/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 14 A particular state university sy... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A particular state university system has six campuses. On each campus, a random sample of students will be selected, and each student will be categorized with respect to political philosophy as liberal, moderate, or conservative. The null hypothesis of interest is that the proportion of students falling in these three categories is the same at all six campuses. a. On how many degrees of freedom will the resulting \(X^{2}\) test be based? b. How does your answer in Part (a) change if there are seven campuses rather than six? c. How does your answer in Part (a) change if there are four rather than three categories for political philosophy?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The degrees of freedom for the resulting \(X^{2}\) test will be 10.\nb. If there were seven campuses instead of six, the degrees of freedom would increase to 12.\nc. If there are four categories for political philosophy instead of three, the degrees of freedom will increase to 15.

Step by step solution

01

Analyzing the given data

The total number of categories of political philosophy is three. The total number of campuses is mentioned as six, hence the number of groups is six. The formula to calculate degrees of freedom in a chi-square test is (C-1)*(R-1), where C is the number of columns and R is the number of rows. In this instance, the philosophy categories can be considered as columns and campuses as rows.
02

Calculating Degrees of Freedom for Part a

Using the formula (C-1)*(R-1), substitute C=3 (liberal, moderate and conservative) and R=6 (number of campuses). Therefore df = (3-1) * (6-1)= 2*5= 10. The degrees of freedom for resulting \(X^{2}\) test based on six campuses and three political philosophies is 10.
03

Adapting the calculation for Part b

For part b, the number of campuses increased to seven from six. Substituting C=3 (liberal, moderate and conservative) and R=7 (number of campuses) into the formula, we get df = (3-1) * (7-1) = 2*6 = 12. So, chances are the degrees of freedom will increase to 12 if there are seven campuses.
04

Adapting the calculation for Part c

For part c, there are now four categories for political philosophy instead of three. Substitute C=4 and R=6 (number of campuses) into the formula. Hence, df = (4-1) * (6-1) = 3*5 = 15. Thus, the degrees of freedom now changed to 15 if there are four categories for political philosophy.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The accompanying data on degree of spirituality for a sample of natural scientists and a sample of social scientists working at research universities appeared in the paper "Conflict Between Religion and Science among Academic Scientists" (Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion [2009]: 276-292). Assume that it is reasonable to regard these two samples as representative of natural and social scientists at research universities. Is there evidence that the spirituality category proportions are not the same for natural and social scientists? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.01\). $$ \begin{array}{l|cccc} & \text { Degree of Spirituality } \\ \hline & \text { Very } & \text { Moderate } & \text { Slightly } & \text { Not at All } \\ \hline \text { Natural Scientists } & 56 & 162 & 198 & 211 \\ \text { Social Scientists } & 56 & 223 & 243 & 239 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

The paper “Overweight Among Low-Income Preschool Children Associated with the Consumption of Sweet Drinks" (Pediatrics [2005]: 223-229) described a study of children who were underweight or normal weight at age 2. Children in the sample were classified according to the number of sweet drinks consumed per day and whether or not the child was overweight one year after the study began. Is there evidence of an association between whether or not children are overweight after one year and the number of sweet drinks consumed? Assume that it is reasonable to regard the sample of children in this study as representative of 2 - to 3 -year-old children and then test the appropriate hypotheses using a \(.05\) significance level. $$ \begin{array}{c|rc} \text { Number of Sweet } & \text { Overweight? } \\ \begin{array}{c} \text { Drinks Consumed } \\ \text { per Day } \end{array} & \text { Yes } & \text { No } \\ \hline 0 & 22 & 930 \\ 1 & 73 & 2074 \\ 2 & 56 & 1681 \\ 3 \text { or More } & 102 & 3390 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

A certain genetic characteristic of a particular plant can appear in one of three forms (phenotypes). A researcher has developed a theory, according to which the hypothesized proportions are \(p_{1}=.25, p_{2}=.50\), and \(p_{3}=.25 .\) A random sample of 200 plants yields \(X^{2}=\) \(4.63 .\) a. Carry out a test of the null hypothesis that the theory is correct, using level of significance \(\alpha=.05\). b. Suppose that a random sample of 300 plants had resulted in the same value of \(X^{2}\). How would your analysis and conclusion differ from those in Part (a)?

The authors of the paper "Movie Character Smoking and Adolescent Smoking: Who Matters More, Good Guys or Bad Guys?" (Pediatrics [2009]: 135-141) classified characters who were depicted smoking in movies released between 2000 and \(2005 .\) The smoking characters were classified according to sex and whether the character type was positive, negative or neutral. The resulting data is given in the accompanying table. Assume that it is reasonable to consider this sample of smoking movie characters as representative of smoking movie characters. Do the data provide evidence of an association between sex and character type for movie characters who smoke? Use \(\alpha=.05\). $$ \begin{array}{lccc} & & \text { Character Type } \\ \hline \text { Sex } & \text { Positive } & \text { Negative } & \text { Neutral } \\ \hline \text { Male } & 255 & 106 & 130 \\ \text { Female } & 85 & 12 & 49 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

The article "Cooperative Hunting in Lions: The Role of the Individual" (Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology [1992]: \(445-454\) ) discusses the different roles taken by lionesses as they attack and capture prey. The authors were interested in the effect of the position in line as stalking occurs; an individual lioness may be in the center of the line or on the wing (end of the line) as they advance toward their prey. In addition to position, the role of the lioness was also considered. A lioness could initiate a chase (be the first one to charge the prey), or she could participate and join the chase after it has been initiated. Data from the article are summarized in the accompanying table. $$ \begin{array}{l|cc} & \text { Role } \\ \hline \text { Position } & \text { Initiate Chase } & \text { Participate in Chase } \\ \hline \text { Center } & 28 & 48 \\ \text { Wing } & 66 & 41 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Is there evidence of an association between position and role? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.01\). What assumptions about how the data were collected must be true for the chi-square test to be an appropriate way to analyze these data?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.