/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 123 The standard screening test for ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The standard screening test for Down's syndrome is based on a combination of maternal age and the level of serum alpha-fetoprotein. Using this test \(80 \%\) of Down's syndrome cases can be identified, while \(5 \%\) of normals are detected as positive. What is the sensitivity and specificity of the test? Suppose that 1 out of 500 infants are born with Down's syndrome.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The sensitivity is 80% and the specificity is 95%.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Sensitivity

Sensitivity is the probability that a test correctly identifies a person with the disease. In this case, sensitivity refers to the proportion of Down's syndrome cases that the test correctly identifies. The given problem states that the test identifies 80% of Down's syndrome cases. Therefore, the sensitivity is: \[ \text{Sensitivity} = 0.80 \text{ or } 80\%\]
02

Understanding Specificity

Specificity is the probability that a test correctly identifies a person without the disease. In this context, it is the proportion of normal cases (without Down's syndrome) that the test correctly identifies as negative. The problem states that 5% of normals are falsely detected as positive. This means that 95% of normals are correctly identified as negative, so: \[ \text{Specificity} = 0.95 \text{ or } 95\%\]
03

Reviewing the Prevalence of Down's Syndrome

The prevalence of Down's syndrome is the proportion of the population that has the condition. The problem states that 1 out of 500 infants are born with Down's syndrome. Thus, the prevalence is: \[ \text{Prevalence} = \frac{1}{500} = 0.002 \text{ or } 0.2\%\]

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sensitivity
Sensitivity is an essential concept in biostatistics, particularly when discussing diagnostic tests. In this context, it refers to the ability of a test to correctly identify individuals with a given disease. It tells us how good the test is at catching the disease when it is truly present. For instance, in the scenario involving Down's syndrome screening, the sensitivity is reported as 80%, meaning that out of all individuals who have Down's syndrome, 80% are correctly detected by this screening method.

To calculate sensitivity, you use the formula:
  • Sensitivity = \( \frac{\text{True Positives}}{\text{True Positives} + \text{False Negatives}} \)
An important thing to note is that high sensitivity is crucial for ruling in diseases, especially those where missing a diagnosis could lead to severe consequences. However, a very high sensitivity might lead to more false positives, meaning some people without the disease might be incorrectly diagnosed as having it. Therefore, while a high sensitivity is desirable, it is just one part of the bigger picture when evaluating a diagnostic test's effectiveness.
Specificity
Specificity is another key component of biostatistics, complementing sensitivity in evaluating diagnostic tests. It measures the test's ability to correctly identify those without the disease. In other words, specificity tells us how well the test can rule out the disease for individuals who are healthy.

In the Down's syndrome screening example, we are told that 5% of "normal" individuals are mistakenly classified as having the condition. Thus, the specificity, or the correctly identified negatives, is 95%. The higher the specificity, the fewer false positives you'll have, meaning healthy individuals are less likely to be incorrectly labeled as having the disease.

To compute specificity, you use the formula:
  • Specificity = \( \frac{\text{True Negatives}}{\text{True Negatives} + \text{False Positives}} \)
Having a high specificity is particularly important in contexts where the cost or risk of follow-up diagnostic procedures is high. In sum, specificity aids in reducing the number of unnecessary additional tests or anxiety for patients who are actually disease-free.
Prevalence
Prevalence is a fundamental concept when trying to interpret the real-world impact of sensitivity and specificity. It represents the actual percentage of a population that has a specific disease at any given time. Essentially, it tells us how common the disease is.

In the given problem, the prevalence of Down's syndrome is stated as 1 out of 500 infants, translating to 0.2%. This figure is crucial because it influences the predictive values of a test—how likely it is that someone who tests positive actually has the disease, and vice versa.
  • Prevalence = \( \frac{\text{Number of cases}}{\text{Total population}} \)
Knowing the prevalence helps in understanding how useful a diagnostic test can be for a particular condition within a specific population. A higher prevalence can increase the predictive value for a positive test result, while a lower prevalence makes false positives more problematic. Therefore, prevalence not only provides insights into how widespread a disease is but also helps in determining the expected accuracy and utility of a test in clinical practice.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A study group of 576 working women \(30-49\) years of age who took phenacetin- containing analgesics and a control group of 533 comparably aged women without such intake were identified in 1968 and followed for mortality and morbidity outcomes. One hypothesis to be tested was that phenacetin intake may influence renal (kidney) function and hence have an effect on specific indices of renal morbidity and mortality. The mortality status of these women was determined from 1968 to \(1987 .\) The researchers found that 16 of the women in the study group and 1 of the women in the control group died, where at least one cause of death was considered renal [13]. Test for differences in renal mortality between the two groups in either direction, and report a two-tailed \(p\) -value. The cohort was also followed for total mortality. The researchers found that 74 women in the study group died, compared with 27 in the control group.

Acute OTM early in infancy may be an important predictor of subsequent morbidity, including psychological and educational difficulties. A study was performed among high-risk infants who had already experienced either a single episode of acute OTM prior to the age of 6 months or two or more episodes before 12 months of life [23] Children were randomized to one of three treatment groups, (a) amoxicillin (AMX), (b) sulfisoxazole (SUL), or (c) placebo (PLA), and their parents were told to administer the drug daily for a 6 -month period (even in the absence of symptoms). If children had an acute OTM episode during the study period, they received the best antibiotic care, regardless of their study-drug group. The results were as shown in Table 10.36 What test can be used to compare the percentage of children who were acute OTM-free between the AMX group and the PLA group?

Retinitis pigmentosa is a disease that manifests itself via different genetic modes of inheritance. Cases have been documented with a dominant, recessive, and sex-linked mode of inheritance. It has been conjectured that mode of inheritance is related to the ethnic origin of the individual. Cases of the disease have been surveyed in an English and a Swiss population with the following results: Of 125 English cases, 46 had sex-linked disease, 25 had recessive disease, and 54 had dominant disease. Of 110 Swiss cases, 1 had sex- linked disease, 99 had recessive disease, and 10 had dominant disease. Do these data show a significant association between ethnic origin and genetic type?

A study was performed among 40 boys in a school in Edinburgh to look at the presence of spermatozoa in urine samples according to age \([15] .\) The boys entered the study at \(8-11\) years of age and left the study at \(12-18\) years of age. A 24-hour urine sample was supplied every 3 months by each boy. Table 10.28 gives the presence or absence of sperm cells in the urine samples for each boy together with the ages at entrance and exit of the study and the age at the first sperm-positive urine sample. For all parts of this question, exclude boys who exited this study without 1 sperm-positive urine sample (i.e., boys 8,9,14,25,28,29,30) If we assume that all boys have no sperm cells at age \(11(11.0 \text { years) and all have sperm cells at age } 18\) then estimate the probability of first developing sperm cells at ages 12 (i.e., between 12.0 and 12.9 years), 13,14,15 \(16,\) and 17

Asthma is an important health problem for inner-city children, frequently resulting in hospital admission if symptoms become exacerbated. It is well known that compliance of children with asthma medication is often poor. Also, many household allergens (e.g., roaches) worsen asthma symptoms. A study is proposed in which children will be randomized to either an active intervention where a community health worker comes to the home and educates the children and parents as to approaches to reduce the risk of asthma symptoms or a control intervention where households will receive the same information in print but no home visits will be performed. It is expected that \(30 \%\) of the children in the active group vs. \(10 \%\) of the children in the control group will have an improvement in asthma symptoms. What test can be used to compare the results in the active and control groups?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.