/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 51 Swedish researchers concluded th... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Swedish researchers concluded that viewing and discussing art soothes the soul and helps relieve medical conditions such as high blood pressure and constipation (AFP International News Agency, October 14 , 2005). This conclusion was based on a study in which 20 elderly women gathered once a week to discuss different works of art. The study also included a control group of 20 elderly women who met once a week to discuss their hobbies and interests. At the end of 4 months, the art discussion group was found to have a more positive attitude, to have lower blood pressure, and to use fewer laxatives than the control group. a. Why would it be important to determine if the researchers assigned the women participating in the study at random to one of the two groups? b. Explain why you think that the researchers included a control group in this study.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Random assignment is important in experimental studies to ensure that any observed effects can be attributed to the intervention being tested, rather than any pre-existing differences between the groups. b. Researchers included a control group in this study to provide a baseline for comparison, and to ensure that the observed effects were a result of the 'art discussion' variable, and not simply due to the act of regular social interaction.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the importance of random assignment

Random assignment is an important aspect of experimental design. The purpose of random assignment is to ensure that the experimental groups are essentially the same before the experiment begins, except for the intervention that is being tested. This is to eliminate any sources of bias that could affect the results of the experiment. Random assignment of the participants to the discussion groups in the given exercise would make sure that any observed differences between the two groups after the experiment, could be attributed to the kind of discussions (art vs hobbies and interests), rather than any pre-existing differences between the groups.
02

Understanding the function of a control group

A control group in an experimental design serves as a baseline against which the effects of the experimental condition can be measured. In this study, the control group (women discussing hobbies) enables the researchers to compare the health impacts of discussing art versus discussing usual hobbies. Without a control group, it would be unclear whether the observed benefits among the women in the art discussion group were genuinely due to the discussions about art, or were simply a result of meeting regularly and having a social discussion. The control group helps to isolate the 'art discussion' variable and its potential effect on health outcomes.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Random Assignment
Random assignment in an experiment is when researchers randomly allocate participants into different groups, such as experimental and control groups. This process ensures that each participant has an equal chance of being placed in any group.
In the Swedish study, random assignment is crucial because it helps to ensure that both groups of elderly women are similar at the start of the experiment. This similarity is important because it means any differences observed after the experiment can be more confidently attributed to the type of discussion (art vs hobbies) rather than other factors, such as age or health status.
Here is why random assignment is so valuable:
  • Reduces bias: Random assignment prevents selection bias, ensuring that groups don’t differ in any systematic way at the outset.
  • Enhances validity: With similar groups, the results of the experiment are more likely to reflect the impact of the variable being tested.
  • Reliable conclusions: It strengthens the study's conclusions because observed effects are more likely due to the tested intervention itself rather than external differences.
With random assignment, researchers can confidently link changes in outcomes to the experimental intervention, thereby enhancing the credibility of their findings.
Control Group
A control group is a vital component of a well-designed experiment. It consists of participants who do not receive the experimental treatment but instead engage in a standard or alternative activity.
In the Swedish study, the control group involved women discussing hobbies and interests, rather than art. This allows researchers to compare the effects of discussing art against other non-specific interactions.
Including a control group is particularly important because:
  • Basis for comparison: It provides a benchmark to measure the effect of the experimental condition, which in this case, is discussing art.
  • Eliminates confounding variables: By comparing against a control group, other factors, like social interaction or group dynamics, can be controlled for, ensuring observed changes are due to the art discussions.
  • Enhances clarity: It clarifies whether the benefit arises because of the intervention itself, or simply from being part of a group discussion.
The control group helps to isolate the critical variable under study, so researchers can better understand its impact.
Experimental Groups
In experiments, experimental groups receive the intervention being tested - in this case, discussions about art. These groups are compared against the control groups to assess the intervention's effect.
The experimental groups are crucial in any study because they directly experience the change or treatment researchers are interested in.
Characteristics of experimental groups include:
  • Exposure to the intervention: Members of this group are exposed to the experimental condition, which may lead to noticeable changes in the measured outcomes.
  • Comparison against control: Observations from the experimental group are compared against the control to determine the specific effects of the intervention.
  • Key to hypothesis testing: It allows researchers to test their hypotheses about the treatment’s efficacy effectively.
Understanding how the experimental group is managed and analyzed helps in determining whether the intervention is beneficial or not.
Bias Elimination
Eliminating bias is a fundamental goal of any scientific experiment. Bias can lead to inaccurate conclusions, affecting the validity of a study's results.
Biased results occur when variables other than the ones being tested impact the outcomes. In this case, proper experimental design, especially through random assignment and control groups, helps to reduce such biases.
Ways to eliminate bias include:
  • Random Assignment: As discussed, this method helps ensure group parity from the start, reducing selection bias risk.
  • Double-Blind Procedures: Although not used in this study, double-blinding where neither participants nor experimenters know who is in which group can further reduce bias.
  • Standardized procedures: Consistent conditions across groups ensure any differences arise only from the intervention.
By actively working to eliminate bias, researchers can assure that their findings are robust and credible, providing insights that are reflective of genuine effects, not skewed influences.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following paragraph appeared in USA Today (August 6,2009\()\) : Cement doesn't hold up to scrutiny A common treatment that uses medical cement to fix cracks in the spinal bones of elderly people worked no better than a sham treatment, the first rigorous studies of a popular procedure reveal. Pain and disability were virtually the same up to six months later, whether patients had a real treatment or a fake one, shows the research in today's New England Journal of Medicine. Tens of thousands of Americans each year are treated with bone cement, especially older women with osteoporosis. The researchers said it is yet another example of a procedure coming into wide use before proven safe and effective. Medicare pays \(\$ 1,500\) to \(\$ 2,100\) for the outpatient procedure.

