/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 60 A construction firm bids on two ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A construction firm bids on two different contracts. Let \(E_{1}\) be the event that the bid on the first contract is successful, and define \(E_{2}\) analogously for the second contract. Suppose that \(P\left(E_{1}\right)=.4\) and \(P\left(E_{2}\right)=.2\) and that \(E_{1}\) and \(E_{2}\) are independent events. a. Calculate the probability that both bids are successful (the probability of the event \(E_{1}\) and \(E_{2}\) ). b. Calculate the probability that neither bid is successful (the probability of the event \(\left(\right.\) not \(\left.E_{1}\right)\) and \(\left(\right.\) not \(\left.E_{2}\right)\) ). c. What is the probability that the firm is successful in at least one of the two bids?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The probability that both bids are successful is 0.08. b. The probability that neither bid is successful is 0.48. c. The probability that at least one bid is successful is 0.52.

Step by step solution

01

Calculating the Probability that Both Bids are Successful

Given the two events \(E_{1}\) and \(E_{2}\) are independent, the probability of both events occurring simultaneously is the product of their individual probabilities. Therefore, the probability that both bids are successful, \(P(E_{1} \cap E_{2})\), can be calculated using the formula \(P(E_{1}) \cdot P(E_{2})\). From the problem, \(P(E_{1}) = 0.4\) and \(P(E_{2}) = 0.2\). So, \(P(E_{1} \cap E_{2}) = 0.4 \cdot 0.2 = 0.08\).
02

Calculating the Probability that Neither Bids is Successful

The probability of the complement of an event can be calculated as \(1 - P(E)\). Given that events \(E_{1}\) and \(E_{2}\) are independent, the probability that neither event occurs (not \(E_{1}\) and not \(E_{2}\)) is the product of their individual complement probabilities. The calculation would be as follows: \(P(\neg E_{1}) = 1 - P(E_{1}) = 1 - 0.4 = 0.6, P(\neg E_{2}) = 1 - P(E_{2}) = 1 - 0.2 = 0.8\), so \(P(\neg E_{1} \cap \neg E_{2}) = P(\neg E_{1}) \cdot P(\neg E_{2}) = 0.6 \cdot 0.8 = 0.48\).
03

Calculating the Probability that at Least One Bid is Successful

The event that at least one bid is successful is the complement of the event that neither bid is successful. So, its probability can be calculated as \(P(\left(E_{1} \cup E_{2}\right) = 1 - P(\neg E_{1} \cap \neg E_{2}) = 1 - 0.48 = 0.52\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Independence
Understanding the concept of statistical independence is crucial when analyzing the relationship between two events. In probability theory, two events are considered to be statistically independent if the occurrence of one event has no effect on the probability of the occurrence of the other. To put it simply, knowing that one event has occurred does not change the likelihood of the other event happening.

For example, in the exercise provided, the fact that the construction firm is successful in one contract bid does not influence the outcome of the other bid. The events are independent, and their probabilities can be multiplied to find the combined probability of both events occurring. Formally, this relationship is expressed as:
\[ P(E_1 \cap E_2) = P(E_1) \cdot P(E_2) \].

It is important to note that independence is a theoretical assumption and may not always reflect real-world situations. Furthermore, the probability of independent events never adds up to more than 1, as they are separate occurrences not affecting each other.
Complement of an Event
The complement of an event is a fundamental concept in probability and represents all outcomes that are not part of the event itself. Formally, the complement of an event \(E\) is denoted as \(eg E\) and essentially captures the notion of 'everything else that can happen in our sample space outside of event \(E\)'.

If you're told that the probability of a certain event is, say, 0.4, then you can instantly determine that the probability of the event not happening is 0.6, because \(P(eg E) = 1 - P(E)\). This is precisely what we did in the textbook exercise for each bid. The calculation of the probability that neither bid is successful is also a direct application of this concept, where you multiply the probabilities of the complements of each independent event.

Another useful application of this concept is that it can help you determine the probability of at least one event occurring. By finding the probability that neither event occurs and then taking the complement of that, you're left with the probability that at least one event occurs, which is what part (c) of the exercise asked for.
Union of Events
The union of two events, denoted as \(E_1 \cup E_2\), represents the occurrence of at least one of the events. It's the event that either \(E_1\), \(E_2\), or both take place. In simpler terms, it's like saying 'either this or that or both.' This is particularly important for compound events where multiple outcomes are favorable.

