Chapter 16: Problem 2
What is a joint cost? What is a separable cost?
Short Answer
Step by step solution
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 16: Problem 2
What is a joint cost? What is a separable cost?
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
Earl's Hurricane Lamp Oil Company produces both A-1 Fancy and B Grade Oil. There are approximately \(\$ 9,000\) in joint costs that Earl may allocate using the relative sales value at splitoff or the net realizable value approach. Before splitoff, A-1 sells for \(\$ 20,000\) while \(B\) grade sells for \(\$ 40,000\). After an additional investment of \(\$ 10,000\) after splitoff, \(\$ 3,000\) for \(B\) grade and \(\$ 7,000\) for \(A-1,\) both the products sell for \(\$ 50,000\) What is the difference in allocated costs for the \(A-1\) product assuming applications of the net realizable value and the net realizable value at splitoff approach? 1\. A-1 Fancy has \(\$ 1,300\) more joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach. 2\. A-1 Fancy has \(\$ 1,300\) less joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach. 3\. A-1 Fancy has \(\$ 1,500\) more joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach. 4\. A-1 Fancy has \(\$ 1,500\) less joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach.
Distinguish between the sales value at splitoff method and the NRV method.
Why is the constant gross-margin percentage NRV method sometimes called a "joint-cost-allocation and a profit-allocation" method?
SW Flour Company buys 1 input of standard flour and refines it using a special sifting process to 3 cups of baking flour and 9 cups of bread flour. In May \(2017,\) SW bought 12,000 inputs of flour for \(\$ 89,000 .\) SW spent another \(\$ 47,800\) on the special sifting process. The baking flour can be sold for \(\$ 3.60\) per cup and the bread flour for \(\$ 4.80\) per cup. SW puts the baking flour through a second process so it is super fine. This costs an additional \(\$ 1.00\) per cup of baking flour and the process yields \(1 / 2\) cup of super-fine baking flour for every one cup of baking flour used. The super-fine baking flour sells for \(\$ 9.60\) per cup. 1\. Allocate the \(\$ 136,800\) joint cost to the super-fine baking flour and the bread flour using the following: a. Physical-measure method (using cups) of joint-cost allocation b. Sales value at splitoff method of joint-cost allocation c. \(\mathrm{NRV}\) method of joint-cost allocation d. Constant gross-margin percentage NRV method of joint-cost allocation 2\. Each of these measures has advantages and disadvantages; what are they? 3\. Some claim that the sales value at splitoff method is the best method to use. Discuss the logic behind this claim.
The Cook Company operates a simple chemical process to convert a single material into three separate items, referred to here as \(X, Y,\) and \(Z\) All three end products are separated simultaneously at a single splitoff point. Products \(X\) and \(Y\) are ready for sale immediately upon splitoff without further processing or any other additional costs. Product \(Z\), however, is processed further before being sold. There is no available market price for \(Z\) at the splitoff point. The selling prices quoted here are expected to remain the same in the coming year. During 2017 , the selling prices of the items and the total amounts sold were as follows: \(\bullet\) \(X-68\) tons sold for \(\$ 1,200\) per ton \(\bullet\) \(\mathrm{Y}-480\) tons sold for \(\$ 900\) per ton \(\bullet\) \(\mathrm{Z}-672\) tons sold for \(\$ 600\) per ton The total joint manufacturing costs for the year were \(\$ 580,000\). Cook spent an additional \(\$ 200,000\) to finish product Z. There were no beginning inventories of \(X, Y\), or \(Z\). At the end of the year, the following inventories of completed units were on hand: \(X, 132\) tons; \(Y, 120\) tons; \(Z, 28\) tons. There was no beginning or ending work in process. 1\. Compute the cost of inventories of \(X, Y\), and \(Z\) for balance sheet purposes and the cost of goods sold for income statement purposes as of December 31,2017 , using the following joint-cost-allocation methods: a. NRV method b. Constant gross-margin percentage NRV methodd 2\. Compare the gross-margin percentages for \(X, Y\), and \(Z\) using the two methods given in requirement 1
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.