/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 30 Suppose that a multiple regressi... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose that a multiple regression data set consists of \(n=15\) observations. For what values of \(k\), the number of model predictors, would the corresponding model with \(R^{2}=.90\) be judged useful at significance level \(.05 ?\) Does such a large \(R^{2}\) value necessarily imply a useful model? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
To determine the number of predictors a model can handle given a set of parameters, use an F-distribution given the \(R^{2}\) and significance level. While a high \(R^{2}\) value does imply a potentially useful model as it captures a high percentage of the variance in the dependent variable, it does not automatically guarantee it since we also need to validate the assumptions of the model and check against overfitting.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Coefficient of Determination \(R^{2}\)

The coefficient of determination, represented as \(R^{2}\), is a key measure used to assess the quality of a regression model. It provides the proportion of response variation that is captured by the regression model. In other words, an \(R^{2}\) value of .90 means that 90% of the variation in the dependent variable can be explained by the independent variables present in the model.
02

Determine Values of \(k\) Using F-Distribution and Significance Level

Since we want to judge if the model is statistically useful at a significance level of .05, we have to involve the use of F-distribution, specifically the upper quartile of the F-distribution. Given that we have the values for \(R^{2}\), \(n\), and significance level, we can obtain the threshold F-value. From there, we can isolate \(k\) by using the formula for F-value in multiple regression which is: \( F = \frac{R^{2}/k}{(1-R^{2})/(n-k-1)} \)
03

Implication of High \(R^{2}\)

A high \(R^{2}\) value does imply a potentially useful model, as it suggests that a high percentage of the variance in the dependent variable can be explained by the independent variables in the model. However, the deemed usefulness of the model that yields a high \(R^{2}\) value also depends on the validity of any assumptions made in the creation of the model and if the model is not overfitting the sample data (i.e., the model also performs well on unseen data).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Coefficient of Determination
The coefficient of determination, symbolized as \(R^2\), acts as a critical measure in multiple regression analysis, essentially quantifying how well the independent variables explain the variability of the dependent variable. An \(R^2\) value ranges between 0 and 1, where closer to 1 indicates a model that accounts for a greater proportion of the variability in the outcome variable.
For instance, an \(R^2\) of 0.90 suggests that 90% of the variation in the dependent variable is predictable from the independent variables in the model. This makes \(R^2\) incredibly useful for assessing the predictive capability of a model.
However, it's crucial to remember that a high \(R^2\) doesn’t always guarantee accuracy or relevance. It's possible for a model to have a high \(R^2\) and still be inappropriate due to other issues like overfitting or missing key variables.
This is why considering \(R^2\) together with other statistical measures helps ensure a more comprehensive evaluation of a regression model.
Significance Level
The significance level, often represented by the symbol \(\alpha\), indicates the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. It's a threshold set by researchers to determine the cutoff for statistical tests, commonly set at 0.05, 0.01, or 0.10 in behavioral sciences. In our exercise, the significance level is set at 0.05.
This means there is a 5% risk of concluding that a model is useful when it is not (Type I error).
  • A lower significance level indicates stronger proof is needed to reject the null hypothesis.
  • A higher significance level suggests that the test has a higher probability of determining an effect in the data.
When evaluating a multiple regression model, researchers use the significance level in tandem with test statistics from the F-distribution to discern the model’s utility. This helps establish whether the correlations observed between the variables in our regression model are statistically significant or could merely appear by random chance.
F-Distribution
The F-distribution is a family of distributions used in statistical tests involving variances, especially in the context of regression analysis. In multiple regression scenarios, the F-distribution helps determine the overall significance of a model under consideration.
In our specific case, the F-distribution comes into play to evaluate the effectiveness of a regression model with a relatively high \(R^2\) value at a specified significance level (0.05). By comparing an F-value derived from the data to a critical F-value from the F-distribution table, analysts can judge whether the set of predictors provides a statistically significant explanation of the variation in the dependent variable.
  • An F-value greater than the critical value suggests the model is statistically significant.
  • An F-value less than the critical value indicates the predictors may not significantly explain the variation.
This approach ensures not only a measure of fit through \(R^2\), but also a robust analysis using the significance level to decree the true predictive power and applicability of the model presented. The critical aspect to keep in mind is that all statistical analyses should consider the underlying assumptions and the potential impact these assumptions hold on the validity of the results.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the dependent variable \(y=\) fuel efficiency of a car (mpg). a. Suppose that you want to incorporate size class of car, with four categories (subcompact, compact, midsize, and large), into a regression model that also includes \(x_{1}=\) age of car and \(x_{2}=\) engine size. Define the necessary dummy variables, and write out the complete model equation. b. Suppose that you want to incorporate interaction between age and size class. What additional predictors would be needed to accomplish this?

