/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 25 10.25 Pairs of \(P\) -values and... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

10.25 Pairs of \(P\) -values and significance levels, \(\alpha\), are given. For each pair, state whether the observed \(P\) -value leads to rejection of \(H_{0}\) at the given significance level. a. \(P\) -value \(=.084, \alpha=.05\) b. \(P\) -value \(=.003, \alpha=.001\) c. \(P\) -value \(=.498, \alpha=.05\) d. \(P\) -value \(=.084, \alpha=.10\) e. \(P\) -value \(=.039, \alpha=.01\) f. \(P\) -value \(=.218, \alpha=.10\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Fail to Reject \(H_{0}\), b. Fail to Reject \(H_{0}\), c. Fail to Reject \(H_{0}\), d. Reject \(H_{0}\), e. Fail to Reject \(H_{0}\), f. Fail to Reject \(H_{0}\)

Step by step solution

01

Compare P-value and Significance Level for Pair a

For the first pair, the P-value is .084 and the significance level, \(\alpha\), is .05. Since the P-value (.084) is greater than the significance level (.05), we fail to reject the null hypothesis, \(H_{0}\).
02

Compare P-value and Significance Level for Pair b

For the second pair, the P-value is .003 and the significance level, \(\alpha\), is .001. Since the P-value (.003) is greater than the significance level (.001), we fail to reject the null hypothesis, \(H_{0}\).
03

Compare P-value and Significance Level for Pair c

For the third pair, the P-value is .498 and the significance level, \(\alpha\), is .05. Since the P-value (.498) is greater than the significance level (.05), we fail to reject the null hypothesis, \(H_{0}\).
04

Compare P-value and Significance Level for Pair d

For the fourth pair, the P-value is .084 and the significance level, \(\alpha\), is .10. Since the P-value (.084) is less than the significance level (.10), we reject the null hypothesis, \(H_{0}\).
05

Compare P-value and Significance Level for Pair e

For the fifth pair, the P-value is .039 and the significance level, \(\alpha\), is .01. Since the P-value (.039) is greater than the significance level (.01), we fail to reject the null hypothesis, \(H_{0}\).
06

Compare P-value and Significance Level for Pair f

For the last pair, the P-value is .218 and the significance level, \(\alpha\), is .10. Since the P-value (.218) is greater than the significance level (.10), we fail to reject the null hypothesis, \(H_{0}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a core concept in statistics used to determine whether there is enough evidence in a sample of data to infer that a certain condition is true for the entire population.

When conducting hypothesis testing, we begin with two hypotheses: the null hypothesis (\(H_{0}\)), which represents a default position that there is no difference or effect, and the alternative hypothesis (\(H_{A}\) or \(H_{1}\)), which suggests that there is a difference or effect. We then collect data and calculate a test statistic, which is used to estimate the probability of observing our sample data, or something more extreme, assuming the null hypothesis is true. This estimated probability is known as the P-value.

The P-value is then compared to a predetermined significance level, \(\alpha\), which is the threshold for deciding whether to reject the null hypothesis. If the P-value is less than \(\alpha\), we reject the null hypothesis and consider our results statistically significant, favoring the alternative hypothesis. Otherwise, if the P-value is greater than \(\alpha\), we fail to reject the null hypothesis and do not have sufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.
Null Hypothesis Rejection
The decision to reject the null hypothesis, \(H_{0}\), is a significant step in hypothesis testing. It implies that the test has found evidence against the null hypothesis and in favor of the alternative hypothesis. However, it's crucial to understand that rejecting the null hypothesis does not prove the alternative hypothesis; it simply indicates that the data collected are not consistent with what we would expect to see if \(H_{0}\) were true.

Even when the null hypothesis is rejected, there remains a probability of making an error—specifically, a Type I error, which occurs when the null hypothesis is true but is incorrectly rejected. This error rate is precisely the significance level \(\alpha\) which is chosen by the researcher before conducting the test. Therefore, the significance level reflects both the researcher's tolerance for making a Type I error and the confidence required in the decision to reject the null hypothesis.

