/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 59 "Crime Finds the Never Married" ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

"Crime Finds the Never Married" is the conclusion drawn in an article from USA Today (June 29,2001 ). This conclusion is based on data from the Justice Department's National Crime Victimization Survey, which estimated the number of violent crimes per 1000 people, 12 years of age or older, to be 51 for the never married, 42 for the divorced or separated, 13 for married individuals, and 8 for the widowed. Does being single cause an increased risk of violent crime? Describe a potential confounding variable that illustrates why it is unreasonable to conclude that a change in marital status causes a change in crime risk.

Short Answer

Expert verified
A potential confounding variable could be the age of the individuals. Younger people could be more likely to commit crimes and also, are generally less likely to be married. Thus, stating changes in crime risk due to marital status alone is unreasonable.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Data

The data in discussion comes from the Justice Department's National Crime Victimization Survey in USA - where the violence rates per 1000 people in different marital statuses are compared. The data displays that the rate of violent crimes is highest for people who have never been married and lowest for widowed individuals.
02

Critiquing the Assumption

The conclusion drawn is that being never married leads to an increased risk of violent crime. However, this assumption is problematic as it directly relates crime risk to marital status without considering other possible contributing factors. A change in marital status alone cannot result in a change in crime risk.
03

Identifying a Confounding Variable

A confounding variable is some other variable that could be influencing the outcomes, in this case, it's the crime risk. A possible confounding variable could be the age of individuals. Younger people are generally not married and could be more likely to engage in violent behaviour. Therefore, it is not the marital status causing the change in crime rates, but other factors like age that are correlating with marital status.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

National Crime Victimization Survey
The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) is an essential tool in understanding crime dynamics within the United States. Conducted by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, this survey provides a yearly overview of the crime victimization experiences of Americans.

The NCVS collects data by interviewing people about their experiences with crime, whether they were reported to the police or not. As such, it extends beyond the information typically found in police reports to provide a more comprehensive picture of national crime rates. The data from NCVS include details on the frequency, characteristics, and consequences of criminal victimization in the US.

Using this data in analyses can show trends over time and disparities among different demographic groups. For instance, insights into how crime affects people of varying marital statuses can be a key outcome of the survey. The NCVS reveals not just the prevalence of crime but helps stakeholders to identify populations at higher risk and tailor interventions accordingly. Understanding the role the NCVS plays in data-driven crime policy is essential for anyone studying criminology, public policy, or statistics.
Marital Status and Crime Risk
The relationship between marital status and crime risk is a topic of interest for researchers, policymakers, and the public alike. In the context of the NCVS findings, it's shown that individuals who have never been married tend to have a higher rate of violent crimes compared to their married, divorced, or widowed counterparts.

At first glance, these statistics may imply a direct influence of marital status on the likelihood of becoming a crime victim. However, it's crucial to recognize that marital status is but one factor in a complex web of social, economic, and individual characteristics that can influence crime risk.

Several theories have been proposed to explain this correlation. Some suggest that married people may have a more stabilizing social network that discourages criminal victimization, or they may spend less time in situations that predispose them to crime. On the other hand, unmarried individuals might experience different lifestyle patterns, like higher social mobility or frequency of night-time social activities, both of which could increase exposure to potential crime. The accurate interpretation of these statistics requires careful consideration of the myriad factors that can intertwine with marital status.
Statistical Data Analysis
Statistical data analysis is the cornerstone of deriving valuable insights from raw data. When researchers work with data, such as that from the NCVS, they must apply sound statistical principles to avoid erroneous conclusions.

One key aspect of this analysis is understanding confounding variables. These are factors other than the primary variable of interest (in this case, marital status) that can cause or prevent the outcome (crime risk). Age, as mentioned in the exercise solution, is an example of a confounding variable that can affect both marital status and crime risk. Younger individuals are often unmarried and also happen to fall into demographic groups that experience higher rates of certain types of crime.

Therefore, in analyzing data on marital status and crime risk, statisticians must consider confounding variables and employ techniques such as multivariate analyses, propensity score matching, or stratification to ascertain the true relationship between variables. By doing so, they avoid spurious correlations and contribute to the creation of sound, evidence-based policies. It's this rigorous approach to data that ensures conclusions and subsequent actions are grounded in reality, rather than skewed by overlooked external factors.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Does eating broccoli reduce the risk of prostate cancer? According to an observational study from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (see CNN.com web site article titled "Broccoli, Not Pizza Sauce, Cuts Cancer Risk, Study Finds," January 5,2000 ), men who ate more cruciferous vegetables (broccoli, cauliflower, brussels sprouts, and cabbage) had a lower risk of prostate cancer. This study made separate comparisons for men who ate different levels of vegetables. According to one of the investigators, "at any given level of total vegetable consumption, as the percent of cruciferous vegetables increased, the prostate cancer risk decreased." Based on this study, is it reasonable to conclude that eating cruciferous vegetables causes a reduction in prostate cancer risk? Explain.

A survey of affluent Americans (those with incomes of \(\$ 75,000\) or more) indicated that \(57 \%\) would rather have more time than more money (USA Today, January 29 , 2003). a. What condition on how the data were collected would make the generalization from the sample to the population of affluent Americans reasonable? b. Would it be reasonable to generalize from the sample to say that \(57 \%\) of all Americans would rather have more time than more money? Explain.

A 1993 study showed that college students temporarily gained up to 9 IQ points after listening to a Mozart piano sonata. This conclusion, dubbed the Mozart effect, has since been criticized by a number of researchers who have been unable to confirm the result in similar studies. Suppose that you wanted to see whether there is a Mozart effect for students at your school. a. Describe how you might design an experiment for this purpose. b. Does your experimental design include direct control of any extraneous variables? Explain. c. Does your experimental design use blocking? Explain why you did or did not include blocking in your design. d. What role does randomization play in your design?

A study of more than 50,000 U.S. nurses found that those who drank just one soda or fruit punch a day tended to gain much more weight and had an \(80 \%\) increased risk in developing diabetes compared to those who drank less than one a month. (The Washington Post, August 25,2004). "The message is clear..... Anyone who cares about their health or the health of their family would not consume these beverages" said Walter Willett of the Harvard School of Public Health who helped conduct the study. The sugar and beverage industries said that the study was fundamentally flawed. "These allegations are inflammatory. Women who drink a lot of soda may simply have generally unhealthy lifestyles" said Richard Adamson of the American Beverage Association. a. Do you think that the study described was an observational study or an experiment? b. Is it reasonable to conclude that drinking soda or fruit punch causes the observed increased risk of diabetes? Why or why not?

The paper "Prospective Randomized Trial of Low Saturated Fat, Low Cholesterol Diet During the First Three Years of Life" (Circulation [1996]: \(1386-1393\) ) describes an experiment in which "1062 infants were randomized to either the intervention or control group at 7 months of age. The families of the 540 intervention group children were counseled to reduce the child's intake of saturated fat and cholesterol but to ensure adequate energy intake. The control children consumed an unrestricted diet." a. The researchers concluded that the blood cholesterol level was lower for children in the intervention group. Is it reasonable to conclude that the parental counseling and subsequent reduction in dietary fat and cholesterol are the cause of the reduction in blood cholesterol level? Explain why or why not. b. Is it reasonable to generalize the results of this experiment to all children? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.