/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 60 The paper "Ready or Not? Criteri... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The paper "Ready or Not? Criteria for Marriage Readiness among Emerging Adults" (journal of Adolescent Research [2009]: 349-375) surveyed emerging adults (defined as age 18 to 25 ) from five different colleges in the United States. Several questions on the survey were used to construct a scale designed to measure endorsement of cohabitation. The paper states that "on average, emerging adult men \((M=3.75, S D=1.21)\) reported higher levels of cohabitation cndorsement than cmerging adult women \((\mathrm{M}=3.39, \mathrm{SD}=1.17) .\) " The sample sizes were 481 for women and 307 for men. a. Carry out a hypothesis test to determine if the reported difference in sample means provides convincing evidence that the mean cohabitation endorsement for emerging adult women is significantly less than the mean for emerging adult men for students at these five colleges. b. What additional information would you want in order to determine whether it is reasonable to generalize the conclusion of the hypothesis test from Part (a) to all college students?

Short Answer

Expert verified
To provide a specific short answer, one must carry out the calculations outlined in the steps. The conclusion will be based on whether the P-value is less than or equal to 0.05.

Step by step solution

01

State the Hypotheses

The null hypothesis \(H_0\) assumes that there is no difference between the population means of men and women. So, \(H_0: \mu_m = \mu_w\). The alternative hypothesis \(H_1\) is that the population mean for women is less than that for men, \(H_1: \mu_w < \mu_m\).
02

Calculate Difference in Sample Means

Calculate the difference between sample means: \(d = M_w - M_m = 3.39 - 3.75 = -0.36.\)
03

Calculate Standard Error

The formula for standard error for two means is \(SE = \sqrt{ \frac{{SD_w^2}}{{n_w}} + \frac{{SD_m^2}}{{n_m}} }\). Plugging the given values, \(SE = \sqrt{ \frac{{1.17^2}}{{481}} + \frac{{1.21^2}}{{307}} }.\)
04

Calculate t-statistic

Here, t-statistic \(t = \frac{d}{SE}\). Calculate this value using the earlier determined values of \(d\) and \(SE\). This gives the number of standard errors the difference in sample means is away from the null hypothesis mean difference of 0.
05

Find the P-value

Looking up the calculated t-statistic in a t-table (or using a t-distribution calculator), find the corresponding P-value. This P-value gives the probability under the null hypothesis of getting a t-statistic as extreme as the one calculated. If this is a small value (traditionally less than 0.05), we have evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
06

State Conclusion

If P-value is less than 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis, and conclude that there is significant evidence to state that the mean endorsement for cohabitation among women is lower than that of men. If P-value is greater than or equal to 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis, and conclude that there is not significant evidence to prove that mean endorsement for cohabitation among women is lower than that of men.
07

Additional Information for Generalization

For part (b), to apply these results to all college students, it would be helpful to know if the students surveyed were a random sample, how the colleges were selected, the diversity of the students and the colleges in terms of location, socio-economic status, religion, etc., as these factors could affect attitudes towards cohabitation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null and Alternative Hypotheses
In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis ( H0) and the alternative hypothesis ( H1) form the foundation for statistical analysis. The null hypothesis represents a position of no effect or no difference, and is the claim we aim to challenge with our data. For instance, in the exercise regarding cohabitation endorsement levels, the null hypothesis asserts that there is no difference in average endorsement levels ( Mw) = Mm) ) between emerging adult men and women.