Exercise Improvement Advice

To ensure that students deeply understand this concept, it's essential to illustrate through multiple examples what it means to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. Varying the P-value and significance level, as done in the exercise, helps students recognize how these two measures interact. Explaining that failing to reject does not prove the null hypothesis but rather indicates a lack of evidence to support an alternative is also crucial for a solid understanding.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance plays a vital role in hypothesis testing, as it helps researchers understand the reliability of their results. It's determined by comparing the P-value of a test to the predetermined significance level. When a result is said to be 'statistically significant,' it means that the observed effect is unlikely to have occurred by chance, given the threshold for \(\alpha\) has been set.

The choice of \(\alpha\) depends on the context of the study and the acceptable risk of making a Type I error. Common significance levels include 0.05, 0.01, and 0.10, representing a 5%, 1%, and 10% risk, respectively, of wrongly rejecting the null hypothesis.

It's important for students to understand that a lower P-value does not mean that the results are 'more significant'—it simply means there is stronger evidence against the null hypothesis at the chosen significance level. A result is either statistically significant or not; this is not a matter of degrees. Furthermore, the concept of statistical significance does not inform about the magnitude or practical significance of the observed effect.

Exercise Improvement Advice

When teaching statistical significance, use real-world context or research scenarios that students can relate to. This helps in making abstract concepts more concrete. Additionally, emphasize the importance of not just relying on P-values but also considering the size of the effect and the practical implications of the results.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A comprehensive study conducted by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development tracked more than 1000 children from an early age through elementary school (New York Times, November 1, 2005). The study concluded that children who spent more than 30 hours a week in child care before entering school tended to score higher in math and reading when they were in the third grade. The researchers cautioned that the findings should not be a cause for alarm because the effects of child care were found to be small. Explain how the difference between the mean math score for third graders who spent long hours in child care and the overall mean for thirdgraders could be small but the researchers could still reach the conclusion that the mean for the child care group is significantly higher than the overall mean for third-graders.

Duck hunting in populated areas faces opposition on the basis of safety and environmental issues. The San Luis Obispo Telegram-Tribune (June 18,1991 ) reported the results of a survey to assess public opinion regarding duck hunting on Morro Bay (located along the central coast of California). A random sample of 750 local residents included 560 who strongly opposed hunting on the bay. Does this sample provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the majority of local residents oppose hunting on Morro Bay? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.01\).

Speed, size, and strength are thought to be important factors in football performance. The article "Physical and Performance Characteristics of NCAA Division I Football Players" (Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport \([1990]: 395-401\) ) reported on physical characteristics of Division I starting football players in the 1988 football season. Information for teams ranked in the top 20 was easily obtained, and it was reported that the mean weight of starters on top- 20 teams was \(105 \mathrm{~kg}\). A random sample of 33 starting players (various positions were represented) from Division I teams that were not ranked in the top 20 resulted in a sample mean weight of \(103.3 \mathrm{~kg}\) and a sample standard deviation of \(16.3 \mathrm{~kg}\). Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean weight for nontop- 20 starters is less than 105, the known value for top20 teams?

According to a survey of 1000 adult Americans conducted by Opinion Research Corporation, 210 of those surveyed said playing the lottery would be the most practical way for them to accumulate \(\$ 200,000\) in net wealth in their lifetime ("One in Five Believe Path to Riches Is the Lottery," San Luis Obispo Tribune, January 11,2006 ). Although the article does not describe how the sample was selected, for purposes of this exercise, assume that the sample can be regarded as a random sample of adult Americans. Is there convincing evidence that more than \(20 \%\) of adult Americans believe that playing the lottery is the best strategy for accumulating \(\$ 200,000\) in net wealth?

A credit bureau analysis of undergraduate students credit records found that the average number of credit cards in an undergraduate's wallet was \(4.09\) ("Undergraduate Students and Credit Cards in 2004," Nellie Mae, May 2005). It was also reported that in a random sample of 132 undergraduates, the sample mean number of credit cards carried was 2.6. The sample standard deviation was not reported, but for purposes of this exercise, suppose that it was \(1.2\). Is there convincing evidence that the mean number of credit cards that undergraduates report carrying is less than the credit bureau's figure of \(4.09\) ?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.