/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 18 Give the number of degrees of fr... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Give the number of degrees of freedom for \(s^{2}\), the pooled estimator of \(\sigma^{2},\) in these cases: a. \(n_{1}=16, n_{2}=8\) b. \(n_{1}=10, n_{2}=12\) c. \(n_{1}=15, n_{2}=3\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Calculate the degrees of freedom for the pooled variance estimator in each of the following sample size scenarios: a. \(n_1 = 16, n_2 = 8\) b. \(n_1 = 10, n_2 = 12\) c. \(n_1 = 15, n_2 = 3\) Answer: In each case, the degrees of freedom for the pooled variance estimator are: a. \(df = 22\) b. \(df = 20\) c. \(df = 16\)

Step by step solution

01

Case a: \(n_1=16, n_2=8\)

To calculate the degrees of freedom for the pooled variance estimator, we use the formula \(df = n_1 + n_2 - 2\). In case a, we have \(n_1=16\) and \(n_2=8\). So, the degrees of freedom are: \(df = 16 + 8 - 2 = 22\)
02

Case b: \(n_1=10, n_2=12\)

In case b, we have \(n_1=10\) and \(n_2=12\). Applying the formula \(df = n_1 + n_2 - 2\) to calculate the degrees of freedom, we get: \(df = 10 + 12 - 2 = 20\)
03

Case c: \(n_1=15, n_2=3\)

In case c, we have \(n_1=15\) and \(n_2=3\). Applying the formula \(df = n_1 + n_2 - 2\) to calculate the degrees of freedom, we get: \(df = 15 + 3 - 2 = 16\) So, the degrees of freedom for the pooled variance estimator in each case are: a. \(df = 22\) b. \(df = 20\) c. \(df = 16\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Pooled Variance
Pooled variance is an essential concept in statistics that helps us combine the variances of two or more groups to obtain an overall measure of variability. It is particularly useful when comparing two independent samples with potentially different sizes but similar variances. By assuming that the variances are approximately equal, we can pool them together to get a single estimate, which provides us a more accurate analysis.
Pooled variance is calculated using the formula: \[ s^2_p = \frac{(n_1-1)s_1^2 + (n_2-1)s_2^2}{n_1+n_2-2} \] where:
  • \(s^2_p\) is the pooled variance,
  • \(s_1^2\) and \(s_2^2\) are the sample variances of the two groups,
  • \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) are the sample sizes of the groups.
By using pooled variance, analysts and researchers can draw more reliable conclusions from data, especially when checking for differences between two group means, like in t-tests. It smoothens out the discrepancies between varying sample sizes and enhances the robustness of statistical findings.
The Art of Variance Estimation
Variance estimation is vital for statistics as it quantifies the extent of variability or dispersion in a dataset. It tells how much the data points differ from the average value. Calculating variance involves determining the average of the squared differences from the mean, and it follows the formula: \[ s^2 = \frac{\sum (x_i - \bar{x})^2}{n-1} \] where:
  • \(s^2\) is the variance,
  • \(x_i\) represents each data point,
  • \(\bar{x}\) is the mean of the data,
  • \(n\) is the number of observations.
Variance helps in understanding the spread within the data and is pivotal for statistical analyses like hypothesis testing and regression. The estimated variance from a sample gives you an approximation of the population variance, which is often unknown. This approximation helps analysts make inferences about the overall population from which the samples were drawn.
Empowering Learners Through Statistics Education
Statistics education plays a crucial role in developing analytical and critical thinking skills. It involves teaching the principles of data collection, organization, analysis, interpretation, and presentation. Understanding statistics helps students comprehend the underpinnings of various phenomena and fosters their ability to make informed decisions.
In a statistics education program, learners are introduced to concepts such as variance, pooled variance, mean, median, mode, probability, and hypothesis testing. Gaining a strong grasp of these concepts empowers students to:
  • Analyze data effectively and draw meaningful conclusions.
  • Understand and interpret research outcomes, facilitating evidence-based reasoning.
  • Evaluate statistical arguments critically, distinguishing between valid and flawed reasoning.
A robust foundation in statistics enables learners to apply mathematical and statistical reasoning to solve real-life problems, making them better equipped for careers in data-driven environments and contributing positively to various fields.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a study of the effect of cigarette smoking on the carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DL) of the lung, researchers found that current smokers had DL readings significantly lower than those of either exsmokers or nonsmokers. The carbon monoxide diffusing capacities for a random sample of \(n=20\) current smokers are listed here: $$ \begin{array}{rrrrr} 103.768 & 88.602 & 73.003 & 123.086 & 91.052 \\ 92.295 & 61.675 & 90.677 & 84.023 & 76.014 \\ 100.615 & 88.017 & 71.210 & 82.115 & 89.222 \\ 102.754 & 108.579 & 73.154 & 106.755 & 90.479 \end{array} $$ a. Do these data indicate that the mean DL reading for current smokers is significantly lower than 100 DL, the average for nonsmokers? Use \(\alpha=.01\). b. Find a \(99 \%\) upper one-sided confidence bound for the mean DL reading for current smokers. Does this bound confirm your conclusions in part a?