Researchers at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto compared babies born to mothers with diabetes to babies born to mothers without diabetes (“Condition- ing and Hyperanalgesia in Newborns Exposed to Repeated Heel Lances," Journal of the American Medical Association [2002]: 857-861). Babies born to mothers with diabetes have their heels pricked numerous times during the first 36 hours of life in order to obtain blood samples to monitor blood sugar level. The researchers noted that the babies born to diabetic mothers were more likely to grimace or cry when having blood drawn than the babies born to mothers without diabetes. This led the researchers to conclude that babies who experience pain early in life become highly sensitive to pain. Comment on the appropriateness of this conclusion.

The short article "Developing Science-Based Food and Nutrition Information" (Journal of the American Dietetic Association [2001]: II44-Il45) includes some guidelines for evaluating a research paper. Obtain a copy of this paper through your university library or your instructor. Read this article and make a list of questions that can be used to evaluate a research study. 2.69 An article titled "I Said, Not While You Study: Science Suggests Kids Can't Study and Groove at the Same Time" appeared in the Washington Post (September 5, 2006). This provides an example of a reporter summarizing the result of a scientific study in a way that is designed to make it accessible to the newspaper's readers. You can find the newspaper article online by searching on the title or by going to http://www.washingtonpost.com/ wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/03/AR2006090300592 .html. The study referenced in the newspaper article was published in the Proceedings of the National Academies of Science and can be found at http://www.pnas.org/ content/103/31/11778.full. Read the newspaper article and then take a look at the published paper. Comment on whether you think that the author was successful in communicating the findings of the study to the intended audience.

The article “Effects of Too Much TV Can Be Undone" (USA Today. October 1,2007 ) included the following paragraph: Researchers at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health report that it's not only how many hours children spend in front of the TV, but at what age they watch that matters. They analyzed data from a national survey in which parents of 2707 children were interviewed first when the children were \(30-33\) months old and again when they were \(5 \frac{1}{2}\), about their TV viewing and their behavior. a. Is the study described an observational study or an experiment? b. The article says that data from a sample of 2707 parents were used in the study. What other information about the sample would you want in order to evaluate the study?

A tropical forest survey conducted by Conservation International included the following statements in the material that accompanied the survey: "A massive change is burning its way through the earth's environment." “The band of tropical forests that encircle the earth is being cut and burned to the ground at an alarming rate." "Never in history has mankind inflicted such sweeping changes on our planet as the clearing of rain forest taking place right now!" The survey that followed included the questions given in Parts (a)-(d) below. For each of these questions, identify a word or phrase that might affect the response and possibly bias the results of any analysis of the responses. a. "Did you know that the world's tropical forests are being destroyed at the rate of 80 acres per minute?" b. "Considering what you know about vanishing tropical forests, how would you rate the problem?" c. "Do you think we have an obligation to prevent the man-made extinction of animal and plant species?" d. "Based on what you know now, do you think there is a link between the destruction of tropical forests and changes in the earth's atmosphere?"

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.