/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 54 A comprehensive study conducted ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A comprehensive study conducted by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development tracked more than 1000 children from an early age through elementary school (New york Times, November 1, 2005). The study concluded that children who spent more than 30 hours a week in child care before entering school tended to score higher in math and reading when they were in the third grade. The researchers cautioned that the findings should not be a cause for alarm because the effects of child care were found to be small. Explain how the difference between the sample mean math score for third graders who spent long hours in child care and the known overall mean for third graders could be small but the researchers could still reach the conclusion that the mean for the child care group is significantly higher than the overall mean for third graders.

Short Answer

Expert verified
A small difference between two means can still be statistically significant. This happens due to the combination of a large sample size (reducing the variability of the estimate of the mean) and variability within groups. Thus, even with a small mathematical difference, a statistical test may find a statistically significant difference.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Basic Concept

The first point to understand is that when we talk about the mean being 'significantly higher', we are not referring to the magnitude of the difference, but rather to the statistical term 'significance'. This implicates that the observed discrepancy is not due to chance, and is a credible one.
02

Grasp the Role of Sample Size

Having a large sample size, like 1000 children in this case, grants us with more accurate and less variable estimates. Hence, we become more confident that our sample mean is close to the true population mean. Therefore, even if the difference between the two means is small, we may still have sufficient evidence to conclude that the difference is significant since we have a large sample size.
03

Learn About Hypothesis Testing

Researchers perform something called a 'hypothesis test' to determine whether the difference between two group means are statistically significant. This test takes into account both the size of the difference and the variability of the scores (standard deviation). Even if the difference between the means is small, if the variability is small as well, this can lead to a statistically significant result.
04

Consider Variance

When comparing means, we need to take into account both the size of the difference and the variability of the groups. It's entirely possible that the overall mean and the mean of those children who spent long time in care are not significantly different in a mathematical sense, but they are statistically different. This is because the statistical difference is not about the raw size of the difference, but rather whether this difference is more than we would expect due to variability in scores (or pure chance).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Mean Comparison
The concept of mean comparison lies at the heart of many statistical analyses, particularly when trying to discern whether two groups differ significantly in a certain characteristic. For example, comparing the mean math scores of third-graders who spent over 30 hours a week in child care with the overall mean score of all third-graders. It might seem counterintuitive, but a statistically significant mean comparison does not necessarily hinge on a large numerical difference between means. Instead, it's about establishing whether the observed difference is reliable and not just a product of random chance.

When researchers report a 'small but significant' difference, they have employed statistical tests to ensure the difference seen isn't just an artifact of the sample data. A small difference, when measured over a large sample like the 1000 children in the study, may still paint an accurate picture that represents the broader population. It means this slight edge in math scores for children in extensive child care could be true for similar children elsewhere, not only those in the study.
Sample Size in Statistics
The role of sample size in statistics cannot be overstated. A larger sample size increases the likelihood that the sample adequately reflects the population, reducing the margin of error and boosting confidence in the results. In hypothesis testing, a larger sample size can make even small differences between the groups statistically significant. This is because increasing the sample size reduces the effect of random fluctuations within the data. When the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development conducted their study with over 1000 children, they ensured a sample size ample enough to detect small yet significant differences in math and reading scores. This concept is crucial for students to grasp – the power a large sample size wields in validating the significance of findings, even subtle ones.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a method used to determine whether there is enough statistical evidence in a sample of data to infer that a certain condition is true for the entire population. In the context of education, for instance, researchers might hypothesize that prolonged child care affects third-graders' math scores. Using a standardized process, they compare the sample mean against the known overall mean, factoring in the sample size and the variability of scores. If the test reveals that the likelihood of the observed difference (or greater) occurring by chance is very low, they conclude the results are statistically significant.

This significance doesn't mean the difference is large; it means we can be fairly sure there is an actual difference and it's not just a coincidence. Students learning about hypothesis testing should understand that it is the cornerstone of making objective decisions based on data in many fields, including education.
Statistical Variability
Statistical variability, or variance, is the measure of how much the scores in a data set differ from each other and from the mean. When variance is low, the scores are more tightly clustered around the mean; when it's high, they are more spread out. In the study of third-graders' math scores, low variability would mean the scores are consistent among children who spent more time in child care, strengthening the trust in the mean score as a representative metric.

When comparing two means, such as the mean score of the child care group and the overall mean for third graders, researchers look for a statistically significant difference while considering this variability. Even if the means are quite close, if the data has low variability, the researchers could conclude with greater confidence that the slight difference is meaningful and reflects a true effect, not merely random chance.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A certain television station has been providing live coverage of a particularly sensational criminal trial. The station's program director wishes to know whether more than half the potential viewers prefer a return to regular daytime programming. A survey of randomly selected viewers is conducted. Let \(p\) represent the proportion of all viewers who prefer regular daytime programming. What hypotheses should the program director test to answer the question of interest?

A television manufacturer claims that (at least) \(90 \%\) of its TV sets will need no service during the first 3 years of operation. A consumer agency wishes to check this claim, so it obtains a random sample of \(n=100\) purchasers and asks each whether the set purchased needed repair during the first 3 years after purchase. Let \(\hat{p}\) be the sample proportion of responses indicating no repair (so that no repair is identified with a success). Let \(p\) denote the actual proportion of successes for all sets made by this manufacturer. The agency does not want to claim false advertising unless sample evidence strongly suggests that \(p<.9\). The appropriate hypotheses are then \(H_{0}: p=.9\) versus \(H_{a}: p<.9\). a. In the context of this problem, describe Type I and Type II errors, and discuss the possible consequences of each. b. Would you recommend a test procedure that uses \(\alpha=.10\) or one that uses \(\alpha=.01 ?\) Explain.

Explain why the statement \(\bar{x}=50\) is not a legitimate hypothesis.

A certain university has decided to introduce the use of plus and minus with letter grades, as long as there is evidence that more than \(60 \%\) of the faculty favor the change. A random sample of faculty will be selected, and the resulting data will be used to test the relevant hypotheses. If \(p\) represents the proportion of all faculty that favor a change to plus-minus grading, which of the following pair of hypotheses should the administration test: $$ H_{0}: p=.6 \text { versus } H_{a}: p<.6 $$ or $$ H_{0}: p=.6 \text { versus } H_{a}: p>.6 $$

In a study of computer use, 1000 randomly selected Canadian Internet users were asked how much time they spend using the Internet in a typical week (Ipsos Reid, August 9,2005 ). The mean of the sample observations was \(12.7\) hours. a. The sample standard deviation was not reported, but suppose that it was 5 hours. Carry out a hypothesis test with a significance level of \(.05\) to decide if there is convincing evidence that the mean time spent using the Internet by Canadians is greater than \(12.5\) hours. b. Now suppose that the sample standard deviation was 2 hours. Carry out a hypothesis test with a signifi-

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.