/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 37 In November 2005 , an internatio... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In November 2005 , an international study to assess public opinion on the treatment of suspected terrorists was conducted ("Most in U.S., Britain, S. Korea and France Say Torture Is OK in at Least Rare Instances," Associated Press, December 7,2005 ). Each individual in random samples of 1000 adults from each of nine different countries was asked the following question: "Do you feel the use of torture against suspected terrorists to obtain information about terrorism activities is justified?" Responses consistent with percentages given in the article for the samples from Italy, Spain, France, the United States, and South Korea are summarized in the table at the top of the next page. Based on these data, is it reasonable to conclude that the response proportions are not the same for all five countries? Use a .01 significance level to test the appropriate hypotheses. $$ \begin{array}{l|ccccc} & & & \text { Response } \\ \hline \text { Country } & \text { Never } & \text { Rarely } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Some- } \\ \text { times } \end{array} & \text { Often } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Not } \\ \text { Sure } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Italy } & 600 & 140 & 140 & 90 & 30 \\ \text { Spain } & 540 & 160 & 140 & 70 & 90 \\ \text { France } & 400 & 250 & 200 & 120 & 30 \\ \text { United } & 360 & 230 & 270 & 110 & 30 \\ \begin{array}{c} \text { States } \\ \text { South } \\ \text { Korea } \end{array} & 100 & 330 & 470 & 60 & 40 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The detailed Chi-Square statistic, P-value and degrees of freedom would need to be computed based on the provided data. The conclusion will be based on whether the computed P-value is less than the significance level of 0.01 which might or might not lead to a rejection of the Null Hypothesis.

Step by step solution

01

State the Hypotheses

The Null Hypothesis, \(H_0\), will be that there's no difference in the response proportions among all five countries i.e., the observed frequencies are similar to expected frequencies. The Alternative Hypothesis, \(H_a\), states that at least one country has a different response proportion.
02

Perform a Chi-Square Test

Firstly, calculate the expected frequencies for each country and response category. The expected value for each cell of the table is computed as \((\text{sum of row values} * \text{sum of column values})/\text{total overall sum}\). Then, compute the Chi-Square statistic which is given by \(\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{(O_i - E_i)^2}{E_i}\) where \(O_i\) and \(E_i\) are the observed and expected frequencies respectively.
03

Compute Degrees of Freedom and the P-value

Degrees of freedom is given by \((\text{number of rows} - 1)*(\text{number of columns} - 1)\). Use the Chi-Square statistic and degrees of freedom to find the P-value from a Chi-Square distribution table. If the computed p-value is less than the specified significance level of 0.01, then reject the Null Hypothesis.
04

Conclusion

Based on the result of the P-value in comparison with the significance level, make a conclusion. If the P-value is less than 0.01, it would indicate that the response proportions across the five countries are not the same while a P-value ≥ 0.01 would fail to reject the Null Hypothesis and imply that there might be no difference in the response proportions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a critical component in statistics used to determine whether there is enough evidence in a sample to infer that a certain condition is true for the entire population. In our exercise, we want to find out if different countries have different opinions on the use of torture, which is where hypothesis testing comes into play.

With hypothesis testing, we start by setting up two opposing statements: the Null Hypothesis (, often denoted as \(H_0\)) and the Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_a\)). In our context:
  • **Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\))**: There is no difference in response proportions among the five countries. In simple terms, people in all countries feel the same about the use of torture.
  • **Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_a\))**: At least one country has a different opinion, indicating variations in the response proportions.
Once these hypotheses are set, we use statistical tests, like the Chi-Square Test, to analyze our data and make a decision regarding these hypotheses.
Significance Level
The significance level is a threshold that determines how strong your evidence must be before you reject the Null Hypothesis. This threshold is predefined and denotes the probability of rejecting a true Null Hypothesis, known as a Type I error.

In the given exercise, we use a significance level of 0.01, which means we are willing to accept just a 1% chance of incorrectly rejecting the Null Hypothesis.

So, if the calculations from our Chi-Square Test yield a P-value less than our significance level of 0.01, it suggests strong evidence against the Null Hypothesis, implying likely real differences in opinions among the countries regarding the issue at hand.
  • A low significance level means we need strong evidence to reject the Null Hypothesis.
  • Choosing a significance level is a balance between the risk of making mistakes and the reliability of the test.
Degrees of Freedom
Degrees of freedom is a concept that refers to the number of values in a calculation that are free to vary. In the Chi-Square Test for independence, degrees of freedom help determine the critical value against which the test statistic is compared.

In our exercise involving a contingency table, we calculate the degrees of freedom using the formula:\[( ext{number of rows} - 1) imes ( ext{number of columns} - 1)\]For this exercise, assuming each country is a row and each response category is a column, understanding degrees of freedom helps ensure we're comparing our test statistic to the correct value in statistical tables.

  • Calculating the degrees of freedom ensures the accuracy of the conclusions drawn.
  • Correct degree of freedom calculations contribute to the validity of the hypothesis test.
P-Value
A P-value is a measure used in hypothesis testing to help you decide whether to reject the Null Hypothesis. It quantifies the strength of evidence against the Null Hypothesis.

The P-value tells you the probability that the differences observed in your data could have occurred by random chance under the Null Hypothesis. In our exercise, once we conduct the Chi-Square Test, we calculate a P-value. If this value is less than our significance level of 0.01, it suggests that such a difference in opinions on torture among countries is statistically significant.

  • A lower P-value indicates stronger evidence against the Null Hypothesis.
  • If the P-value is less than the significance level, we reject the Null Hypothesis.
  • This means we conclude that differences in opinions are likely real, not due to random variation.
Expected Frequency
Expected frequency is a key component in conducting a Chi-Square Test. It represents the frequency that one would "expect" per category if there were no real differences among the groups in question.

