/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 16 An experiment was conducted to c... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

An experiment was conducted to compare the tenderness of meat cuts treated with two different meat tenderizers. Prior to applying the tenderizers, the data were paired by the specific meat cut from the same steer and by cooking paired cuts together. After cooking, each cut was rated by the same judge on a scale of \(1-10,\) with 10 corresponding to the most tender meat. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate that one of the two tenderizers tends to receive higher ratings than the other? Would a Student's \(t\) -test be appropriate for analyzing these data? Explain. $$ \begin{array}{llr} \hline & {\text { Tenderizer }} \\ \text { Cut } & \text { A } & \text { B } \\ \hline \text { Shoulder roast } & 5 & 7 \\ \text { Chuck roast } & 6 & 5 \\ \text { Rib steak } & 8 & 9 \\ \text { Brisket } & 4 & 5 \\ \text { Club steak } & 9 & 9 \\ \text { Round steak } & 3 & 5 \\ \text { Rump roast } & 7 & 6 \\ \text { Sirloin steak } & 8 & 8 \\ \text { Sirloin tip steak } & 8 & 9 \\ \text { T-bone steak } & 9 & 10 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Is the Student's t-test appropriate for analyzing these data? Answer: No, there is insufficient evidence to indicate that one of the two tenderizers has a higher rating than the other. The Student's t-test is appropriate for analyzing these data.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate differences in ratings

Calculate the difference in tenderness ratings for each meat cut between Tenderizer A and Tenderizer B. Differences: [5-7, 6-5, 8-9, 4-5, 9-9, 3-5, 7-6, 8-8, 8-9, 9-10] = [-2, 1, -1, -1, 0, -2, 1, 0, -1, -1]
02

Calculate mean and standard deviation

Calculate the mean (µ) and standard deviation (σ) of the differences. Mean (µ): \((-2+1-1-1+0-2+1+0-1-1)/10 = -5/10 = -0.5\) Standard Deviation (σ): \(σ = \sqrt{\frac{(a_1-\mu)^2+(a_2-\mu)^2+\cdots+(a_{10}-\mu)^2}{n-1}} = \sqrt{\frac{(-2-(-0.5))^2+(1-(-0.5))^2+(\cdots)+(-1-(-0.5))^2}{10-1}} \approx 1.07\)
03

Calculate t-score

Calculate the t-score using the formula: \(t = \frac{\mu}{\frac{σ}{\sqrt{n}}}\) , where \(n\) is the sample size (amount of paired measurements). t = \(\frac{-0.5}{\frac{1.07}{\sqrt{10}}} \approx -1.57\)
04

Determine Degrees of Freedom and Critical Value

Determine the degrees of freedom (df) and two-tailed critical value (\(t_{critical}\)) for a chosen significance level (α). Let's use α = 0.05. Degrees of Freedom (df): \(n - 1 = 10 - 1 = 9\) Two-tailed critical value (\(t_{critical}\)) for α = 0.05 and df = 9: approximately \(\pm 2.262\)
05

Compare t-score with critical value and perform t-test

Compare the calculated t-score with the critical value and determine if the result is statistically significant. Since the calculated t-score (-1.57) falls within the two-tailed critical value range (-2.262, 2.262), we fail to reject the null hypothesis (H0). Based on the results of the paired samples t-test, there is insufficient evidence to indicate that one of the two tenderizers has a higher rating than the other. The Student's t-test is appropriate for analyzing these data.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a statistical method used to make inferences about a population based on a sample of data. In the context of the paired sample t-test from the exercise, it involves following a systematic process to determine whether the observed differences in the meat tenderizer ratings are due to random chance or if they reflect a true effect.

Generally, we start by formulating two opposing hypotheses: the null hypothesis (H0) and the alternative hypothesis (H1). The null hypothesis suggests that there is no effect or difference, while the alternative hypothesis suggests there is a significant effect or difference. For the meat tenderizer case, H0 would be that there is no difference in tenderness between the two tenderizers, and H1 would be that there is a difference.

After collecting and analyzing the data, we compute a test statistic that describes how much the sample data deviate from what we would expect under the null hypothesis. Finally, we make a decision about which hypothesis is supported by the sample data, operating within a pre-determined significance level to control the chance of making a Type I error—incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a determination about the non-randomness of the results of a hypothesis test. When comparing the tenderizer ratings, reaching statistical significance means that it's unlikely the observed difference in ratings occurred by chance.

To assess this, a significance level (often denoted as \( \alpha \)) is chosen. The significance level represents the probability of making a Type I error and is typically set at 0.05, indicating a 5% risk of concluding there is an effect when there isn't one. If the test statistic falls within the critical region defined by this significance level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the result is statistically significant, suggesting a real effect is present. In the tenderizer experiment, however, the result was not statistically significant, indicating that any difference in ratings could be due to chance.
Degrees of Freedom
Degrees of freedom (df) are a crucial component in the calculation of a t-test, representing the number of independent values in the data that are free to vary when estimating a statistical parameter.

