/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 25 Pairs of \(P\) -values and signi... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Pairs of \(P\) -values and significance levels, \(\alpha\), are given. For each pair, state whether the observed \(P\) -value leads to rejection of \(H_{0}\) at the given significance level. a. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.084, \alpha=.05\) b. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.003, \alpha=.001\) c. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.498, \alpha=.05\) d. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.084, \alpha=.10\) e. \(P\) -value \(=.039, \alpha=.01\) f. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.218, \alpha=.10\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
For the given pairs, a. Do not reject \(H_{0}\)b. Do not reject \(H_{0}\)c. Do not reject \(H_{0}\)d. Reject \(H_{0}\)e. Do not reject \(H_{0}\)f. Do not reject \(H_{0}\)

Step by step solution

01

Analyzing P-value and \(\alpha\) for each pair

For each pair, the P-value and \(\alpha\) are analyzed and the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\) is accepted or rejected based on whether the P-value is less than or equal to \(\alpha\). a. Here, the P-value (0.084) is greater than \(\alpha\) (0.05), so we do not reject \(H_{0}\). b. The P-value (0.003) is greater than \(\alpha\) (0.001), hence the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\) cannot be rejected. c. In this case, the P-value (0.498) is greater than \(\alpha\) (0.05), so the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\) is not rejected.d. Here, the P-value (0.084) is less than \(\alpha\) (0.10), hence we can reject \(H_{0}\). e. The P-value (0.039) is greater than \(\alpha\) (0.01), hence the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\) cannot be rejected.f. Lastly, the P-value (0.218) is greater than \(\alpha\) (0.10), hence the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\) is not rejected.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

P-value
The P-value is a crucial component in hypothesis testing. It helps us determine the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis. Imagine the P-value as a measure of surprise. It tells us how unusual our observed data is if the null hypothesis were true.

- A smaller P-value indicates stronger evidence against the null hypothesis, because it suggests that the observed data is less likely to have occurred by chance under the null hypothesis.
- Conversely, a larger P-value suggests weak evidence against the null hypothesis, implying that the observed data is fairly likely given the null hypothesis is true.

We typically compare the P-value to a chosen significance level, often represented as \( \alpha \), to decide whether we should reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis in our statistical tests.
Significance Level
The significance level, symbolized by \( \alpha \), is a threshold set by the researcher before conducting a hypothesis test. It represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true.

Often dubbed the 'alpha level,' it is commonly set at 0.05, though it can vary depending on the context of the research. A lower significance level indicates a stricter criterion for rejecting the null hypothesis.

For example:
  • \( \alpha = 0.05 \): The researcher is willing to accept a 5% chance of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis (Type I error).
  • \( \alpha = 0.01 \): There is only a 1% risk of a Type I error, demonstrating more rigorous standards.
In our exercise, a comparison between each P-value and its corresponding \( \alpha \) helps determine whether to reject \( H_0 \).
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, usually denoted as \( H_0 \), is a statement that there is no effect or no difference, and it serves as the starting point for statistical testing.

The main goal in hypothesis testing is to gather evidence to assess whether the data at hand supports the null hypothesis or suggests an alternative hypothesis might be true. However:
  • If the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level \( \alpha \), we reject the null hypothesis, suggesting that the evidence is strong enough to favor the alternative hypothesis.
  • If the P-value is greater than \( \alpha \), we do not reject the null hypothesis, indicating that there isn’t sufficient evidence against it.
In practice, the null hypothesis serves as a benchmark against which the statistical significance of the observed data is assessed.
Statistical Decision Making
Statistical decision making is the process of using data analysis to guide actions or conclusions. This involves comparing the P-value to the significance level \( \alpha \) to determine the outcome of the hypothesis test.

Here's how we make decisions based on our exercise:
  • "Reject \( H_0 \)" if the P-value is less than or equal to \( \alpha \). This suggests the data provides strong evidence that the null hypothesis is not true.
  • "Fail to reject \( H_0 \)" if the P-value is greater than \( \alpha \). This implies there isn’t enough evidence to dispute the null hypothesis.
By understanding these concepts, researchers can make informed conclusions from their data. This forms the bedrock of many scientific discoveries and practical decisions in fields like medicine, marketing, and more.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The paper titled "Music for Pain Relief" (The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, April \(19 .\) 2006) concluded, based on a review of 51 studies of the effect of music on pain intensity, that "Listening to music reduces pain intensity levels .... However, the magnitude of these positive effects is small, the clinical relevance of music for pain relief in clinical practice is unclear." Are the authors of this paper claiming that the pain reduction attributable to listening to music is not statistically significant, not practically significant, or neither statistically nor practically significant? Explain.

Researchers at the University of Washington and Harvard University analyzed records of breast cancer screening and diagnostic evaluations ("Mammogram Cancer Scares More Frequent than Thought," USA Today. April 16, 1998). Discussing the benefits and downsides of the screening process, the article states that, although the rate of false-positives is higher than previously thought, if radiologists were less aggressive in following up on suspicious tests, the rate of false-positives would fall but the rate of missed cancers would rise. Suppose that such a screening test is used to decide between a null hypothesis of \(H_{0}:\) no cancer is present and an alternative hypothesis of \(H_{a}\) : cancer is present. (Although these are not hypotheses about a population characteristic, this exercise illustrates the definitions of Type I and Type II errors.) a. Would a false-positive (thinking that cancer is present when in fact it is not) be a Type I error or a Type II error? b. Describe a Type I error in the context of this problem, and discuss the consequences of making a Type I error. c. Describe a Type II error in the context of this problem, and discuss the consequences of making a Type II error. d. What aspect of the relationship between the probability of Type I and Type II errors is being described by the statement in the article that if radiologists were less aggressive in following up on suspicious tests, the rate of false-positives would fall but the rate of missed cancers would rise?

A certain pen has been designed so that true average writing lifetime under controlled conditions (involving the use of a writing machine) is at least 10 hours. A random sample of 18 pens is selected, the writing lifetime of each is determined, and a normal probability plot of the resulting data supports the use of a one-sample \(t\) test. The relevant hypotheses are \(H_{0}: \mu=10\) versus \(H_{a}: \mu<10 .\) a. If \(t=-2.3\) and \(\alpha=.05\) is selected, what conclusion is appropriate?

An automobile manufacturer who wishes to advertise that one of its models achieves \(30 \mathrm{mpg}\) (miles per gallon) decides to carry out a fuel efficiency test. Six nonprofessional drivers are selected, and each one drives a car from Phoenix to Los Angeles. The resulting fuel efficiencies (in miles per gallon) are: \(\begin{array}{llllll}27.2 & 29.3 & 31.2 & 28.4 & 30.3 & 29.6\end{array}\) Assuming that fuel efficiency is normally distributed under these circumstances, do the data contradict the claim that true average fuel efficiency is (at least) \(30 \mathrm{mpg}\) ?

A student organization uses the proceeds from a particular soft-drink dispensing machine to finance its activities. The price per can had been \(\$ 0.75\) for a long time, and the average daily revenue during that period had been \(\$ 75.00\). The price was recently increased to \(\$ 1.00\) per can. A random sample of \(n=20\) days after the price increase yielded a sample mean daily revenue and sample standard deviation of \(\$ 70.00\) and \(\$ 4.20\), respectively. Does this information suggest that the true average daily revenue has decreased from its value before the price increase? Test the appropriate hypotheses using \(\alpha=.05\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.