/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 98 Suppose for the sake of simplici... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose for the sake of simplicity that the incidence of macular degeneration is \(1 \%\) per year among people \(65+\) years of age in the therapeutic range \((\geq 10 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{dL})\) and \(2 \%\) per year among people \(65+\) years of age with lower levels of lutein \((<10 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{dL})\). What is the expected relative risk of macular degeneration for lutein-treated participants versus placebo-treated participants in the proposed study?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The expected relative risk of macular degeneration for lutein-treated participants versus placebo-treated participants is 0.5.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem

We need to calculate the expected relative risk of macular degeneration for lutein-treated participants compared to placebo-treated ones using the given incidence rates. For lutein-treated participants, the incidence rate is 1% per year, while for placebo-treated participants, the rate is 2% per year.
02

Define Relative Risk

The relative risk (RR) is a measure of the strength of association between exposure and outcome. It is calculated as the ratio of the probability of the event occurring in the exposed group (lutein-treated) over the probability in the non-exposed group (placebo-treated).
03

Set Up the Formula

Relative Risk is given by the formula: \( RR = \frac{P(E|T)}{P(E|P)} \), where \( P(E|T) \) is the probability of macular degeneration in the lutein-treated group (1%) and \( P(E|P) \) is the probability in the placebo group (2%).
04

Substitute Values into the Formula

Substituting the values into the formula gives us: \[ RR = \frac{0.01}{0.02} \].
05

Calculate the Relative Risk

Performing the division: \[ RR = 0.5 \]. This means the risk of macular degeneration is halved for the lutein-treated group compared to the placebo group.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Relative Risk
Relative risk is a crucial concept in biostatistics used to understand the strength of the association between two groups: those exposed to a certain factor and those not exposed. In the context of our exercise, it helps us compare the risk of macular degeneration between two groups of people aged 65 and above: those receiving lutein treatments and those on a placebo. To calculate the relative risk, we need two probabilities:
  • Probability of developing the condition in the exposed group (lutein-treated).
  • Probability of developing the condition in the non-exposed group (placebo-treated).
We use the formula:\[RR = \frac{P(E|T)}{P(E|P)}\]Here, \( P(E|T) \) is the probability of the event (macular degeneration) occurring in the lutein group, and \( P(E|P) \) is the probability in the placebo group. For our specific problem, the calculated relative risk of 0.5 indicates that people treated with lutein have half the risk of developing macular degeneration compared to those on a placebo. This shows a significant protective effect of the treatment, deeming it potentially beneficial.
Incidence Rate
Incidence rate provides a way to measure how often new cases of a condition occur in a specific population during a defined period. It is often expressed as a percentage or proportion. In our example, it helps us quantify how frequently macular degeneration happens per year in two groups based on their lutein levels. For the lutein-treated group, the incidence rate is 1% per year. This means that out of 100 individuals from this group, 1 person is expected to develop macular degeneration each year. In contrast, the placebo group has an incidence rate of 2% per year, implying that 2 out of 100 people in this group are likely to develop the condition each year. Understanding incidence rates allows researchers and healthcare providers to estimate risk and inform treatment recommendations or policy decisions.
Probability Calculation
Probability calculation in biostatistics is a foundational skill used to determine the likelihood that an event will occur. In the context of the exercise, it helps in understanding how to assign a numerical value between 0 and 1 to the chance of developing macular degeneration. The probabilities used in the relative risk are derived from the incidence rates:
  • For lutein-treated participants, the probability is 0.01 (or 1%).
  • For placebo-treated participants, the probability is 0.02 (or 2%).
By converting these rates to probabilities, we can delve deeper into analyzing research data and assessing health risks. It's essential for developing effective health interventions and understanding the impact of exposure to various factors in different demographic groups. Predictions from probability calculations drive many decisions in public health and clinical practices, emphasizing their importance in biostatistics.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A study was conducted relating particulate air pollution and daily mortality in Steubenville, Ohio [4]. On average over the past 10 years there have been 3 deaths per day in Steubenville. Suppose that on 90 high-pollution days- -days in which the total suspended particulates are in the highest quartile among all days - the death rate is 3.2 deaths per day, or 288 deaths observed over the 90 high-pollution days. Are there an unusual number of deaths on high- pollution days?

In the control group of the Diabetes Prevention Trial, the mean change in BMI was 0 units with a standard deviation of \(6 \mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\). What is the probability that a random control group participant would lose at least 1 BMI unit over 24 months?

The Shanghai Women's Health Study (SWHS) was undertaken to determine risk factor for different cancers among Asian women. The women were recruited from urban communities in \(1997-2000\) and were interviewed every 2 years to obtain health-related information. One issue is whether risk prediction models derived from American populations are also applicable to Asian women. Suppose the expected number of breast cancer cases among a large number of \(45-\) to 49 -year-old women in this study who were followed for 7 years is \(149,\) while the observed number of cases is 107 . Are there an unusually small number of cases among Asian women? Why or why not?

Well-known racial differences in blood pressure exist between Caucasian and African American adults. These differences generally do not exist between Caucasian and African American children. Because aldosterone levels have been related to blood-pressure levels in adults in previous research, an investigation was performed to look at aldosterone levels among African American children and Caucasian children [2]. If the mean plasma-aldosterone level in African American children was 230 pmol/L with a standard deviation of \(203 \mathrm{pmol} / \mathrm{L},\) then what percentage of African American children have levels \(\leq 300\) pmol/L if normality is assumed?

A study was recently published in Western Australia on the relationship between method of conception and prevalence of major birth defects (Hansen et al. [8]). The prevalence of at least one major birth defect among infants conceived naturally was \(4.2 \%,\) based on a large sample of infants. Among 837 infants bom as a result of invitro fertilization (IVF), 75 had at least one major birth defect. How many infants with at least one birth defect would we expect among the 837 IVF infants if the true prevalence of at least one birth defect in the IVF group were the same as for infants conceived naturally?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.