To properly treat patients, drugs prescribed by physicians must not only have a mean potency value as specified on the drug's container, but also the variation in potency values must be small. Otherwise, pharmacists would be distributing drug prescriptions that could be harmfully potent or have a low potency and be ineffective. A drug manufacturer claims that his drug has a potency of \(5 \pm .1\) milligram per cubic centimeter \((\mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{cc})\). A random sample of four containers gave potency readings equal to 4.94,5.09 , 5.03, and \(4.90 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{cc} .\) a. Do the data present sufficient evidence to indicate that the mean potency differs from \(5 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{cc} ?\) b. Do the data present sufficient evidence to indicate that the variation in potency differs from the error limits specified by the manufacturer? (HINT: It is sometimes difficult to determine exactly what is meant by limits on potency as specified by a manufacturer. Since he implies that the potency values will fall into the interval \(5 \pm .1 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{cc}\) with very high probability - the implication is almost always-let us assume that the range \(.2 ;\) or 4.9 to \(5.1,\) represents \(6 \sigma\) as suggested by the Empirical Rule).

Jan Lindhe conducted a study on the effect of an oral antiplaque rinse on plaque buildup on teeth. \(^{6}\) Fourteen people whose teeth were thoroughly cleaned and polished were randomly assigned to two groups of seven subjects each. Both groups were assigned to use oral rinses (no brushing) for a 2 -week period. Group 1 used a rinse that contained an antiplaque agent. Group \(2,\) the control group, received a similar rinse except that, unknown to the subjects, the rinse contained no antiplaque agent. A plaque index \(x\), a measure of plaque buildup, was recorded at 14 days with means and standard deviations for the two groups shown in the table. $$ \begin{array}{lll} & \text { Control Group } & \text { Antiplaque Group } \\ \hline \text { Sample Size } & 7 & 7 \\ \text { Mean } & 1.26 & .78 \\ \text { Standard Deviation } & 32 & 32 \end{array} $$ a. State the null and alternative hypotheses that should be used to test the effectiveness of the antiplaque oral rinse b. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate that the oral antiplaque rinse is effective? Test using \(\alpha=.05 .\) c. Find the approximate \(p\) -value for the test.

Find the critical value(s) of \(t\) that specify the rejection region in these situations: a. A two-tailed test with \(\alpha=.01\) and \(12 d f\) b. A right-tailed test with \(\alpha=.05\) and \(16 d f\) c. A two-tailed test with \(\alpha=.05\) and \(25 d f\) d. A left-tailed test with \(\alpha=.01\) and \(7 d f\)

An experiment published in The American Biology Teacher studied the efficacy of using \(95 \%\) ethanol or \(20 \%\) bleach as a disinfectant in removing bacterial and fungal contamination when culturing plant tissues. The experiment was repeated 15 times with each disinfectant, using eggplant as the plant tissue being cultured. \({ }^{8}\) Five cuttings per plant were placed on a petri dish for each disinfectant and stored at \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) for 4 weeks. The observation reported was the number of uncontaminated eggplant cuttings after the 4 -week storage. $$ \begin{array}{lcl} \text { Disinfectant } & 95 \% \text { Ethanol } & 20 \% \text { Bleach } \\ \hline \text { Mean } & 3.73 & 4.80 \\ \text { Variance } & 2.78095 & .17143 \\ n & 15 & 15 \end{array} $$ a. Are you willing to assume that the underlying variances are equal? b. Using the information from part a, are you willing to conclude that there is a significant difference in the mean numbers of uncontaminated eggplants for the two disinfectants tested?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.