/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 39 In a national survey of 2013 adu... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In a national survey of 2013 adults, 1590 responded that lack of respect and courtesy in American society is a serious problem, and 1283 indicated that they believe that rudeness is a more serious problem than in past years (Associated Press, April 3,2002 ). Is there convincing evidence that more than three-quarters of U.S. adults believe that rudeness is a worsening problem? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The decision to reject or not to reject the null hypothesis depends on the computed p-value in comparison to the significance level (0.05). Without the exact numbers derived from the Z-score calculation and corresponding p-value, a specific answer cannot be given. Implement the steps and formulae provided to derive your answer.

Step by step solution

01

State the Hypotheses

Null Hypothesis (H0): \(p = 0.75\) - This means that 75% of U.S. adults believe that rudeness is a worsening problem. \nAlternative Hypothesis (Ha): \(p > 0.75\) - This suggests that more than 75% of U.S. adults believe that rudeness is a worsening problem.
02

Calculate the Test Statistic

The test statistic for a proportion is calculated by the formula: \[Z = \frac{(p-hat) - p}{\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}} \] Where \( p-hat = \frac{x}{n} \) is the sample proportion, \( x \) is the number of 'successes' in the sample and \( n \) is the sample size. In this case, \( x = 1283 \), \( n = 2013 \), and \( p = 0.75 \). Plug in these values into the formula and calculate the Z-score.
03

Find the P-value

The P-value associated with the observed value of the test statistic in the context of the null hypothesis is calculated. We want to find the probability that we would observe a test statistic as extreme as we did if the null hypothesis is true. This probability is the P-value. We can use a Z-table or statistical software to find this value.
04

Make a Decision

Once you have the P-value, compare it with the significance level (0.05). If the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level, reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis. If the P-value is larger than the significance level, do not reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
When conducting a hypothesis test, the first step is to establish the **Null Hypothesis**. The null hypothesis, denoted as \(H_0\), is a statement that suggests there is no effect or no difference from a known standard or value. It serves as the baseline or default assumption that any observed effects are purely by chance. For instance, when evaluating societal beliefs, such as whether a certain percentage of adults believe rudeness is worsening, the null hypothesis provides a measurable parameter to test against.
  • **Purpose**: The null hypothesis aims to retain the assumption that any experimental or survey result occurs simply by random chance and not due to actual effect or change.
  • **Example Setup**: If a survey suggests that 75% of U.S. adults believe rudeness is worsening, then the null hypothesis \( (H_0: p = 0.75) \) reflects this scenario.
  • **Verification**: The null hypothesis can never be "proven" true, but it can be either rejected or not rejected based on statistical evidence.
Thus, understanding the null hypothesis is crucial, as it frames the starting point of the hypothesis test and guides the decision-making process throughout the analysis.
Alternative Hypothesis
The **Alternative Hypothesis**, denoted as \(H_a\), offers a statement contrary to the null hypothesis. It suggests there is an effect or a difference. This hypothesis is what the researcher typically wants to prove. In our exercise, the alternative hypothesis is \( (H_a: p > 0.75) \), suggesting more than 75% of U.S. adults believe rudeness is worsening.
  • **Objective**: The alternative hypothesis challenges the null and attempts to show that the observed data come from a different distribution or have a pattern that \(H_0\) cannot explain.
  • **Types**: There are typically two main forms:
    • **One-tailed test**: Investigates whether a parameter is greater than or less than the certain value stated by \(H_0\). Our example is a one-tailed test.
    • **Two-tailed test**: Looks for any significant difference, either greater or lesser, than the null hypothesis.
  • **Analysis Implications**: Acceptance of \(H_a\) could imply new insights or discoveries, provided the evidence sufficiently supports it over \(H_0\).
Therefore, understanding the alternative hypothesis allows you to know what the research aims to demonstrate and sets the stage for testing procedures.
Significance Level
**Significance Level**, symbolized as \( \alpha \), is a critical concept in hypothesis testing. It represents the threshold at which you decide whether to reject the null hypothesis. A common significance level used is \( \alpha = 0.05 \), which translates to a 5% risk of wrongly rejecting \(H_0\). In our exercise, this is the level at which conclusions about Americans' beliefs on rudeness are drawn.
  • **Risk Management**: Significance level addresses the likelihood of making a Type I error, which occurs when \(H_0\) is falsely rejected.
  • **Importance**: The selection of \( \alpha \) depends on the research context, balancing between sensitivity (finding genuine effects) and specificity (not finding effects that aren't there).
  • **Usage in Decision Making**: Once the P-value is calculated, compare it to \( \alpha \). If the P-value \( \leq \alpha \), then \(H_0\) is rejected in favor of \(H_a\). If not, \(H_0\) is not rejected.
Understanding significance level is essential because it dictates the stringency of the test and influences the confidence in the results. This measure ensures that researchers only accept findings that meet a predetermined level of statistical significance.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Duck hunting in populated areas faces opposition on the basis of safety and environmental issues. The San Luis Obispo Telegram-Tribune (June 18,1991 ) reported the results of a survey to assess public opinion regarding duck hunting on Morro Bay (located along the central coast of California). A random sample of 750 local residents included 560 who strongly opposed hunting on the bay. Does this sample provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the majority of local residents oppose hunting on Morro Bay? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.01\).