To calculate expected frequencies in our exercise, for each cell in the table, divide the product of the sum of the row totals and the sum of the column totals by the overall total sum. This calculation assumes that there is no association between the countries and the opinion categories being examined.

  • Expected frequencies provide a baseline for comparison with observed frequencies.
  • They help determine if there is a significant difference between what was observed and what was expected under the Null Hypothesis.
  • The comparison between observed and expected frequencies forms the basis for calculating the Chi-Square statistic.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An article about the California lottery that appeared in the San Luis Obispo Tribune (December 15, 1999) gave the following information on the age distribution of adults in California: \(35 \%\) are between 18 and 34 years old, \(51 \%\) are between 35 and 64 years old, and \(14 \%\) are 65 years old or older. The article also gave information on the age distribution of those who purchase lottery tickets. The following table is consistent with the values given in the article: $$ \begin{array}{lc} \text { Age of Purchaser } & \text { Frequency } \\ \hline 18-34 & 36 \\ 35-64 & 130 \\ 65 \text { and over } & 34 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Suppose that the data resulted from a random sample of 200 lottery ticket purchasers. Based on these sample data, is it reasonable to conclude that one or more of these three age groups buys a disproportionate share of lottery tickets? Use a chi-square goodness-of-fit test with \(\alpha=.05\).

The paper "Sociochemosensory and Emotional Functions" (Psychological Science [2009]: \(1118-1124\) ) describes an interesting experiment to determine if college students can identify their roommates by smell. Forty-four female college students participated as subjects in the experiment. Each subject was presented with a set of three t-shirts that were identical in appearance. Each of the three t-shirts had been slept in for at least 7 hours by a person who had not used any scented products (like scented deodorant, soap, or shampoo) for at least 48 hours prior to sleeping in the shirt. One of the three shirts had been worn by the subject's roommate. The subject was asked to identify the shirt worn by her roommate. This process was then repeated with another three shirts, and the number of times out of the two trials that the subject correctly identified the shirt worn by her roommate was recorded. The resulting data is given in the accompanying table. $$ \begin{array}{l|ccc} \hline \text { Number of Correct Identifications } & 0 & 1 & 2 \\ \hline \text { Observed Count } & 21 & 10 & 13 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Can a person identify her roommate by smell? If not, the data from the experiment should be consistent with what we would have expected to see if subjects were just guessing on each trial. That is, we would expect that the probability of selecting the correct shirt would be \(1 / 3\) on each of the two trials. It would then be reasonable to regard the number of correct identifications as a binomial variable with \(n=2\) and \(p=1 / 3\). Use this binomial distribution to compute the proportions of the time we would expect to see 0,1, and 2 correct identifications if subjects are just guessing. b. Use the three proportions computed in Part (a) to carry out a test to determine if the numbers of correct identifications by the students in this study are significantly different than what would have been expected by guessing. Use \(\alpha=.05 .\) (Note: One of the expected counts is just a bit less than \(5 .\) For purposes of this exercise, assume that it is \(\mathrm{OK}\) to proceed with a goodness-of-fit test.)

The article "In Bronx, Hitting Home Runs Is A Breeze" (USA Today, June 2, 2009) included a classification of 87 home runs hit at the new Yankee Stadium according to direction that the ball was hit, resulting in the accompanying data. $$ \begin{array}{l|ccccc} \hline \text { Direction } & \begin{array}{l} \text { Left } \\ \text { Field } \end{array} & \begin{array}{l} \text { Left } \\ \text { Center } \end{array} & \text { Center } & \begin{array}{l} \text { Right } \\ \text { Center } \end{array} & \begin{array}{l} \text { Right } \\ \text { Field } \end{array} \\ \hline \begin{array}{c} \text { Number of } \\ \text { Home Runs } \end{array} & 18 & 10 & 7 & 18 & 34 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Assuming that it is reasonable to regard this sample of 87 home runs as representative of home runs hit at Yankee Stadium, carry out a hypothesis test to determine if there is convincing evidence that the proportion of home runs hit is not the same for all five directions. b. Write a few sentences describing how the observed counts for the five directions differ from what would have been expected if the proportion of home runs is the same for all five directions.

The article "Cooperative Hunting in Lions: The Role of the Individual" (Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology [1992]: \(445-454\) ) discusses the different roles taken by lionesses as they attack and capture prey. The authors were interested in the effect of the position in line as stalking occurs; an individual lioness may be in the center of the line or on the wing (end of the line) as they advance toward their prey. In addition to position, the role of the lioness was also considered. A lioness could initiate a chase (be the first one to charge the prey), or she could participate and join the chase after it has been initiated. Data from the article are summarized in the accompanying table. $$ \begin{array}{l|cc} & \text { Role } \\ \hline \text { Position } & \text { Initiate Chase } & \text { Participate in Chase } \\ \hline \text { Center } & 28 & 48 \\ \text { Wing } & 66 & 41 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Is there evidence of an association between position and role? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.01\). What assumptions about how the data were collected must be true for the chi-square test to be an appropriate way to analyze these data?

Criminologists have long debated whether there is a relationship between weather and violent crime. The author of the article "Is There a Season for Homicide?" (Criminology [1988]: \(287-296\) ) classified 1361 homicides according to season, resulting in the accompanying data. Do these data support the theory that the homicide rate is not the same over the four seasons? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\). $$ \begin{array}{cccc} & \text { Season } \\ \hline \text { Winter } & \text { Spring } & \text { Summer } & \text { Fall } \\\ \hline 328 & 334 & 372 & 327 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.