/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 113 The Shanghai Women's Health Stud... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The Shanghai Women's Health Study (SWHS) was undertaken to determine risk factor for different cancers among Asian women. The women were recruited from urban communities in \(1997-2000\) and were interviewed every 2 years to obtain health-related information. One issue is whether risk prediction models derived from American populations are also applicable to Asian women. Suppose the expected number of breast cancer cases among a large number of \(45-\) to 49 -year-old women in this study who were followed for 7 years is \(149,\) while the observed number of cases is 107 . Are there an unusually small number of cases among Asian women? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, 107 cases are unusually low compared to 149 expected cases given the small probability of such a result under a Poisson model.

Step by step solution

01

Determine Expected and Observed Values

In this step, we identify the expected number of breast cancer cases, which is 149, and the observed number of cases, which is 107. We are tasked with determining if the observed number is unusually small compared to the expectation.
02

Set Up Hypothesis for Comparison

We set up our null hypothesis as: the observed number of cases is consistent with the expected value. The alternative hypothesis is: the observed number is significantly different from the expected value. This can be tested using the concept of a Poisson distribution, as the number of cancer cases is a count of a rare event.
03

Calculate Poisson Probability

We assume the number of cases follows a Poisson distribution since it's a rare event within a fixed period. The Poisson probability of observing exactly 107 cases when 149 cases are expected can be calculated using the formula: \( P(X = 107) = \frac{e^{-149} \times 149^{107}}{107!} \).
04

Estimate Probability of Observing 107 or Fewer Cases

To determine if 107 is unusually small, we should calculate the cumulative probability of observing 107 or fewer cases: \( P(X \leq 107) = \sum_{x=0}^{107} \frac{e^{-149} \times 149^{x}}{x!} \). This calculation might require computational software due to the complexity.
05

Compare and Conclude

Once we have the cumulative probability, we compare it to a significance level, typically 0.05. If \( P(X \leq 107) \) is less than 0.05, then it suggests that observing 107 or fewer cases is rare, indicating that the observed number is unusually small.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Poisson Distribution
The Poisson distribution is a statistical tool used to predict the probability of a given number of events happening in a fixed interval of time or space. This is particularly useful in fields like biostatistics, where we often count events that happen at a low rate over time.

In the context of the Shanghai Women's Health Study, the Poisson distribution comes in handy to assess the occurrence of rare events, such as cases of breast cancer among a specific demographic. With an expected number of events (149 cases), the Poisson distribution helps us calculate the probability of observing exactly or less than the given events (107 cases).

Key Characteristics of the Poisson Distribution:
  • It is used for count data and events that happen independently.
  • The time or space intervals must be known and fixed.
  • Events are rare compared to the number of possible outcomes.
The formula for the Poisson probability is \( P(X = x) = \frac{e^{-\lambda} \times \lambda^x}{x!} \), where \( \lambda \) is the average number of occurrences (in this case, 149), \( x \) is the actual observed number of events (107), and \( e \) is the base of the natural logarithm, approximately equal to 2.71828.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental component of inferential statistics, which is used to determine whether a hypothesis about a dataset is valid. In the exercise, we are tasked with deciding if the observed number of breast cancer cases (107) is significantly different from the expected number (149).

Let's break down the process. We begin with setting up our hypotheses:
  • **Null Hypothesis (H0):** The observed number of cancer cases is consistent with the expected number.
  • **Alternative Hypothesis (H1):** The observed number is significantly different from the expected number, suggesting it's "unusual."
Once we have our hypotheses, we calculate the probability of observing the data under the null hypothesis using the Poisson distribution.

The next step involves calculating the cumulative probability for observing 107 or fewer cases, and comparing this to a predefined significance level, often 0.05. If the computed probability is below this threshold, we reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed number of cases is statistically lower than expected.
Cancer Epidemiology
Cancer epidemiology studies the frequency, distribution, and determinants of cancer within populations, aiming to understand the why and how of cancer occurrences. In our exercise, the focus is on understanding breast cancer rates among Asian women in the Shanghai Women's Health Study.

