/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 63 Bolts Random samples of 200 bolt... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Bolts Random samples of 200 bolts manufactured by a type A machine and 200 bolts manufactured by a type \(\mathrm{B}\) machine showed 16 and 8 defective bolts, respectively. Do these data present sufficient evidence to suggest a difference in the performance of the machine types? Use \(\alpha=.05 .\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: ___________ (Use the conclusion from Step 5 to fill in the blank)

Step by step solution

01

Define the hypotheses

To set up the hypothesis test, we need to define the null hypothesis (H0) and the alternative hypothesis (HA): $$H_0: p_A = p_B$$ $$H_A: p_A \neq p_B$$ where \(p_A\) represents the population proportion of defective bolts from machine type A and \(p_B\) represents the population proportion of defective bolts from machine type B.
02

Calculate sample proportions and pooled proportion

Next, we need to calculate the sample proportions for machine A and machine B: Sample proportions: $$\hat{p}_A = \frac{x_A}{n_A} = \frac{16}{200}$$ $$\hat{p}_B = \frac{x_B}{n_B} = \frac{8}{200}$$ Then, compute the pooled proportion by considering both samples together: $$\hat{p} = \frac{x_A + x_B}{n_A + n_B} = \frac{16 + 8}{200 + 200}$$
03

Calculate the test statistic

The test statistic for comparing two proportions is given by the formula: $$Z = \frac{(\hat{p}_A - \hat{p}_B) - 0}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})}{n_A} + \frac{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})}{n_B}}}$$ Using the calculated values from Step 2, plug in the values into the formula and solve for Z.
04

Calculate the p-value

Since the alternative hypothesis is \(p_A \neq p_B\), we have a two-tailed test. So we need to calculate the p-value using the test statistic (Z) by looking for the probability in the tails of the standard normal distribution. $$p-value = 2 * P(Z > |Z|)$$
05

Draw conclusions

Compare the p-value to the given significance level (\(\alpha = 0.05\)). If the p-value is less than or equal to \(\alpha\), reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis. Based on the comparison, conclude whether there is sufficient evidence to suggest a difference in the performance of the machine types.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Proportions
Proportions in hypothesis testing help us to understand the fraction of a particular characteristic across two groups. In our example, we're examining the proportion of defective bolts manufactured by two different types of machines. Suppose we want to find when there's a significant difference between these two proportions. Essentially, proportions compare parts of a whole. For machine type A, the proportion \(\hat{p}_A\) is calculated by dividing the number of defective bolts by the total number of bolts from that machine. Similarly, for machine type B, the proportion \(\hat{p}_B\) is found the same way. In this context:
  • \(\hat{p}_A = \frac{16}{200}\)
  • \(\hat{p}_B = \frac{8}{200}\)
Understanding these values is critical as they form the basis for sample comparison and hypothesis testing.
Significance Level
The significance level, often denoted by \(\alpha\), indicates the threshold for deciding when to reject the null hypothesis. In hypothesis testing, this value represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true. It's essentially the level of risk we're willing to take for making a mistake in our test conclusions. In this exercise, the significance level is set at 0.05 or 5%. It's a common choice, balancing the risk of error and the need for conclusive results. By choosing this, we agree that a 5% chance of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis is acceptable. If the p-value calculated in our test is less than or equal to this significance level, it suggests that the observed difference in proportions might not just be due to random chance.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, symbolically represented as \(H_0\), serves as the initial assumption that there is no effect or no difference in the context of the test being performed. It provides a starting point for statistical testing. For this problem, the null hypothesis states that the proportion of defective bolts from type A machine is equal to that from type B. Mathematically, it is expressed as \(H_0: p_A = p_B\). The purpose of the null hypothesis is to provide a statement that we can test using statistical methods. If, after analyzing the data, we find evidence strong enough, we may reject this statement in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
Alternative Hypothesis
An alternative hypothesis, denoted as \(H_A\), is what we consider if we find the observed data incompatible with the null hypothesis. It proposes a different state of affairs, suggesting that there is indeed an effect or a difference. In this example, the alternative hypothesis posits that the proportion of defective bolts from machine A is not equal to the proportion from machine B, expressed as \(H_A: p_A eq p_B\). The role of the alternative hypothesis is critical, as it guides researchers on what to conclude if the null hypothesis is deemed unlikely based on the statistical evidence.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Independent random samples of 80 measurements were drawn from two quantitative populations, 1 and \(2 .\) Here is a summary of the sample data: $$\begin{array}{lcc} & \text { Sample 1 } & \text { Sample 2 } \\\\\hline \text { Sample Size } & 80 & 80 \\\\\text { Sample Mean } & 11.6 & 9.7 \\\\\text { Sample Variance } & 27.9 & 38.4\end{array}$$ a. If your research objective is to show that \(\mu_{1}\) is larger than \(\mu_{2}\), state the alternative and the null hypotheses that you would choose for a statistical test. b. Is the test in part a one- or two-tailed? c. Calculate the test statistic that you would use for the test in part a. Based on your knowledge of the standard normal distribution, is this a likely or unlikely observation, assuming that \(H_{0}\) is true and the two population means are the same? d. \(p\) -value approach: Find the \(p\) -value for the test. Test for a significant difference in the population means at the \(1 \%\) significance level. e. Critical value approach: Find the rejection region when \(\alpha=.01 .\) Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate a difference in the population anc?

Adolescents and Social Stress In a study to compare ethnic differences in adolescents' social stress, researchers recruited subjects from three middle schools in Houston, Texas. \({ }^{21}\) Social stress among four ethnic groups was measured using the Social Attitudinal Familial and Environment Scale for Children (SAFE-C). In addition, demographic information abou the 316 students was collected using self-administered questionnaires. A tabulation of student responses to a question regarding their socioeconomic status (SES) compared with other families in which the students chose one of five responses (much worse off, somewhat worse off, about the same, better off, or much better off) resulted in the tabulation that follows. a. Do these data support the hypothesis that the proportion of adolescent African Americans who state that their SES is "about the same" exceeds that for adolescent Hispanic Americans? b. Find the \(p\) -value for the test. c. If you plan to test using \(\alpha=.05,\) what is your conclusion?

Who Votes? About three-fourths of voting age Americans are registered to vote, but many do not bother to vote on Election Day. Only \(64 \%\) voted in \(1992,\) and \(60 \%\) in \(2000,\) but turnout in off-year elections is even lower. An article in Time stated that \(35 \%\) of adult Americans are registered voters who always vote. \({ }^{10}\) To test this claim, a random sample of \(n=300\) adult Americans was selected and \(x=123\) were registered regular voters who always voted. Does this sample provide sufficient evidence to indicate that the percentage of adults who say that they always vote is different from the percentage reported in Time? Test using \(\alpha=.01\)

Potency of an Antibiotic A drug manufacturer claimed that the mean potency of one of its antibiotics was \(80 \%\). A random sample of \(n=100\) capsules were tested and produced a sample mean of \(\bar{x}=79.7 \%\) with a standard deviation of \(s=.8 \% .\) Do the data present sufficient evidence to refute the manufacturer's claim? Let \(\alpha=.05 .\) a. State the null hypothesis to be tested. b. State the alternative hypothesis. c. Conduct a statistical test of the null hypothesis and state your conclusion.

A random sample of 120 observations was selected from a binomial population, and 72 successes were observed. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate that \(p\) is greater than \(.5 ?\) Use one of the two methods of testing presented in this section, and explain your conclusions.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.