/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 16 An experiment was conducted to s... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

An experiment was conducted to study the relationship between the ratings of a tobacco leaf grader and the moisture content of the tobacco leaves. Twelve leaves were rated by the grader on a scale of \(1-10\), and corresponding readings of moisture content were made. $$\begin{array}{ccc}\hline \text { Leaf } & \text { Grader's Rating } & \text { Moisture Content } \\\\\hline 1 & 9 & .22 \\\2 & 6 & .16 \\\3 &7 & .17 \\\4 & 7 & .14 \\\5 & 5 & .12 \\\6 & 8 & .19 \\\7 & 2 & .10 \\\8 & 6 & .12 \\\9 & 1 & .05 \\\10 & 10 & .20 \\\11 & 9 & .16 \\\12 & 3 & .09 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$ a. Calculate \(r_{s}\) b. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate an association between the grader's ratings and the moisture contents of the leaves?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: __________

Step by step solution

01

Ranking the Data

First, we need to rank the grader's ratings and the moisture content of the leaves. Assign a rank based on the value of each observed variable, starting with the smallest. For example, Leaf 1 has a 9 rating and Leaf 9 has a 1 rating; hence, Leaf 9 will be ranked 1 and Leaf 1 will be ranked 11. Similarly, assign ranks for the moisture content. After ranking the data, create a table with columns for the leaf number, the grader's rating rank, and the moisture content rank.
02

Calculate \(d_i\) and \(d_i^2\)

Next, calculate the differences between the ranks for each leaf. This difference is represented as \(d_i\). Then, compute the squared difference, represented as \(d_i^2\). Add these two columns to the table.
03

Calculate \(r_s\) using the formula

After finding the differences and their squares, calculate the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (\(r_s\)) using the following formula: \(r_s = 1-\frac{6\sum d_i^2}{n(n^2-1)}\) Where \(n\) is the number of data points (in this case, 12).
04

Test the Hypothesis

To determine if the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate an association between the grader's ratings and the moisture content, we need to test the null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) that there is no association (or \(r_s = 0\)) against the alternative hypothesis (\(H_1\)) that there is an association (or \(r_s ≠ 0\)). If the absolute value of the calculated \(r_s\) is greater than its critical value corresponding to the given significance level and degrees of freedom (which can be found in a critical value table for the Spearman rank correlation), we reject the null hypothesis, indicating a significant association between the grader's ratings and the moisture content. Now, after following these steps, determine whether the data show a significant association between the grader's ratings and the moisture content of the leaves.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Ranked Data Analysis
Ranked data analysis is an essential tool in non-parametric statistics, where numerical data are replaced by their rank orders. By converting raw scores to ranks, we can investigate relationships in ordinal data or continuous data that does not meet the assumptions of parametric tests, such as normal distribution or homoscedasticity.

Consider the case of the tobacco leaf grader's ratings and the moisture contents: the rankings transform the original numerical values into a sequence that reflects their relative standing. This conversion simplifies the complexity of the data and neutralizes the impact of outliers. It also allows us to use Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, which is robust against non-normal data distributions and provides insights into the monotonic relationship between two variables.

Steps in Ranked Data Analysis

  • Assign ranks to the data based on their value.
  • Calculate differences between ranks of paired observations if necessary.
  • Use ranks in statistical formulas, such as the Spearman rank correlation coefficient, to assess relationships.
By meticulously following these steps, the statistical analysis maintains the order of the values while discarding less essential information, like the exact difference between values, which is often not required for non-parametric tests.
Hypothesis Testing in Statistics
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental aspect of inferential statistics used to make decisions about the properties of a population based on sample data. The test begins with two opposing hypotheses: the null hypothesis ((H_0)) and the alternative hypothesis ((H_1)).

The null hypothesis typically asserts that no effect, difference, or association exists, while the alternative hypothesis suggests the opposite. Using a test statistic, calculated from the data, one evaluates the likelihood of observing the sample data if the null hypothesis were true.

Process of Hypothesis Testing

  • Formulate the null and alternative hypotheses.
  • Calculate a test statistic based on the sample data.
  • Determine the p-value or compare the test statistic to the critical value.
  • Decide whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.
In our tobacco leaf example, hypothesis testing is used to decide whether the observed Spearman's rank correlation coefficient suggests a true association between the grader's ratings and moisture content of the leaves or if the observed correlation could be due to random chance.
Association Between Variables
Determining the association between variables is pivotal in many fields as it helps in understanding how one variable may predict or affect another. An association can take various forms, such as linear, monotonic, or nonlinear relationships.

In the context of the tobacco leaves, we are concerned with a monotonic association, which means that as one variable increases or decreases, the other variable tends to move in the same direction, but not necessarily at a constant rate.