In cancer epidemiology, studies like SWHS are crucial for identifying risk factors and establishing patterns in cancer incidences across various demographics. This helps in tailoring public health policies and prevention strategies.

Significance of Studies in Cancer Epidemiology:
  • They help identify potential causes and risk factors for cancer.
  • Provide data for developing early detection methods and treatment plans.
  • Help in assessing the effectiveness of cancer interventions and policies.
The exercise aims to question if American risk prediction models are applicable to Asian populations. Such comparisons are essential, as they allow researchers to understand the effectiveness of prediction models in different genetic and environmental contexts, highlighting the diversity in cancer epidemiology.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The duration of cigarette smoking has been linked to many diseases, including lung cancer and various forms of heart disease. Suppose we know that among men ages \(30-34\) who have ever smoked, the mean number of years they smoked is 12.8 with a standard deviation of 5.1 years. For women in this age group, the mean number of years they smoked is 9.3 with a standard deviation of \(3.2 .\) Assuming that the duration of smoking is normally distributed, what proportion of men in this age group have smoked for more than 20 years?

Physicians recommend that children with type-I (insulindependent) diabetes keep up with their insulin shots to minimize the chance of long-term complications. In addition, some diabetes researchers have observed that growth rate of weight during adolescence among diabetic patients is affected by level of compliance with insulin therapy. Suppose 12 -year-old type-l diabetic boys who comply with their insulin shots have a weight gain over 1 year that is normally distributed, with mean \(=12\) lbs. and variance \(=12\) lbs. What is the probability that compliant type-l diabetic 12-year-old boys will gain at least 15 lbs. over 1 year?

Draw 100 random samples from a binomial distribution with parameters \(n=10\) and \(p=.4 .\) Consider an approximation to this distribution by a normal distribution with mean \(=\) \(n p=4\) and variance \(=n p q=2.4 .\) Draw 100 random samples from the normal approximation. Plot the two frequency distributions on the same graph, and compare the results. Do you think the normal approximation is adequate here?

The Diabetes Prevention Trial (DPT) involved a weight loss trial in which half the subjects received an active intervention and the other half a control intervention. For subjects in the active intervention group, the average reduction in body mass index (BMI, i.e., weight in kg/height\(^2\) in \(\mathrm{m}^{2}\) ) over 24 months was \(1.9 \mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\). The standard deviation of change in BMI was \(6.7 \mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\). If the distribution of BMI change is approximately normal, then what is the probability that a subject in the active group would lose at least 1 BMI unit over 24 months?

A previous study found that people consuming large quantities of vegetables containing lutein (mainly spinach) were less likely to develop macular degeneration, a common eye disease among older people (age \(65+)\) that causes a substantial loss in visual acuity and in some cases can lead to total blindness. To follow up on this observation, a clinical trial is planned in which participants 65+ years of age without macular degeneration will be assigned to either a high-dose lutein supplement tablet or a placebo tablet taken once per day. To estimate the possible therapeutic effect, a pilot study was conducted in which 9 people \(65+\) years of age were randomized to placebo and 9 people \(65+\) years of age were randomized to lutein tablets (active treatment). Their serum lutein level was measured at baseline and again after 4 months of follow-up. From previous studies, people with serum lutein \(\geq 10 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{dL}\) are expected to get some protection from macular degeneration. However, the level of serum lutein may vary depending on genetic factors, dietary factors, and study supplements. Suppose that among people randomized to placebo, at a 4-month follow-up mean serum lutein level \(=6.4 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{dL}\) with standard deviation \(=3 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{dL}\). If we presume a normal distribution for serum lutein, then what percentage of placebo subjects will have serum lutein in the therapeutic range \((\geq 10 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{dL}) ?\) (For the following problems, assume that lutein can be measured exactly, so that no continuity correction is necessary.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.