/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 1 The article "Television's Value ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 2: Problem 1

The article "Television's Value to Kids: It's All in How They Use It" (Seattle Times, July 6,2005 ) described a study in which researchers analyzed standardized test results and television viewing habits of 1700 children. They found that children who averaged more than two hours of television viewing per day when they were younger than 3 tended to score lower on measures of reading ability and short term memory. a. Is the study described an observational study or an experiment? b. Is it reasonable to conclude that watching two or more hours of television is the cause of lower reading scores? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The study described is an observational study. b. It is not reasonable to conclude that watching two or more hours of television is the cause of lower reading scores based solely on the evidence presented in this study.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Type of Study

Consider the characteristics of the study described. An observational study involves observing and measuring variables without influencing them. An experiment, on the other hand, involves applying some treatment or condition to one group while having a control group for comparison. In this study, the researchers did not manipulate the viewing habits of the children; they merely collected data on their habits and their corresponding test results, making it an observational study.
02

Understand Correlation Versus Causation

Grasp the concept of correlation and causation. Two variables may be correlated without one necessarily causing the other. For example, a correlation might exist between the amount of ice cream sold and the number of drownings on a certain day, but it would be wrong to say that ice cream causes drownings. An external factor like high temperatures could cause both to rise. Simply demonstrating that two variables are correlated does not prove causation. Causation implies a cause-and-effect relationship that can only be demonstrated under controlled experimental conditions.
03

Apply Understanding to This Study

Now apply these principles to relationships between television viewing and reading scores. The study found a correlation between children who watch more than two hours of television a day before age three and lower reading ability and short-term memory. However, the study did not manipulate the amount of TV watching to demonstrate a causal link. Therefore, it is not reasonable to conclude solely based on this study that watching two or more hours of television is the cause of lower reading scores. Other variables, like parenting, socio-economic status, or individual child differences, could also influence both TV watching and reading ability.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The San Luis Obispo Tribune (May 7, 2002) reported that "a new analysis has found that in the majority of trials conducted by drug companies in recent decades, sugar pills have done as well as-or better than-antidepressants." What effect is being described here? What does this imply about the design of experiments with a goal of evaluating the effectiveness of a new medication?

The article "I'd Like to Buy a Vowel, Drivers Say" (USA Today, August 7,2001 ) speculates that young people prefer automobile names that consist of just numbers and/or letters that do not form a word (such as Hyundai's XG300, Mazda's 626 , and BMW's 325i). The article goes on to state that Hyundai had planned to identify the car now marketed as the XG300 with the name Concerto, until they determined that consumers hated it and that they thought XG300 sounded more "technical" and deserving of a higher price. Do the students at your school feel the same way? Describe how you would go about selecting a sample to answer this question.

A 1993 study showed that college students temporarily gained up to 9 IQ points after listening to a Mozart piano sonata. This conclusion, dubbed the Mozart effect, has since been criticized by a number of researchers who have been unable to confirm the result in similar studies. Suppose that you wanted to see whether there is a Mozart effect for students at your school. a. Describe how you might design an experiment for this purpose. b. Does your experimental design include direct control of any extraneous variables? Explain. c. Does your experimental design use blocking? Explain why you did or did not include blocking in your design. d. What role does randomization play in your design?

An experiment to evaluate whether vitamins can help prevent recurrence of blocked arteries in patients who have had surgery to clear blocked arteries was described in the article "Vitamins Found to Help Prevent Blocked Arteries" (Associated Press, September 1, 2002). The study involved 205 patients who were given either a treatment consisting of a combination of folic acid, vitamin B 12, and vitamin B6 or a placebo for 6 months. a. Explain why a placebo group was used in this experiment. b. Explain why it would be important for the researchers to have assigned the 205 subjects to the two groups (vitamin and placebo) at random. c. Do you think it is appropriate to generalize the results of this experiment to the population of all patients who have undergone surgery to clear blocked arteries? Explain.

The article "Doctor Dogs Diagnose Cancer by Sniffing It Out" (Knight Ridder Newspapers, January 9, 2006 ) reports the results of an experiment described in the journal Integrative Cancer Therapies. In this experiment, dogs were trained to distinguish between people with breast and lung cancer and people without cancer by sniffing exhaled breath. Dogs were trained to lay down if they detected cancer in a breath sample. After training, dogs' ability to detect cancer was tested using breath samples from people whose breath had not been used in training the dogs. The paper states "The researchers blinded both the dog handlers and the experimental observers to the identity of the breath samples." Explain why this blinding is an important aspect of the design of this experiment.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Calculus

Read Explanation

Statistics

Read Explanation

Decision Maths

Read Explanation

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Read Explanation

Mechanics Maths

Read Explanation

Discrete Mathematics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.