/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 6 Use the information given in Exe... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Use the information given in Exercises \(4-7\) to calculate Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, where \(x_{i}\) and \(y_{i}\) are the ranks of the ith pair of observations and \(d_{i}=x_{i}-y_{i} .\) Assume that there are no ties in the ranks. \(\sum d_{i}^{2}=16 ; n=10\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for the given data set is approximately 0.903.

Step by step solution

01

Recall the formula for Spearman's rank correlation coefficient

The formula for Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (denoted as \(r_{s}\)) is given by: \(r_{s} = 1 - \frac{6 \sum d_{i}^{2}}{n(n^2 - 1)}\) Where: - \(r_{s}\) is Spearman's rank correlation coefficient - \(n\) is the total number of observations - \(d_{i}\) is the difference between the ranks of the i-th pair of observations - \(\sum d_{i}^{2}\) is the sum of squared differences between the ranks
02

Substitute values into the formula

Now, let's substitute the given information into the formula: \(\sum d_{i}^{2} = 16\) \(n = 10\) Plugging these values into the formula, we get: \(r_{s} = 1 - \frac{6 \times 16}{10(10^2 - 1)}\)
03

Simplify the formula and calculate \(r_{s}\)

Simplify the formula: \(r_{s} = 1 - \frac{96}{10(100 - 1)}\) \(r_{s} = 1 - \frac{96}{10(99)}\) \(r_{s} = 1 - \frac{96}{990}\) Now, we can divide 96 by 990: \(r_{s} = 1 - \frac{32}{330}\) \(r_{s} = 1 - 0.09697\)
04

Final calculation of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient

Now let's calculate the final value for \(r_{s}\): \(r_{s} = 1 - 0.09697\) \(r_{s} = 0.90303\) So, the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient is approximately \(0.903\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Correlation Coefficient Calculation
Understanding the correlation coefficient calculation is essential when studying relationships between different data sets. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient is a non-parametric measure of rank correlation that assesses how well the relationship between two variables can be described using a monotonic function. It's particularly useful when the requirements for Pearson's correlation coefficient are not met, like when the data does not have a normal distribution.

In the given exercise, the formula for Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, denoted as \(r_s\), is: \[r_s = 1 - \frac{6 \sum d_i^2}{n(n^2 - 1)}\], where \(\sum d_i^2\) is the sum of the squared rank differences, and \(n\) is the number of data pairs. The calculation is straightforward yet requires attention to detail to avoid mistakes, especially when squaring differences and substituting into the formula. Simplifying the equation systematically, as shown in the solution, helps prevent calculation errors and leads to the correct Spearman's rank correlation coefficient value.
Statistics Exercises
Engaging with statistics exercises, such as calculating Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, equips students with problem-solving skills applicable in various fields, including business, healthcare, and social sciences. These exercises often involve interpreting data and drawing conclusions from the analyses.

To enhance comprehension and retainment of statistical methods, students are advised to approach exercises methodically. Starting with understanding the problem, gathering required formulas, carefully substituting values, and carrying out calculations with precision ensures the development of a strong foundation in statistics. Visual aids, like graphs or charts, often complement these exercises, aiding in the interpretation of results and enhancing overall statistical literacy.
Probability and Statistics
Probability and statistics are integral branches of mathematics that focus on analyzing random events and interpreting data. Understanding these concepts is critical for decision making in uncertain conditions. Probability aids in predicting the likelihood of events, while statistics involves collecting, analyzing, and representing data.