In the paired sample t-test, the degrees of freedom are calculated as the number of paired observations minus one (df = n - 1). In our tenderizer example, there were 10 pairs of observations, so the degrees of freedom were 9. The degrees of freedom are used to determine the critical t-value from the t-distribution, which is a key part of the hypothesis testing. The critical t-value defines how far away the test statistic has to be from zero to reject the null hypothesis, considering the sample size and desired level of confidence.
T-Score Calculation
In a paired sample t-test, the t-score is a statistic that measures the relative difference between the paired observations compared to the variability of the differences. To calculate the t-score, we use the formula \( t = \frac{\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}} \) where \( \mu \) is the mean of the differences, \( \sigma \) is the standard deviation, and \( n \) is the number of differences.

For the meat tenderizer experiment, we first computed the differences between the scores for each meat cut, then found the mean and standard deviation of these differences. Finally, we applied the t-score formula. The resulting t-score helps us to compare the observed mean difference to the expected mean difference under the null hypothesis. If the absolute value of the t-score is greater than the critical t-value found in the t-distribution table for our degrees of freedom, we reject the null hypothesis; otherwise, we fail to reject it—as was the case in this scenario with the tenderizer ratings.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Eight people were asked to perform a simple puzzle-assembly task under normal and stressful conditions. The stressful time consisted of a stimulus delivered to subjects every 30 seconds until the task was completed. Blood pressure readings taken under both conditions are given in the table. Do the data present sufficient evidence to indicate higher blood pressure readings under stressful conditions? Analyze the data using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for a paired experiment. $$ \begin{array}{ccc} \hline \text { Subject } & \text { Normal } & \text { Stressful } \\ \hline 1 & 126 & 130 \\ 2 & 117 & 118 \\ 3 & 115 & 125 \\ 4 & 118 & 120 \\ 5 & 118 & 121 \\ 6 & 128 & 125 \\ 7 & 125 & 130 \\ 8 & 120 & 120 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

A high school principal formed a review board consisting of five teachers who were asked to interview 12 applicants for a vacant teaching position and rank them in order of merit. Seven of the applicants held college degrees but had limited teaching experience. Of the remaining five applicants, all had college degrees and substantial experience. The review board's rankings are given in the table. $$ \begin{array}{cc} \hline \text { Limited Experience } & \text { Substantial Experience } \\ \hline 4 & 1 \\ 6 & 2 \\ 7 & 3 \\ 9 & 5 \\ 10 & 8 \\ 11 & \\ 12 & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Do these rankings indicate that the review board considers experience a prime factor in the selection of the best candidates? Test using \(\alpha=.05 .\)

A study was conducted to determine whether a particular drug injection reduced the harmful effects of a chemotherapy treatment on the survival time for rats. Two randomly selected groups of 12 rats received the toxic drug in a dose large enough to cause death, but in addition, one group received the antitoxin to reduce the toxic effect of the chemotherapy on normal cells. The test was terminated at the end of 20 days, or 480 hours. The survival times for the two groups of rats, to the nearest 4 hours, are shown in the table. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate that rats receiving the antitoxin tend to survive longer after chemotherapy than those not receiving the antitoxin? Use the Wilcoxon rank sum test with \(\alpha=.05 .\) $$ \begin{array}{rc} \hline \text { Chemotherapy Only } & \text { Chemotherapy Plus Drug } \\ \hline 84 & 140 \\ 128 & 184 \\ 168 & 368 \\ 92 & 96 \\ 184 & 480 \\ 92 & 188 \\ 76 & 480 \\ 104 & 244 \\ 72 & 440 \\ 180 & 380 \\ 144 & 480 \\ 120 & 196 \end{array} $$

In an investigation of the visual scanning behavior of deaf children, measurements of eye movement were taken on nine deaf and nine hearing children. The table gives the eye movement rates and their ranks (in parentheses). Does it appear that the distributions of eye-movement rates for deaf children and hearing children differ? $$ \begin{array}{llc} \hline & \text { Deaf Children } & \text { Hearing Children } \\ \hline & 2.75(15) & .89(1) \\ & 2.14(11) & 1.43(7) \\ & 3.23(18) & 1.06(4) \\ & 2.07(10) & 1.01(3) \\ & 2.49(14) & .94(2) \\ & 2.18(12) & 1.79(8) \\ & 3.16(17) & 1.12(5.5) \\ & 2.93(16) & 2.01(9) \\ & 2.20(13) & 1.12(5.5) \\ \hline \text { Rank Sum } & 126 & 45 & \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Lead Levels in Blood A study reported in the American Journal of Public Health (Science News) followed blood lead levels in handgun hobbyists using indoor firing ranges. \({ }^{6}\) Lead exposure measurements were made on 17 members of a law enforcement trainee class before, during, and after a 3 -month period of firearm instruction at an indoor firing range. No trainee had elevated blood lead levels before the training, but 15 of the 17 ended their training with blood lead levels deemed "elevated." If use of the indoor firing range causes an increase in a person's blood lead levels, then \(p\), the probability that a person's lead level increases will be greater than .5. Use the sign test to determine whether using an indoor firing range has the effect of increasing a person's blood lead level with \(\alpha=.05 .\) (HINT: The normal approximation to binomial probabilities is fairly accurate for \(n=17 .)\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.