/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 78 Are very young infants more like... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Are very young infants more likely to imitate actions that are modeled by a person or simulated by an object? This question was the basis of a research study summarized in the article "The Role of Person and Object in Eliciting Farly Imitation" (journal of Experimental Child Psychology [1991]: 423-433). One action examined was mouth opening. This action was modeled repeatedly by either a person or a doll, and the number of times that the infant imitated the behavior was recorded. Twenty-seven infants participated, with 12 exposed to a human model and 15 exposed to the doll. Summary values are at the top of the following page. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean number of imitations is higher for infants who watch a human model than for infants who watch a doll? Test the relevant hypotheses using a \(.01\) significance level.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The answer will depend on the calculated test statistic (Z) and the comparison of the P-value with the given significance level (0.01). If the P-value<.01, we can say there is sufficient evidence to conclude the mean number of imitations is higher for infants who watch the human model. Conversely, if P-value>.01, there isn't sufficient evidence to say the mean number of imitations is higher for infants who watch the human model.

Step by step solution

01

Formulate the Hypotheses

We are testing whether the mean number of imitations is higher for infants who watch a human model than for infants who watch a doll. Thus, the null hypothesis (H0) is that the mean number of imitations is same for both the groups. The alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that the mean number of imitations is higher for infants who watch a human model. Thus, \(H0: \mu_{Human} = \mu_{Doll}\); \(Ha: \mu_{Human} > \mu_{Doll}\).
02

Calculate the Test Statistic

The test statistic for comparing two means can be calculated using the formula: \(Z = \frac{{\overline{X}_{Human} - \overline{X}_{Doll}}} {{\sqrt{\frac{S_{Human}^2}{n_{Human}} + \frac{S_{Doll}^2}{n_{Doll}}}}}\), where \(\overline{X}_{Human}\) and \(\overline{X}_{Doll}\) are the sample means, \(S_{Human}^2\) and \(S_{Doll}^2\) are the sample variances and \(n_{Human}\) and \(n_{Doll}\) are the sample sizes.
03

Find the P-value

The P-value can be found using the standard normal (Z) distribution table or a calculator that can evaluate P-values. The P-value is the probability of getting a Z as extreme as our calculated Z when the null hypothesis is true. For a one-tailed test (since we are testing whether the mean for human group is higher), we look at the area under the curve beyond our calculated Z.
04

Make a Decision and Interpret

We compare the P-value to the given significance level (0.01). If the P-value is less than 0.01, we reject the null hypothesis. If it is greater, we do not reject. Then we interpret our findings in the context of the problem.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis is a statement that indicates no effect or no difference. It's the starting assumption that any observed differences are due to random chance. In our infant imitation study, the null hypothesis, denoted as \(H_0\), states that the mean number of imitations is the same for both infants watching a human model and those watching a doll. In mathematical terms, this is expressed as \( \mu_{\text{Human}} = \mu_{\text{Doll}} \). The null hypothesis serves as a baseline that the test seeks to challenge by determining if there is enough evidence to suggest a real effect or difference.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis is the counter-claim to the null hypothesis. In hypothesis testing, it's what you seek evidence for through your data and analysis. Unlike the null hypothesis that assumes no difference, the alternative hypothesis suggests that there is indeed a statistically significant difference. In the context of this study, the alternative hypothesis suggests that infants who observe a human model imitate more frequently than those observing a doll. It is represented mathematically as \( \mu_{\text{Human}} > \mu_{\text{Doll}} \). This directional hypothesis indicates a specific expectation that guides the testing process.
Significance Level
The significance level, often denoted by \(\alpha\), is the threshold used to decide whether the observed data are unlikely under the assumption of the null hypothesis. In this study, a significance level of \(0.01\) is used.
  • This means there is a 1% risk of concluding that there is an effect when there is none, generally considered a very stringent criterion for evidence.
  • A smaller \(\alpha\) means stricter requirements for evidence.
By choosing a low significance level, the researchers ensure that findings of a significant difference are robust and not just by random variability.
P-value
The P-value is a critical component of hypothesis testing, representing the probability of observing your data—or something more extreme—assuming the null hypothesis is true. In simple terms, it helps decide whether to reject the null hypothesis. For this exercise, once the test statistic is calculated, you compare the P-value to the significance level:
  • If the P-value is less than the significance level (0.01 here), you reject the null hypothesis.
  • If it is greater, you fail to reject the null hypothesis.
A low P-value indicates that the observed data would be very unlikely if the null hypothesis were true, suggesting that the alternative hypothesis may be more plausible.
Test Statistic
The test statistic is a standardized value that is calculated from sample data during a hypothesis test. It measures how far the sample mean deviates from the null hypothesis mean, relative to the variability of the sample data. In this study, the test statistic is calculated using the formula: \[Z = \frac{{\overline{X}_{\text{Human}} - \overline{X}_{\text{Doll}}}}{{\sqrt{\frac{S_{\text{Human}}^2}{n_{\text{Human}}} + \frac{S_{\text{Doll}}^2}{n_{\text{Doll}}}}}}\]Where:
  • \( \overline{X}_{\text{Human}} \) and \( \overline{X}_{\text{Doll}} \) are the sample means of the human and doll groups respectively.
  • \( S_{\text{Human}}^2 \) and \( S_{\text{Doll}}^2 \) are the sample variances.
  • \( n_{\text{Human}} \) and \( n_{\text{Doll}} \) are the sample sizes.
The calculated \( Z \)-value is then used to find the P-value, determining the statistical significance of the findings.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

