/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 31 A possible important environment... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A possible important environmental determinant of lung function in children is the amount of cigarette smoking in the home. Suppose this question is studied by selecting two groups: Group 1 consists of 23 nonsmoking children 5-9 years of age, both of whose parents smoke, who have a mean forced expiratory volume (FEV) of 2.1 L and a standard deviation of \(0.7 \mathrm{L} ;\) group 2 consists of 20 nonsmoking children of comparable age, neither of whose parents smoke, who have a mean FEV of \(2.3 \mathrm{L}\) and a standard deviation of \(0.4 \mathrm{L}\). What are the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses to compare the means of the two groups?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Null hypothesis: \( H_0: \mu_1 = \mu_2 \). Alternative hypothesis: \( H_a: \mu_1 \neq \mu_2 \).

Step by step solution

01

Identify Study Groups and Variables

We have two groups under study: Group 1 with 23 children whose parents smoke and Group 2 with 20 children whose parents do not smoke. The variable of interest is the mean Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV) of the children in each group.
02

Define the Population Means

Let \( \mu_1 \) be the mean FEV of Group 1 (children with smoking parents) and \( \mu_2 \) be the mean FEV of Group 2 (children with non-smoking parents). We will use these definitions to express our hypotheses.
03

Formulate the Null Hypothesis

The null hypothesis \( H_0 \) states that there is no difference in the mean FEV between the two groups. Mathematically, this is expressed as \( H_0: \mu_1 = \mu_2 \).
04

Formulate the Alternative Hypothesis

The alternative hypothesis \( H_a \) states that there is a difference in the mean FEV between the two groups. Mathematically, this is expressed as \( H_a: \mu_1 eq \mu_2 \). This is a two-tailed hypothesis test.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding the Null Hypothesis
Let's explore the concept of the null hypothesis. In statistical tests, the null hypothesis is a key concept. It's often the first step in hypothesis testing. But, what exactly is it?
To put it simply, the null hypothesis is the default or starting assumption. It suggests that there is no significant effect or difference between two specified groups. Usually, researchers set up the null hypothesis to be refuted. For instance, in our exercise with children’s lung function, the null hypothesis is saying, "there is no difference in forced expiratory volumes (FEV) between children with smoking and non-smoking parents." It is expressed as \(H_0: \mu_1 = \mu_2\).
Acknowledging the null hypothesis is vital in research. It helps frame the study, pushing for evidence to support or refute this starting point. Think of it as the baseline for comparison!
Exploring the Alternative Hypothesis
Now, let's shift our focus to the alternative hypothesis. Where the null hypothesis acts as the baseline claim, the alternative hypothesis presents the second option for a study's findings.
Typically denoted by \(H_a\), the alternative hypothesis claims there is a difference or effect. In experimental studies, researchers often hope to reject the null hypothesis in support of the alternative one. In our lung function exercise example, the alternative hypothesis posits there is a difference in FEV between children with smoking and non-smoking parents. It is expressed as \(H_a: \mu_1 eq \mu_2\).
Formulating an alternate hypothesis allows researchers to test and measure potential disparities between studied groups. This helps to confirm or rule out specific variables as having significant impacts. Can you see now why the alternative hypothesis is crucial for experimental conclusions?
What is Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV)?
Finally, let's understand what Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV) means. It's important to grasp this concept since it’s central to our exercise.
FEV represents the amount of air a person can force out of their lungs in a specific time frame. Typically, it's measured in liters and within the first second of a breath, often represented as FEV1. This measurement is crucial for assessing pulmonary function and diagnosing respiratory conditions.
When looking at environments and their effects on health, scientists use FEV to determine how smoke exposure affects lung capacities in children. In the scenario from our exercise, comparing FEV between children from smoking and non-smoking households offers insights into potential health impacts. FEV provides tangible and measurable data, helping to visualize how external factors like secondhand smoke could affect lung function in growing children. Consider FEV as a vital sign for respiratory health assessments in both research and clinical settings.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A possible important environmental determinant of lung function in children is the amount of cigarette smoking in the home. Suppose this question is studied by selecting two groups: Group 1 consists of 23 nonsmoking children 5-9 years of age, both of whose parents smoke, who have a mean forced expiratory volume (FEV) of 2.1 L and a standard deviation of \(0.7 \mathrm{L} ;\) group 2 consists of 20 nonsmoking children of comparable age, neither of whose parents smoke, who have a mean FEV of \(2.3 \mathrm{L}\) and a standard deviation of \(0.4 \mathrm{L}\). Assuming this is regarded as a pilot study, how many children are needed in each group (assuming equal numbers in each group) to have a \(95 \%\) chance of detecting a significant difference using a two-sided test with \(\alpha=.05\) ?

A study was recently reported comparing the effects of different dietary patterns on blood pressure within an 8-week follow-up period [16]. Subjects were randomized to three groups: \(A,\) a control diet group, \(N=154 ; B,\) a fruits-andvegetables diet group, \(N=154 ; \mathrm{C},\) a combination-diet group consisting of a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, and lowfat dairy products and with reduced saturated and total fat, \(N=151 .\) The results reported for systolic blood pressure (SBP) are shown in Table 8.29. 8.117 Suppose we want to compute a two-sided \(p\) -value for this comparison. Without doing any further calculation, which statement(s) must be false? $$\text { (1) } p=.01(2) p=.04(3) p=.07(4) p=.20$$

A 1980 study was conducted whose purpose was to compare the indoor air quality in offices where smoking was permitted with that in offices where smoking was not permitted [7]. Measurements were made of carbon monoxide (CO) at 1:20 p.m. in 40 work areas where smoking was permitted and in 40 work areas where smoking was not permitted. Where smoking was permitted, the mean CO level was 11.6 parts per million (ppm) and the standard deviation CO was 7.3 ppm. Where smoking was not permitted, the mean CO was 6.9 ppm and the standard deviation CO was 2.7 ppm. Provide a \(95 \%\) Cl for the difference in mean CO between the smoking and nonsmoking working environments.

A possible important environmental determinant of lung function in children is the amount of cigarette smoking in the home. Suppose this question is studied by selecting two groups: Group 1 consists of 23 nonsmoking children 5-9 years of age, both of whose parents smoke, who have a mean forced expiratory volume (FEV) of 2.1 L and a standard deviation of \(0.7 \mathrm{L} ;\) group 2 consists of 20 nonsmoking children of comparable age, neither of whose parents smoke, who have a mean FEV of \(2.3 \mathrm{L}\) and a standard deviation of \(0.4 \mathrm{L}\). What is the appropriate test procedure for the hypotheses in Problem 8.31?

Cigarette smoking has important health consequences and is positively associated with heart and lung diseases. Less well known are the consequences of quitting smoking. A group of 10 nurses, from the Nurses' Health Study, ages \(50-54\) years, had smoked at least 1 pack per day and quit for at least 6 years. The nurses reported their weight before and 6 years after quitting smoking. A commonly used measure of obesity that takes height and weight into account is \(\mathrm{BMl}=\mathrm{wt} / \mathrm{ht}^{2}\) (in units of \(\mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\) ). The BMI of the 10 women before and 6 years after quitting smoking are given in the last 2 columns of Table 8.32 What test can be used to assess whether the mean BMI changed significantly among heavy-smoking women 6 years after quitting smoking?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.