The article "The Undrained Strength of Some Thawed Permafrost Soils" (Canadian Geotechnical Journal \([1979]: 420-427\) ) contained the accompanying data (see page 778 ) on \(y=\) shear strength of sandy soil \((\mathrm{kPa})\), \(x_{1}=\) depth \((\mathrm{m})\), and \(x_{2}=\) water content \((\%) .\) The predicted values and residuals were computed using the estimated regression equation $$ \begin{aligned} \hat{y}=&-151.36-16.22 x_{1}+13.48 x_{2}+.094 x_{3}-.253 x_{4} \\ &+.492 x_{5} \\ \text { where } x_{3} &=x_{1}^{2}, x_{4}=x_{2}^{2}, \text { and } x_{5}=x_{1} x_{2} \end{aligned} $$ $$ \begin{array}{clrrrrr} \text { Product } & \text { Material } & \text { Height } & \begin{array}{l} \text { Maximum } \\ \text { Width } \end{array} & \begin{array}{l} \text { Minimum } \\ \text { Width } \end{array} & \text { Elongation } & \text { Volume } \\ \hline 1 & \text { glass } & 7.7 & 2.50 & 1.80 & 1.50 & 125 \\ 2 & \text { glass } & 6.2 & 2.90 & 2.70 & 1.07 & 135 \\ 3 & \text { glass } & 8.5 & 2.15 & 2.00 & 1.98 & 175 \\ 4 & \text { glass } & 10.4 & 2.90 & 2.60 & 1.79 & 285 \\ 5 & \text { plastic } & 8.0 & 3.20 & 3.15 & 1.25 & 330 \\ 6 & \text { glass } & 8.7 & 2.00 & 1.80 & 2.17 & 90 \\ 7 & \text { glass } & 10.2 & 1.60 & 1.50 & 3.19 & 120 \\ 8 & \text { plastic } & 10.5 & 4.80 & 3.80 & 1.09 & 520 \\ 9 & \text { plastic } & 3.4 & 5.90 & 5.00 & 0.29 & 330 \\ 10 & \text { plastic } & 6.9 & 5.80 & 4.75 & 0.59 & 570\\\ 11 & \text { tin } & 10.9 & 2.90 & 2.80 & 1.88 & 340 \\ 12 & \text { plastic } & 9.7 & 2.45 & 2.10 & 1.98 & 175 \\ 13 & \text { glass } & 10.1 & 2.60 & 2.20 & 1.94 & 240 \\ 14 & \text { glass } & 13.0 & 2.60 & 2.60 & 2.50 & 240 \\ 15 & \text { glass } & 13.0 & 2.70 & 2.60 & 2.41 & 360 \\ 16 & \text { glass } & 11.0 & 3.10 & 2.90 & 1.77 & 310 \\ 17 & \text { cardboard } & 8.7 & 5.10 & 5.10 & 0.85 & 635 \\ 18 & \text { cardboard } & 17.1 & 10.20 & 10.20 & 0.84 & 1250 \\ 19 & \text { glass } & 16.5 & 3.50 & 3.50 & 2.36 & 650 \\ 20 & \text { glass } & 16.5 & 2.70 & 1.20 & 3.06 & 305 \\ 21 & \text { glass } & 9.7 & 3.00 & 1.70 & 1.62 & 315 \\ 22 & \text { glass } & 17.8 & 2.70 & 1.75 & 3.30 & 305 \\ 23 & \text { glass } & 14.0 & 2.50 & 1.70 & 2.80 & 245 \\ 24 & \text { glass } & 13.6 & 2.40 & 1.20 & 2.83 & 200 \\ 25 & \text { plastic } & 27.9 & 4.40 & 1.20 & 3.17 & 1205 \\ 26 & \text { tin } & 19.5 & 7.50 & 7.50 & 1.30 & 2330 \\ 27 & \text { tin } & 13.8 & 4.25 & 4.25 & 1.62 & 730 \end{array} $$ $$ \begin{array}{rrrrr} {\boldsymbol{y}} & {\boldsymbol{x}_{1}} & \boldsymbol{x}_{2} & \text { Predicted } \boldsymbol{y} & {\text { Residual }} \\ \hline 14.7 & 8.9 & 31.5 & 23.35 & -8.65 \\ 48.0 & 36.6 & 27.0 & 46.38 & 1.62 \\ 25.6 & 36.8 & 25.9 & 27.13 & -1.53 \\ 10.0 & 6.1 & 39.1 & 10.99 & -0.99 \\ 16.0 & 6.9 & 39.2 & 14.10 & 1.90 \\ 16.8 & 6.9 & 38.3 & 16.54 & 0.26 \\ 20.7 & 7.3 & 33.9 & 23.34 & -2.64 \\ 38.8 & 8.4 & 33.8 & 25.43 & 13.37 \\ 16.9 & 6.5 & 27.9 & 15.63 & 1.27 \\ 27.0 & 8.0 & 33.1 & 24.29 & 2.71 \\ 16.0 & 4.5 & 26.3 & 15.36 & 0.64 \\ 24.9 & 9.9 & 37.8 & 29.61 & -4.71 \\ 7.3 & 2.9 & 34.6 & 15.38 & -8.08 \\ 12.8 & 2.0 & 36.4 & 7.96 & 4.84 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Use the given information to compute SSResid, SSTo, and SSRegr. b. Calculate \(R^{2}\) for this regression model. How would you interpret this value? c. Use the value of \(R^{2}\) from Part (b) and a .05 level of significance to conduct the appropriate model utility test.