Measuring Association

  • Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for monotonic relationships.
  • Pearson's correlation coefficient for linear relationships.
  • Chi-square tests for categorical variables.
Spearman’s rank coefficient ((r_s)) specifically measures the strength and direction of association between two ranked variables. High magnitude of ((r_s)) indicates a strong association, while a value near zero suggests little to no association. By testing this statistic against a critical value, we infer whether the observed association is statistically significant, that is, unlikely to have arisen by chance alone.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Property Values In Chapter 10 , you compared the property evaluations of two tax assessors. \(A\) and \(B\), as shown in the table below. $$ \begin{array}{ccc} \hline \text { Property } & \text { Assessor } \mathrm{A} & \text { Assessor B } \\ \hline 1 & 276.3 & 275.1 \\ 2 & 288.4 & 286.8 \\ 3 & 280.2 & 277.3 \\ 4 & 294.7 & 290.6 \\ 5 & 268.7 & 269.1 \\ 6 & 282.8 & 281.0 \\ 7 & 276.1 & 275.3 \\ 8 & 279.0 & 279.1 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Use the sign test to determine whether the data present sufficient evidence to indicate that assessor A tends to give higher assessments than assessor B; that is, \(P\left(x_{\mathrm{A}}\right.\) exceeds \(\left.x_{\mathrm{B}}\right)>1 / 2\). Test by using a value of \(\alpha\) near. \(05 .\) Find the \(p\) -value for the test and interpret its value. b. In Chapter 10 , we used the \(t\) statistic to test the null hypothesis that assessor A tends to give higher assessments than assessor \(\mathrm{B}\), resulting in a \(t\) -value of \(t=2.82\) with \(p\) -value \(=.013 .\) Do these test results agree with the results in part a? Explain why the answers are (or are not) consistent.

Use the Wilcoxon rank sum test to determine whether population 1 lies to the left of population 2 by (1) stating the null and alternative hypotheses to be tested, (2) calculating the values of \(T_{1}\) and \(T_{l}^{*},(3)\) finding the rejection region for \(\alpha=.05,\) and (4) stating your conclusions. $$ \begin{array}{l|ccccc} \text { Sample } 1 & 6 & 7 & 3 & 1 & \\ \hline \text { Sample } 2 & 4 & 4 & 9 & 2 & 7 \end{array} $$

Gourmet Cooking Two chefs, \(A\) and \(B\), rated 22 meals on a scale of \(1-10\). The data are shown in the table. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate that one of the chefs tends to give higher ratings than the other? Test by using the sign test with a value of \(\alpha\) near. \(05 .\) $$ \begin{array}{ccc|ccc} \hline \text { Meal } & \text { A } & \text { B } & \text { Meal } & \text { A } & \text { B } \\ \hline 1 & 6 & 8 & 12 & 8 & 5 \\ 2 & 4 & 5 & 13 & 4 & 2 \\ 3 & 7 & 4 & 14 & 3 & 3 \\ 4 & 8 & 7 & 15 & 6 & 8 \\ 5 & 2 & 3 & 16 & 9 & 10 \\ 6 & 7 & 4 & 17 & 9 & 8 \\ 7 & 9 & 9 & 18 & 4 & 6 \\ 8 & 7 & 8 & 19 & 4 & 3 \\ 9 & 2 & 5 & 20 & 5 & 4 \\ 10 & 4 & 3 & 21 & 3 & 2 \\ 11 & 6 & 9 & 22 & 5 & 3 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Use the binomial tables in Appendix I to find the exact rejection region for the test. b. Use the large-sample \(z\) statistic. (NOTE: Although the large-sample approximation is suggested for \(n \geq 25\), it works fairly well for values of \(n\) as small as \(15 .)\) c. Compare the results of parts a and b.

The data given result from experiments run in completely randomized designs. Use the Kruskal-Wallis H statistic to determine whether there are significant differences between at least two of the treatment groups at the \(5 \%\) level of significance. You can use a computer program if one is available. Summarize your results. $$ \begin{array}{llll} \hline & {\text { Treatment }} & \\ \hline 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 \\ \hline 124 & 147 & 141 & 117 \\ 167 & 121 & 144 & 128 \\ 135 & 136 & 139 & 102 \\ 160 & 114 & 162 & 119 \\ 159 & 129 & 155 & 128 \\ 144 & 117 & 150 & 123 \\ 133 & 109 & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$

AIDS Research Scientists have shown that a newly developed vaccine can shield rhesus monkeys from infection by the SIV virus, a virus closely related to the HIV virus which affects humans. In their work, researchers gave each of \(n=6\) rhesus monkeys five inoculations with the SIV vaccine and one week after the last vaccination, each monkey received an injection of live SIV. Two of the six vaccinated monkeys showed no evidence of SIV infection for as long as a year and a half after the SIV injection. \({ }^{5}\) Scientists were able to isolate the SIV virus from the other four vaccinated monkeys, although these animals showed no sign of the disease. Does this information contain sufficient evidence to indicate that the vaccine is effective in protecting monkeys from SIV? Use \(\alpha=.10 .\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.