/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 62 A study concemed the risk of can... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A study concemed the risk of cancer among patients with cystic fibrosis [5]. Given registries of patients with cystic fibrosis in the United States and Canada, cancer incidence among cystic-fibrosis patients between January 1,1985 and December \(31,1992,\) was compared with expected cancer-incidence rates based on the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results program from the National Cancer Institute from 1984 to 1988 . Among cystic-fibrosis patients, 37 cancers were observed, whereas 45.6 cancers were expected. What distribution can be used to model the distribution of the number of cancers among cystic-fibrosis patients?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Use a Poisson distribution to model cancer cases among cystic fibrosis patients.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Observations and Expectations

The problem gives us that among cystic fibrosis patients, 37 cancers were observed while 45.6 were expected over the study period. This means we have both observed data and expected data based on general population cancer incidence rates from the National Cancer Institute.
02

Identifying the Type of Distribution

In scenarios where a rare event (like cancer) is observed over a certain period or among a specific population, and you have an expected value for such events, a Poisson distribution is typically a suitable model. This distribution is useful for modeling count data, particularly when the counts result from rare events happening over a fixed period of time or space.
03

Justifying the Use of Poisson Distribution

Cystic fibrosis is a relatively rare condition, and cancer occurrences in this specific group can also be considered rare. The Poisson model helps to estimate the probability of observing a certain number of events (in this case, cancers) when we have an expectation (e.g., 45.6 expected cases). Additionally, this study doesn't suggest any other complicating factors, making Poisson a suitable choice.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Poisson Distribution
The Poisson distribution is a statistical tool used to model the probability of a given number of events occurring in a fixed interval of time or space. This probability distribution is ideal for rare events where each event occurs independently of one another. It's characterized by the parameter \( \lambda \), which represents the average number of occurrences in the given timeframe. For example, if you know that on average 45.6 cancers were expected among cystic fibrosis patients, then \( \lambda = 45.6 \) becomes our key parameter. To find the probability of observing 37 cases, you'll apply the Poisson probability mass function:
  • \( P(X = k) = \frac{e^{-\lambda} \lambda^k}{k!} \)
  • Where \( e \) is the base of the natural logarithm, \( \lambda \) is your expected value, and \( k \) is the actual observed number of cases (in this case 37).
This formula helps in calculating the likelihood of observing various numbers of cancer cases within the cystic fibrosis patients, making the Poisson distribution a powerful tool for such biostatistical analysis.
Cancer Incidence
Cancer incidence refers to the frequency of new cancer cases within a specific population during a particular time period. This measure helps public health officials understand the impact of cancer on populations, identify risk factors, and plan appropriate interventions. Within this study, cancer incidence among cystic fibrosis patients was compared to the general population’s rates as documented by the National Cancer Institute.
In the study, 45.6 cases of cancer were the expected incidence based on larger population data. However, only 37 cases were observed within the cystic fibrosis registry, suggesting a difference which might hint at intrinsic factors associated with cystic fibrosis, or potentially, data variance.
Understanding cancer incidence not only in the general population but also within specific groups, like cystic fibrosis patients, is crucial as it affects strategic health planning and resource allocation. It also helps in revealing any deviations or anomalies in cancer trends that warrant further investigation.
Cystic Fibrosis Study
Cystic fibrosis is a genetic condition that affects the respiratory and digestive systems. Patients with this condition often suffer from frequent lung infections and reduced lung function over time. The study concerning cancer incidence among cystic fibrosis patients explored this connection over a defined period.
Conducted using patient registries from the United States and Canada, the investigation took place between January 1, 1985, and December 31, 1992. It aimed to compare cancer rates among cystic fibrosis patients with those expected from the general population.
  • The study used data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results program by the National Cancer Institute, which provided baseline expected cancer incidence rates.
  • Findings showed observed cases were fewer than expected, with 37 recorded cancers versus the anticipated 45.6.
This study is insightful, highlighting the necessity for specialized research in understanding how genetic conditions might influence cancer risks differently compared to the general population. Such research can further prompt the need for targeted screening and preventive measures within high-risk groups like cystic fibrosis patients.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that total carbohydrate intake in \(12-\) to 14 -yearold boys is normally distributed, with mean \(=124 \mathrm{g} / 1000 \mathrm{cal}\) and standard deviation \(=20 \mathrm{g} / 1000\) cal. What percentage of boys in this age range have carbohydrate intake below 90 g/1000 cal?

In pharmacologic research a variety of clinical chemistry measurements are routinely monitored closely for evidence of side effects of the medication under study. Suppose typical blood-glucose levels are normally distributed, with mean \(=90 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{dL}\) and standard deviation \(=38 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{dL}\). If the normal range is \(65-120\) mg/dL, then what percentage of values will fall in the normal range?

A doctor diagnoses a patient as hypertensive and prescribes an antihypertensive medication. To assess the clinical status of the patient, the doctor takes \(n\) replicate blood-pressure measurements before the patient starts the drug (baseline) and \(n\) replicate blood-pressure measurements 4 weeks after starting the drug (follow-up). She uses the average of the \(n\) replicates at baseline minus the average of the \(n\) replicates at follow-up to assess the clinical status of the patient. She knows, from previous clinical experience with the drug, that the mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) change over a 4-week period over a large number of patients after starting the drug is \(5.0 \mathrm{mm}\) Hg with variance \(33 / n,\) where \(n\) is the number of replicate measures obtained at both baseline and follow-up. The physician also knows that if a patient is untreated (or does not take the prescribed medication), then the mean DBP over 4 weeks will decline by 2 mm Hg with variance 33/n. What is the probability that an untreated subject will decline by at least \(5 \mathrm{mm}\) Hg if 1 replicate measure is obtained at both baseline and follow-up?

A study was conducted assessing the effect of observer training on measurement of blood pressure based on NHANES data from \(1999-2000\) (Ostchega, et al., [1] ). A goal was that the difference in recorded blood pressure between the observer and trainer be \(\leq 2 \mathrm{mm}\) Hg in absolute value. It was reported that the mean difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP) between observers and trainers (i.e., mean observer SBP minus trainer SBP) = mean (\Delta) was \(0.189 \mathrm{mm} \mathrm{Hg}\) with \(\mathrm{sd}=2.428 \mathrm{mm} \mathrm{Hg}\). If we assume that the distribution of \(\Delta\) is normally distributed, then what \% of (observer, trainer) pairs have a mean difference of \(\geq 2 \mathrm{mm} \mathrm{Hg}\) in absolute value (i.e., either \(\geq 2 \mathrm{mm} \mathrm{Hg}\) or \(\leq-2 \mathrm{mm} \mathrm{Hg}\) )?

Because serum cholesterol is related to age and sex, some investigators prefer to express it in terms of \(z\) -scores. If \(X=\) raw serum cholesterol, then $$Z=\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}$$, where \(\mu\) is the mean and \(\sigma\) is the standard deviation of serum cholesterol for a given age-gender group. Suppose \(Z\) is regarded as a standard normal random variable. What is \(\operatorname{Pr}(Z>0.5) ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.