Calculating the probability of the union of independent events requires careful attention. For mutually exclusive events (events that cannot happen at the same time), the probability of their union is the sum of their individual probabilities. However, when events are not mutually exclusive, as in they can both happen together, we must correct for the fact that we have counted the intersection twice. This correction leads us to the principle of inclusion-exclusion:
\[ P(E_1 \cup E_2) = P(E_1) + P(E_2) - P(E_1 \cap E_2) \].

In the context of the exercise, we were looking for the probability of at least one contract being successful. Since we learned that neither contract affects the other (independence), this can be simplified by finding the probability that both contracts fail and subtracting from one. Using the concept of the complement, this yields the probability of the union without having to add individual probabilities and subtract the intersection.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A transmitter is sending a message using a binary code, namely, a sequence of 0's and 1's. Each transmitted bit \((0\) or 1\()\) must pass through three relays to reach the receiver. At each relay, the probability is \(.20\) that the bit sent on is different from the bit received (a reversal). Assume that the relays operate independently of one another: transmitter \(\rightarrow\) relay \(1 \rightarrow\) relay \(2 \rightarrow\) relay \(3 \rightarrow\) receiver a. If a 1 is sent from the transmitter, what is the probability that a 1 is sent on by all three relays? b. If a 1 is sent from the transmitter, what is the probability that a 1 is received by the receiver? (Hint: The eight experimental outcomes can be displayed on a tree diagram with three generations of branches, one generation for each relay.)

There are two traffic lights on the route used by a certain individual to go from home to work. Let \(E\) denote the event that the individual must stop at the first light, and define the event \(F\) in a similar manner for the second light. Suppose that \(P(E)=.4, P(F)=.3\) and \(P(E \cap F)=.15\) a. What is the probability that the individual must stop at at least one light; that is, what is the probability of the event \(E \cup F ?\) b. What is the probability that the individual needn't stop at either light? c. What is the probability that the individual must stop at exactly one of the two lights? d. What is the probability that the individual must stop just at the first light? (Hint: How is the probability of this event related to \(P(E)\) and \(P(E \cap F) ?\) A Venn diagram might help.)

Consider the following information about travelers on vacation: \(40 \%\) check work email, \(30 \%\) use a cell phone to stay connected to work, \(25 \%\) bring a laptop with them on vacation, \(23 \%\) both check work email and use a cell phone to stay connected, and \(51 \%\) neither check work email nor use a cell phone to stay connected nor bring a laptop. In addition \(88 \%\) of those who bring a laptop also check work email and \(70 \%\) of those who use a cell phone to stay connected also bring a laptop. With \(E=\) event that a traveler on vacation checks work email, \(C=\) event that a traveler on vacation uses a cell phone to stay connected, and \(L=\) event that a traveler on vacation brought a laptop, use the given information to determine the following probabilities. A Venn diagram may help. a. \(P(E)\) b. \(P(C)\) c. \(P(L)\) d. \(P(E\) and \(C)\) e. \(P\left(E^{C}\right.\) and \(C^{C}\) and \(L^{C}\) ) f. \(P(\) Eor C or \(L\) ) g. \(P(E \mid L)\) j. \(P(E\) and \(L)\) h. \(P(L \mid C)\) k. \(P(C\) and \(L)\) i. \(P(E\) and \(C\) and \(L)\) 1\. \(P(C \mid E\) and \(L)\)

A company that manufactures video cameras produces a basic model and a deluxe model. Over the past year, \(40 \%\) of the cameras sold have been the basic model. Of those buying the basic model, \(30 \%\) purchase an extended warranty, whereas \(50 \%\) of all purchasers of the deluxe model buy an extended warranty. If you learn that a randomly selected purchaser bought an extended warranty, what is the probability that he or she has a basic model?

Consider the chance experiment in which both tennis racket head size and grip size are noted for a randomly selected customer at a particular store. The six possible outcomes (simple events) and their probabilities are displayed in the following table: a. The probability that grip size is \(4 \frac{1}{2}\) in. (event \(\mathrm{A}\) ) is $$ P(A)=P\left(O_{2} \text { or } O_{5}\right)=.20+.15=.35 $$ How would you interpret this probability? b. Use the result of Part (a) to calculate the probability that grip size is not \(4 \frac{1}{2}\) in. c. What is the probability that the racket purchased has an oversize head (event \(B\) ), and how would you interpret this probability? d. What is the probability that grip size is at least \(4 \frac{1}{2}\) in.?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.