Core to these fields are correlation coefficients, like Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, which are used to measure the strength and direction of the association between two variables. Students learning probability and statistics should master these coefficients to effectively analyze and interpret real-world data. Pictorial representations, such as scatter plots, complement learning by providing visual insights into the correlation between the data sets.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

How does Alex Smith, quarterback for the Kansas City Chiefs, compare to Joe Flacco, quarterback for the Baltimore Ravens? The following table shows the number of completed passes for each athlete during the 2017 NFL football season: $$ \begin{array}{ccc|ccc} \hline \multicolumn{3}{c|} {\text { Alex Smith }} & \multicolumn{3}{|c} {\text { Joe Flacco }} \\ \hline 25 & 27 & 29 & 25 & 22 & 19 \\ 23 & 25 & 27 & 29 & 34 & 31 \\ 20 & 14 & 16 & 26 & 10 & 8 \\ 19 & 25 & 21 & 20 & 27 & 25 \\ 23 & 19 & 28 & 23 & 24 & 9 \\ & & & 20 & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Use the Wilcoxon rank sum test to analyze the data and test to see whether the population distributions for the number of completed passes differ for the two quarterbacks. Use \(\alpha=.05 .\)

The data shown in the accompanying table give measures of bending stiffness and twisting stiffness as determined by engineering tests on 12 tennis racquets. $$\begin{array}{ccc}\hline \multirow{2}{*} {\text { Racquet }} & \begin{array}{c}\text { Bending } \\\\\text { Stiffness }\end{array} &\begin{array}{c}\text { Twisting } \\\\\text { Stiffness }\end{array} \\\\\hline 1 & 419 & 227 \\\2 & 407 & 231 \\\3 & 363 & 200 \\\4 & 360 & 211 \\\5 & 257 & 182 \\\6 & 622 & 304 \\\7 & 424 & 384 \\\8 & 359 & 194 \\\9 & 346 & 158 \\\10 & 556 & 225 \\\11 & 474 & 305 \\\12 & 441 & 235 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$ a. Calculate the rank correlation coefficient \(r_{s}\) between bending stiffness and twisting stiffness. b. If a racquet has bending stiffness, is it also likely to have twisting stiffness? Use the rank correlation coefficient to determine whether there is a significant positive relationship between bending stiffness and twisting stiffness. Use \(\alpha=.05 .\)

AIDS Research Scientists have shown that a newly developed vaccine can shield rhesus monkeys from infection by the SIV virus, a virus closely related to the HIV virus which affects humans. In their work, researchers gave each of \(n=6\) rhesus monkeys five inoculations with the SIV vaccine and one week after the last vaccination, each monkey received an injection of live SIV. Two of the six vaccinated monkeys showed no evidence of SIV infection for as long as a year and a half after the SIV injection. \({ }^{5}\) Scientists were able to isolate the SIV virus from the other four vaccinated monkeys, although these animals showed no sign of the disease. Does this information contain sufficient evidence to indicate that the vaccine is effective in protecting monkeys from SIV? Use \(\alpha=.10 .\)

Use the Wilcoxon rank sum test to determine whether population 1 lies to the left of population 2 by (1) stating the null and alternative hypotheses to be tested, (2) calculating the values of \(T_{1}\) and \(T_{l}^{*},(3)\) finding the rejection region for \(\alpha=.05,\) and (4) stating your conclusions. $$ \begin{array}{l|ccccc} \text { Sample } 1 & 6 & 7 & 3 & 1 & \\ \hline \text { Sample } 2 & 4 & 4 & 9 & 2 & 7 \end{array} $$

The data were collected using a randomized block design. For each data set, use the Friedman \(F\) -test to test for differences in location among the treatment distributions using \(\alpha=.05 .\) Bound the \(p\) -value for the test using Table 5 of Appendix \(I\) and state your conclusions. $$ \begin{array}{lccc} \hline & {\text { Treatment }} \\ \text { Block } & 1 & 2 & 3 \\ \hline 1 & 3.2 & 3.1 & 2.4 \\ 2 & 2.8 & 3.0 & 1.7 \\ 3 & 4.5 & 5.0 & 3.9 \\ 4 & 2.5 & 2.7 & 2.6 \\ 5 & 3.7 & 4.1 & 3.5 \\ 6 & 2.4 & 2.4 & 2.0 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.