/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 25 The Tomlinson Company manufactur... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The Tomlinson Company manufactures trendy, high-quality, moderately priced watches. As Tomlinson's senior financial analyst, you are asked to recommend a method of inventory costing. The CF0 will use your recommendation to prepare Tomlinson's 2017 income statement. The following data are for the year ended December 31,2017 : Assume standard costs per unit are the same for units in beginning inventory and units produced during the year. Also, assume no price, spending, or efficiency variances. Any production-volume variance is written off to cost of goods sold. 1\. Prepare income statements under variable and absorption costing for the year ended December 31 2017 2\. What is Tomlinson's operating income as percentage of revenues under each costing method? 3\. Explain the difference in operating income between the two methods. 4\. Which costing method would you recommend to the CF0? Why?

Short Answer

Expert verified
In summary, the primary difference between variable and absorption costing is the treatment of fixed manufacturing overhead. Variable costing includes only variable costs in the cost of goods sold, while absorption costing includes both variable and fixed manufacturing overhead. Generally, absorption costing results in a higher cost of goods sold, lower gross margin, and lower operating income than variable costing. To make a recommendation, we would need more information regarding Tomlinson Company's specific financial goals and context. However, if cost control is prioritized, variable costing might be the better choice; if adherence to GAAP and better allocation of fixed manufacturing overhead is desired, absorption costing should be used.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the key differences between variable and absorption costing

Variable costing includes only variable costs (direct materials, direct labor, and variable manufacturing overhead) in the cost of goods sold, while absorption costing also includes fixed manufacturing overhead. This difference affects the calculation of cost of goods sold, gross margin, and operating income in the income statements.
02

Prepare the income statements under variable and absorption costing

Unfortunately, there is not enough data provided in the exercise to create income statements for Tomlinson Company under variable and absorption costing. The data provided needs to include amounts for revenue, direct materials, direct labor, variable manufacturing overhead, fixed manufacturing overhead, and other expenses, in order to complete this step.
03

Calculate the operating income as a percentage of revenues

Once you have prepared the income statements using both costing methods, you can calculate the operating income as percentage of revenues for both methods by dividing the operating income by the revenue for each method and multiplying the result by 100. Operating Income percentage (Variable Costing) = (Operating Income_VC / Revenue) * 100 Operating Income percentage (Absorption Costing) = (Operating Income_AC / Revenue) * 100
04

Explain the difference between the two methods

The primary difference between variable and absorption costing is the inclusion of fixed manufacturing overhead in the cost of goods sold under absorption costing. This results in a higher cost of goods sold and a lower gross margin in absorption costing when compared to variable costing. In turn, this impacts the operating income, which will also be lower under absorption costing. The difference between the two methods lies in the way fixed manufacturing overhead is accounted for: in variable costing, it is treated as a period expense, while in absorption costing, it is included in the cost of goods sold and allocated to the inventory.
05

Recommend a costing method and justify the recommendation

After analyzing the differences between variable and absorption costing, noting the impact on the income statements and operating income percentages, and considering the company's context and financial goals, we can make a recommendation. For example, if the CFO wants to emphasize cost control and better understand the impact of variable costs on the company's gross margin and operating income, it might be more appropriate to recommend variable costing. On the other hand, if the company wants to adhere to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and better allocate fixed manufacturing overhead to product costs, absorption costing would be the better choice. In any case, your recommendation should be clear and justified based on the analysis conducted in previous steps.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Variable Costing
Variable costing is a managerial accounting method that captures only variable production costs—direct materials, direct labor, and variable manufacturing overhead—in the cost of goods sold. It treats fixed manufacturing overhead as a period expense, which is deducted along with selling and administrative expenses to determine operating income.

Within this framework, the cost of producing an additional unit is simply the sum of the variable costs. The main advantage of variable costing is that it provides clarity on how costs behave with changes in production volume, which can be crucial for decision-making and strategic planning.

It's essential to understand that variable costing doesn't conform to GAAP for external reporting, but is extremely useful for internal analysis as it avoids distortion in profit due to changes in inventory levels, which can happen with absorption costing.
Absorption Costing
In contrast to variable costing, absorption costing includes all manufacturing costs in the cost of goods sold, both variable and fixed. Under this method, fixed manufacturing overhead is allocated to each unit produced, meaning that the inventory 'absorbs' a portion of the fixed overhead.

This accounting practice aligns with GAAP requirements and is typically used to prepare financial statements for external reporting. One consequence of absorption costing is that it can lead to fluctuations in operating income if production levels vary significantly from sale levels; producing more units than sold can falsely inflate income due to more fixed costs being allocated to inventory rather than being expensed out.
Operating Income Calculation
Calculating operating income is a fundamental process in assessing a company's financial performance. To determine operating income under both costing methods, one must first identify the revenue, then subtract the cost of goods sold, and finally deduct operating expenses. The formula for calculating the operating income percentage is: \[\text{Operating Income percentage} = \left(\frac{\text{Operating Income}}{\text{Revenue}}\right) \times 100\] When comparing variable costing to absorption costing, operating income can differ due to the different treatment of fixed manufacturing overhead. With variable costing, because fixed overhead is not included in the cost of goods sold, operating income can appear higher, especially in periods where production exceeds sales.
Standard Cost Accounting
Standard cost accounting involves setting predetermined costs for products and services, which are then used for valuing inventory and measuring cost control efficiency. These standard costs are based on expected direct material, direct labor, and overhead rates.