The article "Effect of Manual Defoliation on Pole Bean Yield" (Journal of Economic Entomology [1984]: \(1019-1023\) ) used a quadratic regression model to describe the relationship between \(y=\) yield \((\mathrm{kg} /\) plot \()\) and \(x=\mathrm{de}-\) foliation level (a proportion between 0 and 1 ). The estimated regression equation based on \(n=24\) was \(\hat{y}=\) \(12.39+6.67 x_{1}-15.25 x_{2}\) where \(x_{1}=x\) and \(x_{2}=x^{2} .\) The article also reported that \(R^{2}\) for this model was .902. Does the quadratic model specify a useful relationship between \(y\) and \(x ?\) Carry out the appropriate test using a \(.01\) level of significance.

The article "Readability of Liquid Crystal Displays: A Response Surface" (Human Factors [1983]: \(185-190\) ) used the estimated regression equation to describe the relationship between \(y=\) error percentage for subjects reading a four-digit liquid crystal display and the independent variables \(x_{1}=\) level of backlight, \(x_{2}=\) character subtense, \(x_{3}=\) viewing angle, and \(x_{4}=\) level of ambient light. From a table given in the article, SSRegr \(=19.2\), SSResid = \(20.0\), and \(n=30\). a. Does the estimated regression equation specify a useful relationship between \(y\) and the independent variables? Use the model utility test with a \(.05\) significance level. b. Calculate \(R^{2}\) and \(s_{e}\) for this model. Interpret these values. c. Do you think that the estimated regression equation would provide reasonably accurate predictions of error rate? Explain.

If we knew the width and height of cylindrical tin cans of food, could we predict the volume of these cans with precision and accuracy? a. Give the equation that would allow us to make such predictions. b. Is the relationship between volume and its predictors, height and width, a linear one? c. Should we use an additive multiple regression model to predict a volume of a can from its height and width? Explain. d. If you were to take logarithms of each side of the equation in Part (a), would the relationship be linear?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.