/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 30 A story describing a date rape w... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A story describing a date rape was read by 352 high school students. To investigate the effect of the victim's clothing on subject's judgment of the situation described, the story was accompanied by either a photograph of the victim dressed provocatively, a photo of the victim dressed conservatively, or no picture. Each student was asked whether the situation described in the story was one of rape. Data from the article "The Influence of Victim's Attire on Adolescent Judgments of Date Rape" (Adolescence [1995]: 319-323) are given in the accompanying table. Is there evidence that the proportion who believe that the story described a rape differs for the three different photo groups? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.01\). $$ \begin{array}{l|ccc} & & \text { Picture } \\ \hline \text { Response } & \text { Provocative } & \text { Conservative } & \text { No Picture } \\ \hline \text { Rape } & 80 & 104 & 92 \\ \text { Not Rape } & 47 & 12 & 17 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
To provide the short answer, one must perform the calculations described in the steps. Without giving exact figures, we can say that: If the p-value obtained is less or equal to 0.01, the null hypothesis is rejected and there is evidence that the proportion who believe that the story described a rape differs for the three different photo groups. If the p-value obtained is higher than 0.01, the null hypothesis is not rejected and there is no evidence to suggest a difference across the photo groups.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Expected Frequencies

First, calculate the row, column and total frequencies. Then, using these, calculate the expected frequencies for each cell under the null hypothesis that the row and column categories are independent. This is done using the formula: Expected Frequency = (Row Total * Column Total) / Grand Total. For example, for the 'Rape-Provocative' cell, the expected frequency is \((80 + 47)*(80 + 104 + 92) / 352\). Repeat this for all cells.
02

Calculate Chi-Square Test Statistic

Next, calculate the Chi-Square test statistic, which is given by the formula: \(\chi^2 = \sum((O - E)^2 / E)\), where O are the observed frequencies (actual numbers given) and E are the expected frequencies calculated in Step 1. For example, for the 'Rape-Provocative' cell, the contribution to the chi-square statistic would be \((80 - Expected Frequency)^2 / Expected Frequency\). Sum up these values for all cells to get the Chi-Square test statistic.
03

Calculate Degrees of Freedom and P-Value

The degrees of freedom (df) for a Chi-Square test for independence is given by the formula \(df = (No. of Rows - 1) * (No. of Columns - 1)\), which in this case is \(df = (2-1)*(3-1) = 2\). Use the degrees of freedom and the Chi-Square test statistic to find the p-value. If the calculated p-value is less than or equal to the given significance level (in this case 0.01) reject the null hypothesis, otherwise do not reject.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a key statistical tool used to make inferences about a population based on sample data. In this exercise, the goal is to determine if the perception of what constitutes rape changes based on the image accompanying a story. The initial step in hypothesis testing is to state the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis (H0) posits that there is no difference in perceptions across the three groups (provocative, conservative, or no picture). The alternative hypothesis (HA), on the other hand, states that there is a difference in perceptions among these groups.
To examine these hypotheses, we apply statistical tests to the collected data and use the results to make decisions. If the data provide enough evidence to support HA, we reject H0. If not, we fail to reject H0, suggesting that any observed differences could be due to random chance.
Expected Frequencies
Expected frequencies represent what we anticipate in each category under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true. To calculate these, you need the row totals, column totals, and the grand total of observations. The formula to determine the expected frequency for a particular cell is: \[ \text{Expected Frequency} = \frac{\text{Row Total} \times \text{Column Total}}{\text{Grand Total}} \]By plugging the frequency data into this formula, you calculate what the distribution of responses would look like if the choice of picture had no effect on the judgment made by the students.
If the expected frequencies and observed frequencies are significantly different across cells, it could indicate that factors other than chance are influencing the decisions.
Degrees of Freedom
Degrees of freedom help determine the shape of the Chi-Square distribution and impact the critical value against which the test statistic is evaluated. In the case of a Chi-Square test for independence, the degrees of freedom are calculated based on the number of rows and columns in the contingency table.The formula is:\[ df = (\text{Number of Rows} - 1) \times (\text{Number of Columns} - 1) \]For our specific scenario, with 2 rows (Rape and Not Rape) and 3 columns (Provocative, Conservative, No Picture), the degrees of freedom is \((2 - 1) \times (3 - 1) = 2\). These degrees of freedom are critical when consulting Chi-Square distribution tables to determine our p-value, which tells us if we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
P-Value
The p-value measures the probability that the observed data could occur by random chance if the null hypothesis is true. A smaller p-value suggests stronger evidence against the null hypothesis. In hypothesis testing, you compare the p-value to a predefined significance level (alpha, \(\alpha\)).In this exercise, the significance level is 0.01. If the p-value is less than or equal to 0.01, it indicates that the results are statistically significant, and we can reject the null hypothesis with confidence. If the p-value is greater than 0.01, there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
The p-value is determined using the Chi-Square test statistic and the degrees of freedom. Once you compute the Chi-Square value from your data, you use Chi-Square distribution tables or statistical software to find the p-value by matching it with the corresponding degrees of freedom.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

