/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 82 According to the article "Workah... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

According to the article "Workaholism in Organizations: Gender Differences" (Sex Roles [1999]: \(333-346\) ), the following data were reported on 1996 income for random samples of male and female MBA graduates from a certain Canadian business school: \begin{tabular}{lccc} & \(\boldsymbol{N}\) & \(\overline{\boldsymbol{x}}\) & \(\boldsymbol{s}\) \\ \hline Males & 258 & \(\$ 133,442\) & \(\$ 131,090\) \\ Females & 233 & \(\$ 105,156\) & \(\$ 98,525\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} Note: These salary figures are in Canadian dollars. a. Test the hypothesis that the mean salary of male MBA graduates from this school was in excess of \(\$ 100,000\) in \(1996 .\) b. Is there convincing evidence that the mean salary for all female MBA graduates is above \(\$ 100,000 ?\) Test using \(\alpha=.10\) c. If a significance level of \(.05\) or \(.01\) were used instead of \(.10\) in the test of Part (b), would you still reach the same conclusion? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) Yes, the mean salary of male MBA graduates was significantly more than \$100,000 in 1996. b) Based on the significance level \(\alpha = 0.10\), the mean salary for female MBA graduates was not significantly above \$100,000 in 1996. c) With a significance level of \(0.05\) or \(0.01\), the decision might change, depending on the value of the test statistic.

Step by step solution

01

Hypothesis Formulation for Male Graduates

Formulate the null and alternative hypothesis. Here, we want to test whether the mean salary of male MBA graduates was more than \$100,000. The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) assumes that the mean is \$100,000, and the alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)) is that the mean is more than \$100,000. In symbols, this is: \(H_0: \mu = \$100,000\), \(H_a: \mu > \$100,000\).
02

Test Statistic Calculation for Male Graduates

Calculate the test statistic using the formula \(Z = (\overline{x} - \mu_0) / (s/ \sqrt{N})\) where \(\overline{x}\) is the sample mean, \(\mu_0\) is the hypothesized population mean from \(H_0\), \(s\) is the standard deviation and \(N\) is the sample size. Substitute with the provided values into the formula.
03

Decision for Male Graduates

Compare the calculated test statistic with the critical value from the standard normal distribution table (Z-table) for a one-tailed test. If the test statistic is greater than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis. Since we don't have a significance level, we use \(0.05\) by default.
04

Hypothesis Formulation for Female Graduates

Formulate the null and alternative hypothesis for the female graduates. Here, we want to test whether the mean salary of female MBA graduates was more than \$100,000. The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) assumes that the mean is \$100,000, and the alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)) is that the mean is more than \$100,000. In symbols, this is: \(H_0: \mu = \$100,000\), \(H_a: \mu > \$100,000\).
05

Test Statistic Calculation for Female Graduates

Calculate the test statistic using the same formula as in Step 2 and insert the appropriate values for female graduates.
06

Decision for Female Graduates

Compare the calculated test statistic with the critical value at \(\alpha = 0.10\), since a significance level of \(0.10\) was provided for the female graduates. If the test statistic is greater than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis.
07

Significance Level Change

If a different significance level such as \(0.05\) or \(0.01\) was used instead of \(0.10\), the critical value will be different. Compare the calculated test statistic with the new critical values. If it is greater than the critical value at \(0.01\) or \(0.05\), we would still reject the null hypothesis; otherwise, we won't.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Hypothesis Formulation
When we talk about statistical hypothesis formulation, it's all about setting up a starting assumption (called the null hypothesis) and an alternative one to test against it. In the context of income analysis for MBA graduates, the null hypothesis might state that the average income is a certain amount, say \$100,000. The alternative hypothesis would suggest that the actual average income is different from this amount, for example, it could be higher. This is represented symbolically as:
  • Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)): \(\mu = \$100,000\)
  • Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_a\)): \(\mu > \$100,000\) (for testing if the income is greater).

