer, so benign mammogram reports were, by definition, in error. Write a few sentences explaining whether this type of error in the reading of mammograms is related to delayed diagnosis of breast cancer.

A shipment of 5000 printed circuit boards contains 40 that are defective. Two boards will be chosen at random, without replacement. Consider the two events \(E_{1}=\) event that the first board selected is defective and \(E_{2}=\) event that the second board selected is defective. a. Are \(E_{1}\) and \(E_{2}\) dependent events? Explain in words. b. Let \(n o t E_{1}\) be the event that the first board selected is not defective (the event \(E_{1}^{C}\) ). What is \(P\left(\right.\) not \(E_{1}\) )? c. How do the two probabilities \(P\left(E_{2} \mid E_{1}\right)\) and \(P\left(E_{2} \mid\right.\) not \(\left.E_{1}\right)\) compare? d. Based on your answer to Part (c), would it be reasonable to view \(E_{1}\) and \(E_{2}\) as approximately independent?

The report "Twitter in Higher Education: Usage Habits and Trends of Today's College Faculty" (Magna Publications, September 2009) describes results of a survey of nearly 2000 college faculty. The report indicates the following: \- \(30.7 \%\) reported that they use Twitter and \(69.3 \%\) said that they did not use Twitter. \- Of those who use Twitter, \(39.9 \%\) said they sometimes use Twitter to communicate with students. \- Of those who use Twitter, \(27.5 \%\) said that they sometimes use Twitter as a learning tool in the classroom. Consider the chance experiment that selects one of the study participants at random and define the following events: \(T=\) event that selected faculty member uses Twitter \(C=\) event that selected faculty member sometimes uses Twitter to communicate with students \(L=\) event that selected faculty member sometimes uses Twitter as a learning tool in the classroom a. Use the given information to determine the following probabilities: i. \(\quad P(T)\) ii. \(P\left(T^{C}\right)\) iii. \(P(C \mid T)\) iv. \(P(L \mid T)\) v. \(P(C \cap T)\) b. Interpret each of the probabilities computed in Part (a). c. What proportion of the faculty surveyed sometimes use Twitter to communicate with students? [Hint: Use the law of total probability to find \(P(C) .]\) d. What proportion of faculty surveyed sometimes use Twitter as a learning tool in the classroom?

A company uses three different assembly lines \(A_{1}, A_{2}\), and \(A_{3}\) -to manufacture a particular component. Of those manufactured by \(A_{1}, 5 \%\) need rework to remedy a defect, whereas \(8 \%\) of \(A_{2}\) 's components and \(10 \%\) of \(A_{3}\) 's components need rework. Suppose that \(50 \%\) of all components are produced by \(A_{1}\), whereas \(30 \%\) are produced by \(A_{2}\) and \(20 \%\) come from \(A_{3}\). a. Construct a tree diagram with first-generation branches corresponding to the three lines. Leading from each branch, draw one branch for rework (R) and another for no rework (N). Then enter appropriate probabilities on the branches. b. What is the probability that a randomly selected component came from \(A_{1}\) and needed rework? c. What is the probability that a randomly selected component needed rework?

Consider a Venn diagram picturing two events \(A\) and \(B\) that are not disjoint. a. Shade the event \((A \cup B)^{C} .\) On a separate Venn diagram shade the event \(A^{C} \cap B^{C} .\) How are these two events related? b. Shade the event \((A \cap B)^{C} .\) On a separate Venn diagram shade the event \(A^{C} \cup B^{C} .\) How are these two events related? (Note: These two relationships together are called DeMorgan's laws.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.