=The article "Trial Lawyers and Testosterone: Blue-Collar Talent in a White-Collar World" (Journal of Applied Social Psychology [1998]: \(84-94\) ) compared trial lawyers and nontrial lawyers on the basis of mean testosterone level. Random samples of 35 male trial lawyers, 31 male nontrial lawyers, 13 female trial lawyers, and 18 female nontrial lawyers were selected for study. The article includes the following statement: "Trial lawyers had higher testosterone levels than did nontrial lawyers. This was true for men, \(t(64)=3.75, p<.001\), and for women, \(t(29)=2.26, p<.05 . "\) a. Based on the information given, is the mean testosterone level for male trial lawyers significantly higher than for male nontrial lawyers? b. Based on the information given, is the mean testosterone level for female trial lawyers significantly higher than for female nontrial lawyers? c. Do you have enough information to carry out a test to determine whether there is a significant difference in the mean testosterone levels of male and female \mathrm{\\{} t r i a l ~ l a w y e r s ? ~ I f ~ s o , ~ c a r r y ~ o u t ~ s u c h ~ a ~ t e s t . ~ I f ~ n o t , ~ w h a t ~ additional information would you need to be able to conduct the tesr?

Consider two populations for which \(\mu_{1}=30\), \(\sigma_{1}=2, \mu_{2}=25\), and \(\sigma_{2}=3\). Suppose that two independent random samples of sizes \(n_{1}=40\) and \(n_{2}=50\) are selected. Describe the approximate sampling distribution of \(\bar{x}_{1}-\bar{x}_{2}\) (center, spread, and shape).

Common Sense Media surveyed 1000 teens and 1000 parents of teens to learn about how teens are using social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace ("Teens Show. Tell Too Much Online." San Francisco Chronicle, August 10,2009 ). The two samples were independently selected and were chosen in a way that makes it reasonable to regard them as representative of American teens and parents of American teens. a. When asked if they check their online social networking sites more than 10 times a day, 220 of the teens surveyed said yes. When parents of teens were asked if their teen checked his or her site more than 10 times a day, 40 said yes. Use a significance level of \(.01\) to carry out a hypothesis test to determine if there is convincing evidence that the proportion of all parents who think their teen checks a social networking site more than 10 times a day is less than the proportion of all teens who report that they check more than 10 times a day. b. The article also reported that 390 of the teens surveyed said they had posted something on their networking site that they later regretted. Would you use the two-sample \(z\) test of this section to test the hypothesis that more than one-third of all teens have posted something on a social networking site that they later regretted? Explain why or why not. c. Using an appropriate test procedure, carry out a test of the hypothesis given in Part (b). Use \(\alpha=.05\) for this test.

In December 2001 , the Department of Vererans Affairs announced that it would begin paying benefits to soldiers suffering from Lou Gehrig's disease who had served in the Gulf War (The New york Times, December 11,2001 ). This decision was based on an analysis in which the Lou Gehrig's disease incidence rate (the proportion developing the disease) for the approximately 700,000 soldiers sent to the Gulf between August 1990 and July 1991 was compared to the incidence rate for the approximately \(1.8\) million other soldiers who were not in the Gulf during this time period. Based on these data, explain why it is not appropriate to perform a formal inference procedure (such as the two-sample \(z\) test) and yet it is still reasonable to conclude that the incidence rate is higher for Gulf War veterans than for those who did not serve in the Gulf War.

Public Agenda conducted a survey of 1379 parents and 1342 students in grades \(6-12\) regarding the importance of science and mathematics in the school curriculum (Assodated Press, February 15,2006 ). It was reported that \(50 \%\) of students thought that understanding science and having strong math skills are essential for them to succeed in life after school, whereas \(62 \%\) of the parents thought it was crucial for today's students to learn science and higher-level math. The two samples -parents and students-were selected independently of one anorher. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of parents who regard science and mathematics as crucial is different than the corresponding proportion for students in grades \(6-12\) ? 'Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of .05.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.