/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 48 The San Luis Obispo Tribune (May... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The San Luis Obispo Tribune (May 7, 2002) reported that "a new analysis has found that in the majority of trials conducted by drug companies in recent decades, sugar pills have done as well as-or better than-antidepressants." What effect is being described here? What does this imply about the design of experiments with a goal of evaluating the effectiveness of a new medication?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The effect being described here is that the results from sugar pills (placebos) were mostly as effective as, or more effective than, the results from antidepressants in recent trials by drug companies. This implies that the design of the experiments testing new medications might need to be reviewed. If a placebo is proving to be as or more effective, this could be a sign that there are other factors at work (i.e., psychological), or simply that the drug being tested does not have a significant impact.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Effect Being Described

In this case, the effect being described is that sugar pills or placebos are performing as well, if not better than, the antidepressants. This highlights that in most of these experiments conducted, the medication is not outperforming a placebo.
02

Consider the Implication

This implies that there might be an issue with the design of the trials. It raises questions about the effectiveness of the medication being tested, and whether the trials are being properly controlled to isolate the effects of the medication from other factors.
03

Evaluate the Overall Finding

If the placebo is performing at or better than the medication, it's necessarily something to consider when examining the design of clinical trials aimed at demonstrating the effectiveness of a new drug. It could suggest, for instance, that psychological factors might be playing a significant role in the perceived effectiveness of the drug, or that the drug itself might not be as beneficial as originally thought.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Explain why some studies include both a control group and a placebo treatment. What additional comparisons are possible if both a control group and a placebo group are included?

Based on a survey conducted on the DietSmart.com web site, investigators concluded that women who regularly watched Oprah were only one-seventh as likely to crave fattening foods as those who watched other daytime talk shows ( San Luis Obispo Tribune, October 14,2000 ). a. Is it reasonable to conclude that watching Oprah causes a decrease in cravings for fattening foods? Explain. b. Is it reasonable to generalize the results of this survey to all women in the United States? To all women who watch daytime talk shows? Explain why or why not.

The Institute of Psychiatry at Kings College London found that dealing with "infomania" has a temporary, but significant derogatory effect on IQ. (Discover, November 2005). In this experiment, researchers divided volunteers into two groups. Each subject took an IQ test. One group had to check email and respond to instant messages while taking the test while the second group took the test without any distraction. The distracted group had an average score that was 10 points lower than the average for the control group. Explain why it is important that the researchers created the two experimental groups in this study by using random assignment.

Whether or not to continue a Mardi Gras Parade through downtown San Luis Obispo, \(\mathrm{CA}\), is a hotly debated topic. The parade is popular with students and many residents, but some celebrations have led to complaints and a call to eliminate the parade. The local newspaper conducted online and telephone surveys of its readers and was surprised by the results. The survey web site received more than 400 responses, with more than \(60 \%\) favoring continuing the parade, while the telephone response line received more than 120 calls, with more than \(90 \%\) favoring banning the parade (San Luis Obispo Tribune, March 3, 2004). What factors may have contributed to these very different results?

"Crime Finds the Never Married" is the conclusion drawn in an article from USA Today (June 29,2001 ). This conclusion is based on data from the Justice Department's National Crime Victimization Survey, which estimated the number of violent crimes per 1000 people, 12 years of age or older, to be 51 for the never married, 42 for the divorced or separated, 13 for married individuals, and 8 for the widowed. Does being single cause an increased risk of violent crime? Describe a potential confounding variable that illustrates why it is unreasonable to conclude that a change in marital status causes a change in crime risk.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.