It's crucial to define these hypotheses clearly, as they set the stage for the entire testing process.
Test Statistic Calculation
Calculating the test statistic is a central part of any hypothesis test. The test statistic calculation helps us determine how far our sample statistic is from the null hypothesis's proposed value, measured in standard error units. You do this by using a formula that incorporates the sample mean, hypothesized mean, sample standard deviation, and sample size. In mathematical terms, the formula is: \(Z = (\overline{x} - \mu_0) / (s/ \sqrt{N})\) where \(\overline{x}\) is the sample mean, \(\mu_0\) is the hypothesized mean, \(s\) is the sample standard deviation, and \(N\) is the sample size. This Z-score tells you how many standard deviations away from the hypothesized mean the sample mean lies.
Significance Level
The significance level, denoted by \(\alpha\), is the threshold for deciding whether or not to reject the null hypothesis. It represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is in fact true, which is a type I error. Common choices for \(\alpha\) are 0.01, 0.05, and 0.10. Choosing a lower \(\alpha\) means being more conservative about claiming a result as significant — that is, requiring stronger evidence to reject the null hypothesis. When analyzing the MBA graduates’ incomes, setting different significance levels, such as 0.05 or 0.01 instead of 0.10, would require a larger test statistic to reject the null hypothesis and claim the incomes are significantly different from the hypothesized value.
MBA Graduates Income Analysis
Performing an income analysis on MBA graduates helps us understand the financial returns of obtaining an MBA degree. This kind of analysis often involves hypothesis testing to determine whether the average income of MBA graduates exceeds a certain benchmark. In our case, we are comparing it to a benchmark of \$100,000. This involves using sample data to make inferences about the population as a whole, considering factors such as mean income (\(\overline{x}\)) and variability (standard deviation, \(s\)). This analysis can help educational institutions and students make informed decisions about the value of an MBA program.
Gender Differences in Income
Investigating gender differences in income, especially among MBA graduates, involves exploring whether a gender pay gap exists and its extent. In our example, we compare the incomes of male and female MBA graduates using hypothesis testing. Recognizing potential differences can provide insights into the impact of gender on career progression and pay. It's not just about identifying the presence of a gap but also understanding the magnitude and causes to inform policies for achieving gender equity in the workplace.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a representative sample of 1000 adult Americans, only 430 could name at least one justice who is currently serving on the U.S. Supreme Court (Ipsos, January 10,2006 ). Using a significance level of \(.01\), carry out ? hypothesis test to determine if there is convincing evidence to support the claim that fewer than half of adult Americans can name at least one justice currently serving on the Supreme Court.

Many older homes have electrical systems that use fuses rather than circuit breakers. A manufacturer of 40 -amp fuses wants to make sure that the mean amperage at which its fuses burn out is in fact 40 . If the mean amperage is lower than 40 , customers will complain because the fuses require replacement too often. If the mean amperage is higher than 40 , the manufacturer might be liable for damage to an electrical system as a result of fuse malfunction. To verify the mean amperage of the fuses, a sample of fuses is selected and tested. If a hypothesis test is performed using the resulting data, what null and alternative hypotheses would be of interest to the manufacturer?

Typically, only very brave students are willing to speak out in a college classroom. Student participation may be especially difficult if the individual is from a different culture or country. The article "An Assessment of Class Participation by International Graduate Students" \((\) Journal of College Student Development \([1995]: 132-\) 140) considered a numerical "speaking-up" scale, with possible values from 3 to 15 (a low value means that a student rarely speaks). For a random sample of 64 males from Asian countries where English is not the official language, the sample mean and sample standard deviation were \(8.75\) and \(2.57\), respectively. Suppose that the mean for the population of all males having English as their native language is \(10.0\) (suggested by data in the article). Does it appear that the population mean for males from non-English-speaking Asian countries is smaller than \(10.0 ?\)

An automobile manufacturer who wishes to advertise that one of its models achieves \(30 \mathrm{mpg}\) (miles per gallon) decides to carry out a fuel efficiency test. Six nonprofessional drivers are selected, and each one drives a car from Phoenix to Los Angeles. The resulting fuel efficiencies (in miles per gallon) are: \(\begin{array}{llllll}27.2 & 29.3 & 31.2 & 28.4 & 30.3 & 29.6\end{array}\) Assuming that fuel efficiency is normally distributed under these circumstances, do the data contradict the claim that true average fuel efficiency is (at least) \(30 \mathrm{mpg}\) ?

Although arsenic is known to be a poison, it also has some beneficial medicinal uses. In one study of the use of arsenic to treat acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), a rare type of blood cell cancer, APL patients were given an arsenic compound as part of their treatment. Of those receiving arsenic, \(42 \%\) were in remission and showed no signs of leukemia in a subsequent examination (Washington Post, November 5,1998 ). It is known that \(15 \%\) of APL patients go into remission after the conventional treatment. Suppose that the study had included 100 randomly selected patients (the actual number in the study was much smaller). Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion in remission for the arsenic treatment is greater than \(.15\), the remission proportion for the conventional treatment? Test the relevant hypotheses using a. 01 significance level.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.