The major benefit of using standard cost accounting is that it simplifies bookkeeping, makes budgeting easier, and provides a clear benchmark for performance evaluation. Variances from standard costs can signal areas where management may need to investigate inefficiencies or anomalies. As noted in the problem, Tomlinson Company assumes no variances, meaning actual costs matched their standard costs.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Absorption and variable costing. (CMA) Miami, Inc., planned and actually manufactured 250,000 units of its single product in 2017 , its first year of operation. Variable manufacturing cost was 19 dollar per unit produced. Variable operating (nonmanufacturing) cost was 13 dollar per unit sold. Planned and actual fixed manufacturing costs were 750,000 dollar. Planned and actual fixed operating (nonmanufacturing) costs totaled 420,000 dollar. Miami sold 170,000 units of product at 41 dollar per unit. 1\. Miami's 2017 operating income using absorption costing is (a) 600,000 dollar,(b) 360,000 dolar,(c) 780,000 dollar,(d) 1,020,000 dollar, or \((e)\) none of these. Show supporting calculations. 2\. Miami's 2017 operating income using variable costing is (a)1,100,000 dollar, (b) 600,000 dollar,(c) 360,000 dollar, (d) 780,000 dollar, or \((\mathrm{e})\) none of these. Show supporting calculations.

The Iron City Company started business on January \(1,2017 .\) Iron City manufactures a specialty honey beer, which it sells directly to state-owned distributors in Pennsylvania. Honey beer is produced and sold in six-packs, and in \(2017,\) Iron City produced more six-packs than it was able to sell. In addition to variable and fixed manufacturing overhead, Iron City incurred direct materials costs of 880,000 dollar, direct manufacturing labor costs of 400,000 dollar, and fixed marketing and administrative costs of 295,000 dollar.For the year, Iron City sold a total of 180,000 six-packs for a sales revenue of 2,250,000 dollar Iron City's CF0 is convinced that the firm should use an actual costing system but is debating whether to follow variable or absorption costing. The controller notes that Iron City's operating income for the year would be 438,000 dollar under variable costing and 461,000 dollar under absorption costing. Moreover, the ending finished-goods inventory would be valued at 7.15 dollar under variable costing and 8.30 dollar under absorption costing. Iron City incurs no variable nonmanufacturing expenses. 1\. What is Iron City's total contribution margin for \(2017 ?\) 2\. Iron City incurs fixed manufacturing costs in addition to its fixed marketing and administrative costs. How much did Iron City incur in fixed manufacturing costs in \(2017 ?\) 3\. How many six-packs did Iron City produce in \(2017 ?\) 4\. How much in variable manufacturing overhead did Iron City incur in \(2017 ?\) 5\. For 2017 , how much in total manufacturing overhead is expensed under variable costing, either through cost of goods sold or as a period expense?

Differences in operating income between variable costing and absorption costing are due solely to accounting for fixed costs. Do you agree? Explain.

Candyland uses standard costing to produce a particularly popular type of candy. Candyland's president, Jack McCay, was unhappy after reviewing the income statements for the first three years of business. He said, "I was told by our accountants - and in fact, I have memorized- that our breakeven volume is 25,000 units. I was happy that we reached that sales goal in each of our first two years. But here's the strange thing: In our first year, we sold 25,000 units and indeed we broke even. Then in our second year we sold the same volume and had a significant, positive operating income. I didn't complain, of course \(\ldots\) but here's the bad part. In our third year, we sold \(10 \%\) more candy, but our operating income dropped by nearly \(90 \%\) from what it was in the second year! We didn't change our selling price or cost structure over the past three years and have no price, efficiency, or spending variances \(\ldots\) so what's going on?!" 1\. What denominator level is Candyland using to allocate fixed manufacturing costs to the candy? How is Candyland disposing of any favorable or unfavorable production-volume variance at the end of the year? Explain your answer briefly. 2\. How did Candyland's accountants arrive at the breakeven volume of 25,000 units? 3\. Prepare a variable costing-based income statement for each year. Explain the variation in variable costing operating income for each year based on contribution margin per unit and sales volume. 4\. Reconcile the operating incomes under variable costing and absorption costing for each year, and use this information to explain to Jack McCay the positive operating income in 2017 and the drop in operating income in 2018

Companies that make no variable-cost/fixed-cost distinctions must use absorption costing, and those that do make variable-cost/fixed-cost distinctions must use variable costing." Do you agree? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.