Conversely, the alternative hypothesis posits that there is an effect or a difference, which has not occurred due to random chance. In the cohabitation study, the alternative hypothesis suggests that emerging adult women have a significantly lower mean endorsement for cohabitation ( Mw) < Mm) ). Establishing hypotheses is crucial as they determine the direction and nature of the statistical tests we will perform.
T-Statistic
The t-statistic is a ratio which allows us to assess how far apart the sample means are, relative to the variation in the sample data. In simpler terms, it helps to determine whether a statistical difference between two groups’ means is likely to have occurred by chance. The t-statistic is calculated using the difference between sample means divided by the standard error. In our example related to cohabitation endorsement, the t-statistic quantifies the number of standard errors the observed difference in means ( d) ) is from the expected difference under the null hypothesis (typically zero). The further away the t-statistic is from zero, the more likely it is that the observed difference did not occur by chance, thus providing evidence against the null hypothesis.
P-Value
In the context of hypothesis testing, the p-value is a probability that measures the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis provided by the sample data. It represents the probability of obtaining a test statistic as extreme as the one computed, assuming the null hypothesis is true. A low p-value ( p<0.05) ) typically indicates strong evidence against the null hypothesis, suggesting we should reject it in favor of the alternative hypothesis. In our case study, calculating the p-value helps to decide whether the observed difference in cohabitation endorsement between genders is statistically significant or could be attributed to random sampling variation.
Sample Means Comparison
Comparing sample means is a fundamental aspect of hypothesis testing when dealing with quantitative data. It involves assessing whether the mean values observed in two different samples are statistically significantly different from one another. This process involves calculating the difference between the sample means and evaluating this result against a theoretical distribution (usually a t-distribution for small samples). In the exercise, comparing the sample means of cohabitation endorsements between men and women is the key step for testing the hypothesis that there is a gender difference in attitudes towards cohabitation among college students.
Standard Error Calculation
The standard error is a measurement of the variability of a sample mean estimate. It is important in hypothesis testing because it is used in calculating the test statistic, which in turn helps to inform us about the precision of our sample mean difference estimate. To calculate the standard error for comparing two means, as seen in the cohabitation exercise, we use the formula involving the standard deviations of both groups and their respective sample sizes. A smaller standard error suggests that the sample mean is a more reliable estimate of the population mean. Knowing the standard error is essential when assessing the reliability of sample comparisons and in the calculation of the t-statistic.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a term used to decide if the results of the statistical test are likely to be due to something other than mere random chance. It indicates whether the observed effects or differences in the study are likely to be genuine or just due to variability in the data. Significance is often denoted by the p-value; if the p-value is less than the chosen significance level ( < 0.05)) , the results are deemed statistically significant. This is integral to our decision-making in hypothesis testing, such as determining if the difference in cohabitation endorsement by gender in the study really exists or is statistically significant.
Generalization of Results
The ability to generalize results from a study to a larger population is an essential aspect of research. It depends on how the sample was chosen and whether it is representative of the target population. When our hypothesis test indicates a significant result, we must consider whether our sample is random and diverse enough to allow for broader generalization. In the case of the cohabitation endorsement study, knowing the demographic and geographic diversity of the student sample, as well as the selection process of the colleges, is necessary to understand whether these findings can be generalized to all college students. It is only with representative samples that we can reasonably infer findings to a wider population.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Fish Oil Staves Off Schizophrenia" (USA Today. February 2, 2010) describes a study in which 81 patients age 13 to 25 who were considered atrisk for mental illness were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Those in one group took four fish oil capsules daily. The other group took a placebo. After 1 year, \(5 \%\) of those in the fish oil group and \(28 \%\) of those in the placebo group had become psychotic. Is it appropriate to use the two-sample \(z\) test of this section to test hypotheses about the difference in the proportions of patients receiving the fish oil and the placebo treatments who became psychotic? Explain why or why not.

"Mountain Biking May Reduce Fertility in Men. Study Says" was the headline of an article appearing in the San Luis Obispo Tribune (December 3,2002\()\). This conclusion was based on an Austrian study that compared sperm counts of avid mountain bikers (those who ride at least 12 hours per week) and nonbikers. Ninety percent of the avid mountain bikers studied had low sperm counts, as compared to \(26 \%\) of the nonbikers. Suppose that these percentages were based on independent samples of 100 avid mountain bikers and 100 nonbikers and that it is reasonable to view these samples as representative of Austrian avid mountain bikers and nonbikers. a. Do these data provide convincing evidence that the proportion of Austrian avid mountain bikers with low sperm count is higher than the proportion of Austrian nonbikers? b. Based on the outcome of the test in Part (a), is it reasonable to conclude that mountain biking 12 hours per week or more causes low sperm count? Explain.

Two different underground pipe coatings for preventing corrosion are to be compared. The effect of a coating (as measured by maximum depth of corrosion penetration on a piece of pipe) may vary with depth, orientation, soil type, pipe composition, etc. Describe how an experiment that filters out the effects of these extraneous factors could be carried out.

An experiment to determine if an online intervention can reduce references to sex and substance abuse on social networking web sites of adolescents is described in the paper "Reducing At-Risk Adolescents' Display of Risk Behavior on a Social Networking Web Site" (Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine I2009 \(\mathrm{k}\). 35-41). Rescarchers selected public MySpace profiles of people who described themselves as between 18 and 20 years old and who referenced sex or substance use (alcohol or drugs) in their profiles. The selected subjects were assigned at random to an intervention group or a control group. Those in the intervention group were sent an c-mail from a physician about the risks associated with having a public profile and of referencing sex or substance use in their profile. Three months later, networking sites were revisited to see if any changes had been made. The following excerpt is from the paper: a. The quote from the paper references four hypothesis tests. For each test, indicate what hypotheses you think were tested and whether or not the null hypothesis was rejected. b. Based on the information provided by the hypothesis tests, what conclusions can be drawn about the effectiveness of the e-mail intervention?

In a study of malpractice claims where a settlement had been reached, two random samples were selected: a random sample of 515 closed malpractice claims that were found not to involve medical errors and a random sample of 889 claims that were found to involve errors (New England journal of Medicine \(12006 \mathrm{l}\) : \(2024-2033) .\) The following statement appeared in the referenced paper: "When claims not involving errors were compensated, payments were significantly lower on average than were payments for claims involving errors \((\$ 313,205\) vs. \(\$ 521,560, P=0.004) . "\) a. What hypotheses must the researchers have tested in order to reach the stated conclusion? b. Which of the following could have been the value of the test statistic for the hypothesis test? Explain your reasoning. i. \(t=5.00\) ii. \(t=2.65\) iii. \(t=2.33\) iv. \(t=1.47\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.