/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 7 A survey of affluent Americans (... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A survey of affluent Americans (those with incomes of \(\$ 75,000\) or more) indicated that \(57 \%\) would rather have more time than more money (USA Today, January 29 , 2003). a. What condition on how the data were collected would make the generalization from the sample to the population of affluent Americans reasonable? b. Would it be reasonable to generalize from the sample to say that \(57 \%\) of all Americans would rather have more time than more money? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. A reasonable generalization from the sample to the population of affluent Americans can be made if the sample is representative and sufficiently large, provided that participants' responses were independent and the survey did not include any bias. b. It's not reasonable to generalize these findings to all Americans since the survey only sampled affluent Americans, which isn't representative of all income groups in the population. A stratified sample considering different income groups will be needed for such a generalization.

Step by step solution

01

Assess the Validity of Generalization

To make the generalization from the sample to the population of affluent Americans reasonable, the following conditions should be met: 1. The survey should be based on a random sample: That is the sample should be representative of the population (i.e., affluent Americans). 2. The sample size should be sufficiently large to reflect the overall attitudes of the affluent American population.3. The respondents' answers should be independent of each other.4. The survey design and its questions should not be biased.
02

Evaluate the Generalization to All Americans

It would not be reasonable to generalize from the sample to say that 57 % of all Americans would rather have more time than money. Here are the reasons: 1. The sampled group is a specific segment of the population (i.e., affluent Americans), whose responses might be influenced by unique factors related to their higher income level. It's not representative of all income groups.2. Unless the research specifically sampled and received responses from the other segments (non-affluent Americans) of the population, it would not be valid to extend these findings.3. To make such a generalization, a more comprehensive survey including participants from every segment of the population is needed. This means a stratified sample considering different income groups.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Random Sampling
Understanding random sampling is crucial for accurately conducting surveys and research. To illustrate, let's consider an exercise that involves surveying affluent Americans. A key to gaining insights from a survey is to utilize random sampling. This method ensures that every individual within the target population—affluent Americans with incomes over \(\$75,000\)—has an equal chance of being selected.

This equality is vital because it avoids selection bias, where certain members of the population may be chosen more frequently than others, potentially skewing the results. If only certain neighborhoods or social circles of affluent individuals are sampled, the survey outcomes might not reflect the general attitudes or opinions of the entire affluent population.

Why Random Sampling Matters

Random sampling is the bedrock upon which the credibility of survey results is built. In our exercise, if the survey results indicated that 57% of affluent Americans prefer more time over more money, this percentage is meaningful only if derived from a random sample. Otherwise, the results cannot be safely generalized to represent the entire group.
Survey Design
An effective survey design is a blueprint for obtaining accurate and relevant data. In the context of our exercise where a survey aims to understand the preferences of affluent Americans, the design includes the way in which questions are asked, the order of the questions, and how the survey is administered.

Unbiased and clearly phrased questions are vital to avoid leading responses in a specific direction. The design should also consider the medium—whether the survey is conducted online, in person, or by phone—as each method may influence the type of respondents and the quality of information collected.

Key Aspects of Survey Design

Major aspects to be mindful of include ensuring anonymity to encourage honest answers, using a logical sequence that flows from general to specific questions, and pre-testing the survey on a small sample to iron out any potential issues before full deployment.
Statistical Validity
The cornerstone of well-conducted research, statistical validity, refers to the degree to which the conclusions drawn from a study are accurate and reliable. Our exercise highlights a conclusion about affluent Americans' preferences for time over money. For this conclusion to hold water statistically, the survey methods used must produce a true representation of the population without significant error.

Factors affecting validity include sample size, measurement techniques, and sampling methods. In the context of surveying affluent Americans, statistical validity would suggest that the 57% preference rate accurately reflects the wider population's stance, assuming that other variables such as social desirability or response biases are controlled for.

Ensuring Validity

The application of random sampling and meticulous survey design contributes greatly to achieving statistical validity. Moreover, the researcher should conduct appropriate statistical tests to evaluate the degree of potential error and confidence in the results.
Representative Sample
A representative sample acts as a miniature version of the population from which it's drawn, embodying its characteristics and diversity. If the exercise's goal is to generalize about all affluent Americans based on the survey, it's crucial that the sample accurately mirrors this group in terms of geographic distribution, age, gender, and other relevant demographics.

A sample that's skewed towards a particular segment—even within an affluent bracket—compromises the applicability of the results to the larger group. Hence, the sample should proportionately capture the variability in the affluent population, ensuring that the study's findings are applicable to all affluent Americans, not just a subset.

Characteristics of a Representative Sample

For instance, if affluent Americans from only urban areas are surveyed, the results wouldn't represent those living in rural settings. Therefore, proper sampling techniques and careful consideration of demographics are essential for a representative sample. Without it, any generalization to the population would be unfounded and potentially misleading.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Television's Value to Kids: It's All in How They Use It" (Seattle Times, July 6,2005 ) described a study in which researchers analyzed standardized test results and television viewing habits of 1700 children. They found that children who averaged more than two hours of television viewing per day when they were younger than 3 tended to score lower on measures of reading ability and short term memory. a. Is the study described an observational study or an experiment? b. Is it reasonable to conclude that watching two or more hours of television is the cause of lower reading scores? Explain.

Fast-paced lifestyles, where students balance the requirements of school, after-school activities, and jobs, are thought by some to lead to reduced sleep. Suppose that you are assigned the task of designing a survey that will provide answers to the accompanying questions. Write a set of survey questions that might be used. In some cases, you may need to write more than one question to adequately address a particular issue. For example, responses might be different for weekends and school nights. You may also have to define some terms to make the questions comprehensible to the target audience, which is adolescents. Topics to he addressed: How much sleep do the respondents get? Is this enough sleep? Does sleepiness interfere with schoolwork? If they could change the starting and ending times of the school day, what would they suggest? (Sorry, they cannot reduce the total time spent in school during the day!)

The report "Undergraduate Students and Credit Cards in 2004: An Analysis of Usage Rates and Trends" (Nellie Mae, May 2005 ) estimated that \(21 \%\) of undergraduates with credit cards pay them off each month and that the average outstanding balance on undergraduates' credit cards is \(\$ 2169 .\) These estimates were based on an online survey that was sent to 1260 students. Responses were received from 132 of these students. Is it reasonable to generalize the reported estimates to the population of all undergraduate students? Address at least two possible sources of bias in your answer.

You have been asked to determine on what types of grasslands two species of birds, northern harriers and short-eared owls, build nests. The types of grasslands to be used include undisturbed native grasses, managed native grasses, undisturbed nonnative grasses, and managed nonnative grasses. You are allowed a plot of land \(500 \mathrm{~m}\) square to study. Explain how you would determine where to plant the four types of grasses. What role would randomization play in this determination? Identify any confounding variables. Would this study be considered an observational study or an experiment? (Based on the article "Response of Northern Harriers and Short-Eared Owls to Grassland Management in Illinois," Journal of Wildlife Management \([1999]: 517-523 .)\)

Of the 6500 students enrolled at a community college, 3000 are part time and the other 3500 are full time. The college can provide a list of students that is sorted so that all full-time students are listed first, followed by the part-time students. a. Select a stratified random sample that uses full-time and part-time students as the two strata and that includes 10 students from each stratum. Describe the procedure you used to select the sample, and identify the students included in your sample by placement on the sorted list. b. Does every student at this community college have the same chance of being selected for inclusion in the sample? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.