According to a survey of 1000 adult Americans conducted by Opinion Research Corporation, 210 of those surveyed said playing the lottery would be the most practical way for them to accumulate \(\$ 200,000\) in net wealth in their lifetime ("One in Five Believe Path to Riches Is the Lottery," San Luis Obispo Tribune, January 11,2006 ). Although the article does not describe how the sample was selected, for purposes of this exercise, assume that the sample can be regarded as a random sample of adult Americans. Is there convincing evidence that more than \(20 \%\) of adult Americans believe that playing the lottery is the best strategy for accumulating \(\$ 200,000\) in net wealth?

Ann Landers, in her advice column of October 24 , 1994 (San Luis Obispo Telegram-Tribune), described the reliability of DNA paternity testing as follows: "To get a completely accurate result, you would have to be tested, and so would (the man) and your mother. The test is 100 percent accurate if the man is not the father and \(99.9\) percent accurate if he is." a. Consider using the results of DNA paternity testing to decide between the following two hypotheses: \(H_{0}\) " a particular man is the father \(H_{a}:\) a particular man is not the father In the context of this problem, describe Type I and Type II errors. (Although these are not hypotheses about a population characteristic, this exercise illustrates the definitions of Type I and Type II errors.) b. Based on the information given, what are the values of \(\alpha\), the probability of Type I error, and \(\beta\), the probability of Type II error? c. Ann Landers also stated, "If the mother is not tested, there is a \(0.8\) percent chance of a false positive." For the hypotheses given in Part (a), what are the values of \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) if the decision is based on DNA testing in which the mother is not tested?

The report "2005 Electronic Monitoring \& Surveillance Survey: Many Companies Monitoring, Recording, Videotaping-and Firing-Employees" (American Management Association, 2005) summarized the results of a survey of 526 U.S. businesses. Four hundred of these companies indicated that they monitor employees' web site visits. For purposes of this exercise, assume that it is reasonable to regard this sample as representative of businesses in the United States. a. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that more than \(75 \%\) of U.S. businesses monitor employees' web site visits? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of \(.01\). b. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that a majority of U.S. businesses monitor employees' web site visits? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of \(.01\).

Seat belts help prevent injuries in automobile accidents, but they certainly don't offer complete protection in extreme situations. A random sample of 319 front-seat occupants involved in head-on collisions in a certain region resulted in 95 people who sustained no injuries ("Influencing Factors on the Injury Severity of Restrained Front Seat Occupants in Car-to-Car Head-on Collisions," Accident Analysis and Prevention \([1995]: 143-150\) ). Does this suggest that the true (population) proportion of uninjured occupants exceeds .25? State and test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.