According to Census Bureau data, in 1998 the California population consisted of \(50.7 \%\) whites, \(6.6 \%\) blacks, \(30.6 \%\) Hispanics, \(10.8 \%\) Asians, and \(1.3 \%\) other ethnic groups. Suppose that a random sample of 1000 students graduating from California colleges and universities in 1998 resulted in the accompanying data on ethnic group. These data are consistent with summary statistics contained in the article titled "Crumbling Public School System a Threat to California's Future (Investor's Business Daily, November 12,1999\()\). $$ \begin{array}{lc} \text { Ethnic Group } & \text { Number in Sample } \\ \hline \text { White } & 679 \\ \text { Black } & 51 \\ \text { Hispanic } & 77 \\ \text { Asian } & 190 \\ \text { Other } & 3 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Do the data provide evidence that the proportion of students graduating from colleges and universities in California for these ethnic group categories differs from the respective proportions in the population for California? Test the appropriate hypotheses using \(\alpha=.01\).

The paper "Cigarette Tar Yields in Relation to Mortality from Lung Cancer in the Cancer Prevention Study II Prospective Cohort" (British Medical journal [2004]: 72-79) included the accompanying data on the tar level of cigarettes smoked for a sample of male smokers who subsequently died of lung cancer. $$ \begin{array}{lc} \text { Tar Level } & \text { Frequency } \\ \hline 0-7 \mathrm{mg} & 103 \\ 8-14 \mathrm{mg} & 378 \\ 15-21 \mathrm{mg} & 563 \\ \geq 22 \mathrm{mg} & 150 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Assume it is reasonable to regard the sample as representative of male smokers who die of lung cancer. Is there convincing evidence that the proportion of male smoker lung cancer deaths is not the same for the four given tar level categories?

The polling organization Ipsos conducted telephone surveys in March of 2004,2005, and 2006 . In each year, 1001 people age 18 or older were asked about whether they planned to use a credit card to pay federal income taxes that year. The data given in the accompanying table are from the report "Fees Keeping Taxpayers from Using Credit Cards to Make Tax Payments" (IPSOS Insight, March 24, 2006 ). Is there evidence that the proportion falling in the three credit card response categories is not the same for all three years? Test the relevant hypotheses using a .05 significance level. $$ \begin{array}{l|rrr} & 2004 & 2005 & 2006 \\ \hline \text { Definitely/Probably Will } & 40 & 50 & 40 \\ \text { Might/Might Not/Probably Not } & 180 & 190 & 160 \\ \text { Definitely Will Not } & 781 & 761 & 801 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

A random sample of 1000 registered voters in a certain county is selected, and each voter is categorized with respect to both educational level (four categories) and preferred candidate in an upcoming election for county supervisor (five possibilities). The hypothesis of interest is that educational level and preferred candidate are independent. a. If \(X^{2}=7.2\), what would you conclude at significance level. \(10 ?\) b. If there were only four candidates running for election, what would you conclude if \(X^{2}=14.5\) and \(\alpha=.05 ?\)

The paper "Sociochemosensory and Emotional Functions" (Psychological Science [2009]: \(1118-1124\) ) describes an interesting experiment to determine if college students can identify their roommates by smell. Forty-four female college students participated as subjects in the experiment. Each subject was presented with a set of three t-shirts that were identical in appearance. Each of the three t-shirts had been slept in for at least 7 hours by a person who had not used any scented products (like scented deodorant, soap, or shampoo) for at least 48 hours prior to sleeping in the shirt. One of the three shirts had been worn by the subject's roommate. The subject was asked to identify the shirt worn by her roommate. This process was then repeated with another three shirts, and the number of times out of the two trials that the subject correctly identified the shirt worn by her roommate was recorded. The resulting data is given in the accompanying table. $$ \begin{array}{l|ccc} \hline \text { Number of Correct Identifications } & 0 & 1 & 2 \\ \hline \text { Observed Count } & 21 & 10 & 13 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Can a person identify her roommate by smell? If not, the data from the experiment should be consistent with what we would have expected to see if subjects were just guessing on each trial. That is, we would expect that the probability of selecting the correct shirt would be \(1 / 3\) on each of the two trials. It would then be reasonable to regard the number of correct identifications as a binomial variable with \(n=2\) and \(p=1 / 3\). Use this binomial distribution to compute the proportions of the time we would expect to see 0,1, and 2 correct identifications if subjects are just guessing. b. Use the three proportions computed in Part (a) to carry out a test to determine if the numbers of correct identifications by the students in this study are significantly different than what would have been expected by guessing. Use \(\alpha=.05 .\) (Note: One of the expected counts is just a bit less than \(5 .\) For purposes of this exercise, assume that it is \(\mathrm{OK}\) to proceed with a goodness-of-fit test.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.